ABSTRACTS MCPC2014 Aalborg University, Denmark Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering The Faculty of Engineering and Science February 2014 Abstract MCPC2014 © Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Typesetting: Times New Roman Limited edition, 135 copies ISBN 87-91200-70-9 Editors: Kjeld Nielsen, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Stig B. Taps, Kaj A. Joergensen Print: UNIprint, Aalborg University, Denmark II Preface The first MCPC conference was hosted by Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2001. Since then the MCPC conference has grown to become the primary conference for presenting and discussing current issues and recent developments within the fields of Mass Customization, Personalization, and Customer Co-Creation. Since 2001, the conference has been hosted by University of Technology Munich (2003), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2005), M.I.T. (2007), Aalto University (2009) and UC Berkeley (2011). The 2014 MCPC conference, the seventh in the series, for which the contributions are presented in this book, is hosted by Aalborg University. The MCPC 2014 is a multi‐track conference featuring a combination of high profile keynotes with expert talks, panel discussions, paper sessions, workshops, receptions, and much more. While it is devoted to sharing and discussing the latest research in the field, the MCPC conference has a strong focus on real life applications. Since its beginning, the MCPC conference has had an equal share of participants, practitioners and academics/researchers. This makes the MCPC conference truly unique among many conferences. It strives to connect MCPC thinkers, first movers, entrepreneurs, technology developers, and researchers with people applying these strategies in practice. Twenty years ago Mass Customization was acknowledged as the ”New Frontier in Business Competition”. Ever since, industry has been applying the concept and researchers have developed the topic into a well-established research area and businesses have formed new strategies. More knowledge, methods and technologies are available now than ever before. Along with general Mass Customization topics, this conference addresses Mass Customization from a historical perspective, looking at both mass customization in the past 20 years and towards the new frontiers in the 20 years to come. The MCPC 2014 conference wants to engage academics, business leaders, and consultants in fundamental debates through a set of plenary presentations, workshops, discussion panels, and paper presentations. Continuing our tradition, we invite contri- III butions from a wide range of specialists. MCPC 2014 is looking for contributions in cutting-edge research, as well as insightful advances in industrial practice in key areas. This book presents the abstracts of MCPC2014 with research from the worldwide MCPC community and industry partners, bringing together the new thoughts and results from various disciplines within the topics: Academic tracks 20 Years of Mass Customization – Reflections Choice Navigation Product Modelling Solution Space Development Manufacturing Systems for MCPC MCPC Applications Open Innovation Industrial tracks MC in Project Oriented Industries MC in Engineer-to-Order Industries MC in Volume Oriented Industries MC in Consumer Oriented Industries The organizing committee would like to thank the MCPC community for the support for this conference, hoping that all participants, academic and industrial, will benefit from the presentations and discussions. Aalborg, February 2014 Kjeld Nielsen, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Stig B. Taps, Kaj A. Joergensen IV Table of Contents Keynote Speakers .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PILLER: THE PAST 20 YEARS OF MC RESEARCH - AND WHAT MAY BE COMING UP IN THE NEXT TWO DECADES ...................................................... 3 1.2 1.3 1.4 HUGHES: OPEL ADAM. ONE CAR, A MILLION POSSIBILITIES..................... 5 HADAR: MASS CUSTOMIZATION TECHNOLOGY ENABLING CONCEPTS ...... 7 PINE: INDIVIDUAL CUSTOMERS: THE LIFEBLOOD OF YOUR BUSINESS ....... 9 Industry Track Speakers ...................................................................................... 11 INDUSTRY SESSION 1: ............................................................................................... 13 MASS CUSTOMIZATION IN VOUME ORIENTED INDUSTRIES ...................................... 13 2.1 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURES AND REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING – ENABLERS FOR EFFECTIVE VARIANT CREATION. ....................................... 14 2.2 VESTAS, WIND - IT MEANS THE WORLD TO US. .......................................... 15 2.3 THE FUTURE IS COMING – ARE WE READY FOR IT AT THE LEGO GROUP? .................................................................................................... 16 2.4 PROCESS MODELLING – A WAY TO MANAGE WORKFLOWS IN THE QUOTE AND ORDER PROCESS ..................................................................... 17 INDUSTRY SESSION 2: ............................................................................................... 19 MC IN CONSUMER ORIENTED INDUSTRIES .............................................................. 19 2.5 FUTURE CHALLENGES OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT CONFIGURATION ........... 20 2.6 MASS CUSTOMIZATION IN THE BELGIAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY ................... 21 2.7 SMART FACTORY – SMART SKIS ................................................................. 22 2.8 MAKING THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE TO SIT............................................ 23 INDUSTRY SESSION 3: ............................................................................................... 25 MC IN PROJECT ORIENTED INDUSTRIES ................................................................... 25 2.9 EFFICIENT CONFIGURATION PROGRAMMING AT FLS................................. 26 2.10 PARTIAL MODULARITY AND THE MODULE APPLICATION MATRIX ........... 27 2.11 MODULAR ENGINEERING AND MODULAR CONSTRUCTION ....................... 28 INDUSTRY SESSION 4: .............................................................................................. 29 MC IN ENGINEER-TO-ORDER INDUSTRIES ............................................................... 29 2.12 PLATFORM DESIGN FOR SHORTENING DELIVERY TIME. ............................. 30 2.13 PRODUCT EXPERIENCE DELIVERY VIA 3D IMAGING ................................ 31 2.14 EXPERIENCE FROM CONFIGURATION OF SUB STATIONS AT DANFOSS ........ 33 2.15 CONFIGURATION LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT ............................................ 34 Academic Tracks Speakers .................................................................................. 35 3.1 WEB-BASED SALES CONFIGURATOR CAPABILITIES TO INCREASE THE VALUE OF MASS CUSTOMIZATION ............................................................ 37 V 3.2 UNDERSTANDING THE MICRO-FOUNDATIONS OF MASS CUSTOMIZATION ....................................................................................... 39 Special Session ....................................................................................................... 41 4.1 MASS CUSTOMIZATION AND SUSTAINABILITY .......................................... 43 Academic Sessions Presentations ......................................................................... 45 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 5.16 5.17 5.18 5.19 VI A BONDED EXPERIENCE: ‘VALUE CREATION AS THE CREATION OF AN EXPERIENCE, WITHIN A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP’ ..................................... 47 A CASE INVESTIGATION OF PRODUCT STRUCTURE COMPLEXITY IN MASS CUSTOMIZATION USING A DATA MINING APPROACH ..................... 47 A METHOD FOR SPECIFICATION OF MULTI-VARIANT PRODUCTS USING DEGREES OF FREEDOM OF SHAPE ATTRIBUTES IN PRODUCT STRUCTURES............................................................................................. 47 A PROFILE CHART APPROACH FOR DEFINING THE SOLUTION SPACE OF A PRODUCTION NETWORK ................................................................... 48 APPLYING THE 5 WHYS TO IDENTIFY ROT CAUSES TO NONCOMPLETIONS IN ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION ................................................ 48 CHALLENGES IN REQUEST MANAGEMENT – DEMAND MANAGEMENT OF CUSTOMER-DRIVEN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 49 CUSTOMIZATION ISSUES - A FOUR LEVEL CUSTOMIZATION MODEL ......... 49 DANISH PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION COUNSELLING SELECTION AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA IN EUROPEAN TENDERING................................... 49 DESCRIBING PRODUCT VARIETY USING SET THEORY................................ 50 DELAYS IN THE APPAREL MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY’S IMPLEMENTATION OF MASS CUSTOMIZATION .......................................... 50 DESIGNFUNDING: AN INQUIRY-TOOL FOR MASS CUSTOMIZATION........... 51 DOES CUSTOMER CO-CREATION REALLY PAY OFF? AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE FIRM’S BENEFITS FROM CUSTOMER INVOLVEMENT IN NEW PRODUCT AND SERVICE DEVELOPMENT ............. 51 DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF A RECONFIGURABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM .................................................................................................... 51 DESIGN CONFIGURATOR REQUIREMENTS FOR IS INTEGRATION ............... 52 ENABLING FACILITATION OF MASS CUSTOMIZATION VIA PARTNERING IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ....................................... 52 ENABLERS OF INNOVATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL INDUSTRY ................................................................................................. 53 EXTENDING CONFIGURATION AND VALIDATION OF CUSTOMIZED PRODUCTS BY IMPLICIT FEATURES IN VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS ........................................................................................ 53 EXTENDING THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF MASS CUSTOMIZATION: INITIAL AND ADAPTIVE SOLUTION SPACE DEVELOPMENT FOR HIGH-VARIETY PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS ......... 54 FLEXIBLE LASER METAL CUTTING, AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ROBOCUT LASER CUTTING TECHNIQUE ................................................ 54 5.20 5.21 5.22 5.23 5.24 5.25 5.26 5.27 5.28 5.29 5.30 5.31 5.32 5.33 5.34 5.35 5.36 5.37 5.38 5.39 5.40 5.41 5.42 5.43 FOOD CUSTOMIZATION – AN ANALYSIS OF PRODUCT CONFIGURATORS IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY ................................................ 54 GENERATIVE DESIGN APPROACH FOR MODELLING OF LARGE DESIGN SPACES ..................................................................................................... 55 HOW TO SQUEEZE A CONFIGURATOR INTO A HANDHELD DEVICE ............ 55 INNOTRACING: INVESTIGATING THE MOMENT-TO-MOMENT UNFOLDING OF LEADERSHIP, CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION .................. 56 IMPLEMENTATION OF BIM IN THE DANISH BUILDING SECTOR.................. 56 INTRODUCING MASS CUSTOMIZATION TO SMES IN FURNITURE INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY ....................................................................... 56 INTEGRATION SYSTEM OF MASS CUSTOMIZATION AND MASS PRODUCTION AS A MARKET-ORIENTED PRODUCTION SYSTEM ................ 57 IS SUSTAINABLE MASS CUSTOMIZATION AN OXYMORON? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY TO ANALYZE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF A MC BUSINESS MODEL ............................................................................... 57 LIVING LAB METHODOLOGY AS AN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR MASS CUSTOMIZATION ....................................................................................... 58 MAKING IT PERSONAL: RULES FOR SUCCESS IN PRODUCT CUSTOMIZATION ....................................................................................... 58 MANAGING PROCESS CUSTOMISATION FOR THE CAPITAL GOODS SECTOR. AN APPLICATION CASE STUDY .................................................. 59 MASS APPAREL TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT: APPAREL MADE FOR YOU (AM4U©) ....................................................... 59 MASS-CUSTOMIZATION-SERVICE-ENCOUNTERS: THE INFLUENCE OF THE CO-DESIGN PROCESS STRUCTURE ON PERFORMANCE ....................... 60 MASS CUSTOMIZATION AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT: OVERVIEW & RESEARCH DIRECTIONS ...................................................... 60 MASS CUSTOMIZATION MEASUREMENTS METRICS .................................. 60 MASS CUSTOMIZATION AS INNOVATION DRIVER OF INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS IN PERIPHERAL REGIONAL SME SUBCONTRACTORS ................................................................................... 61 MASS CUSTOMIZATION SYSTEMS ARE NOT ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL ................. 61 MECHATRONIC BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS OF A CUSTOMIZED MANUFACTURING CELL ........................................................................... 61 MODELLING AND ORGANISING CUSTOMER DRIVEN BUSINESS PROCESS IN A MASS CUSTOMIZATION ENVIRONMENT .............................. 62 MULTIDISCIPLINARY PRODUCT DECOMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS BASED ON DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX (DSM) MODELLING ..................... 62 OPEN INNOVATION: CREATING VALUE THROUGH CO-CREATION ............. 63 OPEN INNOVATION, CO-CREATION AND MASS CUSTOMISATION: WHAT ROLE FOR 3D PRINTING PLATFORMS? ........................................... 63 PARADIGM IN THE 21ST CENTURY ............................................................ 63 PRODUCT, ORGANIZATIONAL AND PERFORMANCE EFFECTS OF PRODUCT MODULARITY ........................................................................... 64 VII 5.44 5.45 5.46 5.47 5.48 5.49 5.50 VIII PRODUCTION AND RESOURCE SCHEDULING IN MASS CUSTOMIZATION WITH DEPENDENT SETUP CONSIDERATION.................... 64 SCALING UP LOCAL AND INDIVIDUALIZED SOLUTIONS, CHALLENGING EXISTING LOGIC ........................................................................................ 64 STRATEGIC CAPABILITIES TO MANAGE HIGH-VARIETY PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS: THE ROLE OF UNDERLYING ACTIVITIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL RESOURCES ................................................................. 65 THE IMPACT OF THE ARRANGEMENT OF USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION IN THE CONFIGURATION PROCESS ............. 65 THE SERIES OF “P.L.A.Y”- A COMBINATION OF USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN AND FOOTWEAR DESIGN.............................................................. 66 THE USE OF MODELLING METHODS FOR PRODUCT CONFIGURATION IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS .................................................................. 66 UNDERSTANDING COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THROUGH MODULARITY ........................................................................................... 67 ABSTRACTS MCPC2014 IX X Keynote Speakers Frank Piller, TIM Group, RWTH Aachen Richard P Hughes, OPEL Ronen Hadar, LEGO B. Joseph Pine II, Strategic Horizons 2 1.1 The past 20 years of MC research - and what may be coming up in the next two decades Professor Frank Piller, TIM, RWTH Aachen, Germany [email protected] Bio. Frank T. Piller is a Co-Director of the MIT Smart Customization Group at the MIT Design Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, and a chair professor of management at the Technology & Innovation Management Group of RWTH Aachen University, Germany, one of Europe’s leading institutes of technology. Before entering his recent position in Aachen, he worked at the MIT Sloan School of Management (2004-2007) and has been an associate professor of management at TUM Business School, Technische Universitaet Muenchen. Frequently quoted in The New York Times, The Economist, and Business Week, amongst others, Frank is regarded as one of the leading experts on strategies for customer-centric value creation, like mass customization, personalization, and innovation co-creation. His analysis of “Threadless” (co-authored with Susumu Ogawa), an innovative crowdsourcing business model in the fashion industry, has been elected as one of the Top-20 articles in MIT Sloan Management Review. His group at RWTH Aachen is considered to be one of the globally leading research centers for open and distributed innovation and is supported by competitive research grants of about US$1million annually. This research has been acknowledged, for example, by a finalist nomination for the "Innovating Innovation" Award 2013 by Harvard Business Review and McKinsey for their work on implementing open innovation or the 2012 Global Co-Creation Award by PDMA (the largest professional association for product and service development) for their work on ideation contests with senior citizens. Based on his strong background of rigor and relevant research, Frank Piller is an acclaimed speaker at management conferences and in executive education programs around the world. He has delivered customized executive classes for many Global1000 companies, innovative startups and top business schools alike. He has been elected twice “teacher of the year” (2001 and 2006) at TUM Business School and was a recipient of the RWTH Teaching Award in 2010 and received an award for innovation in teaching within the German Exzellenz initiative in 2012. As a member of the board of directors or scientific advisers he works with a number of innovative technology companies to turn his research into practice. 3 Abstract. What started with customized jeans, personalized sneakers, and engineer-to-order machine tools has developed into the core element of many disruptive business models in industry: personalization and customization of products and services. Credit card contracts are being customized to a consumer's spending profile, broadcasted radio changes to a media stream fitting just our mood and preferences, blockbuster drugs are being replaced by personalized medicine based on real time data tracking, and instead of a "world car" we just buy mobility services when we need it where we need it how we need it. But what are the fundamental elements of a successful mass customization enterprise? Over the past decades, the mass customization community has studied this topic in many different venues. We found that mass customization is a strategic mechanism that is applicable to most businesses, provided that it is appropriately understood and deployed. However, the state of the practice often lacks behind the state of MC research. Here, we still see large challenges in better bridging between what we already know and how it is implemented in business. We will close with some new ideas on the future of mass customization, and especially focus on solution space development, i.e. the way how to define what options shall be offered to customers: Where does customization really provide value, and how can companies determine when and where to customize? Our argument here is that it may indeed be not firms, but users and customers themselves that determine this development. 4 1.2 Opel ADAM. One car, a million possibilities Director, Richard P Hughes, Germany [email protected] Bio. After leaving university in Manchester, England with a BA(Hons) in Marketing & Business, Richard started his career in FMCG joining Kellogg’s GB Ltd on their graduate programme. He then moved across to Automotive, where he has worked for General Motors (GM) for the past 18 years, holding a number of senior leadership roles across both Sales & Marketing functions. For several years, he headed up Marketing Communications, producing many of GM’s TV campaigns. Richard is currently Director of Digital Marketing and Customer Loyalty for Europe, and is based in Frankfurt. He has also worked out of GM’s Zurich and London offices. He is a member of the Executive Committee of ISBA, representing advertisers in the UK on key policy affecting the industry. Abstract. Opel is one of Europe’s largest automakers. Founded by Adam Opel in 1862, the company celebrated its 150th anniversary in 2012. Headquartered in Rüsselsheim, the company has 11 plants and four development and test centers in seven European countries. Opel employs around 37,000 people in Europe. Opel and its British sister brand Vauxhall are present in over 50 countries. In 2013 over one million passenger cars and light commercial vehicles were sold. German engineering and expressive design are at the heart of organisation, and have led to the company receiving many prestigious awards for its innovation, including Car of the Year for the segment leading Ampera electric car. In 2013, the ADAM was launched, a car packed with style, innovation, advanced powertrains and, uniquely, an unprecedented level of personalisation. Through consumer clinic work over the past 5 years, it was clear that some consumer segments wanted greater choice in the personalisation of their car as it was a way that they could express themselves and also buy something ‘unique’. The challenge was set to the engineering, design and marketing teams. How far could this be taken? What was possible? Could manufacturing manage the complexity? Would too much choice be confusing? Traditionally, cars are offered in several trim levels in a hierarchy, but this expressive group wanted more. Why not have a few base platforms that consumers can then build their own model from. Whilst most manufacturers offer choices in colours, seat fabrics, engines and certain options, the decision was made to create a complete range 5 of personalised options stretching from different inner headlining options including LED’s to an extensive array of coloured wheels and styling parts. In fact, the choice was so broad, it was calculated that were over 4.5 million build combinations!! A key part of the consumer purchase journey is the manufacturer website, where they can explore and discover more about their choice of car. The on-line car configurator is highly used tool, enabling the user to build, preview and share their choice of car. For ADAM, a new configurator was built to better showcase the range of options and improve the user interface. Building this new tool presented its challenges due to the model complexity. Has it worked – what insight does the website analytics provide? 6 1.3 Mass Customization Technology Enabling Concepts © LEGO, 2012 Senior Project Manager, Ronen Hadar, LEGO, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Ronen Hadar is a Senior Project Manager at the Concept Center – The LEGO Group’s frontend technology innovation department and has been employed there for the past 3 years. In the past Ronen was employed in areas of business development and engineering R&D. Ronen holds master degree in Innovation and Business Engineering and is currently submitting his PhD in manufacturing concepts for the future. Abstract. Mass customization and mass personalization have been increasing trends in the past decade. However, companies are struggling with implementing mass customization business models and financially justifying them due to manufacturing systems inflexibility. Two interesting manufacturing concepts and technologies are upcoming that may enable companies to be more competitive in this changing environment, namely Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (RMS) and Rapid Manufacturing (RM – commonly referred to as 3D printing). RMS is a manufacturing concept for systems that are designed for fast changeovers. The concept is based on several core characteristics such as: modularity, integrability, focused flexibility, and diagnosability. Implementing these core characteristics will enable a company to make fast changeovers and by that increase its ability to produce smaller batches according to real demand. RM is defined is the use of Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies for the production of consumer goods on a large scale. The free forming characteristic of the technology enables the production of “one-off” products without investing in additional tools and machines. Other advantages can be seen in the supply chain and production processes. The presentation will extensively introduce these two concepts and their potential contribution to the implementation of mass customization business models in a company. 7 8 1.4 Individual Customers: The Lifeblood of Your Business B. Joseph Pine II, Strategic Horizons, United States of America [email protected] Bio. B. JOSEPH PINE II is an internationally acclaimed author, speaker, and management advisor to Fortune 500 companies and entrepreneurial start-ups alike. He is cofounder of Strategic Horizons LLP, a thinking studio dedicated to helping businesses conceive and design new ways of adding value to their economic offerings. In 1999 Mr. Pine and his partner James H. Gilmore wrote the best-selling book The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage, which demonstrates how goods and services are no longer enough; what companies must offer today are experiences – memorable events that engage each customer in an inherently personal way. Published in fifteen languages and named one of the 100 best business books of all time by 800ceoread, in 2011 The Experience Economy came out for the first time in paperback as an Updated Edition with new ideas, new frameworks, and many, many new exemplars. Mr. Pine also published in 2011, with Kim C. Korn as coauthor, Infinite Possibility: Creating Customer Value on the Digital Frontier, on how to use digital technology to stage experiences that fuse the real and the virtual. At its core is a new framework called the Multiverse that builds on the fundamental nature of the created universe – time, space, and matter – by showing how digital technology flips each of these dimensions on their head to create new worlds, first in our imagination and then in our experience. In 2007 Mr. Pine wrote Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want with Mr. Gilmore, which recognizes that in a world of increasingly paid-for experiences, people no longer accept the fake from the phony, but want the real from the genuine. Amazon.com named it one of the top ten business books of 2007 while a cover story in TIME magazine cited it as one of “10 ideas that are changing the world”. His first book was the award-winning Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, which details the shift companies are making from mass producing standardized offerings to mass customizing goods and services that efficiently fulfill the wants and needs of individual customers. The Financial Times chose it as one the seven best business books of 1993. He and his partner followed this up in 2000 by editing a collection of Harvard Business Review articles entitled Markets of One: Creating Customer-Unique Value through Mass Customization. Mr. Pine has also written numerous articles for the Harvard Business Review, The Wall Street Journal, Chief Executive, Worldlink, CIO, Strategy & Leadership, and the 9 IBM Systems Journal, among many others. Prior to beginning his writing and speaking activities, Mr. Pine held a number of technical and managerial positions with IBM. He is frequently quoted in such places as Forbes, The New York Times, Wired, USA TODAY, Investor’s Business Daily, ABC News, Good Morning America, Fortune, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, and Industry Week. In his speaking and teaching activities, Mr. Pine has addressed both the World Economic Forum and TED and has been a Visiting Scholar with the MIT Design Lab. He has also taught at Penn State, Duke Corporate Education, the University of Minnesota, UCLA’s Anderson Graduate School of Management, and the Harvard Design School. He serves on the editorial boards of Strategy & Leadership and Strategic Direction, and is a Senior Fellow with both the Design Futures Council and the European Centre for the Experience Economy, which he co-founded. Abstract. The era of Mass Production is over. There are no markets, only customers. The term “individual customer” is redundant. Customers don’t want choice, they just want exactly what they want. Turn marketing into customering. Do only and exactly what each customer needs. Anything you can digitize you can customize. All customers are unique, and each and every one is the lifeblood of any business. These are a few of the insights Joe Pine has learned in over 25 years of studying Mass Customization. Now that his book, Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, has gone out of print after 20 years, Joe is gathering these insights for a new work on the subject, one centered around a new Mass Customization Manifesto. At this keynote session Mr. Pine will reveal this Manifesto and provide every attendee with a personal copy. He will then expand on each of the concepts in the Manifesto with frameworks that together get at the core of what Mass Customization is – and what businesses must do to embrace it. 10 Industry Track Speakers 11 © Hydrema, © Vestas, © Madshus, © ConfigIT, © LEGO, © SBS, © FL Smidt, © NNE Pharma, © Zazzle, © 3Dfacto, © NCC, © Grundfos 12 Industry session 1: MC in Voume Oriented Industries Session Chair: Associate Professor, Poul H. K. Hansen, AAU, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Poul Kyvsgaard Hansen is an Associate Professor of Technology Management and Organization at Center for Industrial Production at Aalborg University in Denmark. He holds a M.Sc. in Industrial Engineering and a Ph.D. in Technology Management. His current research focuses on various aspects of communicating complex problems and solutions. This includes both organizational and technical issues within three overall research areas 1) Product modularization – Architectures – Platforms, 2) Innovation Management, and 3) Change Management Abstract. Modularization is the foundation for successful Mass Customization and Personalization. However, the phenomenon of managing modularization is not well known. The cause-effect relationships between modularization and realized benefits are complex and comprehensive. Though a number of research works have contributed to the study of the phenomenon of efficient and effective modularization management it is far from clarified. Modularization management does not differ from management in general. As modularity is a means, the management challenge will be to apply this means so it may serve the short and long term goals of the company best possible. The goals that are impacted by decisions on modularity are characterized by being many and crossorganizational. Some generally impacted goals are related to: expected product changes, expected product lifetime, product variety, product family commonality, sourcing possibilities, various lead-times, product performance, manufacturability, product cost policy, competition policy, purchase policy, logistic setup, investment policy, and technology change policy. 13 2.1 Product Architectures and Requirements Engineering – enablers for effective variant creation. Senior Change Agent, Jesper Thyssen, Grundfos [email protected] Bio. Jesper Thyssen, M.Sc.; Ph.d.; Senior Change Agent, System Management, Grundfos A/S. Acquired the M.Sc. degree in 1999, and the Ph.d. in 2005, both from Aalborg University, Denmark. Core areas of experiences are change management within the domains of product development, value engineering, design for X, and product architectures and platforms. Abstract. Grundfos is the world’s largest manufacturer of pumps and pump systems with turnover of 3,035 EUR mill and 18.000 employees. The company experiences an ever more complex product development process due to growing technological complexity, globalization and the quest for constantly shortening the time to market. One of the central themes in the pursuit of improving the product development capabilities is, among others, improved deployment of product architectures and requirements engineering as two interlinked means. The architectural work has in the past mostly been in the scope of single projects and sub-set of a product program. The scope is changing, reflecting a full product program level identifying commonalities and variance upfront, thus improving the effectiveness of the product program. Simultaneously, the rigor and quality of the requirements engineering is in focus and highly interlinked with the product architectural work. As part of an overall change program, improved requirements engineering is central to the quest for increased reuse in the global organization, e.g. the use of technology platforms. The application of new IT tool among other enables a common repository supporting sharing of requirements in a global development organization. 14 2.2 Vestas, Wind - It means the world to us. © Courtesy of Vestas Senior Change Agent, Carl Erik Skødstrup, VESTAS, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Carl Erik Skjølstrup has since his Master Degree from a Japanese national university back in 1984 been responsible for Technology Development and modularization in companies as different as shipbuilding, robotics, machines for the food industry, LEGO and is now since 6 years Vice President in Vestas Technology & Service Solutions responsible for Innovation & Architecture. Abstract. Vestas is the most global player in the wind industry and as such exposed to a large variety of market demands. Energy prices, politics, local regulations and financials are further constantly changing the choice of the optimal wind power plant solution in a given location. Before the financial crises, when the demand for Vestas wind turbines were larger than the delivery capacity, the design principle were based on “design-for-severe-user” and “one-size-fits-all” to ensure maximum output from assembly lines. Needless to say this design strategy is not optimal in the current cost pressured and highly varying market so Vestas needs to set up methods to offer variability towards the market without creating internal complexity. 15 2.3 The future is coming - are we ready for it at the LEGO Group? © LEGO, 2012 Senior Project Manager, Allan Rasmussen, LEGO [email protected] Bio. Allan V. Rasmussen is senior project manager at the Concept Center – The LEGO Group’s front-end technology innovation center. He has a M. Sc. in Chemical engineering from DTU, a Bachelor in Business Administration (HDafsætningsøkonomi) from SDU and a MBA in Technology and innovation management (MMT) from AAU. Abstract. Allan has worked with plastic devilment and innovation for more than 15 years. The last 6 years he has worked with front end material development and innovation at the LEGO Group. He will use this experience to reflect on the adaptability of the LEGO Group – and to what degree the company is ready for the change that the future will hold. Additive manufacturing (or 3D printing) will be a fact in the future. It is only going to be a question how companies are reacting to it. Will the huge success the LEGO Group has experienced the last couple of years be a strong foundation for the changing future? – Or will it narrow the focus of the company to short term optimization and continued improvement? 16 2.4 Process Modelling – a way to manage workflows in the quote and order process Product Manager, Mads Kjærgaard Larsen, 3Dfacto, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Mads Kjærgaard Larsen has a M.Sc. in Economics and Business Administration and has throughout his career been focusing on restructuring business processes that increase revenue and profit. For the past 15 years, Mads has gained a thorough hands-on experience from both supplier and customer side in restructuring business processes by implementing coherent, sustainable configuration, pricing and quoting processes that severely impact the bottom-line and are essential for future growth of many international manufacturing companies. Abstract. Sales and product configurators are cross-organizational tools that provide great ways for all stakeholders in the quoting and ordering process to communicate efficiently about the offered product variance. 3Dfacto experience a rise in the market demand in both Engineer-To-Order and Configure-To-Order oriented industries for extending sales and product configurators to manage the flow of crossorganizational activities around the product composition. Whereas the product knowledge is important in the current sales and product configurators, the process knowledge of managing product releases, quote generation and approval, and new variant creation become increasingly important. A need for a holistic approach to configuration is therefore needed, taking into account both the classic modelling of the product variance but also the modelling and control of the workflow activities in connection with the quoting and ordering of the product composition. Mads Kjærgaard Larsen, Product Manager at 3Dfacto, will share his extensive market experiences with practical examples showing the power of combining process modelling with product modelling. 17 18 Industry session 2: MC in Consumer Oriented Industries Session Chair: Senior Researcher, Lars Skjelstad, SINTEF, Norway [email protected] Bio. Lars Skjelstad is a senior research scientist at SINTEF Technology and Society. He holds a PhD within Mass Customization from NTNU, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Skjelstad is project manager of several Norwegian MCprojects sponsored by The Research Council of Norway. In one of them, the ARMS project, Mass customization is adjusted to Norwegian culture, and an Arena for MC is created at the City of Røros. He has previously worked in industry. Abstract. Consumer oriented industries are the epicenter of the thinking on Mass Customization. The possibilities to capture the customers' interest, and offer something they really want, was by many seen as a new way to survive and even gain market share. Academia followed up with theories and descriptions of how to go about. Listing principles to follow and capabilities to gain to be a preferred supplier. Businesses must take the "customer perspective" and imagine; what do they need? Today we have numerous business cases communicating stories of success. Not only with respect to customer satisfaction, but also in terms of business achievements. The introduction to this industrial track will discuss the balance between different positions when designing a business. 19 2.5 Future Challenges of Industrial Product Configuration Andreas Falkner, Siemens [email protected] Bio. Andreas Falkner holds a PhD in Computer Science. Since 1992 he has been developing product configurators for complex technical systems in various domains. At present, he is Senior Research Scientist at Siemens' Research and Technology Center, Research Group "Configuration Technologies" (Vienna, Austria). Abstract. Siemens is a huge company and offers thousands of different types of products, mainly in a B2B context. Due to different requirements of the different domains and the long history of most of the product lines, different configurators are used. As many of the products (and technical systems) are large and complex, much configuration is done by Siemens designers, engineers and sales persons in-house. To stay competitive and address the challenge to accelerate production processes the business units are forced to increase flexibility and to shorten time-to-market. An important aspect to achieve this is leveraging individualization and masscustomization also in a mainly B2B world: open configuration by the customer, factory sourcing, on-site production of parts etc. This talk gives an overview of the current situation of product configuration within Siemens and how Siemens plans to address the challenges of Industry 4.0 and the trend to open configuration. 20 2.6 Mass Customization in the Belgian Textile Industry Consultant, Sander de Vrieze, Centexbel, Belgium [email protected] Bio. Sander De Vrieze, PhDis working in textile engineering, master in science and engineering; working now almost 4 years as a consultant and advisor in Centexbel, the CENtre of TEXtiles in BELgium. His work is especially directed towards intellectual property (patents) and towards mass customization. We are funded by the Belgian government to stimulate the implementation of mass customisation in the Belgian textile companies. His presentation will be about this implementation, about the success and fail stories. Abstract. The Belgian textile industry consists of around several hundred different companies that operate in many different subdomains. Over the last years, these companies have embraced mass customization. This leads to a transition in several companies, resulting in a stream of new products. When looking to the different segments of the textile industry, interior textiles, technical textiles and fashion, in each segment examples can be found of the transition to mass customization. This is most peculiar, since two of these segments, interior textiles and technical textiles, are historically B2B-companies. At this moment, different ways of implementing mass customization can be seen at Belgian textile companies. B2C implementation of mass customization can be seen in some companies who are historically purely B2B companies. The transition towards these activities shows different problems, amongst others changing the marketing strategy. 21 2.7 Smart factory – smart skis Technical Director, Bjørn Ivar Austrem, Madshus Ski,Norway [email protected] Bio. Education: Master of Mechanical Engineering (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) from 2000. Worked 7 years in the Norwegian offshore industry as engineer and project manager, responsible for installation of subsea equipment for Aker. Since 2007 development manager and now technical director at Madshus AS. Abstract. Cross country skiing is the national sport in Norway. Norwegian ski manufacturer Madshus has, together with Sintef, developed a new way of thinking when it comes to offering customized products and enhanced services to its customers. Small variations in the production processes, combined with the many different snow conditions and different biomechanical level of the customers makes it a tedious job for the retailers to sell the “perfect” ski to all customers. By introducing new technology like smart automization, NFC technology and real time data collection in the factory, Madshus is now able to offer ski property data that will be used to customize the skis to the different customers. This will speed up the selling process and make sales more secure for both the retailer and the customers. 22 2.8 Making the world a better place to sit Vice president manufacturing Røros, Ottar Tollan, SBS AS, Norway [email protected] Bio. Vice President Manufacturing at Scandinavian Business Seating Røros (producing HÅG task chairs, and conference chairs). Previous experience as Maintenance and improvement engineer in Elkem ASA (Aluminium, and Silicon materials), and Production manager Elkem Thamshavn AS. Abstract. - Who are Scandinavian Business seating "Making the world a better place to sit" Our brands - RH, RBM ang HÅG Our procuction sites - Manufacturing in Røros with 70% export - Change and development towards mass customization - The capabilities of Superflex line producing HÅG task chairs - Operational performance 23 24 Industry session 3: MC in Project Oriented Industries Session Chair: Professor Lars Hvam, DTU, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Lars Hvam is Professor in Operations Management at the Technical University of Denmark. He has been working on product configuration and complexity management for more than 15 years as a teacher, a researcher and as consultant. Lars Hvam is also head of the center for product modeling, and the founder and current chairman of the Product Modeling Association, www.productmodels.org, whose aim is to disseminate knowledge of the possibilities offered by product configuration and complexity management through seminars, courses and other activities. Abstract. Companies making complex and highly engineered products like machines, complete factories and buildings face a significant challenge in reducing lead time and uncertainties in the projects and at the same time improve productivity and the quality of the products. In order to meet this challenge a modular product structure and product configuration systems have proved to have a positive impact on quality, lead time and efficiency of the projects. In this session the potential and approaches for applying the principles of modular products and product configuration will be presented. 25 2.9 Efficient Configuration programming at FLS Product Configuration Manager, Morten Hugo Bennick, FL Smidth, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Responsible for Integration of Product models at FLSmidth A/S Abstract. FLSmidth is a world leader in delivering complete solutions for Cement and Mineral Industry, covering from customized equipment to complete operation of plants. MyConfig is a versatile configuration tool that supports and optimizes the daily workflow for sales, proposals, orders and spare parts. The automatically generated output from the system range from product structures, proposals and part lists to 2D and 3D documentation. Different systems, such as MathCAD, STAAD.Pro, SolidWorks, SmartPlant, MS Office, PDMWorks or Enovia can be linked to MyConfig to create and register the generated documents. Among the results of using this method, are a significantly reduced lead time and higher quality level. The models (product builds) used in MyConfig are described by in an efficient programming language which make it is easy to make product structure, attributes, attributes and other business rules. The Technology behind MyConfig; MyConfig is a highly modularized web based system with a modern Web API that allows to easily create new interfaces to engineering software tools like SolidWorks, SmartPlant, MathCAD, STAAD.Pro, Excel, enabling easy access for end users to engineering knowledge. MyConfig itself is accessible from other systems, so other systems can reuse the knowledge that is in MyConfig. Integration into other Companies configurators/Knowledge systems are also available. 26 2.10 Partial modularity and the Module Application Matrix Anders Kudsk, NCC, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Anders Kudsk is Innovation Manager at NCC Construction Denmark A/S. He is responsible for the development of concept construction based on technical platforms an area he has worked with since 2007. Anders is Ph.D. and Master of Science from the Technical University of Denmark and has also a background as a skilled carpenter. Abstract. Much work has been done on mass customization and platforms for fully modularized products. In some industries, e.g. the construction industry, the relationships between the size of the product and its complexity, as well as the availability of development resources and market volume, can in practice make it exceedingly difficult to achieve full modularization in one step, if at all. Due to these challenges, it is necessary to work with partial modularization, and to understand the possibilities for stepwise implementation of modules and platforms. The Module Application Matrix is a framework for mapping the degree of modularity in a product, and the level of design-specific detail required for each of the modules. This approach is helpful both for gaining a big picture understanding of partial modularization, and for working with it, especially at the strategic level. NCC Constructions Denmark A/S is working with partial modularity and stepwise implementation, employing both a topdown approach, focusing on the entire building as a whole, and a bottom-up approach with special detailed focus on selected parts of the building. The two approaches represent two different strategies, as is clarified through use of the Module Application Matrix. 27 2.11 Modular Engineering and Modular Construction Senior Specialist, Jørn Grønbech, NNE Pharmaplan, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Mr. Jørn Grønbech is a mechanical engineer has more than 20 years of experience in equipment design, engineering management as well as project management of projects within the biotech, pharmaceutical and petrol-chemical industries. Jørn is the recognised NNE Pharmaplan specialist in the field of Modular Engineering and Modular Construction and have participated in a large number of projects within this area. Abstract. The presentation will include the following topics: Description of the theory behind NNE Pharmaplan (NP) Modular Engineering and the advantages of use this when designing plants for the pharmaceutical- and chemical industries. In the NP definition of Modular Engineering the process is the only guiding principle in the modularisation – not physical or construction considerations. Presentation of how the modular design is transformed into modular constructions units and the advantages of use this method when establishing new plants or revamps; especially when talking Fast Track projects. A case storie where Modular Engineering and Modular Construction have been used. 28 Industry session 4: MC in Engineer-to-Order Industries Session Chair: Professor, Niels Henrik Mortensen, DTU, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Niels Henrik Mortensen holds a PhD and a M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering and is employed as a Professor at the Technical University of Denmark. He is heading the section of Engineering Design & Product Development at the Department of Mechanical Engineering (DTU-MEK). He is also heading the Product Architecture research group at DTU-MEK. The main focus of the Product Architecture Group is development of procedures and methods supporting development of Product Families based on Architectures and Platforms. Abstract. The main topic of this workshop is to present theoretical and practical results from application of MC in this industry. Due to the low production volume and amount of engineering contents there very different conditions compared to e.g. mass production industry. Among the main topics to be discussed are: How to determine the right balance between off line work (the preparation of e.g. modules) and on line architecture work (the customer project execution)? How to design modules that have sufficient flexibility to serve, a variety of customer needs and at the same time achieve effective production? How dies modern IT systems such as configuration and PLM support MC in this industry? One aspect is multiple structures. Being able to work with both systems and module architectures concurrently has the potential to increase engineering performance significantly. How to organize architecture development and maintenance – what are best practice in industry and academia? 29 2.12 Platform design for shortening delivery time. R&D Manager, Thorkild K. Iversen, Hydrema, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Thorkil K. Iversen. R&D manager for the Hydrema group. M.Sc.M.E from Aalborg University. Abstract. Platform design for shortening delivery time for earthmoving equipment. Hydrema is a medium sized Danish producer of backhoes, excavators and dump trucks. By using platform design and new assembly strategy for 3 new product series, Hydrema has got fewer parts, lower assembly time and higher delivery performance. All machines are made direct to customer ordering configuration direct from the assembly. The platform method has been used both for components, systems and machine modules. Together with DTU Hydrema has participated in a “platform project”, the outcome of this will be shown. 30 2.13 Product Experience Delivery Via 3D Imaging CTO, George Borshukov, Embodee, Portland, OR, United States of America [email protected] Bio. George Borshukov, as Embodee’s CTO, is responsible for the creation and evolution of the first integrated platform for apparel customization and try-on. The virtuoso interactive rendering and visualization capabilities of the Embodee customization and virtual try-on applications build on techniques he developed as a leader in technical innovation in the motion pictures and interactive entertainment industries. At Electronic Arts, George was Director of Creative R&D, where he set standards for facial capture, animation and rendering, and fostered innovation in hi-fidelity graphics and new forms of interactivity including 3D camera-based gestural interfaces. As a Technical Designer for the Bullet Time sequences in The Matrix, George developed the image-based virtual cinematography pipeline for capturing real film sets and locations. These sequences captured people’s imagination and were crucial for The Matrix winning the 1999 Oscar for Best Visual Effects. Borshukov received an Academy Award for Scientific and Technical Achievement for his work on the film and a Visual Effect Society (VES) Award for the development and application of the Universal Capture facial photography technique used in successive Matrix films. Borshukov co-invented the UV Pelting approach for parameterization and seamless texturing of polygonal or subdivision surfaces, an evolving standard for UV mapping in popular 3D packages. He received his M.S. from the University of California at Berkeley’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. He is a contributor to SIGGRAPH, a self-confessed pixel perfectionist, currently living in Portland, Oregon with his family where he enjoys skiing and wakeboarding. Abstract. If mass customization is to become ubiquitous, 3D imagery must play an essential role. The typical method of marketing products today relies on 2D photos that are usually small, lack subtle but important detail, and don’t allow viewing from all angles. Thus, they don’t bridge The Sensorial Chasm: the difference between touching and closely inspecting a product in person vs experiencing it virtually on a screen. New technology allows a single product to be rendered dynamically on demand in vivid 3D -- not just from any angle but with multiple customization options. This creates a practical and effective way of creating a virtual library of thousands of potential visualizations of a single product. This vastly increases the ability of companies to meet hyper-individualized aesthetic tastes of consumers who increasingly not 31 only want but expect to be able to customize a product before it’s manufactured. And it allows companies to effectively market a wide range of products before they’re manufactured. We’ll explore the technology, its real world applications at large companies, and potential future enhancements. 32 2.14 Experience from configuration of sub stations at Danfoss CEO, Ulf Harlou Platform & architecture consultant at CPC, DTU, Denmark [email protected] Bio. Ulf harlou, Msc.Eng., PhD, Platform & architecture specialist, CPC – Center for Product Customization Abstract. Ulf has 15 years of experience with implementation of modularization and configuration management in Scandinavian companies. The basis of Ulfs work is a structured methodology for describing variety, product structures, modules, interfaces, systems, etc. The methodology emphasizes on the importance of describing the product family from market, product and production point of view. All three point of views are important in order to design a product family. 33 2.15 Configuration Lifecycle Management CEO, Henrik Reif Andersen, Configit, Denmark [email protected] Bio. CEO, Configit • Co-founder of Configit • PhD in Computer Science from the University of Aarhus • 25 years experience in IT development and research • Professor of Computer Science Abstract. Enterprise-Wide Management of Vehicle Configurations 34 Academic Tracks Speakers 35 36 3.1 Web-based sales configurator capabilities to increase the value of Mass Customization Professor Cipriano Forza, University of Padova, Italy [email protected] Bio. Cipriano Forza is a full professor of operations management at the Università di Padova (Italy). He is also on the faculty at the European Institute of Advanced Studies in Management, where he teaches research methods in operations management. He has been visiting scholar at Minnesota University (USA), London Business School (UK), and Arizona State University (USA). Currently he serves as an associate editor for the Journal of Operations Management and the Decision Sciences Journal. His research focuses on product variety management. He is researching such topics as mass customization, concurrent product-process-supply chain design, and product configuration. He has been successfully assisting numerous companies in these topics. He has published in the Journal of Operations Management, the International Journal of Operations & Production Management, the International Journal of Production Research, Computers in Industry, the International Journal of Production Economics, Industrial Management & Data Systems, and other journals. In 2003 and 2007, he published two books with McGraw-Hill and Palgrave Macmillan, respectively, on product information management for mass customization. Abstract. Mass customization (MC) literature has long emphasized that the consumer’s experience of self-customizing a product with a sales configurator (or MC experience for short) can be a source of costs for the consumer in terms of time spent, cognitive effort required and negative emotions elicited. More recently, MC research has found that such an experience can also be a source of consumer benefits that go above and beyond the traditionally considered utility of possessing a product that better fits the consumer’s idiosyncratic needs. Both these experience-related benefits and the experience-related costs mentioned above influence the value of mass customization on the supplier’s side by affecting the customer’s willingness to use a sales configurator, the likelihood of his/her abandoning the self-customization process without actually buying a product and his/her willingness to pay for the configured product. We conceptualize five capabilities that sales configurators should deploy to both alleviate such costs and augment such benefits and we develop and validate a parsimonious measurement instrument of such capabilities for both theory-testing and sales configurator benchmarking. By analyzing MC experiences made on real Webbased configurators of consumer goods, we also find support for the hypotheses that 37 these five capabilities increase hedonic and creative-achievement benefits for the consumer as well as his/her satisfaction with the configured product and purchase intention. Implications of these findings for both MC research and practice are finally discussed. 38 3.2 Understanding the micro-foundations of Mass Customization Professor Fabrizio Salvador, IE Business School, Spain [email protected] Bio. Fabrizio Salvador is Professor of Operations Management at IE Business School and Adjunct Professor at the MIT-Zaragoza Logistics Program. He is a founding member of the MIT Smart Customization Group, has been visiting professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as well as adjunct Faculty Research Associate at Arizona State University. He received a Ph.D in Operations Management from the University of Padova, where he also graduated in Industrial Engineering. Dr. Salvador research focuses on the design of business processes under demand and supply uncertainty and organizational learning. He contributed to such topics as Mass Customization, Orchestration of Distributed Operations, Business Intelligence in diverse industries such as Consulting and IT Services, Health Care, Industrial Equipment Manufacturing, Consumer Goods and Engineering Services. His awardwinning research has been published in the MIT Sloan Management Review, Journal of Operations Management, Production and Operations Management, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, among the others. Dr Salvador also serves as Associate Editor for the Journal of Operations Management and the Decision Sciences Journal. Over his career he wan over one million Euros in research grants sponsored from various international agencies. He assisted numerous organizations and their customers’ in innovating their business processes, including AstraZeneca, DHL, IBM, John Deere, Nokia, Xerox, Permasteelisa and Tetrapack. Dr. Salvador is a firm believer in the importance of transfer and interchange of ideas between academia and practice. Accordingly, his teaching experience spans undergraduate, post-graduate courses and executive programs. He also regularly interacts with business leaders through keynote speeches, roundtables and other diffusion-oriented events. Abstract. Research has overly focused on organizational and technological solutions to support mass customization, paying little attention to its micro-foundations, that is, to the contribution of workers’ and managers’ actions. This gap is particularly critical in knowledge work settings where (1) customization is widespread due to the inherent problem-solving nature of work and (2) workers are an essential driver of organizational performance. I report recent findings from a multi-year study of a software maintenance unit of a top-five global technology and consulting company. 39 Analysis of 13,608 maintenance tasks executed by 67 workers over a time span of 2 years reveals a number of counter-intuitive lessons about balancing customization and productivity in knowledge work settings. 40 Special Session 41 42 4.1 Mass Customization and Sustainability Organizers and presenters of the Special Session Ph.D. student Golboo Pourabdollahian & Ph.D. student Frank Steiner [email protected] / [email protected] BIO Golboo Pourabdollahian: Golboo Pourabdollahian is a PhD student and research fellow at Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering. She received her B.Sc in Mechanical engineering from K.N.T University of Technology and obtained her M.Sc degree in Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering from Politecnico di Milano. Golboo’s research is mainly focused on impacts of mass customization on sustainability and development of business models for sustainable mass customization with a focus on footwear sector. Golboo has also carried out some research on mass customization manufacturing and innovative technological enablers for mass customization. BIO Frank Steiner: Frank Steiner is a PhD student and researcher at the Technology and Innovation Management Group at RWTH Aachen University. Frank received a diploma degree in business administration and mechanical engineering at RWTH Aachen University and completed a Masters program in engineering management at Portland State University. Frank’s research mainly focuses on strategic management issues of mass customization in a B2B context. In his dissertation Frank analyzes specific strategic capabilities that companies have to develop in order to realize successful MC business models. Additionally, Frank has conducted several studies on issues of environmental sustainability in mass customization business settings. As fields of application, Frank is strongly interested in the strategic management of products and technologies in the commercial vehicle / automotive sector. Abstract: Mass customization (MC) has been broadly discussed as a potential business model for heterogeneous markets in management literature. In market settings that are characterized by high levels of customer need heterogeneity, MC has to be considered as an economically viable strategy: on the one hand, firms can charge higher prices for customized goods because of the increased willingness to pay of customers for individualized goods. On the other hand, the realization of flexible manufacturing processes and suitable customer interaction tools allows providing these customized goods at cost levels that are comparable to those of mass produced goods. Subsequently, profit margins may be higher compared to those of standardized products under such heterogeneous market conditions. 43 However, it might not be sufficient to assess the MC business model solely on the basis of economical indicators. Environmental problems and the exacerbating climate change have sparked a global debate about ecological thinking and sustainability. Customer demand for more environmentally friendly products on one hand, and strict governmental regulations on the other hand bring out the concept of sustainability as a point of attention for companies. In this context, ELKINGTON (1994) claims that companies need to develop so called “Win-Win-Win”-strategies, which are sustainable in terms of economic, social and environmental aspects. In accordance with this aspect, more and more authors claim that MC – besides being an economically attractive business approach – also carries the potential to be an environmentally beneficial business model. In this context, literature sees mass customization as a mean to reduce overproduction and waste of resources (Pollard et al., 2008), claims that customized products have a longer life span (Kleer and Steiner, 2013) and allow better reuse/recycling possibilities (Boer et al., 2013). Nevertheless, there are only very few studies that support these aspects of environmental sustainability beyond conceptual research. The existing trade-off of considering mass customization and sustainability simultaneously is a challenging task for companies, but it triggers a new research stream for academia. Research initiatives need to support companies in implementing mass customization in a more sustainable manner. Therefore, this special session of the MCPC 2014 conference aims at the examination of the link between MC and sustainability with the help of empirical data or simulation studies. Ultimately, the research discussed in the special session should lead to the identification of general impact factors of mass customization on sustainability. References 1. Boër, C.R., Pedrazzoli, P., Bettoni, A., Sorlini, M., 2013. Mass Customization and Sustainability: An assessment framework and industrial implementation. London et al.: Springer. 2. Elkington, J. (1994), Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. In: California Management Review, 36 (4),90-100. 3. Kleer, R. and F. Steiner (2013), Mass Customization: Bridging Customer Integration and Sustainability? (Working Paper). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2245622. 4. Pollard, D., Chuo, S., Lee, B. 2008. Strategies for Mass Customization. In: Journal of Business & Economics Research, 6 (7), 77-86. 44 Academic Sessions Presentations 45 46 5.1 A Bonded Experience: ‘Value creation as the creation of an experience, within a business relationship’ Marcel Weber, Ron Journee Contact: Marcel Weber ([email protected]) Paper ID 037 Abstract: In this paper we investigate the application of the concepts of customer experience and co-creation for SME’s in the B2B-sector. Based on a systematic review of extant research on the subject of customer experience we will recognize that customer experience management can be a new way for organizations to create a competitive advantage, simultaneously creating more value for their customers. We will introduce a conceptual framework for a better understanding of the concept, identifying several elements that have to be taken into account in customer experience management. Following, we will be able to cross the bridge from customer experience to customer co-creation, in particular the co-creation of experiences in NPD. Reflecting these insights on SME practice will teach us what small and medium-sized enterprises can do to apply customer experience management. 5.2 A Case Investigation of Product Structure Complexity in Mass Customization using a Data Mining Approach Peter Nielsen, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Kjeld Nielsen Contact: Peter Nielsen ([email protected]) Paper ID 059 Abstract: This paper presents a data mining method for analyzing historical configuration data providing a number of opportunities for improving mass customization capabilities. The overall objective of this paper is to investigate how specific quantitative analyses, more specifically the association rule Apriori, can support the development within the three fundamental mass customization capabilities. The results of an Apriori analysis can be utilized for improving the configuration process by introducing soft constraints, consolidating the product structure by joining components or modules and finally for improving production planning and control. 5.3 A Method for Specification of Multi-Variant Products using Degrees of Freedom of Shape Attributes in Product Structures Paul Christoph Gembarski, Roland Lachmayer Contact: Paper ID 033 Abstract: Planning multi-variant products in the early stage of the design process is still a challenge. In the present paper a specification technique is introduced in 47 order to define multi-variant products using degrees of freedom of shape attributes (in the following shape-DoFs) within product structures. Our goal is to plan variety at the beginning of product development actively. Shape-DoFs are classified in the fields of shape attributes (dimension, position, shape as well as their combinations) on the one hand and mandatory or optional components on the other hand. Set up on this taxonomy graphical symbols are introduced for use in product modeling. As application example a pipe rack is modeled. 5.4 A Profile Chart Approach for Defining the Solution Space of a Production Network Lars Skjelstad, Maria Thomassen Contact: Lars Skjelstad ([email protected]) Paper ID 062 Abstract: Abstract. Norwegian leisure boat manufacturers have experienced a transition from large to small production series during the last years following a general decline in demand. They are forced to transform large scale operations into handling small volumes of highly customized products while maintaining the same level of cost efficiency. Literature presents several frameworks that can help to "crack the code" of mass customization. However, the mass customization strategy is still little understood and deployed in industry. There is thus a need to develop more in depth understanding of how companies can get started and enhance their mass customization capabilities. This paper presents a chart approach for defining the solution space of a leisure boat production network. Opportunities and limitations of the suggested approach are also addressed. 5.5 Applying the 5 WHYs to identify rot causes to noncompletions in on-site construction Søren Lindhard Contact: Søren Lindhard ([email protected]) Paper ID 013 Abstract: In on-site production mass customized sub products are assembled through standardized processes. The production is pushing mass customization to the edge by producing unique and complex products. Due to the project structure it has proven difficult to avoid repetitions of problems and to learn from mistakes. A central part of the control framework Last Planner System is to identify not completed activities to identify root causes and to learn. One tool to investigate root causes is the 5 WHYs approach. The 5 WHYs approach has been applied in a case study research to analysis the root cause to not completed activities. In total 17 not completed activities were registered and analyzed. To reduce non-completions the risks each activity is carrying should be analyzed and understood, the product should be followed to identify problems early and to reveal time for intervention, and finally communication onsite should be strengthened. 48 5.6 Challenges in Request Management – Demand management of customer-driven product development Anita Sommer Contact: Anita Sommer ([email protected]) Paper ID 048 Abstract: Request Management (RQM) is a new term used for managing customer requests for new products. It is the counterpart to typical product development processes, which has no direct customer involvement. It is essential to manage customer requests in a structured and efficient way to obtain profitability. This research study seeks to investigate the challenges of RQM in practice. Existing demand chain management literature is used as a basis for developing a RQM framework. RQM is investigated through an explorative research design in a dyadic B2B case study including a global industrial company and its customers. The study provides an insight into a new area of supply chain management, including the process activity flow and challenges involved across the process. Furthermore, the method is dyadic including the customer in the case study, which is rare in related research. 5.7 Customization Issues - A Four Level Customization Model Kaj A. Joergensen, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Stig Taps, Kjeld Nielsen Contact: Paper ID 061 Abstract: Implementation of Mass Customization and Product Configuration in companies requires fundamental considerations about how products can fulfil the demand from customers. In order to support such decisionmaking, a multi-level model for customization is developed. This model identifies four different levels of customization, ranging from the structure level at the bottom, through the performance level and the experience level to the learning level at the top. The model also has a dual view with customers/demand at one side and product/supplier at the other side. It is a rather general model, which can be applied to many types of products and, typically, product designers must decide how far up in levels the customization should aim. In this paper, the four level customization model is applied to wheel chairs. 5.8 Danish Public Construction Counselling Selection and Assignment Criteria in European Tendering Jesper Kranker Larsen, Lene Faber Ussing, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe Contact: Jesper Kranker Larsen ([email protected]) Paper ID 014 49 Abstract: One of the largest customers in the Danish construction industry is public agencies which own and develop projects. For some of the counselling services they recur to be put out in European tendering. The aim is to find which selection and assignment criteria are used most in public tendering. How projects use selection and assignment criteria for counselling services, and finally if there is significant use of selection and assignment methods in public counselling. The method is based on 74 public counselling tenders from the European Tenders Electronic Daily database from January 2010 to March 2013. A following standard error and Fisher's exact test was conducted to test if there were any significant relations. Results indicate that invited tender with pre-qualification and most economically advantageous offer in 57.1 % of the tenders are the most used selection and assignment criteria in public counselling services. 5.9 Describing Product Variety using Set Theory Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Kjeld Nielsen, Kaj A. Joergensen, Stig Taps Contact: Thomas Ditlev Brunoe ([email protected]) Paper ID 063 Abstract: Three capabilities: solution space development, robust process design and choice navigation are critical for mass customizers. In order to become and stay competitive it is proposed to establish assessment methods for these capabilities. This paper investigates the usage of set theory as a means for developing metrics and assessment systems. It is concluded that set theory cannot be used as an assessment method directly but is useful in the development of metrics. 5.10 Delays in the Apparel Manufacturing Industry’s Implementation of Mass Customization Jocelyn Bellemare, Serge Carrier, Pierre Baptiste Contact: Jocelyn Bellemare ([email protected]) Paper ID 042 Abstract: Past research has demonstrated the importance of understanding the mass customization of clothing within the context of trade globalisation, which has led to ever more ferocious competition in the apparel industry. But, why is the apparel manufacturing industry so late in understanding this? This paper outlines and discusses the possible causes of the delays of mass customization in the apparel and fashion industry. The study first identifies (based on a number of interviews with apparel producers) the performance indicators and the integration of technologies necessary for the implementation of a system of mass customization in the clothing industry. The interviews with these producers reveal certain factors and characteristics that can explain this delay. The principal cause is the lack of integration between 50 technologies currently in place and those offered by suppliers which do not adequately respond to the needs of manufacturers and distributers. 5.11 Designfunding: An Inquiry-Tool for Mass Customization Matthias Kulcke Contact: Paper ID 039 Abstract: Designfunding is defined as a unique category of crowdfunding. It is described and explored regarding its potential to become a major inquiry-tool for the preliminary gathering of data as a basis for the conception of mass customization products. 5.12 Does Customer Co-Creation Really Pay Off? An Investigation Into The Firm’s Benefits From Customer Involvement In New Product And Service Development Marcel Weber, dirk van der laan Contact: Paper ID 038 Abstract: The active involvement or co-creation of customers in the innovation process is nowadays very common for firms. Since the awareness that it also entails the involvement of customers many organizations have taken this step. Until now research has mainly focused on the question why customers indulge on such requests and what they get out of these participations. However, little attention has been given to the benefits firms reap from co-creation initiatives. This research tries to bridge that gap and investigates the outcomes organizations perceive from co-creating with their customers. From a dataset containing research data on co-creation by 154 Dutch organizations we investigate how this co-creation affects innovation success, financial results, reputational results and organizational benefits. 5.13 Design and Evaluation of a Reconfigurable Manufacturing System Shuai Zhang, Yang Li, Arne Bilberg, Ronen Hadar Contact: Paper ID 007 Abstract: In modern manufacturing industry, reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) is a promising concept in the research arena. A new RMS system structure has been recently designed by a large consumer goods manufacturer in Europe, aiming to improve its production efficiency. This article shows an exploratory research on the (re)configuration procedure and evaluation of the RMS philosophy based on the new RMS structure, which is part of the RMS research in 51 University of Southern Denmark. Tecnomatix Plant Simulation is used for system analysis and optimization. Results from simulation show that the RMS implemented in this consumer goods manufacturer can be effectively (re)configured as part of the daily operations, and the configuration is analyzed by computer simulation before release. Flexibility can be increased considerably meanwhile the system can maintain an acceptable productivity. 5.14 Design Configurator Requirements for IS Integration Pasi Paunu, Marko Mäkipää Contact: Marko Mäkipää ([email protected]), Pasi Paunu ([email protected]) Paper ID 032 Abstract: Configurators are essential tools in mass customization. While sales configurators and product configurators have received a fair amount of attention, a new type of configurator has emerged for area of order engineering: design configurator. Design configurators can be used to automate order engineering and decrease lead-time for product quotations and customized designs. Thus, they can bring ETO companies closer to mass customization. In literature the concept of design configurator has been suggested and this paper examines the requirements of such configurator for IS integration through illustrative case example. By determining the requirements and integration possibilities of design configurator this study will greatly benefit different industrial contexts when considering a configurator solution. 5.15 Enabling Facilitation of Mass Customization via Partnering in the Construction Industry Kristian Ditlev Bohnstedt Contact: Kristian Ditlev Bohnstedt ([email protected]) Paper ID 023 Abstract: In the past decades, the manufacturing industry has gone through dramatic improvement in productivity, cycle time and inventory level of manufacturing applying information and manufacturing technology. However, the construction industry has not yet been able to enjoy similar magnitude of improvements. The aim of this paper is therefore to investigate which of the normally used procurement forms in the Danish construction industry would facilitate the implementing mass customization. Benchmark results from 2318 cases were obtained from The Benchmark Centre for the Danish Construction Sector containing information on the realization processes and the integration of customers likely to answer the question of which procurement or contract form that would best accommodate the facilitation of near mass customization performance. To test this a one-way ANOVA comparisons was used and it was found that partnering and turnkey contracts significantly enhances the likelihood of facilitating the implementing mass customization than all other contract forms. 52 5.16 Enablers of innovation in the construction material industry Soren Wandahl, Astrid Heidemann Lassen, Alexia Jacobsen, Søren Bolvig Poulsen Contact: Astrid Heidemann Lassen ([email protected]) Paper ID 056 Abstract: The construction industry is viewed as network or supply chain based, which creates a strong interdependence between the different supply network partners and can be a hindrance for innovation. Innovation models must embrace such a contemporary business structures, where competition often takes place between supply chains rather than between individual companies. The research design is based on explorative case studies. By applying case study as method the research is drawn towards inductive research, where we investigate patterns suitable for generalization on enablers for innovation. In total six cases of successful innovation is investigated. The conclusion of this research validates that open innovation in a network approach is a precondition for a successful innovation journey in the construction industry. 5.17 Extending Configuration and Validation of Customized Products by Implicit Features in Virtual Reality Environments Angel Bachvarov, Stoyan Maleshkov, Dimo Chotrov Contact: Angel Bachvarov ([email protected]) Paper ID 031 Abstract: The Virtual Reality is an environment which enables the proactive participation of the customers in defining their needs and requirements within product development process. However, the traditional approaches for representation of physically existing objects (products) using VR show only a few of their properties (geometric, structural, and topological). The potential of VR as technology for efficient validation of still not-materialized artifacts in the early design stages could not be fully used. In order to improve the immersion and to enable customers in configuring more aspects of the newly created customized products as well as to validate these through “experiencing” we proposes the concept of so called implicit features representing “hidden” product properties (i.e. magnetization, surface roughness, humidity) which normally are not part of the object model, cannot be perceived directly and are not given for configuration. Here we discuss the implicit feature concept, their implementation and their use for Customer-Co-Design. 53 5.18 Extending the Theoretical Framework of Mass Customization: Initial and Adaptive Solution Space Development for High-Variety Production Environments Frank Steiner Contact: Frank Steiner ([email protected]) Paper ID 003 Abstract: In today’s markets customer needs are becoming increasingly heterogeneous. In response to the diverse customer needs, companies are oftentimes forced to offer a broad product variety in order to meet the individual demands of their customers. Being confronted with such a business environment, manufacturers need to establish new business models that are capable of dealing with high levels of heterogeneity, such as mass customization. However, as offering limitless choice is economically unfeasible, manufacturers have to develop a suitable solution space by clearly defining which product variants will be offered and which options will be explicitly excluded from the firm’s offering. In this context, this paper introduces the distinction between initial and adaptive solution space development (before and after market launch) and discusses the interrelation between these two modes of defining a product offering for high-variety production environments. 5.19 Flexible Laser Metal Cutting, An Introduction to the ROBOCUT Laser Cutting Technique Sigurd Villumsen, Steffen Nordahl Joergensen, Morten Kristiansen Contact: Sigurd Villumsen ([email protected]) Paper ID 044 Abstract: This paper describes a new flexible and fast approach to laser cutting called ROBOCUT. Combined with CAD/CAM technology, laser cutting of metal provides the flexibility to perform one-of-a-kind cutting and hereby realise mass production of customised products. Today’s laser cutting techniques possess, despite their widely use in industry, limitations regarding speed and geometry. Research trends point towards remote laser cutting techniques which can improve speed and geometrical freedom and hereby the competitiveness of laser cutting compared to fixed-tool based cutting technology such as punching. This paper presents the concepts and preliminary test results of the ROBOCUT laser cutting technology, a technology which potentially can revolutionise laser cutting. 5.20 Food Customization – An Analysis of Product Configurators in the Food Industry Monika Kolb, Paul Blazek, Clarissa Streichsbier Contact: Monika Kolb ([email protected]), Paul Blazek ([email protected]) Paper ID 029 54 Abstract: Product customization offerings appear in a growing number of industries. When looking at the customization potential of food, customer preferences in terms of taste tend to diverge a lot. In addition, there are different needs like nutrition and health which lead to a more heterogeneous diet. These factors enable a perfect playground for the concept of mass customization. 88 existing online food configurators, which are listed in the Configurator Database, have been identified and analyzed. The objective of this paper is to provide the status quo of the food and beverages industry in the market of mass customization. The results shall show insights and implications for creating a food customization project. 5.21 Generative Design Approach for Modelling of Large Design Spaces Bastian Sauthoff, Roland Lachmayer Contact: Bastian Sauthoff ([email protected]) Paper ID 022 Abstract: Mass customisation of mechanical and mechatronic products requires computer aided configuration tools including parametric models of the product. For an extended individual adaption approaches including iterative configuration processes are necessary. Knowledge-Based Engineering Systems (KBES) are developed for this kind of customisation tasks among other things but they are still not universally applicable and accepted in the industry. Thus in this paper an approach for the modelling of large design spaces by parametric models is presented. This approach implies a confinement of the widely defined pretension of KBES by a systematic modelling of practical conversant design solutions. In contrast to the modelling of higher-level design rules the exclusion of inexpedient variants is completely possible. The detailed aspects of the approach consisting of a structural design, effective areas and design elements are illustrated in this paper as well as methodological aspects. The application is demonstrated by a wheel carrier design. 5.22 How to Squeeze a Configurator into a Handheld Device Homero Schneider, Marcos Espindola, Yuzo Iano Contact: Homero Schneider ([email protected]) Paper ID 002 Abstract: In this paper, it is presented the implementation of a solar powered pumping system configurator based on a new approach for the modelling of the configuration process of product families. An important outcome of this approach is that if a few modelling conditions are satisfied, deriving product family members becomes a direct (backtrack-free) process. Consequently, a configuration problemsolving process that typically would require a high-performance computer can be squeezed into handheld devices as a standalone program. 55 5.23 InnoTracing: Investigating the Moment-to-Moment Unfolding of Leadership, Creativity and Innovation Ian Sutherland, Paul Blazek, Birgit Penzenstadler, Hans Lundberg, Hagen Habicht Contact: Birgit Penzenstadler ([email protected]), Paul Blazek ([email protected]) Paper ID 011 Abstract: In researching the crucial drivers in innovation processes it becomes more and more clear that social interactions at a micro-level play an important role when it comes to user innovation. InnoTracing sheds light on understanding what happens in the black box of emergent, situated processes by looking at what participating users regard as their particular "moments of significance" (MOS). The usage of the newly developed software tool InnoTrace allows real time data gathering, aggregating and analyzing and works within the methodological concept InnoTracing as fundamental enabler for identifying previously invisible innovation and leadership effects. This software and methodology combination offers researchers and companies the ability to understand how collaboration processes among innovators work and provides valuable insights on how to create a supporting environment. 5.24 Implementation of BIM in the Danish building Sector Lene Faber Ussing, Jesper Kranker Larsen Contact: Lene Faber Ussing ([email protected]), Jesper Kranker Larsen ([email protected]) Paper ID 041 Abstract: The Danish building sector has now for some years worked for implementation of BIM in the whole building process. In practice it seems with the long way from the wish of using BIM in the whole building process to what really happens on the projects and building sites. To get an idea of how long the BIM implementation has come in the sector, a contractor company at present involved in one of the biggest public construction projects in Denmark was contacted to survey some employees at the project, because such a project ought to be one where BIM is best implemented. This survey shows the building sector is implementing BIM, but there are still big challenges to solve both internally in the company and externally both in the immediate environment and distant environment. 5.25 Introducing Mass Customization to SMEs in Furniture Industry: A Case Study Nikola Suzic, Zoran Anišić, Cipriano Forza Contact: Nikola Suzic ([email protected]) Paper ID 015 Abstract: Even though much insights has been gained by academic research on mass customization (MC), companies still suffer from a lack of guidelines and supports that help them in the process of implementing mass customization. The 56 paper presents an approach to help small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in implementing MC by illustrating its actual application in SME operating in the furniture industry. Possibilities of mass customization implementation in the case company and more generally in the SME furniture manufacturers are discussed in the conclusions of the work. 5.26 Integration System of Mass Customization and Mass Production as a Market-Oriented Production System Akinori Ono, Seiji Endo Contact: Seiji Endo ([email protected]), Akinori Ono ([email protected]) Paper ID 027 Abstract: Mass customization (MC) fills individual customers’ needs. However, it typically modifies an existed mass produced product. Mass production (MP), on the other hand, roughly meets typical customers’ needs. However, with efforts to fill underlying needs, it could provide destructively innovative products. Hence, it can be said that these two production systems are corresponding with two kinds of market orientations: responsive and proactive market orientations. This study empirically show that MC s related to responsive market orientation, which fits needs to MC products based on existed MP products, while MP is related to proactive market orientation, which fits needs to experience innovative products that have never been seen before. We imply that most innovative companies with both kinds of market orientations should continue to develop destructively innovative MP to surpass their customers’ expectation and, concurrently, they should provide MC products based on the MP products to increase the customer values. 5.27 Is Sustainable Mass Customization an Oxymoron? An empirical study to analyze the environmental impacts of a MC business model Golboo Pourabdollahian, Marco Taisch, Frank Piller Contact: Golboo Pourabdollahian ([email protected]) Paper ID 035 Abstract: For about two decades Mass Customization is considered as a proper business model for the markets characterized by heterogeneous needs of customers. It can be considered as a win-win strategy that benefits both customers and companies. However when it comes to environmental impacts of mass customization things are less clear and more challenging. This paper aims at investigating how a mass customization business model performs in terms of environmental sustainability based on an empirical analysis. 57 5.28 Living Lab Methodology as an Assessment Tool for Mass Customization Lynn Coorevits, Constantijn Seys, Dimitri Schuurman Contact: Lynn Coorevits ([email protected]) Paper ID 016 Abstract: Mass customization has been regularly used as a growth strategy during the last decades. The strength of this approach stems from offering products adjusted to customers’ individual needs, resulting in added value. The latter resides in the word ‘custom’, implying unique and utilitarian products allowing for self-expression of the consumer. Researchers and practitioners however, predominantly focused on the company’s internal processes to optimize mass customization, often resulting in market failure. As a response, a framework with five factors determining the success of mass customization was developed. Additionally Living Lab methodologies have been used to improve innovation contexts that were too closed. This paper will fill a gap in the literature by demonstrating that the integration of the five factor framework in the Living Lab methodology is well suited to determine the possible success or failure of a mass customized product in the market by means of a single case study. 5.29 Making It Personal: Rules for Success in Product Customization Neil Patil, Kent Deverell, Elizabeth Spaulding Contact: Neil Patil ([email protected]), Kent Deverell ([email protected]) Paper ID 012 Abstract: Fluid, Inc. proposes a keynote address presenting the largest research report on consumer product customization by Bain & Company with significant contributions from Fluid. The report explains how brands investing in customization are discovering that they can elevate customer loyalty and engagement – and use their customer base as an engine of advocacy to potential buyers. Participants will learn: The results of the survey of more than 1,000 online shoppers and their customization preferences including, “while less than 10% have tried customization options, 25% to 30% are interested in doing so.” The results of the survey of more than 1,200 global executives across a range of industries including, “By providing customization options, brands raise loyalty at a time when it’s more important than ever. 67% believed their customers are becoming less loyal to their brand.” The five most important rules to follow when creating successful product customization programs. 58 5.30 Managing Process Customisation for the Capital Goods Sector. An Application Case Study Juan Manuel Besga, Juan Carlos Astiazaran, Patxi Zubizarreta Contact: Juan Carlos Astiazaran ([email protected]), Juan Manuel Besga ([email protected]), Patxi Zubizarreta ([email protected]) Paper ID 020 Abstract: The capital goods sector is characterised by a limited number of large orders with a high degree of customisation. This means neither products nor processes are standardised, making it difficult to accurately determine delivery times, often resulting in non-fulfilment. This paper describes a conceptual model used in a methodology for defining a reliable production system regarding both delivery times and cost, enabling companies to reach achievable commitments with customers and improve their responsiveness to major changes in demand. This model is based on defining and scheduling generic assembly processes that can be customised for each particular order. The description of the conceptual model is illustrated by an application case study at a hydraulic presses manufacturer. 5.31 Mass Apparel Technology Integration and Development: Apparel Made for You (AM4U©) Muditha Senanayake, Peter Kilduff, Bill Grier Contact: Muditha Senanayke ([email protected]) Paper ID 065 Abstract: The apparel supply chain today is driven by risk based forecasting and planned over production at every link and has been discussed as highly unsustainable. Even though number of researchers and commercial technology companies has attempted to address this issue, up until now, there was no viable alternative to this overstock, discount and wasteful retail cycle. With the availability of communication and retail technologies the modern consumer demands more customized and personalized apparel products that need to be supplied quickly. Considering these dynamics a group of educators with the collaboration of technology companies is developing a Demand Manufacturing (DM©) and Purchase Activated Manufacturing (PAM©) business architecture named Am4U. This embrace ecommerce solutions and business integration systems, body scanning, fabric and accessory dyeing, printing and imprinting and computer integrated manufacturing. The team is currently developing its first Integrated Mini Factory (IMF©) that can demonstrate DM© and PAM© under one roof. 59 5.32Mass-Customization-Service-Encounters: The Influence of the Co-Design Process Structure on Performance Miriam Oversohl, Moritz Wellige Contact: Moritz Wellige ([email protected]) Paper ID 028 Abstract: Increasingly, companies offer customizable products to consumers. This study investigates how the different layouts of a co-design-process effect customers´ perception and evaluation of the process and its outcome as well as the productivity of the process from the companies´ point of view. In an experiment which was carried out with a mass customization provider in the field of shoes, the authors find that a more structured co-design-process reduces cus-tomers´ perception of complexity and decreases duration time necessary to serve customers. However, some expected effects could not be confirmed in the experiment. More specifically, the modifications show no affect on outcome variables like customer satisfaction. Nevertheless, this study provides some val-uable implications for how companies can design their codesign-processes to increase the productivity and decrease complexity. 5.33 Mass Customization and Performance Assessment: Overview & Research Directions Simon Haahr Storbjerg, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Kjeld Nielsen Contact: Simon Haahr Storbjerg ([email protected]) Paper ID 060 Abstract: Mass Customization (MC) has been introduced as the future of manufacturing, and great results have been proven. Recent research, however, documents a high failure rate for companies trying to adapt to MC as a business strategy. Making this transition is, as highlighted by several scholars, an enterprise transformation that requires strategic control mechanisms. This paper contributes to existing MC literature with an overview and analysis of available MC performance assessment methods. Shortcomings of the literature are identified and directions for future research given. 5.34 Mass Customization Measurements Metrics Kjeld Nielsen, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Stig Taps, Kaj A. Joergensen Contact: Kjeld Nielsen ([email protected]) Paper ID 058 Abstract: A recent survey has indicated that 17 % of companies have ceased mass customizing less than one year after initiating the effort. This paper presents measurement for a company’s mass customization performance, utilizing metrics within the three fundamental capabilities: Robust Process Design, Choice Navigation and Solution Space Development. A mass customizer can when assessing 60 performance with these metrics identify within which areas improvement would increase competitiveness the most and enable more efficient transition to mass customization. 5.35 Mass Customization as Innovation Driver of International Competitiveness in Peripheral Regional SME Subcontractors Stig Taps, Kjeld Nielsen, Thomas Ditlev Brunoe, Kaj A. Joergensen Contact: Stig Taps ([email protected]) Paper ID 064 Abstract: The manufacturing literature has for long been occupied with the linking of manufacturing capabilities with the competitive advantages of the company. The dominant manufacturing content approach is concerned with the consistent set of decisions about process technology design and organizational practices that can be exploited as competitive capabilities. This paper suggest that an open network structure demand a transformation of peripheral located SME subcontractor from traditional customized producer to mass customized producer. Mass customization as an instrument for the transformation process consisting of practical tools on many different company levels will comply with the challenges the international competition chart. 5.36 Mass customization systems are not one-size-fits-all Bin Fang, Akinori Ono, Seiji Endo Contact: Seiji Endo ([email protected]), Akinori Ono ([email protected]), Bin Fang ([email protected]) Paper ID 018 Abstract: Although a mass customization system can better satisfy customers’ needs, some customers prefer MP products to MC products. Firms supply products with their single customization system which is standardized, in spite of it not being the desirable customization system for customers in different markets. We hypothesize that MC products are preferred in order to meet customers’ individual, detailed needs in the markets where the all basic needs of the product category have already been satisfied, while an MP product is preferred in the market in where the basic needs for the product category are not satisfied yet. The results of empirical test with quantitative data from Chinese automobile market show that “customized customization systems” are necessary. 5.37 Mechatronic Behavior Manufacturing Cell Analysis of a Customized Paryanto Paryanto, Matthias Brossog, Jochen Merhof, Jörg Franke Contact: Paryanto Paryanto ([email protected]) 61 Paper ID 001 Abstract: Analyzing the mechatronic behavior of a manufacturing cell used in a customized manufacturing process is a difficult task with numerous obstacles. Therefore, a method that can be easily used for developing and optimizing a customized manufacturing cell, i.e. universal contacting module (UCM) cell, for the in-circuit testing of electronic modules is desired. In this paper, we present a convenient method using multi-domain simulation tools for analyzing the mechatronic behavior of the UCM cell. The UCM cell, which consists of mechatronic components such as a six-axis industrial robot and conveyor systems, were successfully modeled, simulated, and validated under several payloads. This work also presents a modeling procedure that can be applied by system engineers with a basic background in control systems for analyzing the mechatronic behavior of manufacturing cell components. 5.38 Modelling and Organising Customer Driven Business Process in a Mass Customization Environment Hans-Henrik Hvolby, Chris Martin, Heidi Dreyer Contact: Hans-Henrik Hvolby ([email protected]) Paper ID 053 Abstract: The techniques of mass customisation in the manufacturing area are being challenged by more recent trends of made to order processes. This paper reviews the relevant literature dealing with the challenges of determining spe-cific made to order processes. The researchers then use a case study approach to gain insights into what are the new demands on planners and schedulers. Two case studies in Denmark are highlighted. The researchers found that the tasks of planning business processes in the order flow is likely change in the future as increased adaptation to customer ordering takes place, which will force changes to staff training and company re-organization. 5.39 Multidisciplinary product decomposition and analysis based on design structure matrix (DSM) modelling Tufail Habib Contact: Tufail Habib ([email protected]) Paper ID 026 Abstract: DSM modelling in complex system design support to define physical and logical configuration of subsystems, components and their relationships. This modelling includes product decomposition, identification of interfaces and structure analysis to increase the architectural understanding of the system. Since product architecture has broad implications in relation to product life cycle issues. In this paper, mechatronic product is decomposed into subsystems and components and then DSM model is developed to examine the extent of modularity in the system and to manage multiple interactions across subsystems and components. For this purpose, 62 Cambridge advanced modeler (CAM) software tool is used to develop the system matrix. The analysis of the product (printer) architecture include clustering, partitioning as well as structure analysis of the system. The DSM analysis is helpful to support decisions about product redesign and modularization. 5.40 Open Innovation: Creating Value through Co-creation yaghoub zahedi, Maryam Raeyat Contact: yaghoub zahedi ([email protected]), Maryam Raeyat ([email protected]) Paper ID 017 Abstract: Research in the field of open innovation and creating value through cocreation is somehow new. The main objective of this study is to answer a question: How open innovation help companies in creating value through co-creation activities? In order to do so, the authors conducted a qualitative research, using interview and focus group sessions. The result indicates four main strategies that companies could follow in different situations. These strategies were: (i) Cor-rective product/service improvement, (ii) incremental product/service improvement, (iii) Crawling product/service improvement, (iv) Radical prod-uct/service improvement. 5.41 Open Innovation, Co-creation and Mass Customisation: What Role for 3D Printing Platforms? Thierry Rayna, Ludmila Striukova, John Darlington Contact: Thierry Rayna ([email protected]) Paper ID 045 Abstract: Both open innovation and 3D printing technologies have attracted a lot of attention recently. Our main aim is to investigate the role of online 3D printing platforms in open innovation with customers. There are four main contribution in this paper. Firstly, it offers a better understanding of the relationship of open innovation, co-creation and mass-customisation and indicates in which case they overlap. Secondly, it provides an `inside-outside' typology of co-creation that enables to classify co-creation activities according to their aim and type of collaboration. The third main contribution is a typology of online 3D Printing platforms, based on their core services. Finally, by combining the two typologies, we are able to demonstrate the role played by each platform based on type of co-creation activity considered. 5.42 Paradigm in the 21st Century Donald Rattner Contact: Donald Rattner ([email protected]) Paper ID 006 Abstract: The image of the artist as a solitary figure who creates art that is autonomous, physically inviolable and subject to fluctuating prices has remained 63 relatively constant since the gallery system was established in the mid-19th century. The advent of computer-aided-manufacturing and mass customization now threatens to replace or augment that paradigm with a more democratic alternative. This talk examines the potential form the new paradigm may take and presents several examples of artists using mass custom technologies to create contemporary art. 5.43 Product, Organizational and Performance Effects of Product Modularity Henrike Boer Contact: Henrike Boer ([email protected]) Paper ID 043 Abstract: A lot has been written about the performance effects associated with implementing a higher degree of product modularity in a firm’s product portfolio. However, these findings are mostly based on case research in the electronics and automotive industries and have hardly been tested and generalized beyond these industries. To be able to establish whether firms not part of these industries would experience the same performance effects, survey research will be needed. To support future survey research, this paper proposes an operationalization of product modularity and details the link between product modularity and firm performance, to support the future development of measures and hypotheses. 5.44 Production and Resource Scheduling in Mass Customization with Dependent Setup Consideration Izabela Nielsen, Grzegorz Bocewicz, Ngoc Anh Dung Do Contact: Izabela Nielsen ([email protected]) Paper ID 034 Abstract: Mass customization has been implemented in services and manufactures to increase the competition of companies. In a manufacturer, procedure for production and resource scheduling has to be changed to adapt to mass customization. A good production and resource scheduling will contribute to the success of mass customization. This paper is aimed to deal with the problem of production and resource scheduling for a production system with dependent setup and internal transportation such as AGVs in mass customization environment. Constraint Programming based methodology is developed to satisfy the demands of customers on-time. An example is presented to illustrate the performance of proposed methodology. 5.45 Scaling up local and individualized solutions, challenging existing logic Nicola Morelli 64 Contact: Nicola Morelli ([email protected]) Paper ID 021 Abstract: This paper is based on a recently completed EU funded project, aimed at creating location based and socially networked services to support elderly people independent life. The project team created a platform of services for elderly people in four EU locations. It included the development of a business model to ensure the economic sustainability of the services beyond the funding period. Elderly people, as commonly known, are reluctant to use new technology and are especially diffident of open social networking systems, because of the openness of those systems, that risks to undermine the urgent need of trust and safeness. The Life 2.0 platform is highly related to a real life context of senior people. This has implications on the scalability of the platform. This paper analyses the lesson learned and proposes some insights on how the diffusion of innovation based on local and personal solutions challenges the common scalability logics. 5.46 Strategic Capabilities to Manage High-Variety Production Environments: The Role of Underlying Activities and Organizational Resources Frank Steiner, Moritz Wellige Contact: Frank Steiner ([email protected]) Paper ID 004 Abstract: Product offerings with a high number of product variants have become a standard in today’s industrial manufacturing sector, and are also becoming increasingly popular in business-to-consumer markets. Increasingly more companies pursue such a strategy as they hope to benefit from the competitive advantage that arises from the opportunity to address every customer individually. However, adapting a respective business model for high-variety production demands profound organizational change. Existing research suggests that companies have to develop certain strategic capabilities when implementing such business strategies. Still, most studies lack a sufficient level of detail in the discussion of these strategic capabilities and remain vague regarding underlying management activities and organizational resources. With this study, we provide more detailed definitions of the strategic capabilities of mass customization. Furthermore, we identify a comprehensive set of underlying management activities and organizational resources and thereby facilitate the realization of the strategic capabilities for practitioners. 5.47 The Impact of the Arrangement of User Interface Elements on Customer Satisfaction in the Configuration Process Paul Blazek, Klaus Pilsl Contact: Paul Blazek ([email protected]) Paper ID 030 65 Abstract: Configuration systems are important drivers for the concept of mass customization. One of the main challenges when conceptualizing, designing and implementing such a configuration system is the creation of an appropriate user interface. The recent literature covers a lot of different findings, which criteria a B2C product configurator should fulfill to offer the customer an optimal customization process. A case study by Streichsbier et al. identified de-facto standards according to the position and availability of certain web elements within the user interface of configurators of the automobile, apparel and electronic industries. As the identified standards vary within the industries, for the following study only the apparel industry, strictly speaking T-shirt configurators, are considered. The empirical aim of the present study, based on user observation, is to find out whether or not the structure of a configurator’s user interface has an influence on the customers´ process satisfaction. 5.48 The Series of “P.L.A.Y”- A Combination of User Experience Design and Footwear Design Shuwen Wu, Luming Yang, Qi Zeng, Yang Xu Contact: Shuwen Wu ([email protected]) Paper ID 066 Abstract: User Experience Design (UED) has already been applied in many aspects including IT industry, costume design, etc. Unfortunately, this concept was only brought to the world of footwear design in recent years. In this paper, “User Experience Design (UED) Concept” was introduced. The developing history, current situation of UED and the successful examples were also analyzed. The applied methods and specific procedures were summarized through this process to seeking the differences and individuality in the developing process of footwear design. Besides, design sketches and concrete shoes were designed and manufactured by using UED concept to test the research results. As a result, the probability of combining footwear design and UED concept was studied in this research and the contents of footwear design were also enriched through this research, which aimed at bringing new experience to consumers so that better connections would be built between consumers and designers through UED footwear. 5.49 The Use of Modelling Methods for Product Configuration in Industrial Applications Lars Hvam, Martin Bonev, Anders Haug, Niels Henrik Mortensen Contact: Martin Bonev ([email protected]) Paper ID 019 Abstract: Developing product configuration system requires extracting and representing domain expert knowledge in appropriate product models. As acknowledged by researchers, this is often one of the most challenging activities in configuration projects, where only little empirical insights have yet been reported. This article investigates the challenge on how industrial companies model their 66 product configuration systems. The study is based on interviews of 18 industrial companies using configuration systems for configuring customer-tailored products. It investigates the relationship between using a structured modelling technique for modelling product families relative to less or no formal approaches. Furthermore, the study explores the specific characteristics of configuration set-ups with respect to size and complexity and their effect on product variant management and availability of product knowledge in organizations. The results empirically validate the need for a suggested systematic modelling approach for large and complex configuration projects and its positive effect on the overall performance of companies. 5.50 Understanding Complex Construction Systems through Modularity Tor Clarke Jensen, Baris Bekdik, Christian Thuesen Contact: Christian Thuesen ([email protected]) Paper ID 036 Abstract: This paper develops a framework for understanding complexity in construction projects by combining theories of complexity management and modularization. The framework incorporates three dimensions of product, process and organizational modularity with the case of, gypsum wall elements. The analysis finds that the main driver of complexity is the fragmentation of the design and production, which causes the production modules to construct and install new product types and variants for each project as the designers are swapped for every project. The many interfaces are characteristics of an integral system, rather than a modular, although the industry forces modular organizational structures. This creates a high complexity degree caused by the non-alignment of building parts and organizations and the frequent swapping of modules. 67 Notes 68
© Copyright 2025 ExpyDoc