Mathematical Methods in Science and Mechanics Experimental investigation of weapon system mounted on track vehicle JIRI BALLA, ZBYNEK KRIST, CONG ICH LE Department of Weapons and Ammunition University of Defence Kounicova street 65, 662 10 Brno CZECH REPUBLIC [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], http://www.unob.cz) Abstract: - The purpose of this article is to familiarize with an attitude of research of automatic weapons mounted on vehicles. Procedures enabling to determine the exciting force from weapon to the mount, angular movement of weapon turret, elevating parts, and recoil of automatic cannon barrel are discussed. The analyses technique of measurements results using FFT and correlation functions have been applied on real system having double 30mm automatic cannons mounted on the board cradle, and on the turret. Key-Words: - Automatic weapon, Combat vehicle, Dynamic model, Exciting force, Weapon mounting, Turret, Elevating parts, Cradle, Correlation function, Spectrum analysis 1 Introduction - angular displacement of hull, Analyses of mounts and carriages vibration of weapon systems when fire burst revealed that the cardinal reason defending to successful research in this area is not sufficient experimental base for measuring on weapon system vibration in extreme conditions, [1], [2]. Successful managing of whole complex questions connecting with measuring in these conditions exceeds possibilities of an individual workplace as are the apparatus, and know-how published in measuring methodologies. Pursuit of achievement of the high hit probability of the air targets in course of burst antiaircraft firing lead to lowering of vibrations of the main parts of the tube weapon systems. Ways how to determine weapon system vibrations are three. One of them is pure calculation method of the main parts movements. The second is pure experimental investigation of the oscillations of the hull, turret, and elevation parts. The last technique is a combination of both previous together with retrieval of the forces acting onto the weapon. In [3], [4] there were published the dynamic model having eight DOF (degrees of freedom). Some characteristics used there were set experimentally on the real system. The considered system, see Fig. 1, has the structure according to the Fig. 2 where the coordinates are labeled as follows: xV yV V xE yE [q] = [yko, , xv, yv, v, xE, yE, E ], Fig. 1: Dynamic model All bodies are connected with reduced flexible bindings indicated as ki. This article deals with an experimental attitude in dynamic problem solution. - longitudinal displacement of turret, - vertical displacement of turret, - angular displacement of turret, - longitudinal displacement of elevating parts, - vertical displacement of elevating parts, E - angular displacement of elevating parts. (1) where yko - vertical displacement of hull, ISBN: 978-960-474-396-4 166 Mathematical Methods in Science and Mechanics analog tape recorders with limited number of channels had to be used two for individual signals after their amplifying, see Fig. 4, where the measuring chain is introduced. FL aKP yVP yVZ Hartmann Braun amplifier xZ KWS amplifier 1st recorder 2nd recorder Fig. 4: Measuring chain Fig. 2: Weapon structure From experience the estimated maximal frequency of the mechanical system had been set at 300 Hz, and then the 615 Hz sampling frequency has been sufficient for purposes of signals digitalization. Before digitalization the signals had been filtered with low-pass filters as follows: FL , aKP - 300 Hz, yVP , yVZ - 200 Hz, xZ - 120 Hz. Afterwards signals have been analyzed using of the Next View® software, see [5], and then the results have been exported in Microsoft Excel® format for final drawing in MATLAB® software. The selected sampling frequency gives the maximal frequency 307 Hz during determination of the spectrum density estimations from the formula 2 Problem Formulation Fig. 3 shows location of gauges used for identification of main parameters of the cradle, and turret. On the weapon system there were measured the following characteristics: - xZ linear displacement of recoiling barrel, - FL forces acting onto carriage during burst fire, - aKP vertical acceleration of board cradle, - yVP , yVZ linear displacements of the front, and rear of turret with respect to the hull. GXX f 2 2 X T jf , T (2) where X T jf - Fourier transform of signal, T – length of signal, f – frequency, j – imaginary unit. Fig. 3: Gauges location on weapon system The minimal length of signal T and the minimal frequency in signal spectrum fmin are connected with equation These parameters will be successively discussed in the next parts. The xZ barrel recoil stroke was determined with the W20 inductance gauge having the ±20 mm measuring range. The HBM (Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik), force transducers (strain gauges) located on the weapon casing have been electrically connected into the Wheatstone bridge and after a laboratory calibration have been found out forces acting from weapon casing onto a board cradle. The vertical acceleration of the cradle was measured using of the tensometric accelerometer BWH 401 with 5000 m∙s-2 limited acceleration