Proposal for a special issue in European Physical Education Review 20 May 2014 Student learning through interaction in physical education Special issue guest editors: Dean Barker, Gothenburg University, Sweden Tristan Wallhead, University of Wyoming, United States Mikael Quennerstedt, Örebro University, Sweden Over the last 50 years, constructivist ideas have shaped educational practices and educational science profoundly. Amongst other things, constructivist thinking suggests that (1) learning involves the construction of meaning and, (2) individuals construct meaning during interactions with others – this is one way in which the process of learning can be thought of as social (Rovegno & Dolly, 2006). In physical education, this thinking is reflected in contemporary student-centered pedagogical models such as Teaching Games for Understanding, Sport Education and Cooperative Learning (Casey & Dyson, 2012). Indeed, the idea that students learn while interacting and that teachers should take on ‘less directive and more facilitative’ roles (Kirk & Kinchin, 2003, p. 229) appears to underpin many PE practices. Despite the assumed centrality of student interactions to learning in PE, the topic has received relatively little scholarly attention. The work of Lafont and colleagues (Darnis-Paraboschi, Lafont, & Menaut, 2005; Ensergueix & Lafont, 2010; Lafont, Proeres, & Vallet, 2007) constitutes one of the most sustained attempts to understand interactive learning in PE. Lafont and colleagues have examined conversations, interactive dynamics and speaking turns occurring in PE settings and have provided important insights into group work and co-constructive activities. A didactique framework (Amade-Escot, 2006) has also proven fruitful, with its focus on the irreducible triad of teacher, student and content while examining the evolution of the content actually learned within peerassisted learning tasks (Hennings, Wallhead & Byra, 2010; Wallhead & O’Sullivan, 2007). Complementing this work, Barker, Quennerstedt, and Annerstedt (2013) have suggested that peerlearners have a key role to play in interactions and that in order to learn in groups, all students must engage in some kind of shared communication. Brock, Rovegno and Oliver (2009) have drawn attention to the role that student status has on the nature of social interactions, suggesting that factors such as athletic involvement, personality and even attractiveness influence how students interact. There are still however important issues to be resolved and explored. How do teachers interact in “less directive and more facilitative” ways in practice? How do interactions shape content development within pedagogical models, such as co-operative learning, where positive interdependence and interpersonal skills are critical to the success of the model? How are the microdynamics of situations affected by social and cultural factors? These kinds of questions constitute the focus of the proposed special issue. Timeline for special issue Confirmation of interest including author and co-authors, approximate research question/topic and working title: 1 July Abstracts submitted to Dean, Tristan and Mikael: 300 words: 1 September 2014 *Abstracts submitted to AIESEP: 300 words: 1 September - 31 December 2014 *Presentation of papers at AIESEP: 8-11 July 2015 Full papers submitted via EPER: 1 August 2015 Papers in review: 1 August – 15 September 2015 Final papers submitted by: 31 October 2015 * For authors interested in presenting in a symposium at the AIESEP international conference in Madrid. Note: symposium abstracts may be due earlier than normal presentation abstracts. References Amade-Escot, C. (2006). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, M. O'Sullivan & D. Macdonald (Eds.), Handbook of research in physical education (pp. 347-365). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Barker, D. M., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2013). Inter-student interactions and student learning in Health and Physical Education: A post-Vygotskian analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2013.868875 Brock, S., Rovegno, I., & Oliver, K. L. (2009). The influence of student status on student interactions and experiences during a sport education unit. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14(4), 355-375. Butler, J. (2006). Curriculum constructions of ability: Enhancing learning through Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) as a curriculum model. Sport, Education and Society, 11(3), 243-258. Casey, A., & Dyson, B. (2012). Cooperative learning in physical education. In B. Dyson & A. Casey (Eds.), Cooperative learning in physical education: A research-based approach (pp. 166-175). London: Routledge. Darnis-Paraboschi, F., Lafont, L., & Menaut, A. (2005). A social-constructivist approach in physical education: Influences of diadic interactions on tactical choices in an instructional team sport setting. European Journal for Psychology of Education, 20(2), 171-184. Ensergueix, P. J., & Lafont, L. (2010). Reciprocal peer tutoring in a physical education setting: influence of peer tutor training and gender on motor performance and self-efficacy outcomes. European journal of psychology of education, 25(2), 222-242. Hennings, J., Wallhead, T. L., & Byra, M. (2010). A didactic analysis of student content learning during the reciprocal style of teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 227-244. Kirk, D., & Kinchin, G. (2003). Situated learning as a theoretical framework for sport education. European Physical Education Review, 9(3), 221-235. Lafont, L., Proeres, M., & Vallet, C. (2007). Cooperative group learning in a team game: Role of verbal exchanges among peers. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 93-113. Rovegno, I., & Dolly, J. P. (2006). Constructivist perspectives on learning. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald & M. O'Sullivan (Eds.), Handbook of physical education (pp. 242-261). London: SAGE. Siedentop, D., Hastie, P., & van der Mars, H. (2011). Complete guide to Sport Education (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Wallhead, T., & O'Sullivan, M. (2007). A didactic analysis of content development during the peer teaching tasks of a sport education season. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 225-243. Ward, P., & Lee, M. (2005). Peer-Assisted Learning in Physical Education: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 205-225.
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc