FAC Presentation 2014-01-30[1].pptx (Read-Only)

Morton District 709
Facility Advisory Committee
•  Team
•  Charter
•  Findings
•  Recommendations
Team Members
Member
•  Chris Carter/Lee Hoffman •  Tony Feleccia •  Christopher Farris
•  Barb Getz
•  Nicholas Jack •  Marjorie Johnson/Greg Prichard
•  Jeff Keach
•  Samantha McKee
•  Barb McMullen •  Brad Mitchell •  Tom Neeley
•  Michael Saunders
•  Rodney Schuck •  Troy Teater
•  Bill Wright •  Tim Taylor
•  Kevin Wilson •  Mike Vlahos
•  Dr. Lindsey Hall Representing
Resident/Parent/School Administrator Teacher Resident/Parent Resident/School District Employee Resident/Parent Resident/Parent/School Administrator Resident/School District Advisor Resident/Parent/Teacher Resident/Parent Resident/Parent Resident/School Board Member Resident/Parent/School Administrator School District Employee Resident/Parent/School District Employee Resident Resident/Parent/School Board Member Resident/Parent Resident/Parent Resident/School District Superintendent Project Charter Summary
Business Case
Opportunity Statement
The Facility Advisory Committee (FAC) is tasked
with developing high level facility plan
recommendations for the school board to further
evaluate, investigate and act upon.
It’s been 36 years since any significant construction
has taken place within district 709 and all schools
are currently near or above capacity. The Facility
Advisory Committee has been tasked with reviewing
the current state of district 709’s facilities.
Goal Statement
In Scope:
Long-term building/facilities needs of District 709
Y: Develop a set of proposals to take to 709 school board
outlining a 5-30 year plan for district facilities.
X1:
X2:
X3:
X4:
X5:
Tour all district facilities
Benchmarking with other districts
Demographic study
Learning needs, identify gaps in current capabilities
Identify 21st century learning opportunities for excellence
Out of scope:
On-going maintenance, “punch-list” items, roofing,
immediate life safety issues
Food for Thought
•  Is “Good Enough” acceptable?
•  Do our current facilities provide the best, well rounded education possible for students?
•  Can we offer every service to our students that they need?
•  Are new buildings needed?
•  Our schools perform very well academically. Could they be better with updated learning
environments, less crowded flexible teaching and learning areas, and more support for
technology?
•  Can our teachers utilize new teaching techniques in our schools, such as:
•  Leveraging technology advancements – “21st century learning”
•  No longer focused only on rote instruction – focus is on hands on collaborative on
team learning
•  Multiple community groups have identified the need for new/updated facilities for at least
5 years.
•  Are we impacting potential community growth because of appearances?
Morton schools are already recognized as one of the
“Best” so why do anything?
–  Inaction is the first step towards future failure
–  Without continued investment in schools, our programs will reach a plateau
and not continue to see the year-over-year improvements we are used to
seeing
–  Talented teachers and staff are key to success, providing the best work and
learning environments will enable us to continually attract the most talented
staff
–  We have had manageable growth over the last decade however the growth
rate is increasing and our schools are already running low on capacity
–  The quality of a community is based on the quality of both academic
performance and physical appearance of its education system
• 
Failing to invest in our schools will have a negative impact on the value of homes and the EAV of the
community
–  Every year of inaction drives:
• 
• 
• 
Increased project costs
Increased throw-way expenditures for/at facilities that may not be needed in the future
Delayed benefits - projects started today will take 6+ years to complete
Student Population
•  Enrollment Trend…
–  2,896 current enrollment
–  Average 1.5% per year growth over last 10 years
–  Cumulative 9% growth rate over last 5 years (1.8% year over
year)
–  1.5% per year growth = 3,214 students by 2020
–  1.8% per year growth = 3,281 students by 2020
Elementary School Needs
•  Completely safe and secure campuses for all elementary schools
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Resolution to PE mandate – build gyms or new cafeterias as need for each school
Additional classroom space for growth in grades K-6
Additional space for RTI and Special Education programs
Fine art programs
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Cameras
Badge/card readers
Secure entrance at all schools
Art ?
Music ?
Increased flexibility to work as teams and less use of direct rote instruction.
