Feasibility and Acute Care Utilization Outcomes of

Feasibility and acute care
utilization outcomes of a postacute transitional telemonitoring
g
program for underserved COPD
patients
Cecile Davis MSN RN
Jason Broad MBA, Miriam Bender PhD RN , Tyler Smith PhD
Intervention Population/Setting
• Sharp Grossmont Hospital
•
•
•
•
540 beds in East San Diego county
Largest COPD population in SD county
Part of Sharp HealthCare integrated health system
R l
Real-world
ld setting
tti
• Population criteria
• Adult patients admitted to Sharp Grossmont Hospital with primary
diagnosis of COPD
• Underserved status defined by Payor
• Unfunded, Medi-Cal, County Medical Services, unassigned Medicare
• Patient discharged to home, board and care, or assisted living
• Needed to be able administer their own medications
Measures
• Primary outcomes were 30, 90 and 180-day acute care utilization
– Data
D t obtained
bt i d via
i Sh
Sharp H
HealthCare
lthC
d
data
t warehouse
h
• ED use, readmission rate
• Any Sharp HealthCare hospital
• Health status at enrollment and discharge using the Clinical COPD
Questionnaire (CCQ)
– Validity and reliably have been determined to be acceptable for COPD
population
• Program satisfaction with Centura Telehealth patient satisfaction tool
– Identifies older adults’ perceptions and beliefs about health technology
– addresses key issues such as privacy concerns, time of use, involvement in
one's healthcare, and quality of care
Program Details: Home Visits
• Baseline home visit by program coordinator
–
–
–
–
–
Self maintenance education
Telemonitoring setup and training
Patient received pillbox and medication reconciliation
Baseline CCQ administered
Establish medical home for patients: follow
follow-up
up visit planned and method of transportation
secured
• 90
90-day
day program
–
Evidence: 90 day time period for new behavior learning to become routine
• Second and final home visit by program coordinator
–
–
–
–
Collection of telemonitoring equipment
Final CCQ administration
Satisfaction tool administration
Final self maintenance education
Program details: Telemonitoring Equipment
•
•
Wireless machine (built in Wi-Fi hotspot)
Biometrics captured daily
–
–
–
–
•
Patient
a e ca
can call
ca program
p og a manager
a age o
or nursing
u s g se
service
ce p
provided
o ded with
telemonitoring equipment at any time
–
•
Pulse Oximetry and Heart Rate
Weight if patient had CHF comorbidity
Daily report of symptom management: preset yes/no question
Education vignette that rotated every week
We chose to use nursing service for the pilot
Triggers for clinician intervention
–
–
Daily report showed 20% increase in symptoms
Automatic telemonitoring trigger
•
–
–
Severe SOB, fever, chest pain, confusion
Patient call-in with problem
Non use for 3 days
Results: Sample
p Size
Hospitalized patients not identified for
mHealth Program
Eligible participants identified via
program manager (n=80)
Declined to participate (n=11)
Control Group (n=550)
Control group
Matched by:
Hospital
Admission type (IPE, IPR, OPI)
Discharge date range
COPD ICD-9 codes (first 3)
Discharge disposition to home
Payor (underserved)
Enrolled into mHealth Program (n=69)
Intent to treat analysis
Program follow-up information
Completed 90-day program
Lost to follow-up
Death before program end
Dis-enrolled patient request
Dis-enrolled (unable to meet requirements)
Propensity Matching on 15 indicators
Final Control group: N=130
Final mHealth group n=65
n=58
n=2
n=2
n=5
n=2
Patient Satisfaction Outcomes
Question
Mean
score
(n=57)
SD
4 99
4.99
.11
11
4.99
.11
The training and support team from Sharp HealthCare helped me
understand how to operate the equipment.
The Commander Flex was easy to use.
Since using the Commander Flex monitoring, I am more motivated to
monitor my health.
The Commander Flex equipment helped me improve my health.
4 56
4.56
.83
83
4.40
.89
I was uncomfortable usingg the Commander Flex technology.
gy
1.05
.27
The Commander Flex took too much time to use.
1.12
.46
I worried about my privacy with Commander Flex technology.
The
h Commander
d Flex
l Technology
h l
h
helped
l d me b
become more involved
l d with
h
my health care.
The care I received with Commander Flex technology was just as good as
having a nurse come to my house.
I would recommend this telehealth program to others.
1.05
.28
4.36
.99
4.36
1.04
4.86
.45
(1) No definitely not. (2) I don't think so. (3) Maybe yes, Maybe no. (4) Yes, I think so. (5) Yes, definitely.
Health Status Outcomes
Clinical COPD Questionnaire score
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
Pre-CCQ total score
Post-CCQ total score
TOTAL SCORE DIFFERENCE
3.82
1.90
1.93
0.947
0.991
1.03
1.6
0.1
5.7
4.2
Pre functional status
Post functional status
FUNCTIONAL STATUS SCORE DIFFERENCE
3.37
1.94
1.43
1.37
1.04
1.30
1
0
6
4
Pre Mental Health
Post Mental Health
MENTAL HEALTH SCORE DIFFERENCE
3.87
1.79
2.08
1.74
1.80
2.06
0
0
6
6
Clinically meaningful change in status is difference of .4 or greater
Acute care utilization outcomes
Control
Tele-monitoring
(n=135)
n %
(n=65)
n %
Percent reduction
(%)
p
30-day ED utilization
11
8.5
5
7.7
9
.45
60-day ED utilization
31
23.9
14
21.5
10
.63
90-day ED utilization
40
30.8
20
30.8
0
.82
30-day all-cause readmission
20
15.4
6
9.2
40
.61
90-day all-cause readmission
40
30.8
19
29.3
5
.88
180-day all-cause readmission
56
43.1
24
36.9
14
.43
Implications
• Telemonitoring may be a promising tool for providing
services that bridge the gap between supply and demand
to improve the health of underserved COPD patients
• Our feasibility study suggests telemonitoring in the context
of a post-acute
post acute transitional care model may reduce nearnear
term admissions by 40% through promotion of selfmanagement in underserved COPD patients
• More rigorous and long-term investigation is warranted
– What is an optimal timeframe for transitional program?
– Outcomes and cost analysis