CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26101592 File No. CIC/BS/A/2013/000532/4499 05 February 2014 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mrs. Pratibha Mehra 194-E Civil Lines, Behind Civil Court, Bareilly – 243001, U.P Respondent : CPIO & Joint Director (Training) Regional Directorate of Apprenticeship Training M/o Labour & Employment ATI Campus, Govind Nagar, P.O. Udyog Nagar, Kanpur - 208022 RTI application filed on PIO replied on First appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order Second Appeal received on : : : : : 11/10/2012 No Reply 29/10/2012 No Order 31/01/2013 Information sought: The applicant has sought the following information:(1) Whether any restriction were imposed on admission and examination in 2008-09, in any Private ITI’s/ITC’s (already affiliated with NCVT Trades) in Bareilly District through RDAT, Kanpur? [Yes or No] a. If yes then provide information regarding following:a) When and why the above aforesaid restrictions were imposed. [Please provide detailed certified documents in support of this] b) Please provide the certified photocopy of the entire file related to above aforesaid restrictions, which should include the remarks/file notings made by all officials/clerks. c) With regard to each official/clerk who handled the above aforesaid restrictions dossier[both when it went down the hierarchy and up the hierarchy], please provide the following:Date of receipt in his/her office Date of dispatch from office Number of days taken to process the above aforesaid restriction d) What is the normal stipulated time period in the Director’s office for handling/deciding such aforesaid restrictions? b. If No then provide information regarding following: Page 1 of 2 If there is No such imposition of any restrictions, made by this Directorate, on the affiliated Private ITI/ITC and if still such affiliated Private ITI/ITC and its trainees suffered from such imposition? Who is the official responsible for this grievance? What action will be taken against him/her? Grounds for the Second Appeal: The CPIO has not provided the information. Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present Appellant: Mr. Rajesh Mehra appellant’s representative through VC M: 9412738286 Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Kumar CPIO’s representative through VC M: 8765727895 The appellant’s representative stated that the respondents vide their letter reference no. RDK/RTI/State/2011-12, dated 18/12/2012 have informed that ‘Admission and Examination of Private ITI/ITCs doesn’t come under the purview of the RDAT Kanpur’ and he will be satisfied if the same is confirmed by way of declaration. The CPIO’s representative stated that he will go through the records and either provide a declaration as above or give a revised declaration. Decision notice: As agreed by the CPIO’s representative a declaration as above should be provided to the appellant within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. BASANT SETH Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy: (R. L. Gupta) Dy. Registrar/Designated Officer Page 2 of 2