PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

Pursuing the initial stages of crystal growth
using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and
fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS)
Takashi Sugiyama
Miyasaka laboratory
Introduction
Many studies have been done for decades to clarify the
mechanism of crystallization.
It is, however, its dynamics are too complicated to be
understood in detail.
Initial stage
Solution
Nucleation
Nano/micro crystal
Bulk crystal
Direct measurement of nucleation process requires a
detection method of individual molecules moving freely in
solution. It is still difficult even now.
Thermodynamic background of crystal growth
ΔGc ΔG
<Supersaturated solution>
Critical size
4
G    R3ns  4R2
3

0
Nc
Aggregation size become
larger than critical size.
Ns
Crystal growth
Previous approaches for pursuing nucleation of crystals
Laser scanning microscope
Crystallization of colloidal particles
Atomic force microscope
・
・
・
molecular ordering dynamics of
proteins at single molecule level on
substrates
• High sensitivity
• High temporal resolution
• High spatial resolution
High-sensitive photo detection methods have been developed
recently, motivating researchers to pursue the crystal growth
using them.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS)
Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS)
CONTENTS
Principle of DLS and FCS
Confocal setup
Autocorrelation function (ACF)
Pursuing crystal growth of naphthalene using DLS
Pursuing protein nucleation using FCS
Summary
Experimental setup for DLS and FCS
Confocal optical setup
Image plane
Molecles/nanoparticles
Pinhole
Sample
solution
Objective
Laser light
High sensitive
Photodetector
(Single photon
counting module)
• DLS: Scattering light from particles
• FCS: Fluorescent light from dyes
High spatial resolution (in particular, z-axis) can be achieved.
Only fluorescent light from probe molecules or scattered light
from crystals on the focal plane is detected.
Autocorrelation function (ACF)
ACF can be used to analyze many kinds of fluctuations.
 I(t   )  I(t) 
g( ) 
 I(t) 2
g(τ) : autocorrelation function (ACF)
I(t) : signal intensity
τ : delay time
δ : fluctuations of intensity
 I (t   )  I (t ) 
 1
 I (t )  2


g( )
g( )


Slow fluctuation
Slow decay of ACF
Fast fluctuation

Fast decay of ACF
Pursuing crystal growth of naphthalene using DLS
“Kinetics of the formation of organic molecular
nanocrystals”
Jack Adrian et al., Nanoletters, 1,141-143 (2001)
Sample
Ternary system: naphthalene/acetone/water
Naphthalene/acetone
solution
Water
Easy to control the solubility of
naphthalene to the mixture solvent
Obtained ACF was fitted with Siegert relation
g( 2) ( ) : ACF
g( 2) ( )  1   exp(2Dq2 )  : 0~1, experimental constant
D : diffusion coeffcient
q : scattering vector magnitude
Diffusion coefficient is determined.
Stokes-Einstein equation
D
kT
6a
k : Boltzmann constant
T : temperature
η: viscosity
a : hydrodynamic radius
Hydrodynamic radius can be calculated.
Result
Incident beam:He-Ne laser(633 nm)
Sample (1)
Naphthalene/Acttone/Water = 0.040/0.637/0.323
Sample (2)
Naphthalene/Acttone/Water = 0.013/0.523/0.464
Sample (1)
(1)
(2)
Time(sec)
Particle is monodisperse during each measurement.
The diffusion coefficient of the naphthalene nanocrystal decreased with time.
Growing process of naphthalene nanocrystals is pursued
ΔGc ΔG
Summary and assignment
0
Using DLS, time-evolution of the naphthalene
crystal sizes (~100nm) under supersaturation
could be pursued.
Nc
Ns
In the DLS measurement, nucleation
steps of the crystal cannot be observed
because nucleation occurs faster than
measurement time.
Other method is needed to pursue nucleation
steps.
Pursuing protein nucleation using FCS
“Screening crystallization conditions using
fluorescence correlation spectroscopy”
Maxim E. Kuil et al., Acta Cryst., D58, 1536-1541 (2002)
Supersaturated solution ・・・ High molecular concentration
It is impossible to apply the FCS under high concentration of fluorescent
probe, where fluctuation of fluorescent light is too small.
Small amount of fluorescent labeled proteins are added to the solutions
of unlabeled ones
Possible to pursue nucleus (clusters) using FCS
Labeled protein
Unlabeled protein
Free diffusion
Cluster
Sample
Protein : Lysozyme
Dye for labelling : Cy5 succinimidyl ester
Cy5 labelled proteins were prepared.
(Label ratio : 0.3~1.6 per protein)
Concentration of labelled protein : ~5nM
<Lysozyme crystal>
Cy5-labelled protein is
homogeneously incorporated,
suggesting labeled proteins affect
their crystallization little.
Solubility change of proteins in adding electrolyte
Effect of salting out
Salting out constant :Ks
Ks    
Ωσ:salting out term
Λ :salting in term
Ωσ depends on hydrophobic part of the surface
and increasing rate of surface tension.
Λ is independent of types of electrolyte and their
concentration under high electrolyte concentration.
In case of increase in electrolyte concentration…
Ωσ
Λ
large
not change
Ks becomes large.
Model used for fitting:
t
fi
1 
T  t  M
G(t )  1 
1
e 

 i 1 1  t
N  1 T

 Di
1
1 t
S 2 Di
G(t): fluorescence intensity ACF τt: triplet lifetime
N: number of particles
M: number of fluorescent component
S: structural parameter
T: fraction of fluorophores
in triplet state
fi: fraction in i component
Relationship τD (the average residence time)
and D (diffusion coefficient)
Wxy is the radius of detection volume.
ACF
D 
2
wxy
4D
Diffusion coefficient can be calculated.
Results
Excitation light :
He-Ne laser (633 nm)
Diffusion rate
became slow with
increase in protein
concentration
correlation time t/μs
• Viscosity rise of the solution due to an increase
in the concentration of the protein
• Cluster formation of the protein
Electrolyte concentration dependence (1)
NaCl
crystallizing
1M
0.31M
no NaCl
Hard sphere
model
Diffusion rate became slow and crystallizing occurred
with increasing electrolyte concentration.
When NaCl was added, diffusion rate became slow and
crystallization occurred.
Decrease of the volume for the proteins to move freely
The thickness change of electrical double layer
Protein cluster and/or nucleus formation
From the experimental results
Diffusion rate became slow although protein
concentration was constant.
No NaCl concentration dependence was observed on
diffusion coefficient of lysozyme at low protein
concentration.
Protein cluster and/or nucleus formation was observed
Calculation volume ratio (no NaCl : 1M NaCl )
1 : 2.1
Existing
probability
no NaCl
0.31 M NaCl
1 M NaCl
Critical
nucleus
The result suggests
Diffusion coefficient change of
labeled lysozyme due to nucleation
and/or association of the protein
was pursued using FCS.
ΔGcΔG
Equilibrium shifts to the critical nucleus
0
Nc
Ns
Electrolyte concentration dependence (2) [Control experiment]
(NH4)2SO4
1M
0.2M
no (NH4)2SO4
Hard sphere
model
・ Crystallizing didn’t occur.
・ Diffusion rate is independent of electrolyte concentration.
Summary
Using FCS, the change of diffusion coefficient was
observed when nucleation and/or association of the
protein was occurred.
The number of molecules inside critical nucleus has not been
determined yet.
Direct measurement of molecular
motion will pave the way to
further understandings of
molecular nucleation.