Kos - IACA - International Anti

New Challenges for Anti-Corruption
Measures and for the Protection of
EU Financial Interests
Alexei Croitoru, Laxenburg, 14 May 2014
OECD Working Group on Bribery: the Way Forward
Laxenburg, 15 May 2014
Drago KOS
OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of
Foreign
Public Officials in International Business
Transactions (1997)
15th anniversary of its entering into force in February 2014;
-
-
-
41 member States;
Articles on: definition of the offence (including definitions of a
»foreign public official«, »foreign country«, »act or refrain from acting
in relation to the performance of official duties)” , liability of legal
persons, sanctions (effective, proportionate, dissuasive + seizure and
confiscation), jurisdiction (allowing double jeopardy), enforcement
(shall not be influenced by considerations of national economic
interest, the potential effect upon relations with another State or the
identity of the natural or legal persons involved), statute of limitations,
money laundering, accounting, mutual legal assistance, extradition,
responsible authorities, monitoring and follow-up.
Recommendation of the Council for Further
Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in
International Business Transactions (2009)
- Chapters on : general, criminalisation of bribery of fpo, tax
deductibility, reporting foreign bribery, Accounting Requirements,
External Audit, and Internal Controls, Ethics and Compliance, Public
Advantages, including Public Procurement, Officially Supported
Export Credits, International Cooperation, Follow-up and institutional
arrangements, Co-operation with non Members, Relations with
international governmental and non-governmental organisations
+
- Annex I: Good Practice Guidance on Implementing Specific Articles
of the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in
International Business Transaction
- Annex II: Good practice guidance on internal controls, ethics, and
compliance
OECD Working Group on Bribery in
International Business Transactions
It was established in 1994, 41 members (generating 80% of
the world export and 90% of outward FDI) + several
observers (China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand,...).
It is responsible for monitoring of implementation and
enforcement of the Convention, 2009 Recommendation +
related instruments.
Its peer-review monitoring system is conducted in three
phases (the 4th will start in 2015) and is considered by
Transparency International to be the „gold standard‟ of
monitoring.
Evaluation Phases
Phase 1: Initial assessment of countries‟ national legislation
to determine their conformity with the OECD Convention
Phase 2: Assessment of the practical application and
implementation of the Convention and related documents
Post-Phase 2 assessment mechanism (December 2009, gives
the general procedural framework for all future phases)
Phase 3: Up-to-date assessment of the countries‟ structures to
implement the Convention and 2009 Recommendation (WG
cross-cutting issues, progress on identified weaknesses,
enforcement efforts, changes in the nat‟l legislation)
Future Activities of the WGB
- to keep standards of the Convention alive,
-to
continue issuing targeted and focused
recommendation
- to continue cooperating with other governmental,
non-governmental and business partners, continue
building a trustworthy platform for global
governance, ensure fair conditions in global trade for
all (member and non-member) states of the world
Future Challenges of the WGB
- selection of topics for evaluation for the future
phases, especially Phase IV
- big players at the door (China, India, Indonesia,
UAE,..),
-equal treatment,
-monitoring “fatigue”,
-reluctance of some of the existing members to
undergo serious monitoring,
-different levels of activities of national delegations,
- workload during the WG sessions,..
Enforcement, Enforcement,
Enforcement
Statistics as of December 2012:
221 individuals and 90 entities from 13 State Parties were sanctioned
under criminal proceedings between 1999 and the end of 2012
At least 83 individuals were sentenced to prison
At least 85 individuals and 120 entities in 5 State Parties were
sanctioned in different proceedings for other offences related to foreign
bribery (ML, accounting)
Around 320 investigations in 24 State Parties were taking place at the
end of 2012, the same as prosecutions against 184 individuals and 18
entities in 15 State Parties
The largest single fine for foreign bribery was imposed against
Our “Big Issues”
- Responsibility of legal persons for foreign
bribery
- Transnational sharing of information
- “Effective, dissuasive and proportionate”
sanctions
- Seizure and confiscation of bribes and proceeds
of foreign bribery
Our Final Goal
To ensure a level playing field !
.
THANK YOU !
QUESTIONS,
COMMENTS,
REMARKS ?