value. The vertical displacements of the turret were determined with two W5 inductance gauge having the ± 5 mm measuring range. The ISBN: 978-960-474-396-4 T 8 f min . (3) This formula explains the fact that in course of the spectral power density calculations the shift of the lowest frequencies contained in the spectrum signal to the higher frequencies can occur. The results of the experiments without any corrections in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show that records are shifted in time, and they have to be reconstructed to obtain right values, mainly for the turret motion. Fig. 5 shows the xZ1 record of the barrel recoil during the same six-round 167 Mathematical Methods in Science and Mechanics burst, and Fig. 6 the same motion recorded in the xZ2 signal serving as second recorder as The first records will be move forward according to the lag time between both records caused by the different tape speed, and the different time of tapes starting. In addition, the second record of the barrel recoil xZ2 is distorted after the third shot during synchronizing one. Every shot occurs when the barrel recoil stroke has minimal (negative) value since the weapon is operates as soft recoil system, see [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], and [12], where the barrel is moving forward before shot. Externally powered weapons are loaded by the different way, theoretically easier, see [13]. its registering. But the beginning of this registration is clear and it corresponds to the first record xZ1 . The correlation theory enables to set the lag time, and to give the all signals into the time alignment. This solution will be used in the part of dealing with the turret angular vibration, see [14], [15], and [16]. 80 FL (kN) 60 40 20 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time (s) 0.7 0.8 0.9 3 Problem Solution 1 3.1 Forces acting onto mount For automatic weapons held in any type of mount it is necessary to know the forces acting on the different parts of the weapon mount during firing. The firing force is represented by vector acting in the center of gravity of recoiling parts in parallel direction with a barrel axis. The variation of the applied force with respect to time depends on the firing force, its damping and the type of automatic system used. Maximum force of shot is very high (250 kN for 30 mm cannon for example), and therefore the barrel (or the whole weapon with fixed barrel) is designed as recoiling. It is explained on the examples of Czech 30 mm AA gun M53/59 during burst firing, see [1] and 5.56 mm rifle FNC, see [2]. The forces applied to the automatic weapon mount are periodic in nature. Displacement transducers (for a barrel recoil), and strain gauges (for determining of the time when the projectile leaves the barrel) was used, see Fig. 7, Fig. 8. The variation in firing force over a six-shot burst was shown in Fig. 5 before. It can be seen that the force transmitted to the mount has a maximum value for the first shot fired. For the second shot there is a reduction in the firing force which is still further reduced for the third shot. From the analysis follows that the maximum force applied to the mount occurs at the instant when the barrel is arrested and the breech carrier begins to act on the buffer, see [1]. aKP (m.s ) 100 -2 50 0 -50 -100 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time (s) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1 yVP (mm) 0.5 0 -0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time (s) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time (s) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 xZ1 (mm) 20 10 0 -10 -20 Fig. 5: First recorder. yVZ (mm) 1 0.5 0 -0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time (s) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Detail 0.02 xZ2 (m) 0.01 T1 0 T2 gauge moving part fixed part -0.01 -0.02 Detail 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time (s) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Fig. 6: Second recorder Fig. 7: Position of recoil gauge on 30 mm cannon ISBN: 978-960-474-396-4 168 Mathematical Methods in Science and Mechanics acceleration individual components contained in the signal spectrum. 1 Detail 0.8 Detail 0.6 T3 T4 0.4 T4 T2 0.2 Right side of weapon casing 0 Left side of weapon casing 0 Fig. 8: Position of force gauges on 30 mm cannon 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Fig. 10: Correlation function of cradle acceleration The spectral density variation of the firing force acting on the mount is shown in Fig. 9, where the basic frequency of 7.5 Hz is given by the rate of fire. Frequencies of 15 Hz, 23 Hz and 30 Hz are higher harmonics, and they can belong to the other weapon parts. For example 23 Hz is contained in the turret vibration. The force magnitude belonging to the basic frequency is much greater than other higher harmonics components. It was used for calculation of the firing stability which allows quick and simple substitution of the force applied to the mount by analytical formula, see [2], [3], [6], [10], and [12]. 7 6 5 GXX 4 3 2 1 0 5000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 f (Hz) 4500 X: 7.609 Y: 4563 Fig. 11: Spectrum density of cradle acceleration 4000 The other cradle kinematic parameters as are the absolute velocity and the absolute displacement with respect to the basic system can be calculated by way of the double integration of the cradle acceleration. It is necessary to note that they would be absolute parameters with respect to the earth. Since there was used only one sensor were not possible to get the angular motion of the elevation parts. Then the results can be used for the estimation of the linear vibration of the system after the end of the fire. The last 100 samples were inserted for the spectrum density calculation of the cradle linear vibration. The result is depicted in Fig. 12. 3500 X: 15.22 Y: 2933 GXX 3000 X: 22.83 Y: 2310 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 50 100 150 f (Hz) 200 250 300 Fig. 9: Spectral density of forces 30 mm AA cannon 3.2 6 Cradle vibration 5 From the time course of the linear cradle acceleration in Fig. 4 is possible to estimate that it has spread spectrum and the normalized correlation function is very narrow. Fig. 10 and Fig. 11 confirm these prerequisites. The basic statistical characteristics of the aKP cradle acceleration are mean value = 0.51m∙s-2, minimal value = -117 m∙s-2, maximal value = 131 m∙s-2, standard deviation = 31 m∙s-2, and median = - 2.29 m∙s-2. High values of the acceleration likely belong to the instant values of the ISBN: 978-960-474-396-4 G XX 4 3 2 X: 18.46 Y: 2.421 X: 43.08 Y: 2.341 1 0 0 50 100 150 f (Hz) 200 250 300 Fig. 12: Spectrum of disappearing cradle vibration 169 Mathematical Methods in Science and Mechanics The frequency about 18 Hz belongs to the linear vibration f y of the turret and higher 43 Hz belongs The individual stiffness in the dynamic model can be set according to the given DOF. In Fig. 1 the whole linear stiffness in the vertical direction is (6) ky k3 k4 , V to the elevating parts (cradle) vibration. V for example. Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 show that both signals are time postponed due to of time different records of the barrel recoil xZ1 and xZ2 , yVP and yVZ . It is 3.3 Turret vibration The turret motion was measured with respect to the hull. Identically as at the cradle disappearing vibration we can proceed according to the previous case for linear turret vibration. The significant frequencies are nearby the frequencies belonging to the cradle. necessary to give them into the same time relation. The correlation theory is one of the best procedures how to do it. The maximum value of the Rx Z , x Z 1 2 cross-correlation function between xZ1 , and xZ2 Although the courses of the turret linear displacement are enough different in Fig. 5, Fig. 6, the significant similarity is clear from their spectrums. Fig 13 is the evidence, and the turret spectrum yvp is very similar with the main frequencies. signals which are stored in both recorders indicates time lags between them, see [13] delay arg max Rx Z1 , x Z2 . (7) After insertion into (7), the time delay is 0.112s and it corresponds to 69 postponed samples, see Fig. 14. 1 1 0.8 0.8 X: 7.586 Y: 0.6271 0.6 GXX RXZ1,XZ2 0.6 0.4 X: 22.76 Y: 0.3071 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 -0.2 0 0 50 100 150 200 f (Hz) 250 300 -0.4 -600 350 Fig. 13: Turret spectrum yvp V determine the angular stiffness of the turret elastic bearing on the hull in model displayed in Fig. 1. When we know turret mass moment of inertia with respect to the transverse axis passing through the gravity center IV, the turret angular stiffness k γ is V kγ I V 2 f γ V . 2 V (4) The linear stiffness of the turret elastic bearing on the hull k γ in the vertical direction is defined by the y similar way, where mV is turret mass kγ mV 2 f y y . 2 V ISBN: 978-960-474-396-4 -200 0 200 sample 400 600 Fig. 14: Cross-correlation function Then the angular displacement of the turret with respect to the hull can be determined using simple relation y yVZ V VP , (8) lS where lS is known distance between both turret sensors. The time course of the angular turret vibration with respect to the hull is shown in Fig. 15. The better interpretation of the turret motion gives autocorrelation function and the spectral density of vibrations. Figures 16 and 17 prove it. In the autocorrelation function, see Fig. 16, there are distinct peaks belonging to individual shots, and it is shown in Fig. 13 where the basic fire frequency is 7.5 Hz as it was explained in Fig. 9, and Fig. 12. The frequency 22.7 Hz is natural frequency of the turret angular vibration. The frequency about 7.5 Hz is rate of fire, and 22.7 Hz is natural frequency of the turret angular vibration f γ . The important result is that we can given as -400 (5) 170 Mathematical Methods in Science and Mechanics elevating parts, and weapons as well. All these clearances are not possible to express because they are not known their size, and they change in course of the use. 0.8 0.6 V (mrad) 0.4 4 Conclusion 0.2 The new experimental procedures for estimating of the dynamic parameters of the burst firing automatic weapons have been proposed. Using of the correlation and spectral analysis have been revealed substantial properties of the weapon system parts as are natural frequencies, dependences of the individual parts on the behavior of the whole system, and each other. Finally, the procedures can serve as methodology for an investigation of the other similar systems. The problems, which were shown in this paper, are the ground of the theory, and the other investigation of automatic weapons mount dynamics problems, see [4], [6], [10], [11], [12] , and [13]. 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 time (s) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Fig. 15: Angular turret vibration 1 0.8 0.6 Acknowledgment: The work presented in this paper has been supported by the research projects of University of Defence, Brno, Czech Republic: Research project of Department of Weapons and Ammunition 2014. 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 -0.4 0 200 400 600 800 1000 References: [1] Allsop, D., Balla J., Cech V., Popelinsky L., Procházka S., Rosický J., Brassey's Essential Guide To MILITARY SMALL ARMS. Design Principles and Operating Methods. BRASSEY'S London, UK 1997, 361 pages. First English edition. [2] Celens, E., Plovie, G., Recoil of Small Arms. RMA Brussels 1994, 11 pages. [3] Balla, J., Combat vehicle vibrations during fire in burst. The Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematical Models for Engineering Science (MMES'10). Puerto De La Cruz, Spain, IEEEAM, and NAUN, 2010, p. 207-212. ISSN 1792-6734. ISBN 978-960-474252-3. [4] Balla, J., Dynamics of Mounted Automatic Cannon on Track Vehicle. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2011, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 423422. ISSN 1998-0140. [5] Next View 4.3 professional software documentation. Maisach (Germany), BMC Messsysteme GmbH, 2009. [6] Balla, J., Jedlicka, L., Racek, F., Krist, Z., Havlicek, M., Firing stability of mounted small arms. International Journal of Mathematical 1200 Fig. 16: Turret autocorrelation function 0.2 0.18 X: 7.586 Y: 0.1872 0.16 0.14 X: 22.76 Y: 0.1209 GXX 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 50 100 150 f (Hz) 200 250 300 Fig. 17: Turret angular vibration spectrum density From Fig. 17 is clear that the rate of fire is lower than natural angular frequency of the turret since the turret motion is able to follow the FL exciting force. It demonstrates the frequency 22.76 Hz in Fig. 17. The maximal values of V achieve about 1mrad. The V course affects clearances in the turret seating, ISBN: 978-960-474-396-4 171 Mathematical Methods in Science and Mechanics Models and Methods in Applied Science, 2011, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 412-422. ISSN 1998-0140. [7] Balla, J., Jedlicka, L., Racek, F., Krist, Z., Havlicek, M., Dynamics of automatic weapon mounted on the tripod. The 12th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematical and Computational Methods in Science and Engineering (MACMESE '10). Faro (Portugal). University of Algarve Faro, 2010, p. 122-127. ISSN 1792-6114. ISBN 978-960-474-243-1. [8] Balla, J., Krist, Z., Popelinsky L., Drive of weapon with together bound barrels and breeches. The 5th WSEAS International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics (MECHANICS'09). Puerto De La Cruz (Spain), 2009, p. 48-53. ISSN 1790-2769. ISBN 978-960-474-140-3. [9] Balla, J., Horvath, J., Gas drive of machine gun. The ICMT'11 - International Conference on Military Technologies 2011. Brno, Czech Republic, University of Defence, 2011, p. 1645-1654. ISBN 978-80-7231-787-5. [10] Balla, J., Mach, R., Kinematics and dynamics of Gatling weapons. Advances in Military Technology, 2007, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 121-133. ISSN 1802-2308. [11] Balla, J., Mach, R., Main resistances to motion in Gatling weapons. Advances in Military Technology, 2007, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 23-34. ISSN 1802-2308. [12] Balla, J., Krist, Z., Popelinsky, L., Theory of High Rate of Fire Automatic Weapon with Together Bound Barrels and Breeches. WSEAS Transactions on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, 2010, vol. 1, no. 5. ISSN 19918747. [13] Balla, J., Twin Motor Drives in Weapon Systems. WSEAS Transactions on Systems and Control, 2010, vol. 5, no. 9, p. 755-765. ISSN 1991-8763. [14] Vitek, R., Measurement of the stereoscopic rangefinder beam angular velocity using the digital image processing method. Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematical and Computational Methods in Science and Engineering, MACMESE'10; Faro; Portugal; 3 November 2010 through 5 November 2010. [15] Dub, M., Jalovecky, R., DC Motor Experimental Parameter Identification using the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method. Proceedings of EPE-PEMC 2010 - 14th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference. Skopje, Republic of ISBN: 978-960-474-396-4 Macedonia: Ss Cyril and Methodius University, 2010, p. 9-11. ISBN 978-1-4244-7854-5. [16] Zaplatilek, K., Leuchter, J., Optimal Polynomial Approximation of Photovoltaic Panel Characteristics Using a Stochastic Approach. Advances in Military Technology, 2013, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 43-51, ISSN 1802-2308. 172
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc