Army Power and Energy

Army Power and Energy
Deputy Assistant Secretary of
the Army
Energy and Sustainability
Mr. Richard Kidd
16 September 2014
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
1
Strategic Context
The Army is addressing energy security through a
comprehensive program to ensure that we have
assured access to reliable supplies of energy and
the ability to protect and deliver sufficient energy
to meet mission-essential requirements.
•
Soldier:
 Lightening soldier power loads
 Agility and self-reliance through advanced portable power
systems, lighter batteries, universal charging devices and
water purifiers
•
Vehicles:
 Utilizing alternative fuels, hybrid and electric systems
 Improving efficiency and extending engine life
 Includes tactical (air and ground) vehicles and non-tactical
vehicles
•
Basing:
 Improving installation fuel, water and energy efficiency
 Net Zero strategy
 Diversity of supply through renewable energy enhancing
energy security
 Energy Initiatives Task Force
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
2
Installation Energy
Through technology and policies
we are reducing our energy
footprint. We will provide
flexibility and resiliency by
developing alternatives and
adaptable capabilities
• Largest facility energy consumer in the Federal
Government – $1.3B (FY13).
• Established Net Zero Initiative to demonstrate
integrated design principals that will ensure the
Army of tomorrow has the same access to energy,
water, land and natural resources as the Army of
today.
• Formed the Energy Initiatives Task Force to
develop large scale renewable energy projects
that will help strengthen energy security while
supporting the Army’s energy goals.
• Utilizing third party financing to improve efficiency
on Army installations. The Army has most robust
ESPC program in entire Federal government.
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
3
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
2009
Energy Efficiency May Lower
Baseline by 30%
Remaining Electric
Consumption
NDAA Renewable Energy Requirement
25% by 2025 or 2,500,000 MWh
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
Major Issues for Army Large-Scale Renewable
Energy Projects:
• Declining Budgets/Incentive Leverage
Need for private financing
• Specialized Expertise
Requires financial, regulatory, environmental
and real estate expertise
• Enterprise Strategy
To define the most efficient path to reach Army
goals
2021
% Renewable Energy of Total Energy
Total Energy in Megawatt Hours
Army Energy Outlook
2023
2025
National Defense Authorization Act:
25% by 2025
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
6% Progress in FY 2012
from 194 different projects
5%
0%
2010
2015
2020
2025
Path to Compliance
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
UNCLASSIFIED
4
Army Large-Scale Renewable Energy Projects
Location: Ft. Drum, NY
Project: 28 MW Biomass
Business/Acquisition Model: PPA Notice of
Intent to Award to ReEnergy Holdings LLC
Yakima Training Center
Location: Tooele Army Depot, UT
Project: Wind/Solar
Business/Acquisition Model:
Competitive Lease
Location: Ft. Irwin, CA
Project: 15 MW Solar
Business/Acquisition Model:
Competitive PPA through DLA
Camp Parks
Ft. Irwin
JFTC Los Alamitos
Location: Ft. Huachuca, AZ
Project: 18 MW Solar
Business/Acquisition Model: GSA
Areawide Contract through TEP
Location: Schofield Barracks, HI
Project: 50 MW Biodiesel
Business/Acquisition Model: Lease
with HECO
Location: Ft. Detrick, MD
Project: 15 MW Solar
Business/Acquisition Model: PPA Notice
of Intent to Award to Ameresco Inc.
Location: Redstone Arsenal, AL
Project: Up to 18000 MW hours per year Solar
Business/Acquisition Model: MATOC PPA
Tooele Army Depot
Camp Roberts
Installation Project Status:
Construction
Contracts and Agreements
Project Assessment &
Validation
Ft. Detrick
Location: Redstone Arsenal, AL
Project: 25 MW Renewable CHP
Business/Acquisition Model: Competitive
PPA through HNC
Redstone
Arsenal
AK
Ft. Meade
Ft. Rucker
Ft. Hood
Ft. Bragg
Ft. Gordon
Ft. Benning
Ft. Stewart
Schofield Barracks
HI
Camp Edwards
Ft. Pickett
Ft. Huachuca
Ft. Greely
Ft. Devens
Aberdeen Proving Ground
Anniston Army
Depot
Ft. Bliss
Ft. Drum
Location: Ft. Hood, TX
Project: Offsite Wind, Onsite Solar
Business/Acquisition Model: Competitive
PPA through DLA
Location: Ft. Stewart, GA
Project: 18 MW Solar
Business/Acquisition Model:
Competitive lease in conjunction
with the GA Power Advanced Solar
Initiative (ASI)
Location: Ft. Benning, Ft. Gordon, Ft. Stewart, GA
Project: 90 MW Solar
Business/Acquisition Model: GSA Areawide
Contract through GA Power
Contributing >30% Towards Army’s 1 GW Goal
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
UNCLASSIFIED
5
Other Army Renewable Energy Projects
• In addition to the EITF the Army develops small scale
renewable energy projects through both appropriated funds
and third party financing
• Energy Conservation Investment Program – 2.7MW in FY13
• Energy Savings Performance Contracts – 8.6 MW in FY13
ECIP - Two 1.1 MW Solar Arrays, Fort Hunter
Liggett
ECIP - 170 KW Photovoltaic Solar Power System,
New Jersey National Guard Joint Training and
Training Development Center
ESPC - 4.1 MW Solar Array
White Sands Missile Range
ESPC - Three 275kW Wind
Turbines, Fort Buchanan
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
6
Third Party Financing
Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) / Utilities
Energy Services Contracts (UESC) and Utilities Privatization (UP)
Private Companies / Servicing Utilities provide initial private capital investment to execute projects
For ESPCs & UESCs, repayment is from realized energy savings paid from Utilities Services Program funds
Army has most robust ESPC program in Federal government & improving – Exceeded goal for Presidents Challenge
More ESPC’s and UESC’s were awarded Dec 11-Dec 13 ($498M) than in any two years of the program
300
100
50
2013
0
2014
Projected
ESPC
2012
• 144 UP awards made through FY13, a net
present value cost avoidance of $2.0 billion.
• 86% of utility systems evaluated.
• All new, major UP investments are amortized
UESC
2011
UP:
150
2010
Over 360 task orders/ 45 installations
> 3.8 Trillion BTU Energy Savings per year
$568 Million in Private sector investments
$100 Million more in development
2009
•
•
•
•
200
2008
UESCs:
250
2007
Over 180 task orders/ 75 installations
>6.6 Trillion BTU Energy Savings per year
$1.32 Billion of Private sector investments
$400 Million more in development
2006
•
•
•
•
3rd Party Investment in Million of Dollars
ESPC:
2005
•
•
•
•
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
7
Army Net Zero (NZ) Challenge
Net Zero is a holistic management approach to bring the overall consumption of
energy, water, and waste on installations down to an effective rate of zero by using
the principles of integrated design to appropriately manage resources.
Through such efforts as reducing demand, increasing efficiency, producing renewable
energy, using graywater, re-purposing materials, and expanding recycling and energy
recovery…consumption of resources can be reduced to an effective rate of zero.
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
8
AMERICA’S ARMY:
THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
ARMY STRONG
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment)
9