Increased ability to use technology and hands on learning during instruction
Increased collaboration and conference space
Ability to facilitate all day kindergarten
Upgraded electrical infrastructure
Improved sustainability initiatives
Morton Junior High Needs
• 
Improved safety and security
–  Cameras
–  Badge/card readers
–  More secure entrance
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Safer student drop off and pickup
Team space facilitating “POD” concept
Additional science labs
Additional fine arts instruction space
Additional RtI and Special Education space
Increased ability to focus on hands on learning and technology during
instruction
Additional gym space for PE instruction
Additional outdoor space for PE instruction and athletics
•  Consistent classroom size
•  Additional parking
•  Increased lunchroom capacity
•  Improved media center/library
Morton High School Needs
• 
Improved safety and security
– 
– 
– 
– 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Cameras
Badge/card readers
More secure entrance
Closed campus for all student
lunches
Additional gym space for PE
instruction and concurrent sporting
events with spectators
More visible main entrance
At least 2 additional science labs
At Least 8 additional classrooms
Improved ADA facilities
Additional fine art instruction space
–  Band
–  Orchestra
–  Chorus
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Increased capacity on performing arts
space: 1,500 seats
Increased cafeteria space to facilitate
closed campus
Improved media center/library space
Additional tennis courts
Outdoor practice space for all teams
Increased parking capacity for up to
750 vehicles
Increased ability to focus on hands-on
learning and technology during
instruction
Increased space for team work and
collaborative learning
Dedicated Study Hall space
Outdoor facilities improvement for
athletics, band, and recreation activities
Maintain High School at Current Location
• 
Double Cafeteria size 4,500 ft2 to 9,000 ft2 capacity to hold 800 students
– 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Could use existing library space.
New media center/library 9,000 ft2 (if library used to expand cafeteria)
Classrooms
•  2 science labs 3,200 ft2
•  8 classrooms 8,200 ft2
Gym
–  New gym 40,000 ft2
–  Fitness and exercise science center
–  Allows for two spectator events at once and increased PE space
Auditorium
–  Capacity to hold entire school (1,500 seats) 25,000 ft2
Parking
–  229 today, growing to 300 with buses moved
–  Need additional 450 spaces 170,000 ft2
Additional outdoor space needed for expansion
–  Current Building occupies 151,000 ft2
+9,000 ft2
+11,400 ft2
+40,000 ft2
+25,000 ft2
+170,000 ft2
244,400 ft2
Convert High School to Middle School
•  Double Cafeteria size 4,500 ft2 to 9,000 ft2 capacity to hold
800 students
–  Could use existing library space.
•  New media center/library 9,000 ft2 (if library used to
expand cafeteria)
•  Can utilize existing footprint
•  Space is configurable to accommodate separate team/
pods for each grade level
•  Current Parking is adequate for Middle school needs
•  Current athletic facilities are sufficient for middle school
needs
•  Middle school does not need as much outdoor space
–  Outdoor space could be used for any necessary expansion/renovations
needs with no impact to students/staff
–  Expandable for future needs
Middle School vs. Junior High
•  Students get access to Fine Arts in 5th grade vs. limited access in 6th
grade
•  Students get the ability to participate in sports starting in 5th grade
vs. 7th grade
•  Students spent almost an equal amount of time in each school
facility fostering better sense of community and school spirit
Project Ideas
Cost = cup of coffee per day per household Build Jr. High School
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
(Grades 7-8)
Build Jr. High school building
Renovate High School add needed space
Build athletic facilities for high school offsite
Address PE mandate at elementary schools
Add Classrooms to accommodate growth at elementary schools
Project Cost
30-35 Million
37-44 Million
7-10 Million
5-8 Million
9-12 Million
88-109 Million
Space Needs in buildings and on campus will dictate need for new High School in 15-20 years
requiring an additional 60+ million making the 25 year cost over 150 Million
Build Middle School
(Grades 5-8 or Grades 6-8)
• 
Build Middle school building
40-45 Million
• 
Renovate High School add needed space
37-44 Million
• 
Build athletic facilities for high school offsite
7-10 Million
• 
Address PE mandate at elementary schools
5-8 Million
• 
Classroom renovations at elementary schools
2-4 Million
• 
Project Cost
91-111 Million
Space Needs in buildings and on campus will dictate need for new High School in 15-20 years requiring
an additional 60+ million making the 25 year cost over 150 Million
Build High School
• 
Build High school building with various options for athletics facilities
60-66 Million
• 
Renovate High School add needed space for middle school usage
20-25 Million
• 
Address PE mandate at elementary schools
5-8 Million
• 
Classroom renovations at elementary schools
2-4 Million
Project Cost
88-102 Million
A dedicated 125 acre High School building site would be adequate for a 50-100 year horizon campus site
No major additional building projects for 20+ years
Comments Backup Slides