http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2009/091117EL.ppt Ecological Risk Management, its theory and practice •Hiroyuki MATSUDA Yokohama National University Professor of Environmental Risk Management Program Leader “Global COE: Eco-Risk Management from Asian Viewpoints” The 1st Japanese Pew Marine Conservation Fellow WWF Japan: advisory committee for nature consv. Standing Committee of Ecol Soc Japan 1 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2009/091117EL.ppt Overview • • • • • Development-conservation balance Stop severe pollution at the early stage Encourage environment-friendly companies Precautionary adaptive management Sustainable use and conservation by voluntary management Matsuda H (2008) Prediction of coastal marine pollution in the Asian waters. In "Conservation on the Coastal Environment", (eds Miyazaki N, Wattayakorn G), Shinju-sha, Tokyo pp. 120-132 2 Classification of environmental risks Human Health Risk (After Junko Nakanishi) 10-1 Individual risk Characteristics of the past pollution incidences and the recent environmental problems. 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 Ecological risk! 103 104 105 106 107 108 Number of people affected (or environment) The per capute risk in the past was high, but the number of people affected was limited. The present per capita risk, with the newly-emerged environmental issues, is realtively small, while the number of people affected is big. -The present risk is more ubiquitous, and is … unclear in nature. 3 3 Junko Nakanishi What are Asian environmental risks? Population increase and economy development ecology Degradation of ecosystems and ecosystem services Innovation of biomass and artificial chemicals chemistry Deforestration and aquatic pollution Sustainable development with precautionary principle Risk trade-off, Risk-benefit, ecosystem, socioeconomy Global COE (Center of Excellence) by Yokohama National University and National Institute for Environmental Studies “Global Eco-Risk Management from Asian Viewpoints 4 Global Changes Human well-being Ecosystem services Japanese edition: Translated by COE-YNU Biodiversity Why do we conserve the nature? Because of intergenerational sustainability for our descendant to receive ecosystem services as we do Ecosystem functions (MA2004) 5 (Christensen et al. 1996) 5 Ecosystem services and well-being (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2004) 6 3 types of ecosystem services • • • • 05/8/4 Goods agricultures 140trilion yen/yr Regulating services 1700 trillion yen/yr Cultural services Value of fishing ground >> fisheries yield 7 Requiem to Maximum Sustainable Yield Theory (Matsuda & Abrams 2007 Am. Fish. Soc.) • Ecosystems are uncertain, nonequilibrium and complex. • We recommend adaptive mangmt. – AM must be carefully used for ecosystem mangmt 12/6/06 surplus production – MSY theory ignores all the three. 8 Stock abundance “Maximum Sustainable Ecosystem Services” = maximizing V Maximum Sustainable Yield = maximizing Y(C) • • • • • • surplus production Ecosystem services V(N, C) V(N, C) = Y(C) + S(N) N = K(1 – qE/r) Stock abundance C = qEN Provisional Service (Fisheries Yield) … Y(C) Utility of standing biomass… S(N) C… catch; E… fishing effort; N… stock biomass • K… Carrying capacity, r…Malthusian parameter, q… catchability 9 Paradigm Shift from MSY to MSES Maximum Sustainable Ecosystem Services Total ecosystem services = Fisheries Yield + Regulating Services 120 Maximum Sustainable Yield 100 80 Unsustainable Fisheries 60 40 No take zone 20 0 2008/3/2 0 20 40 Fishing 60 effort 80 100 120 10 10 Problems in the current global standard ★Inconsistent relationship between development and conservation (e.g. CITES vs FAO) ★Conservation based on top-down regulation ★Strict regulation in order to discourage developing countries ★Controversy between “Europe” and “USA” “Europe” “USA” • Precautionary principle • Adaptive management • Initiative based on UN • Independent of UN – Kyoto Protocol 11 Three Asian Viewpoints in “Eco-Risk Asia” • Adaptive ex post facto verification is needed for precautionary principle. • Perspective of developing countries in Asia that the use of ecosystem services inevitably entails eco-risk. • Natural resource management will likely involve voluntary agreements (co-management). 