Annual Report 2011 Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. Connecting to the community Susan Lathrop Campbell AM (27.5.1944 – 3.3.2011) We remember Sue with great warmth and respect. Sue was an integral part of the clinical legal education movement for many years and had held the position of Chairperson of Springvale Monash Legal Service for many years. She not only was an active Board member but was prepared to step in as a supervisor or oversee a case file load when staff were absent. Sue provided guidance, mentoring and active involvement in planning, implementing and evaluating the legal service’s operations. Sue also contributed extensively to the Lawyers Practice Manual Victoria as writer and editor. Her skills and knowledge were vast, her willingness to be involved were second to none. The world is now short a beautiful soul and you will truly be missed by the Board, staff, volunteers and many students of SMLS and the editors of the Lawyers Practice Manual Victoria. Statement of Purpose Statement of Purpose 1. S MLS aims to empower and support members of our community to use the law and legal system to protect and advance their rights and broaden their awareness of their responsibilities. 2. S MLS seeks to redress imbalances in access to justice through the provision of legal assistance and information, community legal education and law reform. 3. S MLS aims to develop the confidence, skills and ethics of law students through clinical legal education in a community environment. Goals: 1. To empower and advance the rights of disadvantaged members of the community through access to: (i) legal advice, (ii) representation, (iii) information, and (iv) referral to other community organizations. 2. To highlight systemic disadvantage in society and advocate for the removal of barriers to justice through: (i) building partnerships with those most affected by disadvantage, (ii) working within a community development framework in problem solving, (iii) provision of high quality and accessible community legal education and law reform activities. 3.To in conjunction with the Monash University Law Faculty Clinical Education Program, educate future law graduates through: (i) Provision of supervised practical experience at the legal service – advising clients and conducting casework – community engagement (ii) Provision of education around ethical practice, including understanding disadvantage and client empathy and respect. 4.To support the continuing education and professional practice of Victorian legal practitioners through involvement in the production of the Lawyers Practice Manual (Vic). 5.To administer the legal service in line with the principles of good governance, ensuring adequate funding, meeting all constitutional and funding requirements, and maintaining high levels of staff management, productivity, accountability, and training. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 1 Contents Statement of Purpose and Goals 1 Board, Staff, Students, Volunteers 3 Statistics, Details of Outreach Services & Overview of Cooperative/Collaborative Activities 7 Acknowledgements 10 Chair 11 Farewell to Sue Campbell – a clinical role model 12 Director 13 Legal Practice Manager 14 Administration 16 SMLS/SECASA Joint Legal Clinic 17 Family Violence Program 18 Family Law & Child Support 19 Civil Litigation Advocate 20 Community Development & Law Reform 21 Visioning Justice Project 22 SEMAS 23 Student’s Perspective 24 Volunteers Program 25 Lawyers Practice Manual, Victoria 26 Finances 27 Services Provided 32 2 Board of Directors & Staff Board of Directors Sonia Parisi (Chair) Sue Campbell (Chair**) John O’Sullivan (Treasurer) David Starvaggi Anna Hall Jared Heath Simon Varszeghy Christine Keys Marianne Rose Adrian Evans (Consultant) David Yarrow (Consultant) Monash Law Faculty Advisors Bronwyn Naylor (Vice Chair) Azadeh Dastyari Kathryn James Ross Hyams Non Voting Members Helen Yandell (ED) Margaret Austin (Staff Rep) David Yarrow (Vice Chair)* Adrian Evans* Staff Director Helen Yandell Legal Practice Manager Carolyn Stuart Administration Manager Joan Thong Finance Worker Annette Di Battista** SEMAS Volunteers Jeannette Shopland Mitra Pirouzgar Trang Nguyen Janerose Okello** Anne Garner** Melinda Jackson** Network Administrator (IT) Geerish Joyram Ritesh Foolchand** IT Volunteers Ritesh Foolchand Oliver Lam Yew Fong** Locum Professional Practice Supervisors David Starvaggi Community Development Worker Viviana Cohn Dave Taylor** Family Violence Lawyer Janine Hill-Buxton Community Development Workers – Visioning Justice Project Bec Smith Temar John Daniel Haile-Michael **Vacated 2010-11 Coordinator of Volunteers Jason Saultry Professional Practice Supervisors Margaret Austin Sally Merrie Natasha Booth Civil Litigation Advocate Graham Wells *Retired Administration Officer Diane Roberts Administration Workers Nadia Di Battista Jason Saultry Tom Austin Trang Nguyen Susan Ball** Family Law & Child Support Solicitors Alicia de Pedro Malvina Predecki SMLS/SECASA Joint Legal Clinic Acting Supervisor Janine Hill-Buxton South Eastern Migration Assistance Services (SEMAS) Renuka Senanayake Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 3 Professional Practice Students Clinical Period 3 2010–2011 Clinical Period 1 2011 Clinical Period 2 2011 Law Reform Community Development: Semester 2 2010, Semester 1 2011 Students Include: Jeannie CLARIDGE Shaan BAJWA Frances BERKOWITZ Marco PAGLIARO Emma HEGGIE Jodie DUNN Orly ROTSTEIN Doran YACOBI Amanda BIFFIN Hollie JOHNSTON Emily STUBBS Joseph SWEENEY James NEWTON Katherine LAWFORD Chelsea TRANG Minh Van TRAN Benjamin ENGEL Marcel WODA Ali Kemal BESIROGLU Daniel WEAVERS Thomas HANNA Elise CALDWELL Jenna MCCONNACHIE Shanee KATZ Thomas FALLON Katrina LAM Bradley LIPOW Sophia VLAMIS Sarah LENTHALL Lena LETTAU Andrew THEODOROU Jeremy APPEL Anna MURPHY Marco PAGLIARO Monica DOMAGALA Esther Yan Wah LEUNG Helen SCHNEIDER Julian VIDO Katherine MINOGUE Hannah LINOSSIER Thomas WOLF Albert NG Tze Shin GUAN Jenny KUANG Stephanie WALLACE-ROLLE Tom MCLENNAN Jessica MCKENZIE Josh YU Olga PENEVA-PRAKASH Olivia PELS Vivien BENJAMIN Phoebe TOLICH Ineke DANE Catherine SYMES Sara GRIFFITH Scott HILL Ngan Tan HO Chat (Uditha) THOMAS Clare HUGHES Stephanie KOMESAROFF Justine Lai YUET Solina SAM Thomas SCHNEIDER Paulina Fishman Romaine ABRAHAM Linh Cam DIEP Benjamin CLARK Thea EMETLIS Michelle HOLSMAN Hannah HOWSAM Lucy BOYD Alexandros LAZARIDIS Amanda SHUEN Kate LIGHTFOOT Karly WARNER Winnie TSANG Lachlan SALT Bryn BUTLER Shaun BLACKER Melissa BATEMAN Chen YANG Simon FULLER Stefan ZIBELL Charles MORSHEAD Stephen SILVAPULLE Emily JOHNSTONE 4 Jane BLACK Stephanie KOMESAROFF Marianna PARRY Samantha CAMILLERI Simon ACOTT Amanda THOMPSON SMLS/SECASA Joint Legal Clinic Volunteers Laura CHIPP Advance Professional Practice Students: Fiona MARTIN Hollie JOHNSTON Cameron MYERS Katie MINOGUE Sharynn MOORS Chris SPAIN James BROWN Chris EDWARDS Jessica MALIN Caitlin JAMES Lachlan SMITH Celeste KORAVOS Ali BESIROGLU Emily ARCHER Ebony BOOTH Eyal GRENENDE Amy LEWIS Alina LEIKIN Patricia ATHANASIADIS Margaret AUSTIN In SMLS workroom, supervisor and students at work: Katie McGORIAN Eyal GRENENDE Nida SAJJADI-EMAMI Vacated 2010–2011: Carla FERNANDES Derya SIVA Felicity PURCELL Louisa WANG Sach FERNANDO Vanya ETIMOV Wendy WANG Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 5 SMLS Evening Volunteers John O’SULLIVAN (S) Subashini RANJANAN Stephanie CLANCY Prudence BURRELL (S) Kate LIGHTFOOT Raman BAWA Romina WOLL Raj BHATTACHARYA Thi Mong Thuy LE John LONGO (S) Caitlin JAMES Rebecca HALL Philip XIE Belinda SHEN (S) Paul ALEXANDER Rebekah BESSANT Amy YEAP Jeannie CLARIDGE (DS) Kirk BERENGER Sarah BEREZOWSKI Jane LEONG Shaan BAJWA Daniel OPARE Sarah COLMANET Charles WONG Victor ISLAM Elizabeth HO Inderjeeth DIKSHA Sam SAMARAKOON August BARDA Monireh TABAN Emily JOHNSTONE Bei LI Eliza LOCKHART Dzung NGUYEN Thasha WARSHAPPERU Simon VARSZEGHY (S) Chat THOMAS Nia DAVES (S) Frankey CHUNG Vivek ANAND (DS) Eamon MCERVALE Erol CINAR Natasha VANDERHEYDEN Alice KIM Jared HEATH (S) Grace WONG Chris TWIDALE (S) Sally TYERS Anthony HONG (DS) Jeremy APPEL Marta KOWALCZYK Cathy LI Luciana RAMOS Xinni LIM Cora HODGES Hannah LINOSSIER Sharon HUMPHRIES Augustine STEPHAN Andreanna MOSCHOYIANNI Stefanie LIM Emma NEWNHAM Michelle NGUYEN (S) Yvette MARIE-HAIKAL Natasha BOOTH (S) Winnie TSANG Tiffany DOUGLAS (DS) Michelle FINEBERG Elise CALDWELL Matthew DALY Olga PRAKASH-PENEVA Sam HALL Lachlan SALT Grace KELLY (S) Emily STUBBS Jacqui CAUST (S) Kasia STRUS Carina MOORE (DS) Monica DOMAGALA Ngan HO Sophia VLAMIS Astrid ZECENA Janerose OKELLO Diane NGUYEN Charlie MORSHEAD Nadav PRAWER 6 Vacated 2010-2011: Adam COOKE (S) Alexander ILIC Andrew PINCHIN Avtar KAUR Bill GRIMSHAW (S) Daniel VISSENJOUX Danielle STAWSKI Sarah HOLLOWAY Sarah MATTHEWS Sonia PARISI (S) Stephanie GLOVER Steve PETERSON Tehara JAYASURIYA Uditha BERNARD Zengfei HE (DS) Darren HINDLE Despina BEDOVIAN (S) – Supervisor Elise JAWOROWSKI (DS) – Deputy Supervisor Emily SIMONS Erin CLEARY Evelyn WONG Franceska LEONCIO Hannah WESTBROOK Johnson TRAN Karen KWOK Kathleen CASEY Keat LOW Laura EVANS-MCKENDRY Laura MYER Leanne OLDEN Maria Grace WONG Mariam BOLES Marianne ROSE (S) Michael SEELIG (S) Nancy NGUYEN Natalie WONG Nicholas KONG Pretty GULATI SMLS Statistics – 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 Clients Total number of clients 4440 Legal Advice Total number of legal advices provided 3585 Casework Total Cases opened during period (Open & New) 2421 Non-Casework Projects Community Legal Education 29 Total Cases closed during period 1089 Law Reform 32 Proportion % Top 20 Problem Types in 2010-2011 Motor vehicle accident 7.8 Family or domestic violence order 6.6 Road traffic and motor vehicle regulatory offences 6.6 Divorce 5.9 Family Law Other 3.7 Government/administrative issues relating to fines 3.5 Sexual assault and related offences 3.2 Other civil 2.8 Credit and debt owed by client 2.8 Property Other 2.4 Family or domestic violence 2.2 Other civil contracts 2.2 Child Support Other 2.0 Wills/probate Other 2.0 Wills/probate guardianship/trusteeship 1.9 Motor vehicle property damage 1.9 Motor vehicle Other 1.8 Immigration Refugee/Humanitarian-Offshore 1.6 Employment conditions/entitlements 1.5 Credit and debt collection 1.4 All Other problem types (including Tenancy, Consumer, Discrimination, Minor Crime, Neighbourhood Disputes, complaints against public offices) 36.2 Total Problem Types 100.0 Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 7 Core Service Activities 2010–2011 Type of activities Funding categories Number of advices Number of cases Number of project Civil Litigation Project 73 60 3 Child Support Services 40 86 3 State Project 1 2300 72 240 0 Generalist Services 3392 810 39 2% 11% 31% 23% 33% 54% Male 46% Female 2010–2011 SMLS services sought by age group 2% Under 18 31%18–34 33%35–49 23%50–54 11% Over 65 86% 11% 2010–2011 SMLS services sought by gender 3% 2010–2011 SMLS services sought by population by Income Scale 86% Low 11%Medium 3%High 8 Details of Outreach Services Springvale Community Aid and Advice Bureau (SCAAB) Youthlinks SMLS Staff and students attend the Noble Park offices of Youthlinks weekly in order to engage directly with young people enabling a better understanding of issues affecting young people. Magistrates Court Dandenong SMLS provides a lawyer to work as Duty Lawyer one day a week at the court as part of the Family Violence Program. We also contribute to the Court Users network, comprising representatives of all the services involved in family violence work, including Magistrates and court staff, Victoria Legal Aid and other Community Legal Centre lawyers, Relationships Australia, WAYSS, Court Network and Victoria Police. Overview of Cooperative/ Collaborative activities SCAAB and SMLS have co-located for 38 years and continue to collaborate on a daily basis to ensure clients receive a holistic service. We are involved in partnership activities including the operating of the South Eastern Migration Advice Service (SEMAS). This service provides advice and assistance to refugee and humanitarian entrants to Australia seeking assistance under the Special Humanitarian program. SMLS works in partnership with the Monash University Law Faculty and Monash Oakleigh Legal Service to provide a Clinical Legal Education program for law students. This involves working directly with up to 81 Professional Practice students, 12 Advanced Professional Practice students and 24 Law Reform and Community Development students each year, through the seminar program and placement activities. Western Suburbs Legal Service, Fitzroy Legal Service and SMLS have continued to collaborate on the follow up to the Racism Project. Thanks to a grant from the Legal Services Board grants program we have been able to work on the Visioning Justice project, details of which are included in the report. The South Eastern Centre Against Sexual Assault SECASA and SMLS continue to run the Joint Legal Clinic for victims of sexual assault. City of Greater Dandenong have provided ongoing support with accommodation and maintenance. In addition we work collaboratively through a range of networks including the Southern Region Youth Advisory Network and the Multicultural Youth Advisory Group. SMLS is an active member of the Federation of Community Legal Centres, contributing as a member of the Committee of Management as well as membership of various working groups including the Violence Against Women and Children; Civil Law; Older Persons; Child Protection; Community Legal Education workers and Infringements working groups. One staff member is a regular participant at the newly formed Taxi Driver Legal Service operated at Footscray Community Legal Centre. SMLS was the lead member of a Consortium of services, formed to assist Unaccompanied Humanitarian Minors (UHM) who are living in this community. The Consortium includes staff from SCAAB, VLA, VLAF, PILCH, Foundation House and DHS Refugee Minor Program. SMLS is an active member of various Victorian Legal Assistance Forum working groups. VLAF aims to bring members of the legal professional and community agencies together to advocate for improved and coordinated services to marginalised members of the community. Corner Partnership exists to look at the needs of services and communities who are located at 5 Osborne Avenue in Springvale. This includes SCAAB, the Springvale Neighbourhood House and the Springvale Learning and Activity Centre. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 9 Acknowledgements Staff of Law Faculty Monash University for ongoing commitment to Clinical Programs which assist marginalised members of the community. Staff and Committees of Management of our partner organisations at 5 Osborne Avenue, Springvale Community Aid and Advice Bureau (SCAAB), Springvale Neighbourhood House (SNH), and Springvale Learning and Activities Centre (SLAC). Management and Staff of the City of Greater Dandenong for their support, advice and service in attending to SMLS’ requests. Dean of the Law Faculty, Arie Freiberg, and Faculty staff, Dr Bronwyn Naylor, Dr Becky Batagol, and Ross Hyams as well as Professor Gregory Reinhardt of Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration for volunteering their time as guest speakers for the Law Reform and Community Development Unit (LRCD). Inala Cooper of Indigenous Advisory Council, Daniel Leighton of Inclusion Melbourne, Kelly Hinton of Project Respect, and Vrinda Eden of Dandenong Psychiatric Hospital. Priscilla Jamieson of RILC, May Farah of New Hope Foundation, Catherine Burnett, Sanjai Kissus and Browyn Sarantoulia of Refugee Minor Program, Eric Brunett, and Dr. Jeanette Shopland for their assistance in our SEMAS Program. Magistrate Peter Power, Loy Kop, Denis Nelthorpe and James Farell and the Tenants Union for assisting in the Professional Practice seminar program. 10 Magistrates Lesley Fleming and Pauline Spencer, Senior Registrar Mark McCutchan, Counsel David Starvaggi, Peter Schumpeter and Shiva Pillai and Staff of Dandenong Magistrates Court for their assistance in running advocacy workshops for students each clinical period. Peter Horbury and Rini Krouskos of Social Security Rights Victoria, Denis Nelthorpe of Footscray Community Legal Centre, Terry Gorman and Julia Di Giovine of Springvale Community Aid and Advice Bureau. Staff of the Federation of Community Legal Centres for support and assistance. Partners and Staff of Wisewoulds Lawyers for their ongoing Probono partnership. Public Interest Law Clearing House (PILCH) and Vicbar for their Pro bono Counsel assistance. The Professional Practice and LRCD students for their passion, vitality and zeal they bring to the legal service. All SMLS volunteers for their endless enthusiasm and energy in assisting with the Volunteer Program and casework. Chair, SMLS Board Sonia Parisi It is with sadness that I write as Chair, knowing that but for her untimely death earlier this year, Sue Campbell would have the honour of presenting this report. Sue’s contribution to SMLS, and to the education of Victorian lawyers was singular and exceptional. To me, like myriad others, Sue represented many things. She was a teacher, social justice advocate, legal education reformer, wise counsellor, mentor, and friend. She is missed greatly by all who knew her, and our thoughts remain with Mia, Elena and their families. Sue’s influence continues to reach beyond those who passed through the doors of the Monash Law School, and who completed Professional Practice, to the thousands of practitioners who use the Lawyers Practice Manual, and now to every new graduate undertaking legal training in Victoria. Her impact on the practice of law in Victoria is vast and lasting. Sue’s friends in the clinical legal programme, Law Faculty and beyond continue to consider a fitting way to mark her immense contribution to the education of generations of students, and the thousands of clients they have assisted. I look forward to the further development of such a tribute to honour Sue’s decades of involvement, dedication and leadership. Turning to the operation of the legal service to which Sue gave so much, it has been another busy year. Demand for advice services continues to rise, bringing our intake numbers to record-breaking attendances. The last three years in particular have demonstrated a steep increase in need, which shows no signs of abating. SMLS continues to provide great breadth in advice offerings, from the traditional areas of general legal advice, criminal and family matters, to new sessions just begun in employment law, and wills, powers of attorney and guardianship. Our new website not only informs about these services, but also provides a chance for community members to provide their views on how we can continue to shape our services to need. I would like to thank the staff, students and volunteers who through their efforts make the law accessible, despite the challenges that heightened demand and community expectations bring. I also thank Helen and my board colleagues for their leadership and guidance of SMLS. 2013 will mark the 40th anniversary of Law Students from Monash Law Faculty contributing to the legal supports available to the community at Springvale. This will be an important occasion to mark our success to date in the ethical and best-practice training of lawyers. It will also be an opportunity to plan for the future of SMLS so that those who need our support and services will continue to receive them, including the students who benefit greatly from the unique experience that Professional Practice offers. This is clinical legal education at its best – a transformational experience that continues to reverberate for the students throughout their professional lives, whilst assisting and supporting clients and the community. It was the principle to which Sue Campbell devoted so much of her life, and which is our legacy to continue. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 11 Farewell to Sue Campbell – a clinical role model By: Ross Hyams, Convenor – Legal Practice Program “Teaching should be full of ideas instead of stuffed with facts” Author Unknown On 3 March 2011, when Sue Campbell passed away, clinical legal education lost one of its most influential and charismatic leaders. Sue had worked in the clinical program for 24 years as a supervising solicitor, mentor, teacher and convener. It is difficult to imagine what the Monash Law Faculty clinical program would be now, without the dedication and commitment that Sue put into it over her professional life. Sue had also been the Chief Examiner in the foundation law unit then known as Legal Process (now Introduction to Legal Reasoning) for many years and she also inspired countless numbers of students in that role. I considered myself incredibly lucky to work with Sue for almost 20 of her Monash years, but before that, she had been my teacher. I distinctly remember the first time that I ever set eyes on her. It was 3 March 1982 – my very first law lecture in Legal Process. It was a hot day and she came into the lecture theatre, sat on a desk and kicked off her sandals, running the rest of the class in bare feet. She told us “We are going to talk about justice. I don’t care if you studied legal studies at school and I don’t want to hear smart legal argument. We are going to talk about conflict, people’s problems and how they might be resolved”. I remember thinking “This is exactly where I want to be!” I suppose the reality is that she never really stopped being my teacher, as I continually learnt from her throughout our years working together. Like all those who were lucky enough to encounter Sue in their lives, she did not simply teach me facts, but opened my mind to ideas, theories, speculation and most importantly, endless possibilities. Sue always taught by example – in her supervisory work at the Legal Services and her Editorship of the Lawyers’ Practice Manual she really ‘walked the walk’ rather than just talking the talk. She was one of those teachers who inspired generations of students by her unwavering commitment to social justice, her ability to explain complex concepts of law in the most logical and simplest of fashions and her enthusiasm for challenging her students with ideas not only about what the law is and how it works, but how it could be. In 2007, her work was publically acknowledged by her being honoured as a Member of the Order of Australia for “Services to the law, particularly through the development of clinical legal education in Australia and community legal services in Victoria”. In typical Sue Campbell fashion she was selfdeprecating and unassuming in her acceptance of acclaim from her peers for this remarkable achievement. 12 If students were lucky enough (as I was) they would encounter her as a first year lecturer and then, if they undertook Professional Practice some years later, she would cap off their law school experience at one the Legal Services. Her influence on generations of students whom she taught either at the commencement or end of their law studies (or both) is inestimable. In her role as Chairperson of SMLS, in her legal service casework and her mentoring of students, she always demonstrated a deep commitment to issues of social justice. This was evident in the way she discussed the clients’ problems with her students. Clients were never “matters” or “cases” to Sue, but always real people with problems to be resolved which required empathy, delicacy, care and commitment. She tried to inculcate this in her students, not by brow-beating them or sermonising, but simply by personal example. She deeply cared for the concept of a ‘fair go’ for her legal service clients and modelled this in her professionalism and ethic of care. She was a role model in the way she inculcated a sense of professional responsibility in her students, attempting to teach them both compassion and tolerance, and like the much loved Atticus Finch of “To Kill a Mockingbird” fame, inviting them to climb inside a person’s skin and walk around in it, in order to understand another’s perspective. She treated everybody with respect and was brave, courageous and wise. She was an avid believer in the role of the legal system as the great leveller of society. In many ways, she was the ultimate model of legal professional responsibility. Not only was Sue instrumental in her contribution to the clinical program and to SMLS particularly in its early pioneering years, but she was crucial in the ongoing development and advancement of the program. Most importantly, she had both the vision and the pragmatism to ensure that the clinical team’s plans could actually work. I can remember many clinical teachers’ meetings in which we would all “possibility think” of the wonderful new programs or projects which we envisaged for the clinics – Sue would always be able to support our vision with practicalities of the “Right – so if we’re going to do that, how many pencils will we need?” type. SMLS, clinical legal education and the legal service world owes much to Sue Campbell. Her influence on the life of students, colleagues and clients over her many years of leadership is beyond measure. Her memory will always be a blessing. Director’s Report Helen Yandell As in all aspects of life, this year at SMLS has had its highs and lows, new developments and frustrations. I would also like to acknowledge the contribution of Sue Campbell from both a personal level and on behalf of the organization. Sue was not only the Chairperson of the organization but my mentor and sage. She was always available to discuss the big picture developments as well as the minutiae of day to day operations, staff management and policy review. Her death has resulted in a void that has been difficult to fill. Thanks to Sonia Parisi for taking over as the Chairperson of the Board, to Chris Keys and Anna Hall who continue the important policy review work and to Board members in general who have ensured the legal service continues its very important work within the community. As explained, the need for legal services in this community has continued to rise. Staff and Volunteers have risen to this challenge by reviewing and implementing programs to meet this need. I would like to thank Joan Thong and Carol Stuart as the Management Team who manage staff and programs to ensure the smooth running of the legal service. Through annual planning sessions, all staff are actively involved in proposed changes and that level of involvement is evident with new programs having been implemented. I thank all staff for their committment to the service and the community. We have said goodbye to Dave Taylor, Sue Ball and Ritesh Foolchand, all of whom have contribued a lot to the legal service over many years. In their place we have welcomed Viviana Cohn, Di Roberts, Geerish Joyram and Trang Nguyen. The Clinical Legal Education program has also had its highs and lows with student enrollments fluctuating. This has caused us to reduce client numbers during those periods. Students work very hard when they are with us and many return to volunteer at the night services. We thank them for their contributions. The Law Faculty continues to support the Clinical program and we are working to bring the work of academics and the legal service closer together through joint research and projects. We continue to work towards improvements in our facilities at 5 Osborne Avenue with our partners Springvale Community Aid and Advice Bureau (SCAAB) and the City of Greater Dandenong. SCAAB and SMLS work collaboratively at the level of individual clients as well as broader programs such as migration services and youth services. One the personal level, I spent the first quarter of this year in Vietnam exploring the development of clinical legal education programs in that country. I have been able to return during the year to participate in workshops and conferences as the Law Schools move forward with this initiative. I again thank Carol Stuart who has been prepared to step in as Acting Director that can allow me this involvement, while at the same time ensuring the legal service continues to deliver services in a professional manner. I would like to the think that the need for community legal services would decrease rather than increase, that, as members of the community we could all contribute to our society in meaningful ways and access the legal system when and if needed. I will continue to live in hope. We are also fortunate to have a wonderful team of Volunteers who have picked up a large proportion of the increased client demand. Thanks to the skills of one of the volunteer supervisors, Nia Daves, we have been able to offer speciliast employment law advice once a fortnight. We have also said goodbye to some long term supervisors and many of the student volunteers and we thank them for their contributions. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 13 Legal Practice Manager Report Carolyn Stuart Once again the past year at SMLS has been busy. The work continues to increase in all our areas of practice. Clearly our community has a need for a strong and committed legal practice, law reform campaigns and legal education. Our generalist student clinic remained stable with no changes to our supervisory staff, Margaret Austin, Sally Merrie, Natasha Booth, Helen Yandell and myself. Thanks to all the supervisors for their hard work and dedication to providing the students with the best practical training and the clients with some exceptional outcomes. Obtaining the best possible outcome for the client is what we all work for. This might mean a major win or, for some clients, even a small win can be significant in their lives. We hope the students leave here with an understanding that for some clients, just having a friendly and caring student assist them is of enormous benefit when they have either limited language skills, or limited ability to deal with the complexities of their legal situation. We also thank our colleagues from SCAAB who can also assist with financial counseling, and other services, that can benefit our clients in a crisis. It is often this combined working with the client that can resolve their issues which are not always purely legal. Our other programs also continue to offer valuable but more specialized assistance. Our decision to have all clients attend our drop in sessions for initial advice and possible referral has worked well. We now refer all appropriate clients from weekly case meetings to our family law, child support, migration and civil litigation lawyers for ongoing assistance. This process has worked well over the last year and we will be continuing with it through next year. 14 Our family violence program has become involved in various regional networks and we are adding to our referral contacts all the time. We are trying to build these referrals hoping that we can offer the right referrals to clients at court and help them make the arrangements on the spot, so that they know where to go to get extra help if needed. We know that clients who leave court on the day with nothing to follow up on, find the whole process exhausting and often do not want to retell their stories again and again, so do nothing about getting other help if needed. We now have two Advanced Professional Practice students assisting at court which gives us time to do this extra referral assistance with the clients. Thanks to all our lawyers for their hard work and input over the past year. Thanks also to our admin staff for their cheerful help in managing the admin workload and the endless questions from the three groups of students over the year. Below are three of our success stories, some with larger a financial impact on the particular client than others but all of major importance to the client. Without SMLS’s assistance the clients may have faced payments they could not afford or would not have achieved their rightful outcome Case Study 1. Case study 3. During the year we assisted a client who was persuaded to take over management of several halfway and boarding houses. The real operator of these properties is known to the council and is not able to register any more properties in the region. Our client agreed because he was offered a weekly sum of $70.00 and was keen to supplement his aged pension with the additional weekly income. John* is a Pacific Islander who was working as a trades assistant for a labour hire firm. John was contracted to work at a large local company. Whilst on site, John’s co-worker Chris* used to ‘joke’ with him. These ‘jokes’ took the form of a range of disparaging comments critical of John’s race and family. They included: cannibal, darkie, coconut, monkey, dumb and various other demeaning statements. Jibes were also made against John’s wife and family. The council inspected the properties and our client was fined a total of $72,000 for failing to keep the properties in proper order. We obtained legal aid for the Magistrates Court contest mention and managed to get 11 fines removed. There was a sentencing indication that potentially made pleading on the day an option. Unfortunately the indication and the final sentence were not the same and our client ended up having to pay $19,000 in fines and costs to the council – an impossibility on an aged pension. A conviction was also recorded. We applied to VLA for funding for an appeal but were refused. We approached Diane New who is an experienced County Court barrister for pro bono assistance. Fortunately she agreed to help after just a bit of arm twisting and the final result was a non conviction with a $700.00 fine. Our client still had to save to pay even this amount but has now paid his fine and moved on after a very stressful time. Case study 2. Our client was issued with a ticket infringement notice for travelling on a train without a valid concession card. Our client was unable to provide evidence of concession because their low income health care card had expired and they were awaiting a replacement card from Centrelink. SMLS successfully sought a review of the decision to fine our client on the basis that Centrelink should have provided a temporary card while the new card application was being processed. Our client’s fine was cancelled and an official warning issued instead. John found these racist comments distressing and complained to the site manager (who was employed by host company, not the labour hire firm which employed John). [The host company didn’t take any action to stop the comments] The disparaging comments continued for 2 years and John eventually left the workplace. John wanted to take action about the racist comments. He wanted an apology and compensation. He received some initial advice from his union, but they were conflicted and ended up representing the other party, Chris. John represented himself, bringing a complaint in the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission. The complaint was brought against Chris, the host company and the labour hire company. The Commission urged John to seek legal assistance and he approached Springvale Monash Legal Service who took the case on. We spoke to John and obtained statutory declarations from some of his co-workers who had witnessed the racist comments. At the conciliation, John sought a statement of regret, a statement of service and compensation. After some discussion and the production of the statutory declarations, Chris conceded he had ‘joked’ with John. Eventually, the matter was settled with the labour hire company agreeing to provide $16,000 in compensation and past entitlements, a statement of service and a statement of regret. When agreement was reached, it was clear that the labour hire company regretted and what had happened to John and hugs and handshakes were exchanged. The outcome was a good one for our client. It highlights the need for legal assistance, both advising and advocating for clients, particularly given the complexity of the case with the labour hire arrangements. *Not real names Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 15 Administration Joan Thong, Administration Manager In 2010–2011, our Administration section saw several changes in terms of staff movements and increasing workload. After 17 years at SMLS, Sue Ball, our longest serving Admin Worker left in December 2010. Sue began her career at Monash Law Faculty but moved to Springvale Legal Service (as it was then known) in the early 1990s. Besides her admin role, Sue was also involved in OH&S Committee which spanned the Law Faculty and SMLS as well as SCAAB. To date, she maintains her association with Monash by attending regular social activities with other past Law Faculty staff members. With SMLS, Sue has enjoyed working at SMLS on a casual basis when required. SMLS thanks Sue for her invaluable contribution and ongoing support of SMLS. Ritesh Foolchand, IT Network Administrator worked 9 months at SMLS before gaining full time employment at another organisation. Despite his busy schedule, Ritesh has continued to volunteer with SMLS designing our new website (www.smls.org.au) and intranet. We are very grateful for Ritesh’s significant contribution in time and resources to meet our ever growing demands on new technology. Annette Di Battista, Finance Worker resigned due to an increasing workload from her other work. However, SMLS had retained and contracted her bookkeeping services. As we farewelled our old staff, we also welcomed new ones: Geerish Joyram, Diane Roberts and Trang Nguyen. Geerish Joyram worked as an IT Volunteer at SMLS for 2 years. Today, he assumes the role of IT Network Administrator. Our demands on new technology and the maintenance of IT resources and new telephone system have kept him challenged and extremely busy. Diane Roberts came to SMLS in March 2011 to help out in Admin and was eventually appointed to the position of Administration Officer. Diane has settled in well “like a duck to water”. 16 Trang Nguyen started at SMLS as a Work Placement student in 2008. Since then she had maintained her working relationship with SMLS via her volunteer work with the Migration Program. Due to increasing administrative workload in the Program, Trang was offered a position in July 2010. Apart from the above, the remaining Admin staff include Nadia Di Battista, Tom Austin and Jason Saultry. Administrative work at SMLS not only focuses on tasks such as typing legal letters, filing, archives or liaising with workers; it also demands pro-activeness, synergy, good interpersonal and multi tasking skills in each of our Admin staff. The staff are versatile and adaptable to changes and needs from other workers, students/volunteers or service users/clients. Each day may bring its own challenges and expectations but with proper time management and prioritisation of tasks, efficiency and productivity are achievable. Additionally, to enhance the skills and knowledge of the administrative processes, SMLS encourages its staff to participate in staff training or development courses. Overall, our Admin group is a big family with a strong sense of camaraderie and high staff morale. ‘Working in Admin at SMLS continues to be an exciting opportunity. Dealing with clients from a diverse background and helping them seek justice is an extremely rewarding experience and one that I enjoy greatly.’ Nadia Di Battista SMLS/SECASA Joint Legal Clinic Meghan Butterfield I am very happy to be back on the ground at SMLS after twelve months maternity leave. In July 2010, our family unit increased by one with the safe and enormously happy arrival of our daughter and hence, I bade farewell to the SMLS/SECASA Joint Legal Clinic for a year. Well, not “farewell” so much as “see you soon” for, I feel I will always return to the clinic and will be there until the Director wheels me out of the place when I am old and incontinent. This is my 12th year supervising the clinic and it has been 16 years since I was one of the first intake of SECASA volunteers so you will forgive me if I feel like I am part of the furniture! In my absence, Janine Hill-Buxton very capably managed the clinic. Janine is the supervisor of the Family Violence Clinic at SMLS and has been a long-term volunteer at the SMLS/SECASA Joint Legal Clinic. Janine is a machine! I am quite sure that the woman doesn’t sleep. She has five children, an acre of garden, a menagerie of pets, an elderly mother living with her, 2 other jobs and she still found the time to run the Joint Clinic with an abundance of energy and to mentor and nurture the students and volunteers. I cannot speak highly enough of this woman! In July 2010, three Advanced Professional Practice (APP) students came on board, under the energetic and compassionate tutelage of Janine – Emily Archer, Chris Edwards and Celeste Koravos. I trust that their trimester was educational and memorable and that they derived enjoyment and learning from acting for many victims of sexual assault (and from getting some exceptional results). Obviously, their experiences were positive as all three stayed on as volunteers. Emily and Celeste are still volunteering, a year after they commenced the course. They are both conscientious and delightful volunteers and we are very grateful to have them in our organization. Over Summer 2010/11, Caitlin James and Carina Moore undertook APP with the clinic. Caitlin has remained with us as a volunteer and her commitment is greatly appreciated by the clinic and we hope to see her smiling face within the walls of SMLS for months, if not years, to come. In the first clinical period 2011, Stephanie Wallace-Rolley, Katie Minogue, Hollie Johnston and Chris Spain passed through our doors as APP students. Again, the students acted for numerous victims of sexual assault in applications before the Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal (VOCAT). Some sensational results were obtained and it can only be presumed that the students enjoyed the APP course as three of them, Katie, Hollie and Chris have stayed on as volunteers. Monday nights are busy. I arrive around 1pm so I can do file reviews with the APP students before the volunteers start to turn up after their day jobs and the night session commences. We have a magnificent collection of dedicated volunteers – most of who are there every week. With a staff of 18, all in the one place on Monday nights only, there are not many spare seconds. I have to thank my very patient volunteers from the bottom of my heart. Some nights, if the students have many clients, it is 9 o’clock before I can speak with them and I am very grateful to them for their understanding and tolerance. Luckily, it is a close knit family so that there is lively discussion (and a real sense of camaraderie), while the vollies wait for their name to come up on the faithful post it note stuck on my office door. The files presently involve applications for compensation from VOCAT on behalf of victims of sexual assault. We have enjoyed some fantastic results before the Tribunal, particularly at Frankston. Unfortunately, we are experiencing lengthy delays before the Melbourne Tribunal due to an untenably slow registry. This is disappointing for our clients, many of whom have endured protracted criminal proceedings and hope that the finalisation of their VOCAT application will signify closure of an unhappy chapter in their lives. On a happy note for SMLS, we are attaining generous awards for costs from VOCAT so that our clinic continues to obtain financial reward for the Legal Service. We continue to examine the viability of bringing action under Section 85 of the Sentencing Act in appropriate cases. Section 85 provides the mechanism by which an offender may be ordered to pay compensation to his/her victim as part of his criminal sentence. In order to be viable, an offender must have sufficient assets to satisfy any order that may be attained and herein lies the difficulty in the majority of cases. In some cases, where an offender has significant assets, the Office of Public Prosecutions (OPP) may take out a confiscation order to restrain those assets, making a successful outcome for a victim more likely. However, in my experience, this practice is not consistently followed by the OPP and opportunities to restrain assets are often lost. Hence, VOCAT applications often provide the only realistic recourse available to a victim. In summary, a productive, profitable and educational year has been had at our clinic and I remain in debt to Janine for her strong leadership in my absence. I look forward to another enjoyable and productive year. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 17 Family Violence Program Janine Hill-Buxton With the rise of the incidents of Family Violence in the last year, our program is now being utilized in various ways. The Thursday court day at Dandenong Magistrates Court is a very busy day and the networking that we have been able to establish is now assisting clients getting the necessary advice from various services available both at the court and through the court’s referrals. With the program now becoming an Advanced Professional Practice subject at Monash University, we can now extend the program further. The students are expected to manage up to 10 Victims of Crime Assistance applications as well as attend the Dandenong Magistrates’ Court on Thursdays. This rotates so each student has one on one with the supervisor at the court. Students are also expected to attend as many of the Court Users Meeting, Critical Linkages meeting (WAYSS) and other seminars that arise during to the semester to ensure a well rounded view of the family violence program. SECASA is our primary referral at this stage but we are looking to expand this to the court with the students able to complete applications at the court on Thursdays. This will enable victims a quicker progression through the Victims of Crime Application process. This will also allow for emergency interim award for relocation or security purposes. The program has been extremely busy during the year and there are still many things that need to be completed in regard to the students and to the new referrals systems. This will take probably about half of this year to complete, but from then on it should be a much smoother program. The Family Violence Program can look forward to a year of expanding our networks and assisting victims in more areas than was previously possible. I would particularly like to thank the staff at the Dandenong Magistrates court and the family violence police officers from Victoria Police for supporting our efforts to assist as many victims in this program and ensuring that people receive accurate legal advice when it is most needed. This year we hope to do emergency applications for interim awards for victims at the court on the day the application is made, and assist victims with the intervention order process. We are also in the process of setting up new referrals to services with shorter waiting list that just been established in the area. 1 www.RobertMcLelland.com.au “A Strong Response to Family Violence Bill Consultation” 18 Family Law and Child Support Malvina Predecki Alicia de Pedro This has been an eventful year with proposals by the Federal Government to amend the Howard Government’s Family Law Reforms. The 2006 Amendments focussed on shared parenting. The Family Law Amendment Legislation is currently before the Senate. The Federal Government’s amendments are focussed on giving children more protection. This means that where there is a competition between the principles of shared parenting and safety of the child, the principle of the safety of the child will receive priority. There are also proposed amendments to the definition of family violence. The amendments broaden the definition of family violence to include types of behaviour that include physical behaviours that control or coerce. Throughout the course of the year we have given advice to clients regarding many family law and child support matters including, Parenting matters in the Federal Magistrates Court, Paternity disputes, Change of Assessment Applications, Appeals in the Social Security Tribunal and Departure Order Applications. We have been involved in a range of networks, including the Federation of Community Legal Centres’ Violence Against Women and Children working group, Child Support Stake holder meetings, Child Support Meetings, attended by Community Legal Centre practitioners and Victoria Legal Aid practitioners to discuss case studies, law reform and policy and the Law Institute of Victoria Community Issues Committee, a group of junior practitioners to discuss issues in the community, hold forums and discussion panels as well as fundraise and develop initiatives to promote social justice and tolerance in the community. Attorney General Robert Mc Clelland has said that there was a strong community response and more than 400 submissions were received during the public consultation on the draft Family Violence Amendment Bill.1 This year we have worked in partnership with practitioners from various Community Legal Services and Victoria Legal Aid on law reform about Child Support and Family Violence and reform of paternity presumptions. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 19 Civil Litigation Advocate Graham Wells It’s been another very busy year, in what remains a very rewarding area. Like many of my colleagues, I empathise with the predicaments many of our clients bring. However, there are times when a client’s desperate circumstances can cloud or muddy the objective waters that bring merit or a cause of action. Not getting to close to clients was something Justice Harper remarked on in a recent advocacy seminar at Dandenong Magistrates Court. With seminars like this and CPD training, I am feeling a lot more comfortable as an advocate. Motor Vehicle Accidents (MVA’s) One notable success, involved a client with a mental illness. Her insurer refused to defend her matter, but through persistence and internal review, the insurer realised that they needed to honour the claim. In another concertina motor vehicle matter, we were able to piggyback on the work of a private firm, and then get the insurer of the main wrongdoer, to pay out for our client’s damage. Employment and Discrimination Law We have also picked up increased demand for representation in discrimination and workplace disputes. The two go together. As a result we have had matters both at the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) and the Victorian Equal Opportunity Human Rights and Commission (VEOHRC). These have been a mix of sexual harassment and racial discrimination disputes. 20 Banks and mortgages We have also picked up a number of debt disputes involving one of the large banks. Generally, we have settled these once we have got the parties talking to each other. They have involved clients with little or no English or the presence of mental illness. Tenancy We have had several tenancy matters that have resulted in representation at VCAT. In both instances, good outcomes were obtained for our clients. Costs and Conduct disputes Again these seem to be common with clients who speak little or no English, or who might suffer forms of mental illness. Our representation normally involves investigating the conduct that led to the dispute, and where there is merit, seeking a re-hearing application. These are intrinsically problematic matters, and we have had mixed success. In one extreme matter a small outlying firm litigated against a past elderly client, who lived alone in rental accommodation, for $342.00. Thankfully we were able to settle this matter. Law Reform In addition to writing the occasional submission and some lobbying, I am still convening the Federation Civil Law Working Group. This year we have run several mini conferences on the new Civil Procedure Act 2011, and tenancy for CLC Lawyers. More are planned for the coming year. Community Development and Law Reform Viviana Cohn Having only started working as the Community Development Worker at SMLS five months ago I want to take this opportunity to express my enthusiasm about the work achieved before my arrival! I am keen to continue this work and wish to thank the SMLS community for the warm welcome I have received. Good Community Development practices are designed to give people greater control over the conditions that affect their lives. Community Development principles are concerned with issues of powerlessness and disadvantage and are informed by what the community of interest identifies as relevant. To this end, SMLS has worked with a number of communities this year on a range of issues. Law Reform and Community Development (LRCD) Unit In the first semester of 2011 the LRCD students were involved in the following projects: – Sex Industry issues – In consultation with Kelly Hinton of Project Respect the LRCD students prepared a research report outlining the Swedish Governments approach to regulating the sex industry in Sweden including an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the “Swedish Model” within the Australian context. This project also involved the production of an overview of the Italian Government approach to illegal sex trafficking. – Refugee issues: In consultation with Renuka Senanayake of SEMAS these students undertook an evaluation of Unaccompanied Refugee Minors split family visa applications which informed appeals for reviews of the DIAC decisions. Community Development and Law Reform activities: Further to the LRCD co-ordination work, I have also worked with numerous community organisations throughout the local region on concerns such as Psychiatric Consumer rights; Unaccompanied Refugee Minors support service gaps; “Homeless not voteless” education campaign meetings; Federation of Legal Centres networking dialogues and CALD Youth Inclusion programs with the City of Greater Dandenong. We have submitted recommendations to the Federal Inquiry on Multiculturalism; Review of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act; and participated in the Attorney General Service Provider Consultation Forum. SMLS also hosted a BBQ activity in celebration of Law Week which was well attended by clients and staff, who enjoyed sausages and legal game activities. In summation, the past five months have been both challenging and rewarding. I have had the honour to work with a team of very dedicated workers, volunteers and students as well as interesting members of the local and wider community. I look forward to carrying on the work of my predecessors! – Youth justice issues: In consultation with Denise Goldfinch of Youth Links this student project involved the production of a paper outlining both the history and the regulatory context of police “Stop and Search Powers”. –F amily violence issues: In consultation with the SMLS Family Violence Worker Janine Buxton-Hill and Dr. Bronwyn Naylor tthis work involved evaluating existing research aimed at examining the affectivity of family violence support services, with a mind to further research in the area. – Indigenous reconciliation issues: In consultation with the Monash University Indigenous Advisory Council the students worked on an ongoing project involving the development of a Monash University wide Indigenous Reconciliation Action Plan. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 21 Visioning Justice Project Bec Smith Recent trends in the negative representations of young people (particularly those from diverse backgrounds) in mainstream television, radio and newspapers have deeply impacted young people in our city. These young people have experienced significant alienation stemming from the unnecessary fear evoked in media representations, resulting in intensified police attention and increased involvement with the justice system. These things lead to particularly negative outcomes for vulnerable young people in Melbourne, including experiences of violence, injury and imprisonment. Young people say they are consistently excluded from the media and policy debates about the issues that most deeply affect their day to day lives: debates about policing, use of public space and the details of how the justice system disproportionately disrupts their communities. In the words of an African young person from Melbourne’s west: It’s been [a] rough ride. I honestly thought that coming to Australia I was going to leave, ya know, the entire corrupt, political, civil war ideology of Africa behind me … You have a lot of the people in the community saying, ‘Just make the best, be quiet, if the police hit you on one cheek, turn the other. Let them do whatever they want you to, just behave yourself, we’re gonna get out of here eventually.’ So when I see this, obviously it really destroys my heart. People are running away from Australia because of, ya know, people are saying we’re never gonna be accepted. The police won’t, the politics won’t accept us.1 In an attempt to intervene in this dynamic and to turn this reality around for at least some impacted young people, SMLS has joined forces with 3CR in conducting the Visioning Justice Project. In the first half of 2011 a small group of young people from diverse backgrounds have been working away in 3CR studios on this alternative media project. One of the projects key aims is to get young people’s experiences and opinions onto the airwaves and into the public realm, and to generate a grass roots ‘vision’ of how their communities can engage with criminal justice institutions in a positive and transformative way. Visioning Justice, funded through the Legal Services Board grants program, is a commitment to the young people to find practical solutions to the problems they and many of their peers have faced when involved with the criminal justice system, to listen to and publicise their stories and to work alongside them to create meaningful changes in their interactions with the police and justice system. 1 Project participants have undertaken an 8 week training course to support the development of their radio documentaries. They’ve learned about 3CR, panelling, interviewing, the documentary form, using portable recorders and interviewing. We’ve also had 6 guest speakers to help interrogate and understand the issues and complexities of the justice system and it’s impacts, including legal experts, advocates and activists, a Magistrate and a New and Emerging Communities Liaison Officer from Victoria Police. Visioning Justice seeks to address social disadvantage by the development of sustained working relationships around issues of social justice with diverse young people, and by maintaining a supportive space for these young peoples’ perspectives and analysis in the media and policy arenas. The project is in part an attempt to encourage the justice system to be more responsive to marginalised communities and to generate positive alternative solutions to the structural issues that generate conflict. By gaining skills in radio production and building confidence in voicing their experiences and ideas for dealing with the ongoing conflict, the young people may not only be able to bring about change in their own lives but influence the outcomes of many of their peers. We hope that as a result, these young people experience freedom and the expression of their civil, political and human rights very differently to how they have previously. The radio documentaries will be broadcast and launched in late September and available on the 3CR website. We will produce a CD, which will be distributed to policy makers and community agencies. The documentaries will present a number of policy recommendations from the project participants, including changes to police accountability systems, changes to treatment of young people in public spaces, encouraging mainstream media to put forward their views and present the ‘whole picture’ and acknowledgement of Australia’s history and how it’s informed how our justice system operates and disproportionately affects certain groups. Project participants have greatly enjoyed the training, learning about the legal system as well as radio production. They have been extremely generous in putting forward their views and really value the opportunity to have their voices on the airwaves. They are also really keen to present their documentaries to decision makers, especially in the Department of Justice, the Police, and the Courts. Please tune in and listen up for the Visioning Justice radio documentaries coming to you soon on 3CR and the SMLS website. mith & Reside, Boys You Wanna Give Me Some Action? Interventions into policing of racialised communities in Melbourne (2010) S www.fitzroy-legal.org.au/cb_pages/files/LegalAid_RacialAdol_FA2.pdf 22 SEMAS South Eastern Migration Advice Service Renuka Senanayake During the period under review, the effective delivery of the program’s services was affected by two significant factors – constraints on funding and procedural and policy changes along with unprecedented delays in processing visa applications under the Special Humanitarian Program by the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC). The program continued with funding assistance from SMLS and a limited grant under the Settlement Grants Program received by SCAAB to assist persons of Afghan origin. As a result, the program’s work was limited to assisting unaccompanied minors and a few vulnerable members of the community. The program was unable to extend its services to members of the public eligible for Settlement Grants Program assistance as provided in the past. Numerous changes in policy and procedures brought to the processing of humanitarian visa applications and the unprecedented delays meant that much of the program’s resources were diverted to advocate for our clients, ensuring that applications lodged on behalf of them – most of whom were young persons – continued to contain relevant information. In particular, the withdrawal of priority processing accorded to applications made by minors for family re-unification coupled with the decision by DIAC not to process applications on split family grounds once a young person turned 18 has adversely affected our clients, resulting in many visa refusals. These changes and decisions placed a considerable burden on the service’s ability to assist new clients. Advocacy/Law Reform As a member of the Consortium on the Unaccompanied Humanitarian Minors Law Access Project, SEMAS along with Foundation House, Department of Human Services, Flemington Kensington Legal Service and Victoria Legal Aid ensured that unaccompanied minors had access to migration advice and assistance. The Consortium also advocated for funding for legal and migration services to assist unaccompanied minors. One of our young clients, whose application to be re-united with his mother was refused in December last year, wished to challenge this decision. SEMAS with assistance from Victoria Legal Aid and Barrister Lisa Ferrari assisted this young person to challenge DIAC’s decision not to process these applications on split family grounds once the young person turns 18 in the High Court, known as M10. With assistance from Russell Kennedy Pty Ltd we are assisting a further 6 young persons whose family’s applications were refused to lodge their applications in the High Court pending an outcome in M10 which will be heard on 26 September in Adelaide. During the year many of our humanitarian visa applicants had adverse decisions, often based on arbitrary findings by individual assessing officers. As these clients have no formal rights of review SEMAS has assisted these clients lodge complaints with the Commonwealth Ombudsman. SEMAS contributed to the following reports: –L isten to Children- Child Rights-2011, NGO Report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. –A report ‘The steps to family re-union’ by the Victoria Legal Assistance Forum –R efugee Council of Australia’s submission on future directions and current challenges in Australia’s Refugee and Humanitarian Program. Community Legal Education SEMAS in partnership with New Hope Foundation held information sessions on Refugee and Humanitarian Visas for the Burmese Community and Afghan Community and unaccompanied minors. Appreciations SEMAS wishes to acknowledge the support and assistance extended to the program by Priscilla Jamieson, Catherine Burnett, May Farah, Dana Krause and Krystyna Grinberg and Emma Dunlevie. SEMAS also wishes to acknowledge the invaluable contribution of our administration assistants Nadia Di Battista and Trang Nguyen, Trang who has also been a volunteer during the year. The program would also like to thank our dedicated team of volunteers Dr. Jeanette Shopland and Mitra Pirouzgar. The Program continues to benefit from their assistance and expertise. Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 23 Student’s Perspective Ali Besiroglu In my penultimate year at law school I decided not to apply for a clerkship and instead enrolled myself into the summer clinical unit of Professional Practice at the Springvale Monash Legal Service. As I reflect and compare my experiences to that of my clerk friends, I can unequivocally say that clinical legal education was well worth the opportunity cost. The deficiencies of law school education started to surface within my first week of client interviews. Whilst my lecturers had taught me the substantive and procedural content of the law, I was not taught how to manage the explosion of emotions inextricably linked with clients who came into contact with the justice system. I quickly realised that effective lawyering required more than knowledge of the elements to assault and promissory estoppel, but in fact required a high standard of interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence. Research suggests that a lack of emotional intelligence is endemic within the Australian legal profession, and this is a principal consideration as to why a third of Australian lawyers suffer from depression and anxiety.1 Indeed, new lawyers are expected to have deep level dealings with clients who have a multitude of distressing problems without receiving any training in interpersonal skills. Clinical legal education fills this void by equipping students with emotional skills such as empathic communication, and reflective practice so that ‘the more open we are to our own emotions, the more skilled we will be in reading feelings of others’.2 By far the most perplexing realisation was the paradox that whilst law school had trained me to think like a lawyer, the profession actually demanded that I think outside the legal mindset. Working at a community legal centre taught me that client legal issues are often the effect of greater underlying non-legal causes, and by failing to address these underlying causes, legal issues continue to surface. I learnt to appreciate that when a client entered the interview room, I was presented with the opportunity of holistic intervention and I was encouraged to take the extra step of facilitating appointments with other crucial services. Any law student who believes that a clerkship alone is sufficient practical training is missing out on an invaluable learning opportunity. Clinical legal education at a community legal centre will not only teach you the practicalities of lawyering, but more importantly, will challenge your core values, emotions, and motivations to create a grounded and stronger professional self. 1 elk et al, Courting the Blues: Attitudes Towards Depression in Australian Law Students and Legal Practitioners (University of Sydney, 2009) <online> at 26 July K 2011, or click here for summary. 2 J ames ‘Seeing Things As We Are. Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Legal Education’ (2005) 8 IJCLE 124; Goleman, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ (1995) 96. 24 Volunteers Program Jason Saultry The past year has seen a high demand for the evening drop-in service. This has taken place in the face of a reduced number of supervisors, meaning that the remaining supervisors have had to work very hard to meet demand. Regardless, they – along with our exceptionally dedicated receptionists and caseworkers – have done another stellar job over the past 12 months. A volunteer appreciation evening will be held in September. It’s time to do away with the mental challenge of previous evenings; no longer will there be a quiz. It’s now time to get physical! As such, there will be a ten pin bowling night. The outgoing volunteer coordinator will make a return to say goodbye, and any volunteer rivalries can be worked out in the lanes and gutters. It’s been inspiring to watch the talented, committed volunteers over the last three years. May the volunteer program continue to prosper and serve the people of Springvale for many years to come. We welcome applications to volunteer as a receptionist, case-worker or supervisor for the night sessions. Likewise, we are able to receive applications to become a volunteer SEMAS/SMLS/SECASA Joint Legal Clinic caseworker. Volunteer applications are welcome at anytime. For more information, please contact the Coordinator of Volunteers by emailing [email protected] Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 25 Lawyers Practice Manual Victoria This has been a very successful year for the LPM with sales increasing. The Editorial Committee has seen some changes. We are saddened by the loss of Sue Campbell as she was a founding member of the LPM and has provided a great deal of input over the years. Many of the committee meetings were held in Sue’s home. Sandy McCullough as the Editorial Coordinator has kept us focused as we move forward. Current editors include Adrian Evans, Mary Anne Noone, Mia Campbell, Rachel Jones, Ross Hyams, Perry Wood, Rob Cortina, Paul McClure, Bernard Welch and Helen Yandell. We bade farewell to Judith Dickson who had contributed greatly over the years. There have been numerous changes to laws so we have been busy keeping the chapters up to date. We thank all those contributors who do this work voluntarily. The highlight for this year was the 25th anniversary of the LPM, held at the offices of DLA Phillips Fox. A Q & A style panel comprising of Sue Campbell, Simon Smith, Guy Powles and Maureen Tehan were moderated by Neil Rees and told the story of the LPM from its commencement to the current day. Many of the contributors and editors over the years attended and a great night was had by all. 26 Finances Annette Di Battista Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. gratefully acknowledges the following organisations for their funding during 2010–2011: Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 27 Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. Statement of Financial Performance for the year ended 30 June 2011 Jul 2010 - Jun 2011 Jul 2009 - Jun 2010 Ordinary Income/Expense Income Community Leg Serv Proj Funding Fundraising/Donations Interest Received LPM Royalties Other Grants 497,631.00 544,364.33 1,041.62 2,612.74 27,016.66 21,318.75 71,661.25 56,812.25 458,277.69 356,798.30 SMLS/SECASA Costs Recovered 37,552.34 33,185.98 Sundry Income 10,180.47 16,126.87 1,103,361.03 1,031,219.22 Total Income Expense Capital Equip - Losses on Disposal Client Disbursements Communications 622.29 9,782.16 5,432.53 14,742.87 8,818.82 Editorial Work 39,020.69 40,289.34 Finance and Accounting Fees 14,976.64 7,449.49 2,893.94 2,919.74 Interpreters Library Resources Subscriptions Minor Equipment Purchase 180.00 299.00 13,328.89 12,490.88 3,272.95 3,438.95 Office Overheads 26,382.93 16,582.55 Other Premises Costs 60,914.61 36,694.09 Programming & Planning 1,202.14 2,613.18 Repairs and Maintenance 42,080.90 28,960.19 Staff Recruitment 1,178.14 360.00 Staff Training 8,856.95 4,708.43 809,723.94 765,596.06 5,142.55 3,461.34 Staffing Costs Sundry Expenses Travel Total Expense 28 0.00 817.21 Depreciation Charge Insurance Net Income 2,815.02 978.52 1,281.88 1,058,291.05 942,018.76 45,069.98 89,200.46 Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. Statement of Financial Position As of June 30, 2011 Jun 30, 2011 Jun 30, 2010 ASSETS Current Assets Chequing/Savings NAB Business Cash Maximiser A/c 306,557.19 599,934.32 NAB Term Deposit 56-554-4179 500,000.00 5,000.00 Petty Cash 104.15 374.15 Petty Cash - S McCullough 100.00 100.00 SMLS Cheque A/C 3,546.04 822.39 0.00 3,989.00 810,307.38 610,219.86 Accounts Receivable 389.70 4,430.36 Other Current Assets - SMLS Trust A/C 165.43 205.01 810,862.51 614,855.23 -25,609.50 -74,289.62 28,038.00 77,975.60 2,428.50 3,685.98 -25,847.72 -14,571.83 SMLS Management A/C Total Chequing/Savings Total Current Assets Fixed Assets Office Furn. & Equip. - CLSP Accumulated Depreciation At Cost Total Office Furn. & Equip. - CLSP Office Furniture & Equip - SMLS Accumulated Depreciation At Cost Total Office Furniture & Equip - SMLS Total Fixed Assets TOTAL ASSETS 84,671.48 51,462.39 58,823.76 36,890.56 61,252.26 40,576.54 872,114.77 655,431.77 16,589.24 13,033.54 629.16 191.95 LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Accounts Payable Credit Cards - NAB Business Visa Other Current Liabilities Grants Received In Advance Legal Services Board Monash Uni Total Grants Received In Advance Net GST Collected 77,274.54 0.00 144,810.02 106,206.80 222,084.56 106,206.80 13,215.81 12,191.99 Payroll Clearing Accounts PAYG Superannuation Total Payroll Clearing Accounts 7,986.33 9,577.32 10,632.17 11,477.71 18,618.50 21,055.03 Salary and Wage Accruals Provision - Annual Leave 40,017.34 46,184.99 Provision - Long Service Leave 24,324.74 19,276.78 Provision - Maternity Leave 41,668.48 47,393.73 Provision - Sick Leave 25,000.00 25,000.00 Total Salary and Wage Accruals 131,010.56 137,855.50 Sundry Creditors and Accruals Provision for Outreach Provision Repairs & Maintenance Total Sundry Creditors and Accruals Total Other Current Liabilities 20,000.00 70,000.00 30,000.00 90,000.00 30,000.00 474,929.43 307,309.32 492,147.83 320,534.81 TOTAL LIABILITIES 492,147.83 320,534.81 NET ASSETS 379,966.94 334,896.96 334,896.96 245,696.50 45,069.98 89,200.46 379,966.94 334,896.96 Total Current Liabilities EQUITY Retained Earnings Net Income TOTAL EQUITY Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 29 Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. Statement of Cash Flows As of 30 June 2011 Jun 30, 2011 Jun 30, 2010 1,071,786.45 851,500.93 143,411.68 127,763.36 Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from Grants Receipts from Clients, Income Generating Activities and Other Receipts Payments to Suppliers and Employees Net Cash used in Operating Activities (985,037.48) (863,563.88) 230,160.65 115,700.41 Cash Flows from Investing Activities Proceeds from Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment 2,815.02 Payment for Property, Plant and Equipment Net Cash used in Investing Activities Cash Flows from Financing Activities Increase (Decrease) in Loans Net Cash provided by Financing Activities - (16,728.51) 29,372.99 (13,913.49) 29,372.99 - - - - Net increase in Cash Held 216,247.16 145,073.40 Cash at the Beginning of the Reporting Period 610,219.86 519,352.02 Cash at the End of the Reporting Period 826,467.02 664,425.42 Reconciliation Of Cash Petty Cash Advance Cash at Bank and on hand 204.15 474.15 810,103.23 609,745.71 810,307.38 610,219.86 45,069.98 89,200.46 Reconciliation of Net Cash used in Operating Activities to Operating Result Operating Result Loss (Profit) on Disposal of Assets 2,815.02 Depreciation 14,742.87 Decrease (Increase) in Trust A/c (39.58) 8,818.82 23.02 Decrease (Increase) in Interest Accrued - - Decrease (Increase) in Prepaid Expenses - - Decrease (Increase) in Disbursements & Costs due - Decrease (Increase) in Sundry Debtors (4,040.66) Increase on Hand Increase (Decrease) (Decrease) in in Stock Accounts Payable, Creditors and Accruals - Increase (Decrease) in Grants Received in Advance Increase (Decrease) in Staff Leave Provisions OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT MOVEMENT: Balance at 1 July 2010 (2,293.23) - 62,580.20 28,287.83 115,877.76 (49,661.70) 230,160.65 115,700.41 (6,844.94) Net Cash used in Operating Activities 41,325.21 CLSP SMLS TOTAL 40,576.54 3,685.98 36,890.56 Additions 0.00 38,233.61 38,233.61 Disposals 49,937.60 2,209.50 52,147.10 -49,937.60 -5,024.52 -54,962.12 -1,257.48 2,428.50 -13,485.39 58,823.76 -14,742.87 61,252.26 Write down in value of assets Depreciation expense Balance at 30 June 2011 30 - Auditor’s Report AUDITOR’S REPORT AUDITOR’S REPORT The accompanying Financial Statements, comprising a Statement of Financial Performance, Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Cash Flow of SPRINGVALE MONASH LEGAL SERVICE INC. have been audited in accordance with Australian Audit Standards. In my opinion the financial statements present fairly with the financial position of SPRINGVALE MONASH LEGAL SERVICE INC. at 30 June 2011 and the results of its operations for the period ended on that date. Signed………………………………………… Date 4 October 2011 DONALD K ALKEMADE Registered Company Auditor 8040 ALKEMADE & ASSOCIATES Springvale Monash Legal Service Inc. | Annual Report 2011 31 Services Provided Generalist Legal Advice and Support Family Law and Child Support Advocacy Civil Litigation Advocacy Migration Advice and Support Victims of Crime Assistance (Sexual Assault) Advocacy Victims of Crime Assistance (Family Violence) Advocacy Community Development Community Legal Education Advocacy for Law Reform Reg: A0013997D ABN 96 206 448 228 5 Osborne Avenue Springvale VICTORIA 3171 (Mailing Address: PO Box 312 Springvale, VICTORIA 3171) Telephone: (03) 9545 7400 Facsimile: (03) 9562 4534 Email: [email protected] Website: www.smls.org.au Hours of Operation 9:00am – 5:00pm Monday to Friday 6:00pm – 8:30pm Monday to Thursday Client Intake Session Appointment Only Session 1:30pm – 3:30pmFriday Drop In Sessions 9:30am –12:30pmMonday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Friday 6:00pm – 7:30pmMonday 7:00pm – 8:30pmTuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday 32 Snapshots of events held in 2010–2011 Celebrating 100th Anniversary International Women’s Day March 2011 Jane Stanley, Executive Officer of The Council of Single Mothers and Their Children (CSMC) was our Guest Speaker at this celebration. Cultural Diversity Day Event March 2011 Prof Prac students, Sophia and Winnie at the SMLS stall at the event. It was a joyous and vibrant occasion showcasing numerous cultures’ traditions. Law Week Celebration BBQ May 2011 Carolyn Stuart and Margaret Austin fired up the barbeque. The event was thoroughly enjoyed by all staff, students, clients and members of the community.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc