Request for Proposal on Research Project Ⅰ. Terms of Reference 1. Background ❍ A need to develop sustainable management system for forest resources as well as REDD+ Request for Proposal (RFP) ❍ Agreement for joint project of REDD+ demonstration activity in Kampar peninsula, Riau province, Sumatra Island between Korea and Indonesia Title: Research Service for Acquiring Carbon Credits from REDD+ project . ❍ The goal of the Project is to build a successful sustainable forest management model and establish the foundation to acquire forest carbon credits - Establish a FMU management plan including REDD+ activities and DA to acquire carbon credits - Lead sustainable maintenance after termination of the project Objective ❍ Support to establish Forest Management Plan in TBS (Tasik Besar Serkap) KPH ❍ Complete and register the REDD+ Project Design Document (PDD) in accordance with the VCS (Verified Carbon Standard) Registry System <Korea-Indonesia FMU/REDD+ Joint Project Agreement> ◇ This project wants to bulid Capacity of the Forest Management Unit (FMU/KPH) of Tasik Besar Serkap in Kampar Peninsula to promote reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conservation, the sustainable forest management and enhancement of existing carbon stocks (REDD+) May 2014 Korea-Indonesia FMU/REDD+ Project Management Unit ◇ The goals of the project are capacity building of FMU/KPH, REDD+ implementation, support of carbon reduction mechanism in Korea ◇ In addition, based on the agreement of both Sides, this project is the ‘REDD+ implementation-stage* project’ that implements demonstration activities (DA) related to REDD+ as a part of TBS KPH forest management plan. * Stages of a Project: preparation → implementation → monitoring - 2 - 2. Project Area Overview Service Team Composition ❍ Service team is composed of General and Technical team · General · Technical ❍ Consortium ❍ : completion / registration of PDD : Socio-economic survey and forest inventory & carbon survey : See Bid Notice. Location: Peatland forest in Kampar, Sumatra (14,000ha) ❍ Located inside the Tasik Besar Serkap (TBS) Forest Management Unit (FMU), Kampar ～ peninsula, Riau Province: East Longitude 102˚18’1” ～ 0˚49’22” 102˚52’41”, North Latitude 0˚ 37’41” (Forest Inventory & Carbon Survey) For the work efficiency and professionalism, korean researchers works for analysis team and indonesian researchers / company work for survey team. - Participation of an expert with experience in completing and registering an REDD+ Project Design Document (PDD) - Encourage the PDD to promote biodiversity and the rights of local community & indigenous people Key Tasks ❍ Completion and registration of REDD+ PDD in accordance with the VCS · Analyze the applicable methodology of VCS and complete PDD · Act for the validation and verification process & registration ❍ Socio-economic Survey · Identify the causes of deforestation and forest degradation through socio-economic survey · Develop reduction alternatives by linkage of the prevention of deforestation and forest degradation · Conduct environmental assesment considering the domestic law of Indonesia · Establish a socio-economic database by units of local community ※ REDD+ Project area (Inside the bold red lines, 14,000ha), TBS FMU management area(colored in yellow, 513,276ha) ❍ Forest Inventory and Carbon Survey · Forest resource and biodiversity survey · Analysis on land use and land use change for more than 10 years · Forest carbon sequestration survey in each carbon pool & estimate the forest carbon change for more than 10 years · Set the future Reference Emissions Level for the next 30 years · Develop TBS KPHP monitoring methodology and establish monitoring system · Basic research for the establishment of TBS KPHP FMP Budget and Duration: USD753,000$/ within 20 months from the day of signing the contract (1 year follow-up) - 3 - - 4 - 3. Implementation Plan Description of the Local Envrionment ❍ Ecological Environment ∼ ❍ Conduct the tasks separately by each project (Figure 1) ∼ - Support the establishment of TBS KPH Forest Management Plan: KPH support project - Flat peatland at altitude 10m 30m, depth of peatland is 6m 9m - 49 main tree species including Meranti, Suntai, Kelat, Jangkang, etc. ～ 3 - Diameter at breast height (DBH): 30cm 70cm, total stand volume: 1,550m /2,300 trees, 3 average stand volume: 128m /ha, - Animals species that inhabit in the area include 45 species of mammals, 217 species of birds, and 42 species of reptiles ❍ Legal and Institutional Environment - The project area is a production forest inside TBS FMU (Hutan Produksi Tetap) ※ TBS FMU (513,276ha) is consisted of production forest 95%, limited production forest 0.52%, protected forest 3.67% · According to the REDD+ project scenario, the project area has relatively high ❍ Primarily use the results of socio-economic, forest inventory and carbon survey as basic data for the completion of REDD+ PDD and share on both sides so that the data also can be utilized as the basic data for establishing the TBS KPH Forest Management Unit. ❍ The service team must accompany the KPH staff on the field survey to contribute to the capacity building of KPH - Encourage the KPH to conduct forest inventory survey and management by themselves even after the completion of the Project ❍ Establish the REDD+ project site as the focal area of Indonesia REDD+ research in tropical forests and peatland forests. carbon sequestration due to its high possibility of deforestation compared to other FMUs (protected areas, etc.) - Implementation of REDD+ DA through TBS KPH not necessary to get approval from the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry · However, upon registering the PDD, the approval for REDD+ DA through KPH must be acquired from the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry ❍ Socio-economical Environment - Under the administrative area, the location falls into Sungai Apit district, Siak regency, Riau province, Sumatra island - The total population of Kecamatan Sungai Apit is 25,000 people (15 villages) · Average population: approx. 1,500 people/village, population density: approx. 21people/km2 - Per capital income: Monthly 920,000 IDR (Approx. 100,000 KRW) ❍ Deforestation Status - Primary forest is a protected forest, but the secondary forest is deforested or reforested after logging in the form of artificial plantations - Deforestation is starting to occur around from the area close to industrial plantation area - Various drivers of deforestation are existing such as farming and illegal logging by local residents, and forest fire etc. Figure 1. Service Team Task Flowchart (Figure1) - 5 - - 6 - 4. Scope of Work Socio-economic Survey (Technical Team I) Task Area - The land use and land use change analysis is targeted on Kampar (513,276ha) - The forest inventory and carbon survey based on the field survey is targeted on the REDD+ project area and the local residence area (14,000ha) - The tasks are separated into forest inventory and carbon survey team and analysis team (Figure 1) ❍ Objective - To identify the main drivers of deforestation and forest degradation through the local socio-economic survey - Develop alternatives to reduce the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. · Develop a DA linked to the promotion local development or methods securing the livelihood of local residents, etc. Completion / Registration of PDD (General Team) ❍ Objective - To register the PDD at VCS and establish the foundation for forest carbon credit trading - To make the PDD to promote the rights of the local community & indigenous people, and biodiversity. ❍ Team Composition - Korean / Indonesian Researchers (Universities / Research Institute) ❍ Key Tasks - Identify key drivers of deforestation and forest degradation by socio-economic survey · Analyze the main drivers of deforestation and forest degradation (Conduct literature reviews and interviews on local residents) ❍ Team Composition - Korean consulting company in Indonesia and Indonesian consulting company ❍ Key Tasks - Analyze the applicable methodology of VCS and configurate the implementation plan ·Analyze the REDD+ methodology for the prevention of deforestation of tropical peatland forests ·Analyze the creation format of the Project Design Document (PDD) ·Plan the timeline in establishing the DB with the information obtained from socio-economic, forest inventory, and carbon survey - Act for the validation, verification, and registration process · Select the VVB(Validation, Verification Body) and act for the registration process · Review and modify the PDD in accordance with the verification and validation results of the VVB The verification and validation step is operated at full-scale as a follow-up process after ※ the completion of the Project. · Analyze the correlation between the drivers and the degree of deforestation and forest degradation - Develop alternative reduction methods linked to preventing deforestation and forest degradation · Suggest alternatives for the local economical development and building foundation for the livelihood of local residents (REDD+ DA demand survey, survey on the main source of income of local residents, etc.) - Conduct environmental assesment considering the domestic law of Indonesia. · Check the relative legislation to the environmental assesment for the establishment of PDD and FMU FMP, and conduct the environmental assesment to achieve the REDD+ carbon credits - Establish a socio-economic database by units local community villages · The current residency status, main source of income, etc. · Conduct a survey on the change in local recognition by a comparing and contrasting the - Establish the foundation of the trading of forest carbon credits · Suggest alternatives for the distribution between the countries and the usage of carbon credits after registration · Analyze the status such as relative legislation of Indonesia, international & domestic carbon credit trading market, etc. - Provide consulting on Research Service and the establishment of FMP · Provide consulting on the establishment of FMP so that the information collected for the completion of REDD+ PDD is properly utilized before-after of REDD+ DA implementation - Establish database on social, economic, and humanities information for the completion of PDD · Provide the necessary information in accordance with the PDD creation guidelines analyzed by the PDD creation team · Work together with the PDD creation team (by taking turns) to support the PDD registration · Provide consulting and technical support on the field work of other tasks - 7 - - 8 - Schedule Forest Inventory and Carbon Survey (Technical Team II) ❍ Objective 2014 2015 Contents - To establish the database (DB) on forest inventory and carbon for the creation of PDD - To establish the information and DB on the tropical peatland forest such as carbon sequestration and carbon map ❍ Team Composition 1/4 2/4 3/4 4/4 1/4 2/4 3/4 4/4 ◦Support the establishment of TBS KPH FMP ·Comparative study of outstanding KPH FMP ·Analyze the entire process of FMP approval - Researchers (Universities and research institutes) from both Korea and Indonesia - Consisted of a survey and analysis team for the work efficiency and professionality ❍ Key Tasks [Survey Team] - Forest inventory and biodiversity survey ·Collect forest inventory and carbon stocks from concession holders in TBS ·Making the long-term FMP ◦ The Project to create and register the REDD+ VCS PDD - Announcement and selection of research project team · Establish a survey target area in the REDD+ project area and local residency area - Documentation and registration of VCS REDD+ PDD (The forest inventory survey plots matches the carbon survey plots) · Conduct the forest inventory and biodiversity survey inside the forest inventory survey plots ·Analysis of methodology - Forest damage status survey ·Document 1st Report and Mid-term report of PDD ·Finalization of PDD documenting · Survey on the area of deforestation and forest degradation, forest fire damage, and forest fire prevention - Forest carbon sequestration survey in each carbon pool ·Verification of PDD ※ Follow up performed process:1year full-scale validation will · Establish a forest inventory survey plots in the REDD+ project area and local residency area · Conduct a sample survey for the forest carbon sequestration survey in each carbon pool* ·Review of Professional Advisory Group *carbon pool: above-and below-ground biomass, dead wood, litter and soil ·Collecting data and analysis of survey methods - Establish the permanent plots for the monitoring · Establish a permanent plots around the formal forest inventory survey plots [Analysis Team] - Analysis on land use and land use change for more than 10 years using satellite imagery · Analyze the trends on deforestation and forest degradation through satellite imagery survey · Analyze the carbon and physiochemical change dynamics caused by in water leakage in peatland forests - Estimate the forest carbon sequestration change for more than 10 years · Analyze the carbon samples obtained by forest inventory survey in each carbon pool · Identify the estimate sequestration change through field survey and satellite imagery be -Socio-economic Survey ·Pre-interview and plan for actual survey ·Stakeholder meeting such as FGD ·Develop reduction alternatives by linkage of the prevention of deforestation and forest degradation ·Review of preliminary outcomes by doing several alternative as DA ·Providing income alternatives such as improving local ·Review of Professional Advisory Group -Forest Inventory and Carbon Survey ·Collecting data and analysis of survey methods analysis - Establish a monitoring system ·Educating the survey method including KPH members - Establish the GIS-Based database (DB) ·Satellite imagery analysis(analysis of land use and land use change) ·Field survey and analysis(Sampling for carbon analysis and forest inventory) · Measure the variations in between each forest carbon stock and analyze the correlations of forest carbon and environmental factors · Create the forest inventory and carbon map (GIS-based) · Establish the DB based on the relative research data - 9 - to local people ·Review of Professional Advisory Group ◦ (Workshop, Publication International symposium) - 10 - multinational members such as Korean, Indonesian, etc. 5. Exepcted Outputs The final product is to be delivered as a CD and 30 copies each in the Korean, English, and Indonesian language. (The Final Report must include a summary.) 6. Schedule & Timeline: See Bid Notice. ❍ The outsourcing research team (task performer) must include the detailed contents of each task in the proposal. ❍ Issues not mentioned in the Request for Proposal and Proposal may be discussed frequently between the PMU and the outsourcing research team (task performer), but the opinion of the PMU prevails that of the task performer in cases of disagreement. 7. Requirements General guidelines Changing the Terms of the Tasks and Duration ❍ The outsourcing research team is to serve its contractual obligations in accordance with the research instructions and implementation guidelines to perform and conduct ❍ The PMU hold the rights to press charges against the outsourcing research team (task performer) as a breach of contract under the following conditions: the research project in good faith. ❍ Even if there are changes made to the research project due to unforeseen circumstances of the KI FMU/REDD+ Joint Project Management Unit (hereinafter - If the instructions of the PMU have not been implemented on time without any specific reason. - If the task performer has lost the capacity to complete the project within the referred to as 'PMU'), the outsourcing research team is obligated to follow the instructions of the PMU. ❍ The outsourcing research team is to abide by the relative legislations and procedures in conducting the research project. ❍ The outsourcing research team must follow the instructions of the research supervisor. ❍ In cases that the outsourcing research team is considered unfaithful to the instructions and supervision of the PMU, the PMU may initiate the termination of contract, in which the outsourcing research team is fully responsible for the penalty for breach of contract. ❍ The outsourcing research team must review and ensure the violation of copyrights regarding all external material utilized in the research. Thus, the outsourcing research team is fully responsible for all issues regarding this matter. ❍ All materials, public data, statistics, and standards utilized for the research must have citations and are up-to-date at all times. ❍ Disagreements on matters between the PMU and the research team must be resolved through conversation. However, if the opinions differ drastically, the contract period without any specific reason. - If the progress or the actual implementation of the project is completely different from the PDD without any specific reason. - If the negligence of the task performer is obviously recognized without any specific reason. ❍ The contents of the Request for Proposal is subject to change due to unforeseen circumstances of the PMU after the contract agreement. The changes made on the task range and budget change after the contract agreement is to be determined by mutual agreement. Responsibility of the Research Service Team ❍ Even if the outsourcing research team (task performer) has performed a task under the approval of the project supervisor, the task performer has opinion of the PMU prevails the research team. the obligation to take responsibility of any damages or mistakes occurred by negligence of its performance. Further more, if the PMU requests the Code of Conduct modification or refinement on these matters, the task performer is responsible in making amendments at the expense of its own, even after ❍ The outsourcing research team (task performer) must conduct the project in accordance with the proposal submitted to the Project Management Unit (PMU). ❍ The outsourcing research team (task performer) must include a researcher with prior experience in the field of potential carbon sequestration analysis and research for obtaining carbon credits (stellite imagery analysis and forest carbon analysis, etc.), prior experience in the creation of Project Design Document (PDD), and a expert in environmental law & internationals policies, etc. ❍ The outsourcing research team (task performer) is to be consisted of - 11 - the completion of the Project. ❍ The outsourcing research team (task performer) is responsible for all civil and criminal liability, if damage occurs to the PMU due to the negligence of the task performer such as imperfection of planning, error occurrence, false submission of documents, or failing to conduct its obligations and measures and so on. ❍ If the outsourcing research team (task performer) has damaged a third party in the process of conducting the research project or has violated a relative law, the task performer is responsible for all damages and legal obligations. - 12 - ❍ If the submitted final report leads to the loss of the PMU, the outsourcing research team (task performer) is responsible for all damages and make compensation for the damages. Ⅱ. Selection of the Research Service Team 1. Selection Overview Confidentiality ❍ The outsourcing research team (task performer) must follow the security issues during and even after the completion of the Project. - The task performer and all participants of the research project are prohibited in leaking any relative information to the Project that has been acquired through the Contract through negotiations ❍ Contract in accordance with the Korean Law ⌜ ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE ACT ON CONTRACTS TO WHICH THE STATE IS A PARTY, Article 43⌟ act of participating in the research. - The necessary data for the research that is in relation to Government security must be carried out in consultation with the relevant authorities. - The outsourcing research team (task performer) must take particular care in safekeeping all records, data, research results, etc. collected in the course of research. - The task performer holds the security responsibility for all documents provided by Applicable regulation ❍ ACT ON CONTRACTS TO WHICH THE STATE IS A PARTY and ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE ACT ON CONTRACTS TO WHICH THE STATE IS A PARTY ❍ Negotiation standard by Contract(See section 162 of MOSF, 10th Jan 2014) the PMU. - In case of public criticism and resentment occur in relation to the Project due to Process the failure of performing the security issues, the task performer is responsible for all damages and legal obligations. ❍ The copyright of the final result is shared by the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Indonesia. Leaking, possessing, copying the final Public Bid Notice ⇒ Registration ⇒ documents Evaluation of the documents ⇒ result of the Project without PMU approval is prohibited. Hence, the task performer is responsible for all damages occurred by violating the security issues ❍ All research participants must be approved by the PMU, especially upon the replacement of researchers. The replaced researcher is to receive sufficient training regarding the task before taking over the job. Evaluation of the technique and budget ⇒ Selecting the prior negotiation party ⇒ Negotia -tion ⇒ Final selection of the party ⇒ Contracting 2. Selection Method and Procedures Bidding ❍ Qualifications - See Bid Notice Submission Document and Proposal ❍ Submission documents: See Bid Notice ※ See <III. Proposal Writing Instruction> as for how to write technical proposal and price proposal. ❍ Submission method: See Bid Notice ❍ Submission place: See Bid Notice ❍ Submission period: See Bid Notice ❍ Note - 13 - - 14 - Assessment Items and Scoring - Directly visit and apply - The proposals submitted before deadline(working hours) shall be valid. Submitted materials(proposal, and other documents, etc.) will not be returned. - Document submitted shall not be modified after the deadline. - Fore inquires, it is possible to call or visit. However such inquiries no legal effect. Document examination ❍ Examine the submitted documents ❍ Those that lack necessary documents or qualification are excluded from the assesment. Assesment ❍ Assesment method and criteria - Total Assessment Score (100) = Technical Proposal Assessment (80) + Bidding Price Proposal Assessment (20) - If didn't submit the necessary documents, related item will get zero point. Assessment Item Scoring Total 1. Technical Evaluation a. Ability of Applicants 1) Task achievement actions and personnel 2) PDD registration results 3 or more 2 1 3) Task results in related fields in the past 5 years 4 3 2 4) Proposed business management evaluations (Refer to attached evaluation table) 5) Possession of Related Instrument Satelite Imagery Analysis Program Carbon Analyzer b. Evaluation of Participating Personnel 1) Experts in related fields 6 people 5 people 4 people (1 per field) 2) Research results of participating personnel (related to REDD/within 3years) 6 or more 5 or more 4 or more c. Feasibility of business plans 1) Comprehension of business plan contents 2) Business approach methods 3) Detailed promotion plans for the business 100 80 23 8 ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ d. Potential to achieve goals 3 2 1 3 2 1 1 17 9 8 7 8 7 6 30 5 5 20 10 1) Potential to achieve registration VCS 2. Price evaluation - 15 - 7 6 5 10 20 - 16 - Remarks ❍ Technical Evaluation ❍ Other Considerations - (Object of evaluation) Implementation of technology evaluations limited to task performer passing the document evaluations (It will be notified separately) - (Evaluation method) Organize Evaluation Committee, Implement depending on - Proposals, all related materials, and evaluation results related to proposals will not be public, and businesses may not dispute these results nor the selection process - Submission of additional materials relating to evaluation may be requested if needed, and interested parties from businesses may attend to hear explanations PMU's evaluation standards and method ※ Evaluation committee consisting of up to 6 internal/external experts - Evaluation through submitted proposals and PT speeches Selection of Priority Negotiator ❍ The total score comprising the technology score (out of 80) and price score (out of 20) will be calculated and those with the highest scores will be selected for priority - Proposal evaluation scores calculated as the average after eliminating the highest and lowest score from each committee among evaluations of each proposal. If there are two or more of the same high or low score, only one negotiator - Even if only one person qualifies based on results of technology evaluation (68 points or more out of 80), that person will be selected for priority negotiator will be excluded. - If two or more companies receive the highest score, the company with the higher ❍ Bid price evaluations: Proposal will be opened and assessed in public with the presence of bidders after the evaluation of proposals technology evaluation score will be selected for priority negotiator - If the technology evaluation scores are the same, the proposer with the highest score - Implementation of bid price evaluations limited to task performer achieving 68 points or more (out of a total 80) in technology evaluations - Bid price evaluations will be scored based on contract signing standards for in the list of detailed evaluation items below will rank first - Feasibility of business plan > Ability of consignment organizations > Participating personnel negotiation (2014.1.10. Ministry of Strategy and Finance Contract Regulations No. 162) article 7 and [asterisk] <Asterisk: Bid price scoring formula> (a) Evaluations of bidders with more than 80/100 price estimate in bid price ․ × * Lowest bid price: Lowest bid price among valid bidders * Appropriate bid price: Bid price of appropriate evaluation subjects * In cases of business budgets during bid price evaluations, VAT will be included in the price estimate, and in case of planned prices, the price estimate will be applied to the planned price (b) Evaluations of bidders with under 80/100 price estimate in bid price × × Decisions on the negotiation process and successful bidders ❍ Implementation of negotiations for deciding on successful bidders against priority negotiator ❍ If priority negotiator are inconclusive, implementation of negotiations with other negotiators in order of ranking ❍ If priority negotiator result in a deal, no further negotiation with negotiators in order of ranking ❍ If negotiations with all qualified negotiators fail, bidding will be re-announced * Lowest bid price: Lowest bid price among valid bidders * Appropriate bid price: Bid price of appropriate evaluation subjects, with bid price calculated as 60/100 if the price estimate is less than 60/100 * In cases of business budgets during bid price evaluations, VAT will be included in the price estimate, and in case of planned prices, the price estimate will be applied to the planned price (c) Scores calculated using the bid price evaluation formula will be rounded off to the fifth decimal place - 17 - - 18 - Ⅲ. Proposal Writing Guideline 3. Writing the Bidding Price Proposal The bidding price proposal must contain the detailed budget for each item necessary for the implementation of the project 1. Type of Proposal Make a proposal that includes all expenses required to perform the all Technical Proposal Bidding Price Proposal tasks (excluding VAT) of the project The ‘Bidding Price Proposal’ must be filled out on the <Attachment 2. Writing the Technical Proposal Form 12> and attach the detailed version as the “Detailed calculation of the price proposal” General Information ❍ All cost incurred by creating the proposal is at the expense of the proposing bidder. 4. Other Considerations ❍ All information acquired in the process of writing the proposal must remain confidential ❍ The proposal is to be written in the English and Korean language. In order to use acronyms and abbreviations, a separate table that explains the acronyms and abbreviations in the detail must included in the proposal ❍ The proposal must be written in accordance with the “Table of contents” and submit in the form of attachments of other long written materials such as technical explanation, etc. ❍ The contents of the proposal must only contain the clear and necessary details in short, on A4, within 100 pages (numbered). ※ See 『Attachment 1』 Instructions for Proposal Writing Efficacy of proposal ❍ Information on submitted proposals may not be changed and will be considered as part of contract conditions when signing the contract ❍ Additional proposals or material may be requested from bidders if required by the PMU, and materials submitted for this will maintain the same efficacy as the proposal ❍ After contract signing and while business is being carried out, items not specified in the proposal may occasionally be carried out upon negotiation with the PMU, and if there is a difference of opinion between the two parties, the opinion of the PMU shall prevail. Proposal Contents Notes ❍ General Information - General status and history, capital. and sales status (Attachment Form 4) - Organization and HR Status (Attachment Form 5) - Task Performing organization and Personnel (Attachment Form 6) - Background of Participating Personnel for Task. (Attachment Form 7) ❍ Proposers will bear all costs relating to writing, submitting, discussing and modifying the proposals and the group takes no responsibility for such cost ❍ The proposer must submit directly to the scoring location within the specified submission period, and proposals will not be accepted if these criteria are not met - Research History of Task Performance Expert (Attachment Form 8) - Major Project performances (Attachment Form 9) - Proof of Business Performance (Attachment Form 10) - Present State of Program/Equipments of Proposed Companies (Attachment Form 11) ❍ Submitted documents may not be changed ❍ The group may request additional materials or on-site inspections for the purpose of verifying information submitted in proposals, and in such cases the bidder must comply - Price Proposal(Attachment Form 12) ❍ The detailed contents of the project - Clearly understand the details of the project and describe in detail of the purpose of proposal, features and benefits of the proposal, implementation method, and expected outcomes, etc. ❍ If information in a proposal is proven to be false after submission, all responsibility for civil or criminal cases arising due to this will be borne by the company which submitted the proposal - If information in a proposal is proven to be false after submission or a company engages in unfair practices to influence the screening, that company will be disqualified - Regarding information unspecified in this bidding notice and service proposal, the regulations of the Ministry of Planning and Finance Contract Regulations, ‘Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party, ordinances and regulations’ shall be followed - 19 - - 20 - [Attachment 1] 5. Submission of Proposal Proposal Writing Guideline Submission period: See Bid Notice Submission place: See Bid Notice Submission documents: See Bid Notice Validity of the proposal ❍ The submitted proposal can not be altered in any terms and is considered as part of the contract condition upon selection. Items Ⅰ . Proposal Outline ❍ The Lead Organization may request additional suggestions or data if necessary and the submitted material will also hold the same validity as the proposal. Precautions ❍ The proposal must be submitted to the submission place on time (Late submission is not permitted) ❍ All submitted documents are not returned, and all cost incurred by the submission of this outsourcing research project is at the expense of the proposing task performer ❍ The proposal shall not contain false information or simple predictions, and all information must be valid and proven objectively. If false information is found in any of the submitted documents, the proposal submitter is automatically excluded from the selection. ❍ All proposals submitted for this outsourcing research project remain confidential, unless the call for deliberate evaluation. Contact: See Bid Notice. 1. Purpose of proposal 2. Features and benefits 3. Future direction and expected outcomes Ⅱ . General Information of the Proposing Company 1. History and overview 2. Organization 3. Similar task performance Ⅲ . Technology Sector 1. Scope of Task 2. Considerations 3. Task implementation and DB establishment strategy 4. Other task performance method Ⅳ . Management Sector 1. Organization configuration 2. Report and review plan 3. Performance organization and work division 4. Individual participants and resume Ⅴ . Others - 21 - Writing Instructions Research Project Title Contents Summary o Clearly understand the contents of the project and describe the purpose, range, preconditions, advantages, and specifics of the proposal. o Summit the similar task performance within recent 5 years related to the Research Project.(Must submit documentary evidence) - Expertise and specialities of the Company, etc. o Things to consider in relation to the task performance o Suggest implementation strategy in accordance with the project objectives and purpose o Suggest the detailed implementation plan for each task sector o Suggest the organization configuration and project schedule in detail o Suggest the report plan throughout the project period. o Suggest the performance organization and the work division in detail by the participant in the consortium o The size of workforce and individual background data such as job title and work experience, etc. o Other details not mentioned in the above items such as cooperation sector, etc. - 22 - 【Annexed Form 1】 [Appendix 2 ] Appraisal of Management State (Credit Evaluation Table from Credit Rating Institution) Handling Period Application of Bid Participation Please fill in the following sections if relevant. Instantly Section Management State (3scores) Evaluation Standards ㅇ Credit Rating AA+, Debenture AA A AA0,A ACP A1 A2+ Corporate AA AA+, Credit A AA0,A Rating ACredits 30 2.9 ※ A+ A0 B+,B under A- BBB+ BBB0 BBB- BB+, BB0 BB- 0,B- CCC+ A20 A2- A3+ A3+ A3- A30 A+ A0 2.8 2.7 B+ B0 B- under C B+,B under A- BBB+ BBB0 BBB- BB+, BB0 BB- 0,B- CCC+ 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 App lica nt Company name Company Reg. # Address President Tel. Date of Birth Bid Outl ine Bid Notice # evaluated recently based on the date of bid announced by credit rating institution within expiration date. ※ If not submitted, the company is evaluated by the lowest rate and for different partial evaluation scores, the highest scores are applied. *Those who work for the tasks of clause 1 or 4 of the clause 1 of the article 4 on law on "Use and protection of Credit Information Act". Dep osit Payment Exemption & Confirmation Prox y Seal for Use Original # Bid Case Name Payment Based on the latest debenture (or CP) rate or company credit evaluation confirmation which was # 2014 - ․Rate of Deposit : Above 5/100% ․Deposit Amount : KRW (￦ -) ․Reason : ․I confirm to pay for the deposit in cash equivalent to the above written amount when contract is not made after buy-in. All the rights for this bid commissioned to the below person. are Seal to use for this bid is declared like the blow. Name : Date of Birth : Seal for use (Affixed) I accept all the issues of bid announcement in order to participate in the business unit competitive bid which was announced by the above number and apply for it with attached required documents. * Attach-required documents : documents designated for bid-registration Applicant : (Affixed) Co-director of KI FMU/REDD+ Joint Project - 23 - - 24 - 【Annexed Form 2】 【Annexed-Form3】 【Pledge of Security Upright Fulfillment 】 Confirmation of Proposal Application Application No. Company Name Company name : Registration No. : Address : Contact : Date of Prop President osal Location I pledge to observe the followings during bidding. Birth Tel. Fax. The proposal on "Research Service for Acquiring Carbon Credit from REDD+ project" is submitted as follows. Attachments 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 기술제안서 Copy. Copy. Copy. Copy. Copy. . ㅇ All the documents for proof are composed and submitted based on facts. If false contents are found, I will not raise any objection even though I lose right to participate in the bid. ㅇ ㅇ ㅇ . 2014. Applicant (President) : (Seal Affixed) Co-director of KI FMU/REDD+ Joint Project ㅇ I pledge that I don't have any objection on operator selection method, proposal request details, your organization's policy for this bid. I will not raise any legal objections. I will not raise any objection on evaluation methods of evaluation committee composed for proposal assessment, standards to evaluate, results. I will observe entire security tasks, enforcement rules, etc. to perform the above labor service (business). I will perform security provisions on task directions. Of course, I will not disclose facts that I acquired while working for free. 「 」 I recognize Transparent management without corruption and fair administration is a key for society development and nation competitiveness deeply. I respond actively to integrity pledge initiative. In labor service bid participation, executives, employees, proxies of our company will perform illegal acts, etc. sincerely. 절취선--------------------------------------------------------------절취선 Proof of Applied Proposal Application . Seal for No. Company .2014 Pledger : President (Seal Affixed) Application Name President Remarks Co-director of KI FMU/REDD+ Joint Project - 25 - - 26 - 【Annexed Form 4】 【Annexed Form 5】 General Information and History (Company Introduction) Company name Company Organization and Personnel (Representative Company) President 1. Present state of suggested company organization Business Sector Location Business Tel. Registration No. Y ear of Year E stablishm ent Financial State month Capital Sales Net Income Remarks (2012) (Unit : thousand KRW) Performance (Case/thousand KRW) Total 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Remarks 2. Present state of suggested company personnel Recent Year Milestones of Company Main Businesses ※ Company introduction for only representative company. (In case of performance, all consortium participants' data available) - 27 - - 28 - 【Annexed Form 6】 【Annexed Form 7】 Background of Participating Personnel Task Performing Organization and Personnel (Company-oriented) 1. Task Performing Organization Area Section Name Age Title Degree (Academic Background) Major Number of experience of Remarks task participation 2. Personnel (Name, belonging, position, role sharing, input time, etc.) ※ Area is Outsourcing service. In sections, planning, carbon survey, field survey, ※ Task consortium-centered record - 29 - report composition, assistant, etc. shall be classified. - 30 - 【Annexed Form 8】 【Annexed Form 9】 Task Performance Experts Information Name Final Education Tasks for This Project ID No. University End digit * processing Major (Degree) Graduate School Major (Degree) General Management Department Experience in the relevant areas Major Project Performances (Record all consortium members) Title Project Name Project Duration Month Year Contract Amount Orderer Remarks Certificate Period of Rate of Project Participati Participation on % Research Performance related to REDD Research Name Overview Period (MM YY ~MM YY)within 3years Contents Orderer Remarks ※ Attentive Matters ㅇ Within 10 cases including present projects which are related to proposal tasks ㅇ In remarks, classify public agencies or other agencies. ㅇ Make sure to attach certificate of performance which was confirmed by ※ Attach copy of documents of research related task performance and copy of orderer (Civil companies or individual orderers must attach labor contract, tax invoice, or invoice) certificates if relevant. - 31 - - 32 - 【Annexed Form 10】 【Annexed Form 11】 Present State of Equipments of Proposed Companies Proof of Business Performance Section Type Price 1. Business Name 2. Total Contract Amount 3. Development Amount (Within contract amount) 4. Date of Contract 5. Date of Launch 6. Date of Completion 7. Details Please prove and confirm that our company has performed the projects ordered by your company as the above-mentioned. , , 2014 Address : Company Name : President : The above-mentioned were confirmed. , , 2014 Address : Company Name : President : - 33 - - 34 - Q'ty Total Remarks 【Annexed Form 12】 (Unit:USD) Price Proposal : Estimate Specification Section Amount Rate of composition (%) Details of Calculation VAT. Excluding Total - 35 -
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
