912985_A2_exam_comp_084

Chapter 8 Cognition and development
Answer plans
Division 1 Development of thinking
Answer plan 1
Discuss Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. (8 marks +
16 marks)
Answer plan 2
Discuss Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development. (8 marks
+ 16 marks)
Piaget’s theory
Vygotsky’s theory
AO1
AO1
AO1
AO1
AO1
AO1
AO1
IDA
AO2
AO2
AO2
AO2
AO2
IDA
IDA
Key points – maturation, qualitative differences
Key mechanisms – schema, assimilation, accommodation,
equilbration, operations
Stage 1 sensori-motor (0–2), e.g. object permanence,
stage 2 pre-operational (2–7), e.g. egocentricism
Stage 3 concrete (7–11), e.g. conservation, stage 4 formal
(11+), e.g. abstract hypothetico-deductive reasoning
Nativists claim infants can do more, e.g. Baillargeon and
DeVos (1991) used carrot behind window
Research support for egocentrism (three mountains) but
Hughes (1975) children could cope with policeman doll
Research support for conservation (e.g. with counters) but
Samuel and Bryant (1984) two questions may confuse
Research support for formal logic (beaker problem) but
Wason and Shapiro (1971) 10% university students can
Limitations, e.g. tasks unrealistic, sample-biased (middle
class, Western), ignores social factors
Strengths, e.g. qualitative differences supported by research
Real-world application to education, e.g. readiness, value of
disequilibrium, importance of self-discovery
Contrast with Vygotsky, e.g. cultural vs individualist
approach, but also similarities (Glassman, 1999)
Work out your own plan for this question and
then write your answer.
Describe and evaluate applications of cognitive
development theories to education. (8 marks +
16 marks)
DIY
Application to education
AO1
AO1
AO2
AO2
AO2
AO2
AO2
AO2
IDA
IDA
Elementary and higher mental functions, role of culture
The role of others – experts
Semiotics, the role of language and stages (preintellectual
speech, egocentric speech, inner speech)
Zone of proximal development (ZPD)
Research support for role of culture, e.g. Gredler (1992)
primitive counting system in Papua New Guinea
Research support for scaffolding, e.g. Wood and Middleton
(1975) pyramid task and continigent regulations
Research support for language, e.g. Carmichael et al.
(1932), challenged by Sinclair-de-Zwart (1969)
Research support for ZPD, e.g. McNaughton and Leyland
(1990) mothers working with jigsaw puzzles
Limitations, e.g. social influences overplayed, not conducive
to research (hard to operationalise)
Strengths, e.g. positive approach because suggests ways to
assist learner
Real-world application to education, e.g. collaborative
learning, peer tutoring, scaffolding
Contrast with Piaget, e.g. cultural vs individualist approach,
but also similarities (Glassman, 1999)
Answer plan 3
(a) Outline and evaluate Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive
development. (4 marks + 8 marks)
(b) Outline and evaluate how Vygotsky’s theory has been
applied to education. (4 marks + 8 marks)
Part (a) Vygotsky’s theory
AO1
AO1
AO2
The role of culture and others – experts
Zone of proximal development (ZPD) and scaffolding
Research support for role of culture, e.g. Gredler (1992)
primitive counting system in Papua New Guinea
Research support for ZPD, e.g. McNaughton and Leyland
(1990) mothers working with jigsaw puzzles
Limitations, e.g. social influences overplayed, not conducive
to research (hard to operationalise)
Contrast with Piaget, e.g. cultural vs individualist approach,
but also similarities (Glassman, 1999)
AO1
AO2
AO1
AO2
AO1
IDA
AO2
Part (b) Application to education
AO2
AO1
AO1
AO2
AO2
AO2
AO2
AO2
IDA
AO2 or
IDA
AO2 or
IDA
AO2 or
IDA
84
Psychology A2: The Exam Companion
AO2
Collaborative learning, shared understandings
Peer tutoring creates motivation to learn as expert guides
you through ZPD
Research support, e.g. Gokhale (1995) better performance
on critical thinking test
Research support, e.g. Cohen et al. (1982) though best for
tutor (Cloward, 1967)
Culture bias, most appropriate in collectivist societies, e.g.
Stigler and Perry (1999) compared US and Asian schools
Comparison with traditional methods, Bennett (1976)
found active learning less good