12 YNU COE program A Preliminary Study to Comparative Natural Resources Policy: The Concept of Biodiversity and Its Significance in Biodiversity Strategies Hiroki OIKAWA, Mineo KATO and Tadayoshi SHIGEOKA Global standard indirect utility conservation Public involvement endemic and endangered species genetic information Local standard direct- and indirect utility sustainable use Stakeholder involvement useful native species morphological information integrity ecosystem services Nation Indonesia Malaysia Philippin Singapore Thailand Viet Nam Year HP 2003 ○ 1997 × 1997 × 1992 × 2002 × 1995 ○ • As Indonesian BDS suggests, BDSs prepared by developing countries are likely to put more emphasis on direct use value of biodiversity than its non-direct and non-use values. 13 Biodiversity Asian Strategies by Eco-Risk COE 14 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2009/091117EL.ppt Overview • • • • • Development-conservation balance Stop severe pollution at the early stage Encourage environment-friendly companies Precautionary adaptive management Sustainable use and conservation by voluntary management Matsuda H (2008) Prediction of coastal marine pollution in the Asian waters. In "Conservation on the Coastal Environment", (eds Miyazaki N, Wattayakorn G), Shinju-sha, Tokyo pp. 120-132 15 益永茂樹氏 Source of dioxins in Tokyo Bay P C D D & D Fs p g / g d r y s e d i m e n t 50, 000 PCDD&DFs pg/g dry sediment 40, 000 30, 000 20, 000 Observed burn 燃焼 PC P CNP 実 測濃度 observed Agrochemicals 10, 000 0 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 Y ear Masunaga et al (2003) Chemosphere 53:315–324 16 Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals (Zinc) to Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages Based on Field Survey in the Hasama River Basin, Miyagi, Japan. Iwasaki (YNU), Kagaya (U.Tokyo), Miyamoto(AIST), Matsuda(YNU) 17 Iwasaki et al. unpublished Zinc concentration near abandoned mine 調査地点 447 μg/L377 Nihasama Riv Hosokura mine source of metals 136 152 Namari Riv. St.2 St.1 126 St.3 Standard Zn = 30mg/L Polluted 流下方向 St.4 Hasama Riv. St.5 6 64 6 Unpolluted St.8 5 St.6 Twice higher 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000m St.9 St.7 18 Stop heavy pollution at the early stage! Do not discourage good companies! • Major risk source of the present dioxins is pesticides in agriculture during 1950-60s – congener analysis by Masunaga et al. (2003 Chemosphere 53) • Zinc is strictly regulated (0.03mg/L) – Zn in many stn is larger than 0.03mg/L – Benthic fauna is not lost in Stn with 0.06mg/L Zn (Iwasaki et al. 2009 Env. Tox. Chem. 28) – Zn criterion by population level risk is 0.1 mg/L – Stn near the abandoned mine is very high Zn. (by Kamo & Naito 2008 Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 14) 19 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2009/091117EL.ppt Overview • • • • • Development-conservation balance Stop severe pollution at the early stage Encourage environment-friendly companies Precautionary adaptive management Sustainable use and conservation by voluntary management Matsuda H (2008) Prediction of coastal marine pollution in the Asian waters. In "Conservation on the Coastal Environment", (eds Miyazaki N, Wattayakorn G), Shinju-sha, Tokyo pp. 120-132 20 Fishing down (MA 2005) ? • Mean trophic level is obtained by FAO FISHSTAT and FISHBASE • It does not mean the degree of overfishing • Japan has a high MTL (Ecological Footprint?) 21 By D.Pauly Changes in the Marine Trophic Index 22 GBO2 Pauly D., Watson R. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B;2005;360:415-423 Catch and mean trophic level in Japan 23 Difference in fish consumption between countries Low Value Food Fish as a Share of Total Fish Consumption Total Fish Consumption (Metric Tons) 140000 90 120000 80 70 100000 60 80000 Percent Metric Tons Consumed After Doug Beard 60000 Developing World 50 Developed World 40 30 40000 World 20 20000 10 0 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 0 1970 Year 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Year From Delgado et. al. 2002, Fish to 2020, Table E.14 24 From Delgado et. al. 2002, Fish to 2020, Table 3.3 Rebuilding Global Fisheries (Worm et al. 2009) Trends of biomass (B) & exploitation rate (u) for 166 individual stocks. Boris Worm Current exploitation rate versus biomass for 166 individual stocks. 25 We can use >2 million tons of pelagic fishes sustainably in Japanese EEZ. • But demand-supply mismatch: overfishing and underuse. 26 Source: Fisheries Research Agency, Japan Payments for Ecosystem Services • Market Profiles by N. Carroll & M. Jenkins • Carbon by K.Hamilton & S. Bushey – – Compliant Carbon Forestry Voluntary Carbon Forestry • Water by T. Stanton – – – Compliant Water Quality Trading Voluntary Watershed Management Payments Government-Mediated Watershed PES • Biodiversity – – – Compliant Biodiversity Offsets by N. Carroll Voluntary Biodiversity Offsets by K Kate & P Maguire Government-Mediated Biodiversity PES by R Miller et al. – Individual Fisheries Quotas (ITQs and IFQs) by T. Agardy • Bundled – Certified Agricultural Products by M. Andersson & T. Oberthur • Appendix 1: Individual Fisheries Quotas • Appendix 2: Certified Agricultural Products 27 Japan pay many prizes! • • • • • Kyoto Prize (1985-) by Inamori Foundation Japan Prize (1985-) by JSPS International Prize for Biology (1986-) by JSPS Blue Planet Prize (1992-) by Asahi Glass Foundation International Cosmos Prize (1993-) by EXPO’90 Foundation 28 Traditional fisheries are also endangered • Can whaling be managed to protect whales and whalers? – Plenary talk by Judy Zeh at International Mammalogical Congress at Sapporo, 2005 • Commercial fishery exists in the Shiretoko World Nature Heritage • Conserve diversity of flora, fauna, language and culture!! 29 Expected Loss of Longevity • If cancer probability = 10-5 and 10 years life expectancy are lost, then • Expected loss of longevity = 0.7 hours!! • We can compare ELL between various sorts of risk factors. 30 Quantifying Health Benefits from Eating Fish M. Daviglus Society for Risk Analysis 1999 Annual Meeting http://www.riskworld.com/Abstract/1999/SRAam99/ab9ab073.htm • Benefit = fish includes unsaturated fatty acids and decreases heart diseases. • Men aged 40 to 55 years, who consumed 35 g or more of fish daily had 38% and 44% lower risk of death from coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction, respectively. This benefit is much higher than the health risk from dioxin. 31 Weekly intake of each fish Weekly intake of concentration of Mercury intake each fish (g) methyl mercury from each fish (ppm) (μg/week) Intake from non-seafoods sharks sea bream bluefin tunas 80 whales 5 shellfish 20 anchovy 160 mackerel 160 total 425 0.35 0.33 0.54 0.12 0.49 0.03 0.21 total(μg/day) 11.9 0.0 0.0 43.4 0.6 9.7 5.3 33.4 104.3 14.9 (Souce: Japan Ministry of Health 2005, Nakanishi et al. 2003) 32 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2005/aquanet.htm Risk of mercury Mercury intake (mg/day) your case Threshold for adults Threshold for embryos Average intake of Japanese Average in 1960s Minamata disease in 1960s Tuna eater (250g/day) % in Red Risk for blood cell adults (ppm) Risk for embryos 14.9 25.0 15.7 0.024 1.4E-06 7.8E-05 0.038 1.1E-05 0.0005 0.025 1.7E-06 9.5E-05 8.4 0.015 1.3E-07 7.6E-06 98.0 0.140 0.0013 0.0236 1250.0 1.753 0.2771 0.6709 137.2 0.195 0.0036 0.048 (Source: Japan Ministry of Health 2005, Nakanishi et al. 2003) 33 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2005/aquanet.htm My typical lunch menu (for 2 persons) 650 yen (US$6) with coffee 21 34 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2009/091117EL.ppt Overview • • • • • Development-conservation balance Stop severe pollution at the early stage Encourage environment-friendly companies Precautionary adaptive management Sustainable use and conservation by voluntary management Matsuda H (2008) Prediction of coastal marine pollution in the Asian waters. In "Conservation on the Coastal Environment", (eds Miyazaki N, Wattayakorn G), Shinju-sha, Tokyo pp. 120-132 35 Rodricks “Calculating Risks” Fallacy of Zero-Risk リスク要因 死亡率 2000 Rodeoロデオ 3 All factors全死亡要因 1000 Fire火事 2.8 Smoking喫煙 300 Trihalomethan etc 0.8 Cancer from smoking 120 Peanut butter 3spoons/day 0.8 Fire fighting消火活動 80 Beef steak 85g/day 0.5 Hung glider 80 Flood洪水 0.06 Coal mining炭鉱 63 Struck by lightening落雷 0.05 Farmwork農作業 36 Falling stars流星直撃 <10-5 Automobile自動車 24 The number of died person per 100,000 per year Risk factors Motorcyclingバイク Mortality Qi’s anxiety (Qi-you杞憂 ) 生涯リスクは上記の数字が(松田注:年齢,年代により)大きく変わらないとすれば約70倍したものとなる. 22 36 Effect on ecosystems by climate chage Global mean temperature increase above pre-industrial Hare, W. L. (2003). Assessment of Knowledge on Impacts of Climate Change – Contribution to the Specification of Art. 2 of the UNFCCC. http://www.wbgu.de/wbgu_sn2003_ex01.pdf. 37 http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2009/091117EL.ppt Overview • • • • • Development-conservation balance Stop severe pollution at the early stage Encourage environment-friendly companies Precautionary adaptive management Sustainable use and conservation by voluntary management Matsuda H (2008) Prediction of coastal marine pollution in the Asian waters. In "Conservation on the Coastal Environment", (eds Miyazaki N, Wattayakorn G), Shinju-sha, Tokyo pp. 120-132 38 Guideline for nature restoration projects. Coral reefs between Ishigaki & Iriomote Committee on Ecosystem Management of The Ecological Society of Japan* (2005) Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology 10: 63-75 with English abstract *Hiroyuki MATSUDA, Tetsukazu YAHARA, Yasuhiro TAKEMON, Yoshio HADA, Mariko HASEGAWA, Kazumasa HIDAKA, Stefan HOTES, Yasuro KADONO, Mahito KAMADA, Fusayuki KANDA, Makoto KATO, Hidenobu KUNII, Hiroshi MUKAI, Okimasa MURAKAMI, Nobukazu NAKAGOSHI, Futoshi NAKAMURA, Kaneyuki NAKANE, Miho Ajima NISHIHIRO, Jun NISHIHIRO, Toshiyuki SATO, Masakazu SHIMADA, Hinako SHIOSAKA, Noriko TAKAMURA, Noriko TAMURA, Kenichi TATSUKAWA, Yoshitaka TSUBAKI, Satoshi 39 TSUDA, Izumi WASHITANI http://risk.kan.ynu.ac.jp/matsuda/2005/EMCreport05e.html Flow diagram for ecological risk management Consensus building public scientists 0. Concerns, issues Scientific procedure 1. Screening 2.Delimit management scope, invite stakeholder 3.Organize local council and scientific committee Reset goals when not agreed 8. Check necessity and purpose of management 4.Characterize “undesired events” 5. Enumerate measures of effects 6. Analyze stress factors by modelling 7. Risk assessment for no-action case Reset goals when infeasible 9. Set preliminary numerical goal 10. Choose monitoring measures 11. Select method of control 13. Decide measures & goals Revision required 12. Check feasibility of goals 14. Initiate management 15. Continue management and monitoring 16. Review numerical goals and purposes Finish program 40 Why to conserve biodiversity? • To enjoy human well-being based on ecosystem services based on biodiversity (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005) • Good indicator for sustainable historical relationship between human and nature – Same as to conserve historical monuments (Hirakawa & Higuchi 1997) 41 Conserve biodiversity and monuments (Hirakawa & Higuchi 1997; Yahara & Washitani 1996) • Rich biodiversity = an evidence of sustainable relationship between our ancestors and nature • Sustainability is a global standard. • Loss of biodiversity = an indicator of unsustainable impact on the nature • Our generation’s mission = to leave native biodiversity to the next generation as much as possible. • Similar to conserve historical monuments 平川浩文・樋口広芳(1997)生物多様性の保全をどう理解するか 科学67:725-731 鷲谷いづみ・矢原徹一(1996)『保全生態学入門』文一総合出版、270頁 42 http://www.imj.co.jp/simasha/000/migi07/p19.pdf MPAs to protect Walleye Pollack Since 1995 Spawning ground Since 2005 Bottom trawlings are totally banned at the coastal area 43 43 Made by Mitsutaku Makino Coastal Foodweb at Shiretoko World Natural Heritage Most of keystone species are caught and recorded by local fishers org.s! Sustainable fisheries play roles of umbrella species like top predators! 44 44 Made by Mitsutaku Makino Fisheries production statistics (tons) at Shiretoko WNH Very informative time-series data for monitoring the changes in ecosystem structure/functions 45 45 Made by Mitsutaku Makino
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc