A.P. INFORMATION COMMISSION (Under Right to Information Act, 2005) Samachara Hakku Bhavan, D.No.5-4-399, ‘4’ Storied Commercial Complex, Housing Board Building, Mojam Jahi Market, Hyderabad – 500 001. Phone Nos: 040-24740601 (O) / 24740109 & 24740592(F) Appeal No.10432/SIC-SPR/2014 Dated: 4-7-2014 Name of the Appellant & Address Sri :Kankanala Ramabrahmam, S/o. Late K.Butchiyya, R/o. Yarazerla Village, Ongole Mandal, Prakasham District 523 272 Name of the Respondents Public : Information Officer (U/RTI Act, 2005)/ The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation, Rural Sub Division2, APSPDCL, Ongole, Prakasham District Appellate Authority (U/RTI Act, 2005) O/o. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, APSPDCL, Operation Circle, Ongole, Prakasham District. ORDER 1. Sri Kankanala Ramabrahmam, S/o. Late K.Butchiyya, R/o. Yarazerla Village, Ongole Mandal, Prakasham District 523 272 has filed 2nd appeal dated 09-04-2014 which was received by this Commission on 17-04-2014 for not getting the information sought by him from the PIO / The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation, Rural Sub Division-2, APSPDCL, Ongole, Prakasham District and 1st Appellate Authority / O/o. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, APSPDCL, Operation Circle, Ongole, Prakasham District. 2. The brief facts of the case as per the appeal and other records received along with it are that the appellant herein filed an application dated 25-09-2013 before the PIO requesting to furnish the information under Sec.6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, on the following points mentioned in his application: The Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation, APSPDCL, Ongole transferred the 6(1) Application of the Appellant to the Assistant Divisional Engineer/Operation/RSD-2/Ongole vide Memo No.DEE/O/OGL/Tech/F.RTA/D.No.3682/13 dated 15-10-2013 to furnish information to the Appellant. 3. The Public Information Officer / Assistant Divisional Engineer/Operation/RSD-2/Ongole informed the Appellant vide Lr.No.ADE.O.RSD-2.OGL.F.RTI.D.No.3008/13 dated 11-11-2013 that certain information is called for from the Asst.Accounts Officer/ERO/Rurals/Ongole and the Assistant Engineer/O/Rural/Ongole. The information shall be furnished soon. 4. Since the appellant did not receive the information from the Public Information Officer, he filed 1st appeal dated 23-12-2013 before the 1st Appellate Authority requesting him to furnish the information sought by him u/s 19(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. 5. The Divisional Engineer / Technical, Operation Circle, APSPDCL transferred the appeal dated 2312-2013 to the PIO / O/o. Divisional Engineer, Operation Division, APSPDCL, Ongole to furnish information to the Appellant immediately. 6. The appellant stated that as he did not get the information from the 1st Appellate Authority even after 30 days of filing his 1st appeal, he preferred this 2nd appeal before this Commission requesting to take action against the PIO and 1st Appellate Authority for not furnishing information sought by him and also to arrange to furnish the information sought by him u/s 19(3) of the RTI Act, 2005. The 2nd appeal was taken on file and Notices issued to both the parties for hearing on 4-7-2014. On 4-7-2014 the case is called. The Appellant is absent. The Respondent, PIO / is present. The 1st Appellate Authority is absent. The PIO represents that part information was furnished to the appellant on 02-7-2014. As per the records placed before the Commission, the 1st Appellate Authority had failed to hear the case and pass appropriate orders on the 1st appeal filed before him. Issue Show Cause Notice, to the PIO for not furnishing information in time. S.PRABHAKAR REDDY STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER Authenticated by: Assistant Registrar Copy to: SO, APIC / SF
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc