Massive Star Astrophysics with MCSF Dominik J. Bomans, Alexander Becker, & Kerstin Weis Astronomical Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum and Research Department “Plasmas with complex interactions” of the Ruhr-University Bochum Colosimo Unfortunately for funding , it is not Stellar Astrophysics with MSFC (the Manchester City Football Club) MC S F but the Magellanic Clouds Massive Stars and Feedback survey Power of “complete” datasets But how complete are we? For example: how complete is our census of Wolf-Rayet star in the Magellanic Clouds? Hainich et al. 2014 Why another MC survey ? DPOSS etc.: photographic, no narrow band SHS (Parker et al. 2005): photographic, only H and SR 2MASS (Cutrie et al. 2012): only NIR, no narrow band Spitzer (Gordon et al. 2011): MIR MCPS (Zaritsky et al. 1999) : problems at brightest stars, no narrow band data OGLE (Udalski et al. 2008): saturated at ~ -6, no narrow band data (Massey et al. 2002) Not spatially complete, no narrow band MCELS (Smith et al. 1998): narrow band, only 2 (non-standard) broad-band filters → niche for complete, multi band (broad and narrow) optical survey What is MCSF ? MCSF: Magellanic Clouds massive Stars and their Feedback survey u, B, V, R, I, H, [OIII], [SII] imaging of both LMC and SMC Complete coverage spatially (LMC ~ 8̊ x 8̊ SMC ~4.5̊x 2.5̊) and in brightness (currently down to MB ~ 0) → spatial resolution and depth comparable to HST data of Local Group galaxies RoBoTT @ Cerro Armazones Robotic Bochum Telescope = RoBoTT 2x 150mm refractor on common mount FOV each:: 2̊42' x 2̊42' on 4096^2 CCD Pixelscale 2.37”/pix Fields LMC (B,V,R) SMC (B,R,Hα) LMC N11 MCSF data example (Hα): The superbubble/starforming complex N11 In the LMC Data reduction LMC: 9 fields, SMC: 2 fields of 4096^2 pixels Even brightest LMC stars not saturated on short exposure frames Many frames, of several integration times → similar to Multi-CCD Cameras Uses THELI Pipeline (Erben et al. 2005), version 2012 →accuate astrometry, correction for distortions, excellent flat-fielding, correction for residual pixel to pixel variations, and mosaicking Drizzling to new pixel scale of 1” Different dataproducts generated: - deep - shallow - individual epochs Automated photometry with modfied DoPhot (Alonso-Garcia et al. 2012) - spatial variable PSF possible - artificial star experiments for completeness and photometric error estimates Hess Diagram LMC 1.9 106 stars Hess Diagram SMC 0.5 106 stars Emissionline Stars red = SMC blue = LMC increasing fractition of emission line stars with mass Oe / Be stars red = SMC blue = LMC Higher Be content in SMC Increase towards lower luminosity SMC/LMC ratio roughly constant In B star regime Value of ratio consistent with Iqbal & Keller 2013 But ow compared to e.g. Martayan et al. 2010 O9.5V B0V Current MCSF catalog contains ~500 Be stars In the SMC and ~670 Be stars in the LMC CMD to HRD with astro-informatics Clean CMD from foreground stars Match database with UV (GALEX, SWIFT), NIR, MIR (Spitzer) Estimate spectral class from SED with maschine learning techniques (train algorithm with (many) stars of known classification) → 80000 stars with approximate “spectral” type 98% of training set recovered Still residuals due to incomplete photometry and fragmentary training set Resulting HRD of SMC Overplotted: Geneva tracks with rotation (Georgy et al. 2013) Search of WR stars Again via astro-informaticts: Create training set with spectral Classification and use UV-IR Multi-band photometry MCSF CMDs of LMC (up) and SMC (right) training sample with spectral classification New early O and WR candidates Probability distribution for all stars to be part of each trained category (e.g. LMC) Candidates for new hot supergiants in the LMC with stellar tracks (60 M⊙, 40 M⊙, 30 M⊙) with rotation (Meynet & Maeder. 2004) Doing okay? Compare with new WR stars from Massey et al. (2014) Check currently limited To B < 16 mag in LMC and B < 17 mag in SMC ID Massey MCSF LMC143-1 WN3 + O8-9III WR LMC173-1 WN3 + O7.5V Be SMC159-2 O8f?p B1/5III LMC156-1 O6If O4V((f)) LMC164-2 O8f?p WN4.5 LMC173-2 O7.5Iaf O9.7Ia LMC174-4 O4Ifc A1Iab LMC174.5 B[e]+WN? Be Waiting for ESO about follow-up spectroscopy proprosal for 150 candidates. Luminous Variables in the SMC HD 5980 AzV 320 To do … Improve foreground cleaning add more UV photometry upgrade NIR from 2MASS to VMC (Cioni et al. 2011) update spectral classification database Investigate binary evolution at highest mass bins IMF and Lyman continuum flux analysis in superbubbles Diffuse ionized gas and link to X-rays ... …. and work on the archive …. MCSF Archive http://www.astro.rub.de/Astronomie/MCSF Just started, currently some technical info, pretty pictures, and CMDs It will contain full photometry, cross-match with NIR, MIR, and UV, and images... First subsets of the in photometry in fall. ... Alexander has to work on papers for his thesis, too.... If you need some data urgently, please contact us... Image: Ch. Malin
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc