PREMIAM – MCA Viewpoint

PREMIAM – MCA Viewpoint
• EIA history examples in the UK:
ESGOSS and SEEEC
• Management and Coordination
• NCP – the current review
• PREMIAM and the NCP EG
• PREMIAM across the devolved
administrations and civil contingencies
• Funding and cost recovery
• Exercising PREMIAM
EIA history in the UK: ESGOSS
and SEEEC – prior to EG
Braer - Shetland,
Scotland -1993
Sea Empress – Milford Haven
Wales -1996
Braer Incident – Shetland 1993 - ESGOSS
Ecological Steering Group on the Oil
Spill in Shetland
(ESGOSS)
Report
of Lord Donaldson’s
Inquiry into the prevention of
pollution
from merchant
• No formal UK EIA
mechanism
in placeshipping
at
the time
‘Safer Ships, Cleaner Seas’
• Instigated and funded by Scottish Office
• Donaldson Enquiry
1993
• Baseline studies extrapolated
• Studies covered:
•Inter/sub tidal habitats
•Benthic macro and meiofauna
•Sand eels, otters, seals
•Fish and shellfish monitoring programme
SEA EMPRESS – Milford Haven, Wales –
1996 - SEEEC
• SEA EMPRESS Environmental Evaluation
Committee
• No formal UK EIA mechanism in place at the time
• Instigated and funded by Welsh Office
• 200km shoreline impacted
– SEEEC set up to evaluate environmental impact
– 2 years, 100 projects
– 3.5$ spend
Post SEA EMPRESS and Prior to
PREMIAM
•UK NCP Environment Groups
•MCA STOp Notice brief EIA
section
•EG’s activated up 2-3 times
annually
•Minor incident – “virtual” group
•Major incident – Formal EG with
ELO’s to all response cells
•EIA involvement but not in the
complete sense of PREMIAM
•PREMIAM can fill that gap
EIA - PREMIAM: Management and
Coordination
• Robust management and coordination essential – not least cost
recovery. Management to design and coordinate studies.
– Which key individuals/organisations to oversee the process?
Across the Administrations?
– Best practise monitoring, scientific rigour and objectivity
– Technical reasonableness, proportionate/relevant
– Avoid duplication
– Involve compensation bodies with planning and methodology
– Importance of documentation
UK NCP current review
•
•
•
•
•
Presently considering consultees comments
Likely a shorter doc – detail via weblinks
New STOp notices: for SRC and EG
Shoreline response in line with CCA
EG and PREMIAM words unlikely to change
PREMIAM and the NCP EG
• Should run in parallel?
• EG first responsibility to advise all response cells – but
also: EG local knowledge feeds in to PREMIAM
• Once NCP finalised – we need words for the STOp
Notice?
• Is the STOp Notice the best platform to describe how the
Administrations will adopt PREMIAM?
PREMIAM across the UK
Administrations and Civil Contingencies
• PREMIAM delivers overall game plan but…..
– Differences in how to adopt across UK Administrations
– PREMIAM position with civil contingency committees – leading
shoreline operations
– Issues of funding and cost recovery across the Admins?
– Incident affecting 2 or more Administrations – Coordination
Management?
– Wales EIA to sit with SEG
– Each Administration wishes to maintain overall control
– Opportunity to explore ways to resolve, deconflict here at
Conference
Funding and Cost recovery
• Initial funding agreed for England – other administrations?
• Establishment of “reasonableness” for EIA
• View of all potential funding orgs – including P and I Clubs wrt
initiating funding for EIA
• View of Govt may differ from P and I?
• Who decides reasonableness wrt cost recovery? Both before
initiation of PREMIAM and during the project?
• Where is the shortfall picked up?
• Will risk of shortfall influence the EIA scope?
• Again… Across the Administrations
Funding and Cost Recovery
• Not all spills require EIA as automatic
• Success rate of EIA cost recovery not always good
• Studies fundamentally fully appropriate and
proportionate
• Documentation quality and appropriateness
• Repetition of work already carried out?
• Nature and extent of env damage all covered
• EIA sufficiently objective?
• No formal guarantees wrt quality and objectiveness
Exercising PREMIAM
• MCA involved with many Spill exercises
• Some major exercises may be useful test for
PREMIAM
–
–
–
–
–
Cross border working
Central management mix with local expertise
Response Cells interaction with PREMIAM
EG and PREMIAM
Exercise DRAGON – Liverpool Bay, Sept 2014?
Considerations….
•
•
•
•
PREMIAM and the NCP EG protocols
NCP words
STOp Notice words
Involvement of compensation bodies in EIA
design
• Administrations definition of reasonableness
• Cross Administration adoption of PREMIAM
Contact details:
Kevin Colcomb
MCA
- Counter
Contact
details:Pollution & Salvage
Tel: +44(0)2380 329411
• Kevin
Colcomb
e-mail:
[email protected]
Thank you for your
attention
• MCA - Counter Pollution & Response
• Tel: +44(0)2380 329411
• e-mail: [email protected]
• MCA web site: www.mcga.gov.uk
– for UK National Contingency Plan
– Environment Group STOp notice
MCA
web site:
www.dft.gov.uk/mca/
– Shoreline
Response
Centre
STOp notice
• UK National Contingency Plan
• Environment Group STOp notice