TWO DIFFERENT WAYS TO ACHIEVE LOW BNR LIMITS 1. AERATED ANOXIC 2. IFAS/MBBR Presented by Tom Larsen Thursday January 23, 2014 Aerated Anoxic and IFAS January 23, 2014 ©2014 Evoqua Water Technologies LLC PAGE 1 Current Aerated Anoxic Design Practices Variations on oxidation ditch with aerated tanks in series to achieve BNR Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) • Nitrification • Denitrification • Phosphorus removal • Reduce alkalinity requirements • Reduce process oxygen requirements • Control sludge settleability Aerated Anoxic Tank (Channel) A biological reactor in which the oxygen delivery is less than the oxygen demand, thereby, creating a zone of continuous oxygen deficiency (avg. DO levels between 0 and 0.5 mg/L) Aerobic tank (channel) A biological reactor in which the oxygen delivery is equal to or greater than the oxygen demand, thereby, creating a zone of continuous oxygen residual (avg. DO levels between 1.5 and 2.5 mg/L DO Profile in Orbal 0 0.5 2 Aerated Anoxic – Oxygen Deficit Aerobic – Oxygen Residual • First tank is high substrate operated at an oxygen deficit – low DO • Last tank is low substrate operated with an oxygen residual – high DO Oxygen Demand and Supply % Oxygen Demand 100 80 60 demand 40 supply 20 0 1 2 Channel 3 Nitrogen Removal Methodologies Pre-anoxic N2(g) Q QINT anoxic Aerobic Q O2 QRAS Sim-pre N 2(g) QINT Q Aerated Anoxic QW<<Q Aerobic Q O2 QRAS QW<<Q Sim-Pre MLSS Recycle Combines the process kinetics of methodologies for improved total nitrogen removal: Simultaneous nitrification-denitrification Pre-denitrification Denitrification Efficiency (assuming 100% RAS) 100 % Denitrification 90 80 Sim-Pre 70 Pre 60 50 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 MLSS Recycle:Influent 3 3.5 4 Lexington-Rockbridge, VA - Orbal Design 3.0 MGD 6 mg/l TN Aerated anoxic MLE Actual 2.5 - 6 mg/l TN (no supp. C) Nitrogen Removal Performance St. Charles, MO • • 7.5 MGD ADF with 24.4 MGD peak 30’ Wide channels with bridge mounted aerators • Torque tube disc aerator also available Vertical Loop Reactor Swatara, PA – VertiCel • Design • 6.3 MGD • 6 mg/l TN • 0.8 mg/l TP • Aerated anoxic • 5-stage Bardenpho • Actual • 3 - 6 mg/l TN (no supp. C) • 0.2 - 0.8 mg/l TP(less chemical) Sample problem – VertiCel Existing primaries converted to RAS tank with mixers and aerated anoxic channel with disc aerators Middle aeration basin converted to a VLR Outside aeration basins stay as fine bubble Internal mixed liquor recycle pumps from aeration back to VLR Sample problem – key parameters VertiCel MLSS 4,100 mg/l SRT 11 days RAS = 100% of ADF IR = 300% of ADF Operating power = 150 hp Secondary Clarifiers SOR average = 433 gpd/ft2 SOR peak = 996 gpd/ft2 SLR average = 29.5 lbs/day/ft2 SLR peak = 42 lbs/day/ft2 (step feed) Configurations IFAS Process Sludge Treatment MBBR Process Sludge Treatment Biomass Carrier - Core of the Process • Evoqua biomass carriers • Patented carrier design • Biological tested for surface validation • Tested under nitrification, BOD oxidation, and denitrfication CM-10D Ammonia performance 140 20 18 120 • Test surface area results ~800 m2/m3 BOD load to reactors 60 12 12 g/m2/d 80 5.5 g/m2/d 14 3.9 g/m2/d Effluent NH3N, competition 10 8 6 40 4 20 2 CM10D effluent NH3 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Day 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 0 210 BOD loading (g/day) 100 NH3 (mg/l) • Trade name: BioSphere 16 Major components – Retention Screens • All retention screen are stainless steel • Wedge wire or perforated plate construction • Minimum screen opening 7mm • All supports supplied • Purging supplied as necessary Major Components of Biosphere - Aeration Aeration Biosphere process uses aeration for oxygen transfer and mixing. • Self sealing diffuser option available • Stainless steel or PVC construction • Low to no maintenance required. • Actual clean water OTE testing data available. Design of a nitrification MBBR considers multiple variables Influent sBOD should be less than 5 mg/L To achieve this, multiple stages are use, i.e. BOD stage then nitrification stage Competition for DO exists in biofilm To keep all layers aerobic, high DOs are required To illustrate why the DO is elevated in a MBBR we must look within the biofilm Biofilm layers SDNR occurs deep in aerobic biofilm Bulk liquid MTBL Media surface Although DO is high for MBBR, this results in nitrification rates 2 to 3 times higher than activated sludge at the same DO and temperature JNH3, g/m2/d, DO, mg/l 6 mg/l DO 4.5 mg/l DO Neptune Beach, FL required to decrease nitrogen by converting from contact stabilization to IFAS Effluent nitrogen before and after implementation of the IFAS process After installation of the IFAS system, the plant was able to meet the new TMDL standards Sample problem – IFAS Existing primaries converted to anaerobic tanks with mixers Aeration basins segmented into 6 zones Pre-Anoxic, Aerobic zone 1, Aerobic zone 2, MLSS IR zone, post anoxic, re-aeration zone Sample problem – key parameters IFAS MLSS 3,500 mg/l SRT 7.5 days RAS = 100% of ADF IR = 175% of ADF Operating power = 325 hp Supplemental carbon = 500 – 1000 lbs/day Secondary Clarifiers SOR average = 433 gpd/ft2 SOR peak = 996 gpd/ft2 SLR average = 23 lbs/day/ft2 SLR peak = 38 lbs/day/ft2 Aerated Anoxic and IFAS January 23, 2014 ©2014 Evoqua Water Technologies LLC PAGE 26 Thank you for your attention Contact info: Tom Larsen [email protected] phone: 262-521-8482 Aerated Anoxic and IFAS January 23, 2014 ©2014 Evoqua Water Technologies LLC PAGE 27
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc