AGN降着流のX線観測

AGN降着流のX線観測
1.
2.
3.
4.
AGNからのX線
降着円盤からのX線(GBH)
AGNのX線観測実例
VSOP-2に向けて
幅 良統 (名古屋大学)
X-rays from AGNs
0.01
10!3
10!4
10!5
keV (Photons cm!2 s!1 keV!1)
0.1
Power law
Absorbed power law
Thermal emission
Compton reflection
Thomson scattering
0.2
0.5
1
2
Energy (keV)
5
10
Accretion Disk in AGNs
•
Big Blue Bumpの存在
•
•
標準円盤:内縁温度が極端紫外部
soft X-ray excessの存在
•
標準円盤にしては熱すぎる
(0.1-0.2 keV)
•
hot accretion disk ? → 一つの解
釈ではある
降着流の理解は不十分
X-rays from Accretion Disks
• 恒星質量ブラックホールの観測
• high/soft ⇆ low/hard 状態遷移
• very high state、slim disk state
• 降着円盤3つのブランチ
X-ray spectra of GBH
very high state
low/hard state
high/soft state
例: RXTEJ1550-564
RXTE PCA+HEXTE
Done astro-ph/0203246
Very High State
steepなpower law的
photon index 2.4-3
L/Ledd > 0.2?で
あらわれる
High/Soft
強いsoft成分
+弱いhard成分
Low/Hard
power lawが卓越
photon index 1.7
L/LEdd < 2-3%で
あらわれる
State of the Accretion Disk
Luminosity 大
Slim Disk state
Very High state
High/Soft state
(Intermediate state)
Low/Hard state
Quiescent state
Luminosity 小
降着円盤
Slim Disk
Standard Disk
Radiatively-Inefficient Flow
(ADAF etc.)
Properties of Different A.D. states
very high
high/soft
blackbody
soft comp. +
spectrum
+ power
power law
law
other prop.
QPO
L ∝ T4
low/hard
power law
radio jet
Low Luminosity AGNs
・
・
・
・
・
・
LLAGNは多い(近傍の明るい銀河の>1/3)
そのうちの2/3はLINER
光度が小さい(Eddington 光度の1%以下)
放射効率が悪い(通常のAGNより1-4桁下)
Big blue bump (BBB)がない
Radio loud
Terashima & Wilson 2003
Low Luminosity AGNs
NGC 3998
Power lawモデル
Γ = 1.87(1.85-1.88)
NH = 3.3x1020 cm-2
LX = 5.9x1041 ergs/s
Fe K (6.4 keV, narrow)
EW < 25 eV
(Δχ2=2.7)
Optically thick な物質が無い
光学的に薄い (RIAF的な)降着円盤?
Ptak et al. 2004
Narrow-Line Seyfert 1s
•Sub-class of type 1 Seyfert galaxies
•Relatively narrow (< 2000 km/s) Balmer line
Broad-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies (BLS1s)
•Large amplitude & short time
variability
•relatively small black hole ?
•Similar luminosity to BLS1s
•strong soft excess
•high-mass accretion rate?
Rapid growth BH?
Early phase of AGN evolution?
QPO in NLS1
RE J1034+396からQPO検出
・Narrow-line Seyfert 1
・Strong soft excess + pl
QPO → MBH ∼ 4 x 105 Msolar
→ Lbol ∼ 10 x LEdd
Gierlinski et al. 2008, Nature 455, 369
Slim disk state ?
A. D. states v.s. AGN type
very high
high/soft
blackbody
soft comp. +
spectrum
+ power
power law
law
other prop.
AGNs
QPO
L ∝ T4
NLS1? & Sey1?
low/hard
power law
radio jet
LLAGN?
GBHとのアナロジーからAGN typeと
降着円盤の状態は対応がつきそう・・・
GBHとの決定的な違い
→ 単一objectのstate change
極端な強度/スペクトル変動を示す天体の観測
X-ray study of NGC 4051
UV (2910Å) image of NGC 4051
•
Nearby (z=0.0023) NLS1
•
BH mass
•
One of the lowest luminosity object (∼
1041 erg s-1)
•
Strong intensity and spectral variation
on timescales of hours to years
106 Msolar
2001
Dim 1
Flare
2002
20
60
60
Light Curve
Dim 3
10
5
[counts sec!1]
40
0
20
[counts sec!1]
20
2×104
Time [sec]
4×104
0
0
0
[counts sec!1]
40
15
Dim 2
0
•
•
5×104
Time [sec]
105
0
5×104
Time [sec]
2001
•
•
High flux state
Large amplitude & short time variability
2002
•
•
Low flux state
Small amplitude variability
105
Variability Amplitude
● 2001
□ 2002
<X>; average count rate
S; total variance
σ; statistical error
Dim1
•
Total light curves are
divided into 5 ksec
duration
•
Calculate Fvar in each
segment
•
Most data points are
distributed 0.1 0.4
•
Fvar = 0 in the Dim3 state
Dim2
Dim3
Dim3 is stable state
Flare
Counts-counts Plot
correlation between soft (0.3-0.5 keV) and
hard (4.0-12.0 keV) band count rate
Flare
2001
2002
Dim1
Positive correlation
Dim2
Dim3
Large deviation in Dim3 state
Spectra in Various States
Flare
Dim 1
Dim 2
Dim 3
100
counts s!1 keV!1
10
1
0.1
0.01
0.5
1
2
Energy [keV]
5
10
Differential Spectrum
100
counts s!1 keV!1
10
Flare - dim1
1
0.1
0.01
10!3
!
soft comp. + power law
連続成分が単調に増加
4
2
0
!2
!4
0.5
1
2
Energy [keV]
5
10
Spectrum in Dim1 State
counts s!1 keV!1
10
!
吸収を受けたpower law
反射成分
鉄輝線
stable成分
普遍的に存在
1
0.1
0.01
4
2
0
!2
!4
0.5
1
2
Energy [keV]
5
10
Differential Spectrum
Heavily absorbed component
NH
1023 cm-2
counts s!1 keV!1
1
0.01
!
Dim2 − Dim3
Absorption may play
an important role in
the spectral variation
0.1
4
2
0
!2
!4
0.5
1
2
Energy [keV]
5
10
Spectrum in Dim3 State
Thermal emission from optically thin plasma
extended regionからの
emissionが支配的
0.01
10!3
10!4
吸収成分無し
FX [keV(photons cm!2 s!1 keV!1)]
Compton reflection from distant matter
This is consistent with Fvar = 0
in Dim3 state
0.5
1
2
Energy [keV]
5
10
Spectral Variation
•Dim3 ⇔ Dim2; Change of the absorbed component
•Can the spectral variation be recognized as the variation
0.8
of the absorbed component ?
0.4
0.2
0
Fcover [10!11 erg cm!2 s!1]
0.6
□ 2001
● 2002
0
1
2
F2!10 [10!11 erg cm!2 s!1]
3
2001; almost constant absorbed flux
2002; gradually decrease with total flux
Summary of Results
Flux
State
Fvar
C-C plot
Spectrum Absorber
Max
Flare
0.1 0.4
Positive
constant
Dim1
Pl + Ab
Dim2
< 0.1
Min
Dim3
=0
Deviation
decrease
Thermal
+ Comp
disappear
10
1
2
Energy (keV)
5
0.1
0.01
10!3
10!4
1
2
Energy (keV)
10
0.01
10!3
10
0.2
0.5
1
2
Energy (keV)
5
10
10
!4
10
!3
0.01
Dim3
10
!5
keV (Photons cm!2 s!1 keV!1)
5
Dim2
0.1
0.5
0.5
10!4
10
!4
10
!3
0.01
Dim1
0.2
0.1
10
!5
keV (Photons cm!2 s!1 keV!1)
0.2
•Assumption
•Fdir ∝ Semi
•Semi > Sabs
•Fabs = const.
•Semi < Sabs
•Fabs ∝ Semi
•Semi = 0
•Fabs = 0
5
10!5
1
2
Energy (keV)
keV (Photons cm!2 s!1 keV!1)
0.5
0.1
0.2
10!5
10!4
10!3
0.01
keV (Photons cm!2 s!1 keV!1)
Flare
10!5
keV (Photons cm!2 s!1 keV!1)
0.1
Interpretation
0.2
0.5
1
2
Energy (keV)
5
Dim3 spectrum consists of stable components
No variavility found
10
NGC 4051のまとめ
大きなflux 変化に伴うスペクトル変化
dim state → 変動無し
LLAGN的特徴
radiatively efficient → inefficient ?
LLAGNはradio loud
dim stateではradio flux増加?
radio fluxの変動探査が本質的
候補天体
X線領域で極端なlow flux stateになる天体
D [Mpc]
log Msolar
F [mJy]
NGC 4051
12
6.2
10
Mrk 335
100
7.1
3
Mrk 766
50
6.5
15
NGC 3516
38
7.6
2
NGC 2992
30
7.7
91
NGC 2992
RXTE, MAXI等モニタ観測 → dim state確認
明らかになる
と嬉しい事
normal stateとdim stateの電波強度比較
電波強度(jet origin)とディスク状態の関係
AGNにおけるstate changeの実態
state changeのtriggerは?
理論的予測+電波観測+X線観測が重要