Week in China 3 October 2014 Issue 255 www.weekinchina.com 1 7 8 9 10 11 13 15 20 21 Talking Point Week in 60 Seconds China Ink Environment Economy Property Media Society and Culture And Finally The Back Page www.benitaepstein.com Are they still buying? Turbulence in Hong Kong is making it worse, but luxury goods firms were already suffering from sagging Chinese demand Brought to you by Week in China 3 October 2014 Talking Point Trouble in store Luxury lags in Hong Kong but new book has high hopes for China’s shoppers Fewer of them this week: big-spending Chinese tourists were put off coming to Hong Kong by protesters R Photo Source: Reuters oads blocked by thousands of demonstrators, confrontations with police using pepper spray and tear gas, and even thunderstorms and torrential rain. After days of civil unrest on Hong Kong’s streets it’s no wonder that shops selling brands like Tiffany and Van Cleef & Arpels in Hong Kong have chosen to stay shut since last weekend. But it’s also no surprise that visitors from China are showing less interest in shopping for luxury items in Hong Kong’s vibrant malls and flagship stores. The problem for the luxury labels is that some of the biggest protests are going on near the most-visited retail areas, prompting fears that the current slowdown in luxury sales in the city will soon show signs of a much steeper decline. In fact, retail sales in Hong Kong rose 3.4% in August from a year earlier to $5.15 billion (they got a boost owing to the timing of the Mid-Autumn Festival, which fell in early September). But sales of luxury goods were much less robust, falling by 6.1% that month. The luxury sector’s performance has been lacklustre for months, with fewer visits from mainland tourists blamed by most industry spokesmen. Even before this week’s events, the mood was apprehensive among retailers, with the potential for civil unrest said to be putting off visitors. One travel agency told Reuters that Chinese tours had dropped by almost a third, boding ill for the holiday period that started on Wednesday this week. Ricky Tse Kam-ting, chairman of the Hong Kong Inbound Tour Operators Association, told the South China Morning Post that mainland tourists would be down by half during the holiday compared with last year, when 920,000 mainlanders visited in the first six days of October. That leaves some luxury bosses wondering whether Hong Kong can recover its reputation as a haven for luxury retail. More broadly they also fear whether the boom in spending by Chinese shoppers is showing signs of abating too. Blame the austerity campaign? Luxury labels were reporting disappointing results long before Hong 1 In the future, finance will help new growth flourish. There are grounds for cautious optimism in the real economy — but creating sustainable growth always needs careful encouragement. New income streams should be built on opportunities that have longevity and new solutions prepared for technology that will continue to evolve. In this era of transparency, HSBC is working with clients to help create conditions in which businesses can flourish. By connecting the developed and the developing world, we can help you protect and cultivate real growth — and so create that success that lasts. There’s more on the future of finance at www.hsbcnet.com/growth HSBC operates in various jurisdictions through its affiliates, including, but not limited to, HSBC Bank plc who is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., member of NYSE, FINRA and SIPC, and HSBC Bank USA, NA. Issued by HSBC Holdings plc. AC22067 Week in China 3 October 2014 Talking Point Kong’s streets went into lockdown with announcements about falling profits from brands like Prada, Gucci and LVMH. Richemont, the Swiss giant behind Cartier watches, also said it has been suffering from anaemic sales as demand from China wanes. Most analysts are blaming President Xi Jinping’s austerity programme, saying it has curtailed gift-giving in the public sector and the wider business world. WiC has tracked this new mood for some months with stories ranging from plummeting baijiu sales (see issue 252 for the most recent mention) through to hotels that are dumping their five-star ratings (see WiC225). The estimates are that as many as half of luxury sales to Chinese customers were motivated by gift-giving in the past, which is why Beijing’s crackdown on corruption and lavish spending has been so significant. For some product categories like watches and jewellery, the pain has been greater. Sales have dropped by as much as 40%, it has been reported. Photo Source: Reuters Longer term, the prospects look rosier? Nobody knows how long the antiextravagance campaign is going to last. But looking beyond the immediate horizon, the future for the luxury industry looks a lot brighter, suggests Erwan Rambourg in The Bling Dynasty: Why The Reign Of Chinese Luxury Shoppers Has Only Just Begun, which was recently published. Rambourg is global co-head of consumer and retail research at HSBC and begins his book by introducing the different types of luxury consumer in China. This is useful in adding some narrative colour to the bigger-picture estimates of market sizes and spending patterns that Causeway Bay has long been a favoured Chinese shopping destination feature in so many accounts of the Chinese luxury scene. But what is soon clear is that these different layers of customer – ranging from entry-level “everyday luxury” shoppers to the most sophisticated “ultra high end” elite (see chart on next page) – make up a pyramid of purchasers, representing about a fifth of total luxury consumers worldwide. They contribute even more than that in purchases – just over a third, globally – as the Chinese spend more than other nationalities too. Apart from its size, what’s obvious about Chinese demand for luxury goods is its diversity. The pyramid structure makes that case plain, although Rambourg adds perspective by contrasting China with Japan. Here he mentions the work of Professor Yamada Masahiro, who coined the term “parasite singles” for young, unmarried Japanese who live at home with their parents so that they can spend more of their income on luxury goods and travel. The best-known members of this group – the “office ladies” – went mad for luxury brands in the 1990s, Rambourg says, and 10 years ago half of Louis Vuitton sales were made to Japanese consumers. But as the office ladies have got older they have lost their enthusiasm for luxury. And worryingly for the labels, there’s no new segment of shoppers replacing them. In China the market looks in better shape because demand is more varied: from the newer shoppers in poorer cities excited about a visit to Starbucks through to the most experienced, affluent consumers trying to affect disinterest as they tour the most exclusive boutiques in Shanghai. The overall prospects for growth look solid too. Benchmarking from a minimum income level of $23,800 a year, Rambourg says that there will be about 75 million luxury shoppers from China by next year. By 2025, the qualifying threshold will be higher at $30,500, but the total customer base will have grown significantly, doubling at least to 150 million, with spending on luxury items set to triple over the same period. So the pyramid is going to keep on getting bigger as existing consumers trade to higher price points and are replaced by new shoppers 3 Week in China 3 October 2014 Talking Point entering at the base level. “The 2015 pyramid is, in reality, only the emerged tip of the iceberg,” Rambourg predicts. Sounds good for Hong Kong? The surge in demand highlights another key aspect of the Chinese impact on the luxury world. Despite being home to 35% of the world’s luxury customers, only 12% of luxury sales take place inside mainland China. The point is that many Chinese are choosing to shop overseas, a trend that is likely to accelerate as more of them start to travel internationally. Hong Kong’s success in attracting mainland spending is the best example of this phenomenon, with a city of seven million people reporting the same luxury sales as China itself, with a population of more than 1.3 billion. Visitors from the mainland are said to account for 60% of the handbags sold in the city, for instance, and as many as 80% of the watches. Hong Kong’s allure for the mainland Chinese is widely understood. Tourists enjoy the status of going on overseas shopping trips and they are more confident that the goods they are buying aren’t fake. Most of all, they can save 30% by avoiding import and consumption taxes, as well as the VAT, charged on the same items at home. Hong Kong’s experience fits with the latest findings from Nielsen’s Mainland Chinese Luxury Shopper survey (from August) in which 97% of respondents said that shopping is the key activity when they travel overseas. And although the shopping may look frenzied, it is actually quite well organised. About 90% of shoppers said they have planned Rambourg’s pyramid of Chinese luxury consumers where they will shop before travelling, while 38% know exactly which products they will buy. Further, Rambourg explains in The Bling Dynasty how the pyramid effect reappears in the way that Chinese shoppers head for different districts in Hong Kong. Take three examples: Canton Road on the Kowloon peninsula is a magnet for the group tours shopping in the city for the first time (which is also why it is home to more than 20 Chow Tai Fook stores, the world’s largest jewellery retailer); Pacific Place on Hong Kong island is looking to attract a savvier shopper with a more understated, less frenetic experience (“It feels empty – which for a luxury shopper is actually the right feeling,” Rambourg says); while Hysan Place in Causeway Bay is dedicated to shoppers who want a hipper experience, especially younger visitors who like to hang out as well as shop. Of course, visits to each of those shopping areas is going to be dis- rupted by the street protests this week, which have arrived during the National Day holiday, a peak period for travel from China. That could contribute to a trend Rambourg identifies: more Chinese have been looking at alternative shopping destinations to Hong Kong. Japan is getting more interest as the yen has weakened, while Taiwan is more popular too, because of improved transport links with mainland China and the shared cultural ties. But South Korea is the most fashionable new spot, benefiting from the ‘new cool’ of Korean TV series and pop music (see WiC252). So while Hong Kong is going to remain as a profitable hub for the luxury brands, it seems that other cities in Asia are going to increase their share of Chinese business. Of course, another option is for jetset Chinese to buy top brands in Paris, London or even Venice (where WiC spotted a lot of this activity in August). But Rambourg says luxury sales in Europe are weaker too, in part because of the stronger euro, but also because retailers have been pricing their goods much more aggressively, aware that the same 4 Week in China 3 October 2014 Talking Point items are still more expensive in China itself. How about other new trends in the luxury business? China’s luxury market started out as male-dominated. This is changing – and the pace of the shift may even quicken because of the clampdown on gift-giving. The future of luxury is much more likely to be female, Rambourg says, which should be good news for firms that sell jewellery and handbags, but less so for sellers of watches, for example. How about another question: if millions more Chinese are going to start buying luxury brands, will they still regard them as ‘exclusive’ enough to justify the higher prices? Rambourg remembers this as a danger for Louis Vuitton in South Korea, where the label earned a nickname as “the three-second bag” because you would see it every three seconds when walking around parts of Seoul. (He spent eight years as a marketing manager with LVMH and Richemont prior to going into banking.) Factor in that the surge of these new luxury customers from China is going to be one-and-a-half times the size of the South Korean population and the dangers for brands suddenly being seen as too ‘mainstream’ are more apparent. One response is to create scarcity value by restricting sales to small audiences at the highest prices. That’s the approach of some of the ‘max-lux’ brands, like topend jewellers Leviev or Graff. But in modified format, the same idea can be applied in limiting the number of outlets at which a brand sells its goods. The more stores, the more sales potential. But opening too many shops creates the wrong impression – a brand that seems to shoppers more Golden Arches than gold Planet China Strange but true stories from the new China Back in WiC251, we looked at the debate about whether China’s school children should receive military training. Last week the controversy moved to university campuses, where the same principles in military training are in force too. But what sparked debate this time was a photo showing the head of Anhui Xinhua University reviewing a parade of student cadets. Netizens were bemused that he did so standing in an open-topped, black Audi, in a posture reminiscent of a North Korean despot. As the university’s Shi Xiuhe drove past the 6,000 assembled students (all in military fatigues) he offered a few words of encourgement, calling out: “Students thank you for your hard work” and “Strive to win glory for Xinhua University”. Netizens were soon scoffing at Shi for having delusions of grandeur, but he defended himself, saying it was a matter of practicality. Covering the 400 metres on foot would have taken 20 minutes, he explained, “while it takes just five minutes by car”. However, Shi must be worried by the publicity and may fear his exploits could backfire. Tellingly, the Liberation Army Daily commented that a university administrator participating in a parade car review was inappropriate, and not to be encouraged. Beijing Times also reported that PLA parade regulations reserve such reviews for state leaders and are to be used only in major national festivals or if the country is going to war or celebrating a military triumph. (with stores popping up with the frequency of McDonald’s outlets). Another tactic for brands is to highlight their heritage. This is an inviting strategy for firms with storied histories, as newcomers can’t respond in kind. Cartier makes clear it was founded in 1847, while Vacheron Constantin – the world’s oldest watch manufacturer – goes back even further to 1755. Consumers seem to respond to this too – “established heritage” mattered for four out of 10 respondents to the Nielsen survey of Chinese luxury shoppers in August. A third strategy for the luxury firms is to go ‘lifestyle’ by extending the brand across a broader range of products rather than concentrating 5 Week in China 3 October 2014 Talking Point on a single one. Labels that try this may be suffering from stalling growth in their key product category, Rambourg suggests, or feel that they are losing some of their edge to fresher competitors. One example of a label taking the ‘lifestyle’ route is Coach, the American leather goods brand, which has diversified from handbags into shoes, apparel, fragrance and jewellery. Louis Vuitton has also undergone the ‘lifestyle’ makeover. After leading in luggage for almost a century and a half from its founding in 1854, the French firm began to offer men’s leather goods and other accessories in 1993. Then it started selling apparel and shoes, and has also launched fine jewellery, watches and eyewear. In 2016, it is expected to start selling fragrances too. How the luxury firms handle the influx of new demand from China will determine much of their commercial future. And as an example of a brand that is prospering, the Financial Times suggests Paris-based Hermès, which opened its latest ‘maison’ or flagship store in Shanghai last month, bucking the gloomier mood about China pervading the rest of the sector. Hermès is certainly outperforming. Like-for-like sales at LVMH, the world’s largest luxury group, grew just 3% in Asia ex-Japan for the first six months of the year, while revenues at Hermès jumped 17% in the same period. Why? Hermès has fewer outlets in China than its peers, which might have protected it from some of the wider slowdown. By focusing on the handcrafted nature of its products and offering less in the way of logo-heavy design, it may have been less affected too by the gift-giving clampdown (see WiC227 for an earlier report on the advantages of its positioning). Also important is that fans of the brand’s silk scarves and leather goods are less often purchasing them to give away. “Instead, consumers tend to buy Hermès products for themselves,” the FT reports. And in fact, this is the Holy Grail for most of the finer brands selling to Chinese customers. By offering goods that appeal on the basis of their fundamental quality rather than as a way of showing off to others, the luxury labels hope to wean clients from their earlier taste for gaudy conspicuous consumption and outsized logos. At the more mature end of China’s luxury market, consumers are increasingly embracing the ethos of style guru Coco Chanel: “You live but once, it might as well be amusing”. In other words, worry less about impressing others; instead indulge in the very best and do so for your own gratification. ■ A rotten apple Illustration: www.benitaepstein.com The wait in China to buy an iPhone 6 will soon be over with the smartphone now gaining permission to be sold in the Chinese market, after licencing delays. The devices will go on sale on October 17. But as the Chutian Golden Newspaper reports, one sales boss has already capitalised on the frenzied demand for the product. The newspaper says that a man surnamed Liu, who ran a sales team in Wuchang, was worried that his group would not hit their monthly goal of Rmb300,000 ($48,864) in revenues. So at the end of a Glengarry Glenross-style sales meeting he told team members they would each get an Apple 6 (the literal translation of an iPhone in Mandarin ) if they reached their targets. This certainly got the juices flowing and by September 20 the group blew through Rmb300,000 in sales. However, the staff were to be disappointed. Rather than give them the new phone (which Liu would have had to import via the Hong Kong grey market), he handed each an apple (yes, the fruit) with a number 6 painted on it. They were furious and didn’t seem to get the joke (if one was intended). The newspaper then spoke to a lawyer with the Hubei Zunerguang law firm, who said the five employees wouldn’t have much chance of suing their boss as there were no outside witnesses to verify his verbal commitment or any formal confirmation that he really meant an iPhone 6 versus an ‘Apple with a 6’. That said, Liu might find it hard to motivate the team in future… 6 Week in China 3 October 2014 The Week in 60 Seconds Hong Kong in the headlines The major news items from China this week were... 1 The HSBC China Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index, a measure of nationwide manufacturing activity, had a final reading of 50.2 in September. This was slightly lower than HSBC’s preliminary September PMI of 50.5, announced last week. “The data in September suggest that manufacturing activity continues to expand at a slow pace,” said HSBC China Chief Economist Qu Hongbin. “We think risks to growth are still on the downside and warrant more accommodative monetary as well as fiscal policies.” 2 Since September 28, tens of thousands of demonstrators have surrounded government offices and filled major roads around Hong Kong, in spite of an attempt on Sunday to use tear gas to disperse them. Their main demand is that the people of Hong Kong be allowed to vote for any candidate of their choosing in elections for the post of chief executive in 2017 (the first in which citizens would have such a vote). They also demanded the resignation of Leung Chun-ying, the territory’s chief executive (for more see China Ink). 3 China celebrated its National Day holiday. The China Tourism Academy said it expects 480 million people to travel during the week-long break from October 1 to October 7, up 13% year-on-year. But many tourists will likely give Hong Kong a miss, because of the pro-democracy protests. The China National Tourism Administration told tour operators not to organise tour groups to the city (though people who booked before this week would not be affected). Jiang appears with successors Hu and Xi on Monday 4 Jiang Zemin, China’s former president and Communist Party chief, made a rare public appearance on Monday in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, to mark the approach of National Day on Wednesday. Jiang, 88, has often been rumoured to be in poor health. His last public appearance was in May. 5 To Tim Cook’s relief, Apple has announced that the new iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus will go on sale on October 17 in China, one of the biggest markets for the company, with huge demand expected from existing iPhone users. The devices will be on sale via all three of China’s mobile carriers and will support both 4G network standards used in China, TDD and FDD LTE. Analysts reckon that if 70% of existing iPhone users upgrade, Apple could end up shipping as many as 3 million units a month to China for the next year, putting it among the top five smartphone vendors in the country. 6 Photo Source: Reuters Available in China from October 17: the iPhone 6 Alibaba Group’s financial affiliate won approval from Chinese authorities to establish a privatelyowned bank. The company said the bank would be headquartered in Hangzhou, the eastern Chinese city where Alibaba is based, and that Alibaba will own a 30% stake. The CBRC said Shanghai Fosun High Technology will hold a 25% stake in the bank (the rest will be owned by several private investors). Setting up a bank will allow the e-commerce giant to collect deposits and give it greater freedom to offer other banklike services. ■ 7 Week in China 3 October 2014 China Ink What will he do? Hong Kong’s CY Leung faces a crisis Photo Source: Reuters The Chinese language press says The key issues The English language press says The state media is deeply displeased at the scenes in Hong Kong. “Photos of Hong Kong police being forced to disperse demonstrators with tear gas have been widely circulated online across the world,” the Global Times noted. “These activists are jeopardising the global image of Hong Kong, and presenting the world with the turbulent face of the city.” The China Daily was also upset, blaming an “illegal assembly” for the clashes on Hong Kong’s streets. Ming Pao Daily, one of the more moderate newspapers in Hong Kong, reckons that both sides are to blame: “It seems more persuasive to say the police's attempt to quell the demonstration with tear gas resulted from interactions. Had the police managed to keep demonstrators at bay by setting up barriers, police officers on duty might not have been ordered to use pepper spray. Had demonstrators been deterred with pepper spray, tear gas fumes might not have been seen.” The reaction to the use of tear gas on Hong Kong’s pro-democracy protesters? The New York Times calls the use of tear gas “heavyhanded”, while The Economist points out that an image of a lone protester holding his umbrella aloft in a cloud of tear gas recalls memories of brutal crackdowns in China in the past. Meanwhile, the Guardian quoted the UK foreign secretary, Philip Hammond, as saying that the British government was against the use of CS gas – a type of tear gas – against the protesters. The newspaper also reported that Chemring, the British company that sells tear gas to the Hong Kong authorities, will review its sales policy after the canisters were fired at unarmed protesters on Sunday. Xinhua said that Beijing is “fully confident” that Hong Kong’s government could handle the “illegal” democracy movement, while Li Shenming, deputy director of the National People's Congress Internal and Judicial Affairs Committee, argued that Hong Kong’s people are not ready for democracy. In an op-ed published in the People's Daily, Li wrote: “In today's China, engaging in an election system of one-man-one-vote is bound to quickly lead to turmoil, unrest and even a situation of civil war.” The Hong Kong Economic Journal reckons that while President Xi Jinping hasn’t made a public statement about the ongoing protests, he will be paying close attention to events. “The Occupy Central protest becoming the spark that set the prairie on fire is the last thing Beijing wants to see. If things are not handled properly, it could really threaten the regime.” What are the ramifications? The Financial Times says Beijing faces “a choice between repression and a humiliating climbdown”. The Wall Street Journal sees it is a “turning point” in the city’s quest for democracy. “For years the people of Hong Kong avoided direct conflict with Beijing in the hope that Chinese authorities might be persuaded to grant them self-government. Now they realise that their only chance for democracy is to demand it,” it declares. While CNN reckons the road ahead isn’t going to be easy, it also thinks the demonstrators are having a potentially significant impact. “Xi and the Communist Party are unlikely to shift from the short-term tactic of censorship and suppression… But they (the protesters) are carving out a space for civil and political participation throughout Greater China.” The stock market in Hong Kong continued to fall on Tuesday, losing another 1.3% after falling 1.9% on Monday. The situation was especially grim for Hong Kong retailers, given that the October 1 National Day holiday is one of the main shopping weeks in Hong Kong and the protests threatened to keep tourists away. On Tuesday, Australia, Italy, Singapore and the US issued travel alerts for Hong Kong too. As the Hong Kong Commercial Daily says: “The Occupy Central movement seriously hurts Hong Kong’s economy and the longer it drags out, the more damage it wrecks.” Oriental Daily News concurs, saying that whatever the outcome, the movement is “a fight with no winners”. Bad for the economy? The South China Morning Post agrees that the protest has affected local shops worst, reporting too that Beijing had suspended travel visas for group tourists from the mainland, while the Wall Street Journal said that retailers specialising in jewellery and cosmetics – which are both heavily taxed in China – were hardest hit by the protests. Shares of jewellery chains Luk Fook and Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group both fell this week. A series of luxury goods labels also closed their stores near the demonstration sites in Central and Causeway Bay, both of which are prime Hong Kong shopping areas (see Talking Point). ■ 8 Week in China 3 October 2014 Environment Debate warms up Beijing signals it will curb carbon emissions F Photo Source: Reuters ive years ago China annoyed the world’s climate experts by sending a second tier official from the NDRC, the economic planning body, to negotiate with global leaders at the climate change talks in Copenhagen. While Barack Obama sat through the night with 50-odd other leaders trying to salvage a climate deal, China’s then Premier Wen Jiabao, was conspicuously absent. Instead, a certain Xie Zhenhua sat opposite the US president, blocking almost every suggestion and at times even wagging his finger at him. When the final deal was agreed – Premier Wen Jiabao did turn up for the signing – it was virtually meaningless, disappointing developed and developing nations alike. One country which walked away happier, of course, was China, because the Copenhagen meeting failed to reach any decision on binding curbs on emissions. Today, perhaps as a result of rising anger at pollution at home, China seems willing to do more, even if the tone is still a mite on the defensive side. At the UN Climate Change Summit in New York last week vice-premier Zhang Gaoli told delegates that his country was committed to “tackling this grave challenge” but added that it was “not doing this at others’ request but on our own initiative”. “We will announce post-2020 actions on climate change as soon as we can, which will bring about marked progress in reducing carbon intensity, increasing the share of non-fossil fuels and raising the forest stock,” Xinhua reported him as saying. Zhang also reiterated Chinese plans to reduce its emissions of carbon per unit of GDP by 45% by 2020, compared to 2005 levels. China’s position on carbon emissions – the main driver of climate change – has always been that it should be allowed more leeway because it has a huge population and began industrialising much later than Western nations. Even today Beijing will not commit to giving a date for “peak carbon” saying only that it hopes to get over the hump and onto a downward trend as “early as possible”. But as a recent report shows, the argument that China only emits much more carbon than other countries because it has so many people is getting weaker. Crucially, its per capita emissions are catching up too. Published ahead of the talks in New York, the Global Carbon Report indicates that China’s emissions now account for 28% of the world total and are greater than the US and the EU’s combined. Furthermore, the 60 international scientists who compiled the study say that Chinese emissions will rise significantly by 2019, when they will be equal to the output of the US, the EU and India together. In another key datapoint, the study also says that China’s emissions have been rising so fast that they now exceed Europe’s on a per capita basis – 7.2 tonnes per person to 6.8 tonnes per head respectively. Of course Europe and the US (which has emissions of 16.4 tonnes per person) “export” a lot of their emissions by buying goods pro- China’s contribution to the issue duced in China. Even so, the report estimates that these goods account for about 16% of the mainland’s emissions, leaving China close to European levels in a like-for-like comparison. The Chinese media largely ignored the report, with only Xinhua picking up on it. It accused “Western researchers” of adopting a “selective attitude” to carbon emissions data, and added Western countries were trying to “force China to accept excessive responsibilities and obligations when it came to reductions”. “Chinese also have the right to pursue a higher living standard. When Western countries criticise China’s carbon emissions they are ignoring our stage of development. By asking us to take on discriminatory responsibility for the reduction of carbon emission they are trying to hold back the development of China,” it said. Fortunately, the environmental statistics out of China aren’t all bad. The Financial Times reported this week that the country set a new record in the third quarter for spending on solar power ($12 billion versus $8.8 billion in Europe). It added that China’s solar installations are set to reach a generating capacity of 14 gigawatts this year, which the FT says is almost a third of the world’s total. ■ 9 Week in China 3 October 2014 Economy China’s newest city The elevation of Khorgas is part of Xi Jinping’s new Silk Road initiative F or much of its 300-year history, Khorgas in western Xinjiang has led a pretty unglamorous existence as an imperial outpost and garrison town. But on Friday, as part of President Xi Jinping’s plan to resurrect the old Silk Road, it became China’s newest city. With a population of only 85,000, Khorgas – which can also be spelt Horgos – didn’t qualify automatically for city status, so the State Council had to issue a special edict in June to ensure its elevation. The hope is that a change in status will enable it to attract more investment and that its addition to the Silk Road project will help to quell a rising wave of separatist violence in the region. “Development is the key to addressing all issues in Xinjiang,” Xi said during a visit there in early May. But as he was ending his tour, three people were killed and 79 injured in a bomb attack on the railway station in the regional capital, Urumqi. So just what is the ‘Silk Road Economic Belt’ and how will it help Beijing regain control over this restive region? As with the 21st Century Maritime Silk Route (see WiC253), details on some of Beijing’s grander plans can be vague. But like the original Silk Road, which was really a network of dozens of routes weaving their way over the Eurasian landmass, the newer version is ostensibly about trade. It also leverages the fact that Xinjiang shares borders with eight countries: Mon- The new city of Khorgas golia, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. The idea appears to be focused on increasing transportation links through Xinjiang to make it easier to facilitate trade with neighbouring countries. To that end the local government has built, or is in the process of building, three ‘free’ land ports: one in Khorgas, which is already functioning, another near Kashgar (which has just opened) and a third about 20 kilometres from the border with Pakistan. One hope: that the initiative will allow more goods from Central Asia to arrive in China more easily (and play to a cultural preference among Xinjiang’s Turkic-speaking ethnic group in dealing with peoples from this area too). Longer term, the plan is that companies from China’s wealthier eastern seaboard will see the opportunities of being closer to untapped markets to China’s far west, and thus set up factories in the region that create new jobs. If China and Pakistan ever build the long-mooted Khunjerab rail link – officials in Kashgar have hinted that this will be included in the next five-year plan – companies based in southwestern Xinjiang might also export their goods to the wider world via the Arabian Sea. But there are risks associated with the project too, as government officials admit in their less guarded moments. If it works as the central government envisages, the Silk Road programme will mean even more Han Chinese moving to Xinjiang – an area traditionally populated by several non-Chinese minorities, the dominant being the Uighurs. Past migrations of Han Chinese to Xinjiang have irked this group, as many Uighurs feel the objective is to dilute their culture and their Muslim faith. In retaliation some locals say that their only recourse is to use the state’s Uighur-friendly family planning policy against Beijing by having as many children as possible so as to outnumber the migrant Han families who can only have one child each. Another worry for the Chinese is that increased contact with countries such as Pakistan and Afghanistan might lead to an influx of Islamic fundamentalists. In this fear, the Han even find common ground with some of the Uighurs. As one Uighur told WiC of his fears of radical Islam recently: “I want my own state if it is like Turkey. If it is like Pakistan or Saudi Arabia, I would rather we stayed part of China.” ■ 10 Week in China 3 October 2014 Property Everything must go Real estate developers are offering surreal deals to lure buyers O Photo Source: Reuters n previous occasions when China’s property market was in the doldrums, developers offered the prospect of free BMWs to entice people into buying new apartments. And in a sign that the property market is struggling desperately, they are resorting to unorthodox methods once more as they try to drum up interest. Last week Sina, a news portal, reported that a property developer in Guangxi was trying to lure homebuyers with free poultry. The marketing stunt offered to give away 1,000 chickens – on a first-comefirst-grab basis – to people who showed up at a promotional event for an apartment complex it was trying to sell units in. “A thousand chickens are free to grab. They’re yours if you can catch them,” the promotional material promised. Thousands of people – mostly retirees – showed up at the event, causing chaos (the crowds were so large that some people lost their shoes, local media reports). China News Net says that all the chickens were snapped up in 15 minutes. The property development was rather less popular. Most attendees left without even asking about the prices for the new homes. Poly Real Estate, one of China’s largest developers, is also trying to tempt buyers with an innovative strategy: it is offering sales discounts proportionate to a client’s weight (to qualify for this quirky offer, customers have to agree to diet for a few weeks). Empty apartments at a residential area in Shanghai China’s largest residential developer Vanke is also trying to be creative. It has partnered with Alibaba’s Taobao site, and has offered anyone who spends on the e-commerce platform a discount of Rmb10,000 ($1,629) when they buy a home featured in one of its promotions. However, the marketing ploys seem to have done little to resuscitate the property market. September, which is traditionally peak sea- son for housing purchases, posted negative results. Average new home prices fell 0.9% from August, dropping at a faster rate even than the 0.6% decline witnessed between August and July. “Although sales volumes in China’s property market are likely to improve in September and October – months that typically have the highest sales in the year – the increase won’t be enough to offset the weak sales so far in 2014,” says ana11 Week in China 3 October 2014 Property This one’s unsold too... Photo Source: Reuters lyst Christopher Yip from Standard & Poors. The slowdown in the property market has already prompted a number of regional governments to ease or cancel their home purchase restriction schemes. Meanwhile, state-owned banks have started giving the market a muchneeded boost by relaxing access to credit for some homebuyers. Some of the criteria for loans to first-time home buyers is being eased, while existing mortgage holders may also be eligible for the more attractive loan rates that first-home buyers are offered, even when buying a second property, reports 21CN Business Herald. But looser credit shows little sign of reviving the sector so far, says the Xi’an Evening News, as potential buyers are cautious about getting into the market when home prices seem to be on a steadily downward trend. “The easing of home purchase curbs will not boost house sales significantly, with only Hohhot posting an obvious market rebound and a few cities including Wenzhou, Hangzhou and Chengdu seeing short-term surges in house transactions,” agrees property brokerage Centaline. To prepare for what could be a long winter, many developers are tapping the equity market for cash. In late September, Guangzhoubased Agile announced a rights issue, joining Country Garden and Yuexiu Property in asking shareholders for new funds. Agile has a net debt-to-equity ratio of 99%, compared with the average of 61% among Chinese developers. For smaller developers, the situation is tougher still. One firm on the brink of bankruptcy is Golden Century, a real estate player in Handan, a third-tier city in Hebei province. Its chief executive Shi Yubao has vanished. But the problem at Handan is deeper than one AWOL developer. Shi is said to have borrowed at least Rmb1 billion from local private lenders, while a total of 32 other property firms in Handan were found to have raised Rmb9.3 billion from illegal fundraising or high-return deposits, according to Xinhua. The local police have detained 94 people and are pursuing another 43 in a crackdown on such activities – with the sweep also netting small-loan companies and rural cooperatives. One result is that construction has halted at dozens of projects in Handan and most of the city’s resi- dents are now afraid to purchase a home. They worry that developers could default on their shady loans or simply run away with homebuyers’ deposits. Accordingly, new home sales in Handan plunged 32% between January and June, says SouFun (a mere 903 units sold in the entire six months). Unsold apartment space also jumped 17% to 1.4 million square metres (15 million square feet), according to the local statistics bureau. Golden Century is one of the more visible examples of the challenging environment. “More small property developers will face default risk in the fourth quarter, as financial institutions become increasingly cautious in lending to them,” says Zhang Hongwei, research director at Shanghai-based property consultancy ToSpur. “We will also see large developers grabbing more market share through acquisition of smaller developers.” If the real estate business sounds grim, the furniture industry is on life support. Already, some of largest furniture makers are calling it quits, because its fortunes are so closely linked to the ailing property sector, reckons Time Weekly. Housen, one of the biggest furniture manufacturers in Shenzhen, has just closed down, for instance, and two other furniture firms have stopped production since early September. Previously, FZD, another large furniture maker from Shenzhen, also shuttered its production line. The company reportedly owed its workers over Rmb10 million in wages. “Based on the current economic condition, it’s no wonder that the furniture industry is in trouble, given that it is downstream of the property business,” says Jiang Hongyuan, president of the Zhejiang Province Furniture Association. ■ 12 Week in China 3 October 2014 Media Paper losses Launch of a Huffington Post-like news website in Shanghai causes stir T Photo Source: Reuters he People’s Daily started out as a highly sought after publication (it sounds unlikely, we admit). But its origins lie with journals run by underground Party members in the 1940s in Northeast China, a region which was first under Japanese occupation and then (during the Chinese civil war) controlled by the KMT. At that time it was widely read by intellectuals, despite the great risks. Those who helped circulate it, or sometimes simply just possessed a copy, might be tortured. Today, it’s hard to imagine anyone risking jail for the chance to read it. Propagandist monotone and tightly-censored content has undermined much of its initial appeal. The newspaper also has plenty of competition. By the end of 2012, there were nearly 3,500 state-run media firms publishing newspapers and magazines (and on top of that, more than 1,416 state broadcasters or movie producers). Most of them are struggling financially. The website of the People’s Daily, which was listed in Shanghai in 2012, only survives on hefty state subsidies too. The leadership in Beijing is well aware that the state media is declining in effectiveness. After chairing a powerful committee on reforms in August, President Xi Jinping called for measures to be taken to develop new media organisations that are “diversified, advanced and competitive”. Xinhua quoted Xi saying he wants: “Several new media groups that have strength, communication capacity, credibility and are influential to be established.” For those who prefer not to go online to get their news Shanghai has been leading the charge for this sensitive initiative. Late last year two of the city’s oldest newspapers merged to form Shanghai United Media Group (or SUMG, see WiC218). It is now the biggest print media group in China by assets and its creation is being trumpeted as a turning point for staterun newspapers, which have been losing readers to online news providers and weibo commentators. In July, SUMG began the counteroffensive by launching The Paper, an internet newspaper. Its Chinese name Pengpai sounds like “paper” but it is also an adjective for raging sea waves. And indeed the new venture has been making a pretty big splash. Some say that The Paper is supposed to resemble the popular American internet newspaper the Huffington Post. Also available via mobile apps such as Tencent’s WeChat, The Paper has already become “one of the hottest words on China’s social media”, says the Global Times. Financial Times columnist Xu Danei has blogged too that The Paper is the most ambitious debut in the Chinese media world since 2010 when influential journalist Hu Shuli kicked off Caixin, publisher of Century Weekly. What is so special about The Paper? Financially it is backed by the Shanghai government but also by private sector investors such as Hony Capital, an investment firm linked to PC-making giant Lenovo. It is also the first internet media firm to be awarded a licence to cover politics and current affairs. (Other licence holders: the websites of traditional newspapers, which remain tightly censored.) The Paper’s editorial staff largely come from SUMG’s Oriental Morning Post, one of the country’s more highly regarded newspapers (it broke the news in 2008 that Chinese dairy firm Sanlu was one of the culprits behind a tainted milk scandal). 13 Week in China 3 October 2014 Media According to Foreign Policy magazine, The Paper looks like a “news site trying to find the sweet spot where public service journalism converges with Party objectives”. One of the objectives is to bolster Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption drive. Since commencing operations a couple of months ago The Paper has already published two exclusives on graft involving government officials. It also appeared to be testing the censor’s bottom line when it wrote a glaring exposé about health problems at a mercury mine in Guizhou province. State-run counterparts are giving The Paper positive reviews, including comments in the China Daily that the launch is “one small step for the internet but a giant leap for the newspaper industry”. But others still need to be convinced. Shanghai Jiaotong University professor Wei Wuhui told Foreign Policy that The Paper faces an uphill battle as a new media platform. For such sites to be successful they normally require more interaction with readers, as well as user-generated content, he says, and that is something that is extremely difficult to police. In fact, while The Paper offers tentative hopes for a freer media sector, the authorities are also ratcheting up the scrutiny of business journalists. Last month police detained eight reporters from the financial newspaper 21CN Business Herald on allegations that they have been collaborating with public relations firms to extort money from listed companies in return for positive coverage (see WiC252). Last week, the 21CN’s chief editor and general manager were also detained. The 21CN is operated by the Guangdong-based Nanfang Media Group, which has nurtured some of China’s more liberal newspapers including Southern Weekend and Southern Metropolis Daily. But the crackdown on privately-run media organisations seems to be helping the state press regain investor attention. For example, Guangdong Guangzhou Daily Media has seen its Shenzhen-listed stock climb nearly 80% this year. Shares at Zhejiang Daily Media have also risen more than 30% during the same period. ■ Who’s Hu: Fu Sheng Profiles of China’s business leaders China’s internet heavyweights are building their business empires by acquiring promising startups (see WiC230). To do so, they are looking for promising young entrepreneurs to become part of their inner circles. Fu Sheng, the young CEO of Cheetah Mobile, is one of the young tycoons who thrives by “standing on the giant’s shoulders”, reckons Caijing magazine. Photo Source: Imagine China Getting started Born in 1978 in Jiangxi province, Fu studied economics at the Shandong Institute of Business and Technology. He could find only one computer in his faculty, but he taught himself how to use it. Still, the lowly reputation of his college prevented him from getting a dream job after graduation. That changed in 2002 when he joined software firm 3721 and met Zhou Hongyi, who later founded Qihoo 360, bringing Fu along with him as its product manager. Fu helped to develop Qihoo’s 360 Safeguard into one of China’s most popular pieces of anti-virus software. But he later fell out with Zhou and left Qihoo to join venture capital firm Matrix China in 2008. A year later he changed career path again, founding his own software firm Conew Image so as to compete with his former colleague Zhou. Big break Zhou has made few friends among tech tycoons due to his readiness to confront his rivals (for examples, see WiC86 about Qihoo’s legal tussle with Tencent, and WiC163 for its ugly battle with Baidu). So becoming the enemy’s enemy has been a good way for Fu to forge allies. When he met Xiaomi’s CEO Lei Jun – who also founded Kingsoft Security, with Tencent’s CEO Ma Huateng as a coinvestor – Lei invested in Conew. In 2010 Conew merged with Kingsoft Security and became Cheetah. Cheetah has since grown into a leading player in internet and mobile phone security applications. As of this week, it carries a market capitalisation of $2.6 billion – having gone public in New York in May – making Fu (owning 8%) one of the richest internet tycoons under 40. Need to know Fu is a big fan of trendy American tech products and he made headlines back home when he wore a pair of Google Glass spectacles while banging the opening bell on Cheetah’s trading debut. He was also one of the first people in China to buy a Tesla Model S. He wrote a weibo post in July talking about his driving experience in the electric car. And it began with a thank you to Lei Jun.... 14 Week in China 3 October 2014 Society and Culture On the road In a busy week for cinema releases, Ning Hao hopes for box office gold I Photo Source: Reuters n the film Sideways, Paul Giamatti plays Miles, a divorcee and failed writer, who takes off with his longtime friend Jack (Thomas Haden Church) for a week of bonding before Jack gets married. But the two men quickly realise that their definition of adventure is very different. Miles wants to spend the week relaxing, golfing and enjoying some good wine. Jack, on the other hand, is on the prowl and wants one last fling, before settling into domestic life. Chinese director Ning Hao has also made a film about two friends hitting the road. Break-up Buddies tells the story of a recently divorced man who goes on a road trip in southern China with his best friend (and a pet dog), in this case to search for a new lady. The story sounds straightforward enough, but the comedy has raised eyebrows for being raunchy by Chinese standards. The film features a couple having sex in a car while grannies dance nearby, as well as scenes featuring lesbians and sex toys, says the Wall Street Journal, which was given a preview before the film opened on Tuesday. The movie is being released during the lucrative one-week holiday that began on Wednesday with China’s National Day. Director Ning has preferred to focus on some of the other themes in Break-up Buddies. “We are in a transitional phase of the society when absurdity and conflicts stand out,” he says. “Modern China is very absurdist, so I like to apply absurdist qualities to my films.” Chang Chun-ning: stars in Black and White with Huang Bo Yue Xiaojun, the scriptwriter, offers another interpretation. “The film is about a middle-age crisis. The crisis not only reflects on marriage, it can also be on your career or something else. When the time has come, each one of them at their middle age would have their own problems. I think the film can reflect the feelings of the people who were born in the seventies.” Break-up Buddies reunites Huang Bo and Xu Zheng, two popular comedians who also starred in the 15 Week in China 3 October 2014 Society and Culture Photo Source: Reuters (then record-breaking) 2012 comedy Lost in Thailand. Dalian Evening News reckons that the road film genre, combined with the popular duo, is going to dominate the box office again over the holiday period. But it is going to be a busy week of promotion for Huang. In addition to Break-up Buddies, the actor also stars in two more films that are released this week. In Dearest, a drama directed by Hong Kong filmmaker Peter Chan, he plays a father who struggles to cope with the disappearance of his young son. And Huang is also one of the stars in Black and White: The Dawn of Justice. The action thriller, which premieres on October 1, features Taiwan’s Mark Chao and actress Chang Chun-ning. To hear NetEase describe it, “moviegoers can choose between Huang Bo the comedian, Huang Bo the tearjerker, and Huang Bo the triad. The point is, Huang has thoroughly dominated the October National Day holiday week.” It is not the first time that Huang is effectively competing against himself to attract cinema audiences. Two years ago, the actor also starred in three films – Lost in Thailand, Journey To the West: Conquering the Demons and the romantic comedy Say Yes. The three hits raked in a total of Rmb3 billion ($489 million) at the box office, says Dalian Evening News. Critics say it remains to be seen whether he can break his personal record. Huang first became a household name after the surprise success of Crazy Stone, a low-budget comedy also directed by Ning. The film’s success, along with its sequel Crazy Racer, cemented Huang’s reputation. In 2009, he won Best Leading Actor at the Taiwanese Golden Horse Awards, one of the most prestigious in Asia’s movie calendar, for his role as an idiotic farmer taking care of his village’s cow during the Huang: comedian stars in three movies released this week Sino-Japanese War in the 1940s. Huang reckons that his popularity is based largely on his regularguy appeal: “I don’t have the face and body figure of a superstar, so the viewers may find [me] more identifiable. When people meet me on the street, they won’t react in the way [as they would if] they came across Andy Lau or Tony Leung. That doesn’t happen to me. The most they do is to come over and tap on my shoulder,” he told Time Out in an interview. This year’s week-long holiday is going to be competitive for film releases. Ann Hui will also release her highly-anticipated drama Golden Era, starring Tang Wei (see WiC251). There’s also Sun Honglei’s One Step Away, a film about wartime lovers, plus two Hollywood movies, Into The Storm and Divergent. The battle among animated films is likely to be even more intense. In total, nine animations will screen between the end of September and early October, including the family-friendly McDull: Me and My Mum and sci-fi offering Kuiba III. Mob money Crowdfunding to boom? A merican television network The CW scrapped Veronica Mars in 2007 as the teen noir drama was falling off in the ratings. The show’s diminished but loyal viewership then called out for a movie sequel to their beloved series. And their wish was finally granted this year, thanks to crowdfunding service Kickstarter. The show’s star Kristen Bell (who plays the title character) launched a fundraising campaign in 2013. Incentives such as T-shirts and cinema tickets were offered to fans who would donate more than $10. Although its backers wouldn’t receive any financial return, the project sailed past its $2 million fundraising goal within 10 hours. Over 90,000 devotees contributed to the tune of $5.7 million. And thus in March Veronica Mars became the first crowdfunded project to reach cinema screens. 16 Week in China 3 October 2014 Society and Culture The project’s success has inspired other filmmakers to turn to websites like Kickstarter and the trend is catching on in China too. There, it’s not only about diehard fans resurrecting a much-missed franchise. Powered by the leading internet firms and trust companies, Chinese investors are looking at channelling some of their savings into the world’s fast-growing movie market. Baidu is one of the internet giants that’s leading the charge. This month the web search company launched a film investment unit known as Baifa Youxi together with China Film Group and Citic Trust (both are state-backed leaders in their respective industries). The first project raised cash for Golden Era, starring Tang Wei and directed by Ann Hui (see WiC251), and got flagged to investors as a Chinese version of Gone With the Wind. Golden Era is one of the fortunate films scheduled for showing during the week-long National Day holiday period (see previous article). Baifa Youxi allowed investors to put up as little as Rmb10 ($1.65) but earn up to a 16% return linked to box office performance. The Rmb15 million funding target was met within minutes, raising a total of Rmb18 million from over 3,300 supporters. Baifa Youxi offers multiple plans for investors. They can choose to bet on different income streams generated by Golden Era, (such as its internet broadcasting copyright fee). More personal perks range from getting the storyboards, free membership of Baidu’s video sites and even a personalised message from popular starlet Tang Wei herself. Li Zimin, general manager of Citic Trust, told Xinhua that the crowdfunding initiative is a “win-win combination of the film industry and consumer finance”. In April, e-commerce firm Alibaba also launched a similar crowdfunding unit known as Yulebao, which for the time being is focusing on financing TV content. China Film Group is also hyping Baifa Youxi as a new platform for creative marketing. “It allows production firms and celebrities to understand the consumer better and thereby meet their needs. It is a good start to build a dream factory for different elites, investors and users,” the company’s CEO La Peikang said. Movie producers aren’t the only ones reaching out to micro-financiers. Vanke, the biggest real estate developer by sales, is also testing the water. Last week, the property firm launched a crowdfunding project to invest in a single 100-square-metre apartment at one of Vanke’s residential projects. The apartment is worth Rmb900,000, Vanke claims, so investors that contribute to the Rmb540,000 fundraising target (the minimum commitment is Rmb1,000) can expect a 40% return when the apart- ment is then resold via an internet auction. The results? More than 500 investors filled the fundraising quota in less than nine hours. Better still, the scheme helped generate huge publicity for the developer. More than 30 million netizens forwarded news of the offer on social media (prompted perhaps by the chance of winning film tickets by doing so). Similarly, Vanke’s scheme featured on the front pages of 120 newspapers, National Business Daily has reported. Critics questioned the deal, however, including the China Daily, which classed it as a “publicity stunt that offers little real benefit to consumers”. Strictly speaking, these crowdfunding projects fall into the scope of shadow banking, as most are effectively wealth management products sold through trust firms or insurers. The Securities Times said the China Securities Regulatory Commission is still compiling its rulebook on these schemes so as to provide a legal basis for the activity – so as to better protect the rights of retail investors. Other observers wonder if crowdfunding might serves as another way in which policymakers might try to erode some of the dominance of the state banks in China’s financial sector. Conor Roche, a British researcher who is working to launch an equity crowdfunding platform in Pick your battles wisely “You want to compete with tens of millions of disorganised individual fighters, farmers with broken down guns, rather than with one elite Roman army” Photo Source: Imagine China ☛ Renren boss Chen Yizhou tells the Wall Street Journal why he invested in Vipshop, the website specialising in discounted ‘flash sales’ of fashion goods. Chen says he realised that Vipshop isn’t competing with the main internet players in China (the Roman army) but more with mom-and-pop apparel shops in fourth-tier cities. Chen Yizhou 17 Week in China 3 October 2014 Society and Culture Shanghai’s free trade zone, told Forbes that the trend could kick off a new wave in crowdfunding that might leave European and US-based equivalents in the dust. Southern Weekend agreed. “It is going to be the golden era for crowdfunding in China,” the newspaper predicted. Instituting changes Confucius is embraced by Beijing, rejected in Chicago C Photo Source: Reuters onfucius preached harmony. So one wonders what he would have made of the war of words that broke out over an international language institute bearing his name last week. On September 24, four days before the 2,565th anniversary of the philosopher’s birth, the University of Chicago announced that it was, in all probability, closing its fouryear-old Confucius Institute. The university had been negotiating with the Chinese government for several months to extend the institute’s contract, it said, but “recently published” comments by the official in charge of the dialogue were “incompatible with continued equal partnership”. Precisely which of Xu Lin’s comments had caused the university to “suspend negotiations” is not clear, but it is likely they were given in a long interview that she conducted with the Jiefang Daily on September 19. The Jiefang Daily recounts how in April over a hundred of the university’s faculty members signed a letter requesting that the institute be closed down when its contract came up for renewal this year. Xu’s reaction – which was praised by the newspaper – was simply to Great sage: Confucius on a Chinese campus write a letter to the dean saying: “If your school decides to quit, I agree.” Of course the newspaper did not explain that the petitioners were concerned about the institute’s potential damage to academic freedoms at the university, as well as the Chinese government’s treatment of academics back home (see WiC254 for news about Professor Ilham Tothi). “American universities should not be taking money or institute funds from governments that are jailing professors and that do not provide academic freedom in their own country,” Professor Bruce Cumings at the university told the Chicago Maroon. Of course these complaints are nothing new (see WiC244 for an earlier article on a row over the institutes) but the University of Chicago’s decision to distance itself from Hanban, the Chinese government agency that fund and runs the 465 Confucius Institutes around the world, will offend many in China, not least because of its timing. As well as being the anniversary of the sage’s birthday, September 26 also marks the tenth anniversary of the opening of the first Confucius Institute in Seoul. According to a new State Council ruling, the same date is to be celebrated as Confucius Institute Day from this year forward too. Confucianism – which Mao tried to eradicate – now seems to enjoy greater support amongst China’s current crop of leaders. That became unabashedly clear when the Chinese President Xi Jinping hosted a huge conference dedicated to the philosopher in the Great Hall of the People last week. “All countries and nations should learn and draw on the strength and essence of others’ ideology and culture. This is an important condition to encourage dignity, confidence and strength of native ideology and culture,” he told the attendees. Others suggest that the ruling Communist Party is trying to resurrect Confucianism to fill some of the void left by the redundancy of Marxist and Maoist teachings, which have been displaced by 30 years of capitalism. Adherence to Confucianism could instill a renewed sense of discipline and morality in Chinese society too – or, at least, that seems to be the hope. But not all of China’s leading thinkers seem to be on board with the idea of a new Confucian era. Last week the head of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences spoke out against the concept, suggesting instead that more modern ideologies were more resonant themes for China. “Today, as a Communist country 18 Week in China 3 October 2014 Society and Culture with its own characteristics, we’re still in the historical era that classic Marxist writers defined – one in which socialism and capitalism are involved in a fight to the death… We cannot remove class struggle from the international stage and we cannot remove it from the domestic arena either,” wrote Wang Weiguang in the Party’s journal Qiushi. Coupled with a newspaper warning that “hostile Western forces” were guilty of overstating the death toll from the Great Famine between 1958 to 1961 (to “negate the legitimacy of the Party”), Wang’s comments seemed to symbolise a fightback from those who want Communist thinking to endure. Netizens were less convinced, with some even questioning whether Wang and people like him had lost touch with reality. “What era do they think we are living in?” asked one bewildered weibo user. The Oriental Daily in Hong Kong thought there was also something ridiculous about the whole idea too: “The vested interest class in China these days are bureaucrats including Wang himself. They would become the targets of class struggle. That’s why it is impossible for the incumbents to launch a class struggle on themselves.” ■ World of Weibo: Faye Wong From the moment Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor set eyes on each other on the set of Cleopatra in 1962, they were infatuated. The two fell in love quickly and furiously. But as difficult as it was to live apart, they couldn’t live together either. The couple were married and divorced twice. Still, for Taylor, Burton remained her true love: “I was a fool to marry so often (she had six other ex-husbands),” she told the Telegraph. “If I had my time over again, I would never do that. The truth is I now don’t give a damn about most of those men. Richard is the only one I truly loved and still care about.” Like Burton and Taylor, China’s Faye Wong, 45, and Nicholas Tse, 34, can’t seem to stay away from each other for long. Ten years after the two first broke up they are rumoured to have rekindled their relationship. After their first split, Tse went on to marry Hong Kong actress Cecilia Cheung in 2006 and have two sons, but they divorced in 2011. Wong, too, married the actor Li Yapeng in 2005. But they got divorced last year too (it was her second split with a husband). News that Wong and Tse could be rekindling their romance became a red hot topic on China’s blogosphere, surpassing news about Alibaba’s mega-IPO, tennis star Li Na’s retirement, and Scotland’s referendum. As of this week, there were 450 million tweets and reposts about the rumoured relationship on Sina Weibo. Netizens were split in their views about the couple. Some were supportive of the relationship. Others blasted their chaotic love lives, claiming the two were showing little consideration for their children. Some voiced strong disapproval of Wong, saying that a mother of two romancing a man more than a decade younger is irresponsible and selfish. “It’s such a mess. Why didn’t they marry each other in the beginning?” asked one netizen. Other netizens expressed sympathy for their former spouses, saying that Tse shouldn’t abandon his ex-wife Cheung. “You rejected a perfectly good wife and two beautiful children to be with a woman who is not only 11 years older but has married twice previously and has two children of her own. This is nauseating. Two people who are so irresponsible certainly deserve each other,” she lambasted. Amid the growing criticism, some returned to the fray to defend the couple. “Both of them are single, so what’s wrong with them Wong: her love life fascinates millions in China getting back together?” one fan wrote. “Instead of criticising Wong Faye I actually admire here more and more. More than 10 years ago, she didn’t care what people thought and held the hand of a man who was only 23. Today, she still doesn’t care what other people think… She’s always so honest and true to herself,” was another verdict. More perceptive netizens said that the negative comments about Wong have a subtext – they are another example of China’s cultural stereotyping of women, in this case a belief that stretches back through the centuries that an older woman should not marry a younger spouse. “All the criticisms against Faye Wong mostly surround the fact that she was married and divorced twice, a mother of two yet dating a man who is 11 years younger. This suggests that women in China are still being typecast for two roles: wife and mother. But people are oblivious of women’s wish for self-improvement and their pursuit for love,” one netizen mused. 19 Week in China 3 October 2014 And Finally Under starter’s orders? British Queen’s eldest grandson could lead horse racing revolution in China T he modern Chinese word for street is malu, which translates as ‘horse road’. The term derives from the earliest race course in imperial China. Five British merchants founded the Shanghai Racing Club in 1850 and built a horse racing track in the city. The path down which the expats would ride their horses from the course to the Bund was known as the malu by Chinese onlookers. Bets were wagered on horse racing from the early days of the track’s founding in Shanghai but in 1949 racing was banned by Mao Zedong as an “immoral pursuit”. That makes it all the more intriguing that punting on the horses might be on the verge of being legalised again. The latest sign of a new approach was the launch of the China Jockey Club at Beijing’s prestigious CPPCC auditorium in September. In attendance at the event was Queen Elizabeth II’s grandson, Peter Philips, who the Daily Telegraph says has been “hired by the Chinese authorities to launch a horse racing industry to rival Britain’s”. The club intends to hold its first races next year, it said in a statement on its English language website, but the form of betting is yet to be decided. “The China Jockey Club will set out the strategy for development of the racing industry in China, working with a number of international bodies to ensure the industry is sustainable… part of the income generated will be distributed to support public welfare and give back to society,” the statement confirmed. Soon to return to Shanghai? A few places in China already allow horse racing but betting is still illegal. In Wuhan a millionaire called Ren Ningning built a state-of-theart track including stands for 30,000 people but has struggled with the commercial practicalities of attracting customers. At the moment punters get involved by way of a lottery. Their tickets bear the numbers of one of the horses (brought to Wuhan by Ren from Australia, Ireland and Japan). If the horse does well, the ticket holder wins a small gift like a bottle of wine. The only money that changes hands is the entrance fee and the spectators don’t get to choose which horse they back. Under his stadium complex, however, Ren has already installed the infrastructure required for proper bookmaking – a gambling hall with windows for punters to place bets and the spaces for screens to display the odds. Another city that has dreamt of becoming China’s horse racing capital is Nanjing (see WiC79). China already runs a sports lottery and, as we pointed out in WiC244, it became much more active during the World Cup, and in a way that implied the authorities may be getting more relaxed about gambling (perhaps realising that at least Rmb1 trillion, or $163 billion, is gambled with offshore bookies already, according to estimates from Economic Information Daily). For the first time the lottery allowed punters to make predictions about World Cup match scores this year, driving ticket sales up 93% compared to the year before. Demand was boosted by internet giants Alibaba and Tencent helping local lotteries with online sales and – in a key break with past practice – offering odds on outcomes. While notably less generous than the terms offered by the black market offshore, any winnings at least had the advantage of being legal. (Though notably the odds-offering approach seems to have been adopted as a temporary measure during the World Cup, perhaps as an ‘unofficial’ pilot scheme.) The hope for horse racing fans is that the government will back the China Jockey Club initiative and allow the trial of a more fully-fledged gambling system similar to Hong Kong’s. This might see the state as the only bookmaker – with a decent proportion of the financial proceeds recycled into good causes. ■ 20 Week in China 3 October 2014 The Back Page Photo of the Week In Numbers 20% The proportion of their loans that Hong Kong banks made to mainland Chinese clients last year; up from 16% in 2013. The Wall Street Journal reports that the territory’s banks are now scaling back this lending. $30 billion Photo Source: Reuters The amount of Macau gambling by highrollers financed by China’s junket operators. That is two thirds of Macau’s gaming revenues, but these shadow financiers are finding business tougher as a result of the anti-graft campaign. A giant Snoopy balloon in Shanghai’s financial district (in case you’re wondering, a nearby mall was holding a Snoopy exhibition) Where is it? Some of the places referred to in this issue 61.9 million tonnes China’s crude steel consumption excluding net exports in August. The China Iron and Steel Association reports this number fell 1.9% and was the first decline in domestic steel consumption for 14 years. 266 minutes Xinjiang Beijing China Nanjing Chengdu Hubei Wuhan Anhui Shanghai Hangzhou Zhejiang The amount of time that a 43 year-old man maintained the plank position. Mao Weiding, a member of the Beijing SWAT team, recently subjected his body to an incredible four hours and twenty-six minutes in plank mode, breaking the Guinness World Record for “longest time in an abdominal plank position”. Guizhou Guangdong Hong Kong Want to sign up for Week in China’s website, the Friday email and our digital magazine? Go to www.weekinchina.com/welcome and fill out our subscriber form. It only takes a few moments and subscriptions are free. Invite friends to register too? Just send them the same link. Need to change your subscriber email address? There’s a button at the bottom of the weekly email that allows you to change email address. Or just send an email to [email protected] and we can do it for you. Want the iPad and Android apps? If you type Week in China into the search function in the Apple App Store and/or the Google Play Store you will be able to download our app respectively for your iPad and Android smartphone devices. The Week in China website and the weekly magazine publications are owned and maintained by ChinTell Limited, Hong Kong. Neither HSBC nor any member of the HSBC group of companies ("HSBC") endorses the contents and/or is involved in selecting, creating or editing the contents of the Week in China website or the Week in China magazine. The views expressed in these publications are solely the views of ChinTell Limited and do not necessarily reflect the views or investment ideas of HSBC. No responsibility will therefore be assumed by HSBC for the contents of these publications or for the errors or omissions therein. @2014 Week in China is published weekly by ChinTell Limited, a company based in Hong Kong. All rights reserved. To contact us email: [email protected] 21
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc