M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
TAB I.3 PAST PERFORMANCE
I.3
PAST PERFORMANCE
This Section is presented in response to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s
Request for Proposal, Section B, Proposal Part B Tab I.3 – Past Performance and all Addenda.
I.3.a
Kawasaki’s Reliability Information
Kawasaki understands the Authority’s rationale for requesting the additional detail on vehicle
and equipment reliability information which was added by Addendum 7, as a means of
comparatively assessing the value provided by the proposers in terms of projected reliability,
vehicle availability and the resulting reduction in life cycle costs for this project. Table I.3-1
illustrates Kawasaki’s reliability information for the past 10 years.
The Authority will note from this table, that Kawasaki’s cars invariably exhibit reliability that far
exceeds the contractual requirements, which attests to Kawasaki’s excellent attention to design
integrity, our rigorous focus on systems integration and our unparalleled control of quality,
coupled with Kawasaki’s practice of selecting and working with the optimum subcontractors for
the specific project.
I.3.b
Reliability of Proposed Major Subcontractors
In accordance with Addendum 7, Kawasaki has used our excellent working relationships with
our proposed major subcontractors to provide the Authority with the requested subcontractor
reliability data. As a result of this collaboration with our major subcontractors, Table I.3-2
illustrates the reliability of Kawasaki’s proposed major subcontractors for the past 10 years.
As the data collection process and raw data used by subcontractors is relatively similar
throughout the North American transit industry, Kawasaki has provided representative
information as illustrated by a sampling of four major subcontractors, in order to avoid
unnecessary repetition. Refer to Appendix I.3-1.
It should also be noted that the requested customer concurrence letters were solicited by
Kawasaki’s major subcontractors and due to the lack of response from these transit authorities,
the only option that Kawasaki has is to refer the MBTA to the official point of contact for the
various procurements.
I.3.c
Kawasaki’s Transportation Rail Car Contracts
Table I.3-3 provides project information for Kawasaki’s
transportation rail car contracts over the past 10 years.
North American passenger
The sheer volume of these major vehicle projects, coupled with the reputation of the transit
authorities who saw fit to award these projects to Kawasaki, speaks volumes to Kawasaki’s
established position in the US transit market, which is further highlighted by the number of
repeat orders from these authorities. For details on Kawasaki’s US experience, including repeat
orders, refer to Tab I.1.c.5 Carbody.
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
1 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
2 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
TABLE I.3-1: KAWASAKI’S RELIABILITY INFORMATION
Description of Vehicle
Customer
Long Island Rail
Road (LIRR)
1. James W. Allen
M9 Project Manager
Tel: 718-725-2625
Washington
Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority
(WMATA)
2.
Mr. Debo Ogunrinde
Program Manager,
7000 Series
Tel: 202-962-2347
Qty
92
Base
Order
528
Vendors
L
W
H
Seats
TBD
*Carbody and Trucks will be
provided by Kawasaki.
Coupler: Dellner
Passenger Door: Fuji Electric
HVAC: Merak
Lighting: Luminator
Propulsion: Toshiba
Friction Brake: Knorr Brake
Communication: TOA
ATC: AnsaldoSTS
Monitor/Diagnostic: Toshiba
Scope of Work
Vehicle
Type
Contractual
Reliability
Requirements
Actual
Reliability
Achieved
(Current)
Actual
Reliability
Achieved
(Warranty)
Reliability
Met or
Exceeded
Req’mts?
Contract Details
Data
Collection
Process /
Raw Data
Customer
Concurrence
Letter
Design Resp.
New or
Existing
Design?
M-9
Electric
Commuter
Rail Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
New
150,000 miles
MDBF
Not Available
(N/A)
N/A
N/A
Field
reporting/
N/A
N/A
In
progress
Sept.
2013
In
progress
Contract
Duration
NTP
Status or
Close
Out Date
85’
10’ 6”
13’ 10”
221 /
married
pair
75’
10’
10’10”
A-Car
62
B-Car
68
7000
Series
Subway
Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
New
200,000 miles
MDBD
N/A
N/A
N/A
Field
reporting/
N/A
N/A
In
progress
Aug.,
2010
In
progress
11’11”
A1/A2Car 28
B-Car
36
C-Car
36
R188
Subway
Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
Combined
New &
Existing
150,000 miles
MDBF
N/A
N/A
N/A
Field
reporting/
N/A
N/A
In
progress
May,
2010
In
progress
12’
A-Car
42
B-Car
44
R160B
Subway
Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
New
100,000 miles
MDBF
Not reported to
Kawasaki
732,376 as of
Jan 31, 2012
Yes
Field
reporting /
N/A
88 months
Nov.,
2002
Reliability
reporting
closed
June 5,
2012
*Carbody and Trucks are being
provided by Kawasaki.
New York City
Transit (NYCT)
Mr. Kenneth Teu
Director, Contract
3. Administration, Car
Equipment
Engineering &
Technical Support
Tel: 718-694-4481
New York City
Transit (NYCT)
Mr. Kenneth Teu
Director, Contract
4. Administration, Car
Equipment
Engineering &
Technical Support
Tel: 718-694-4481
506
Coupler: Wabtec
Passenger Door: Vapor Stone Rail
HVAC: Mitsubishi Electric
Lighting: Luminator
Propulsion: Bombardier
Friction Brake: Wabtec
Communication: TOA
ATC: (out of scope)
Monitor/Diagnostic: Koito
Industries
51’
8’10”
*Carbody and Trucks are being
provided by Kawasaki.
Coupler: Wabtec
Passenger Door: Fuji Electric
HVAC: Mitsubishi Electric
Lighting: Luminator
Propulsion: Alstom
Friction Brake: Wabtec
Communication: TOA
ATC: (out of scope)
Monitor/Diagnostic: Koito
Industries
60’
660
*Carbody and Trucks were provided
by Kawasaki.
9’9”
N/A
*The R160 Contract with the NYCT
has been executed by ALSKAW,
LLC, a joint venture by Alstom and
Kawasaki. All of the R160 vehicle is
designed by Kawasaki, but are built
by Alstom (R160A) and Kawasaki
(R160B).
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
3 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
Description of Vehicle
Customer
Metro-North
Railroad (MNR)
Mr. Timothy
5. McCarthy
Senior Director,
Capital Engineering
Tel: 212-499-4428
Qty
405
Vendors
Coupler: Wabtec
Passenger Door: Vapor Stone Rail
HVAC: Mitsubishi Electric
Lighting: Trans-Lite
Propulsion: Mitsubishi Electric
Friction Brake: Knorr Brake
Communication: Axion
Technologies
ATC: Alstom Signalling
Monitor/Diagnostic: Mitsubishi
Electric
L
W
H
Seats
Scope of Work
Vehicle
Type
Design Resp.
New or
Existing
Design?
85’
10’6”
14’3”
A-Car
111
B-Car
101
S-Car
114
51’
9’3”
11’8”
A-Car
30
C-Car
34
PA-5
Rapid
Transit
Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
40
R142A &
R142S
Subway
Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
New
Contractual
Reliability
Requirements
Actual
Reliability
Achieved
(Current)
Actual
Reliability
Achieved
(Warranty)
Reliability
Met or
Exceeded
Req’mts?
Contract Details
Data
Collection
Process /
Raw Data
Customer
Concurrence
Letter
Contract
Duration
NTP
Status or
Close
Out Date
M-8
Electric
Commuter
Rail Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
New
150,000 miles
MDBF
282,087 as of
Dec 31, 2013
282,087 as of
Dec 31, 2013
Yes
Field
reporting /
N/A
N/A
In
progress
Aug.,
2006
In
progress
New
160,000 miles
MDBF
Not reported to
Kawasaki
660,000 (12month), as of
Apr 30, 2013
Yes
Field
reporting /
N/A
N/A
In
progress
May,
2005
In
progress
100,000 miles
MDBF
Not reported to
Kawasaki
260,013 (12month), as of
Nov 30, 2005
Yes
Field
reporting/
N/A
N/A
64 months
July,
1997
*Carbody and Trucks are being
provided by Kawasaki.
Port Authority
Trans-Hudson
Corporation (PATH)
Mr. Thomas H.
Rowbottom,
Superintendent
Car Equipment
Division, Harrison
6.
Car Maintenance
Facility
Foot of Cape May
Street, Harrison, NJ
Tel: 973-350-3913
trowbottom@panynj.
gov
350
Coupler: Wabtec
Passenger Door: Vapor Stone Rail
HVAC: Mitsubishi Electric
Lighting: Luminator
Propulsion: Siemens
Friction Brake: Wabtec
Communication: TOA
ATC: (out of scope)
Monitor/Diagnostic: Koito
Industries
*Carbody and Trucks are being
provided by Kawasaki.
New York City
Brakes: WABCO
Transit (NYCT)
Communications: Telephonics
Mr. Kenneth Teu
HVAC: Melco
Director, Contract
Door System: Vapor
7. Administration, Car
600
Propulsion: Adtranz
Equipment
Monitor and MDS: Koito
Engineering &
APU: Toshiba
Technical Support
Lights: Luminator
Tel: 718-694-4481
New York City
Brakes: WABCO
Transit (NYCT)
Communications: Telephonics
Mr. Kenneth Teu
HVAC: Melco
Director, Contract
Door System: Vapor
8. Administration, Car
212
Propulsion: Adtranz
Equipment
Monitor and MDS: Koito
Engineering &
APU: Toshiba
Technical Support
Lights: Luminator
Tel: 718-694-4481
Massachusetts Bay
75
Transportation
Brakes: WABCO
Authority (MBTA)
17
Communications: Comco
Mr. Jeffery D.
9.
HVAC: Stone
Gonneville
Door System: Vapor
15
Chief Mechanical
Lights: Luminator
Officer
33
Tel: 617-222-4554
*Samples of the raw defect history data are included in Appendix I.3-1 to
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
612.5”
103.2”
142.7”
R142A
12/4/06
R142S
1/10/08
722.5”
120”
145.5”
44
R143
Subway
Car
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
New
100,000 miles
MDBF
Not reported to
Kawasaki
250,303 (12month), as of
Dec 31, 2004
Yes
Field
reporting/
N/A
N/A
55 months
Dec.,
1998
1/10/08
1024”
120”
186.2”
185
641
In-house lead,
not
subcontracted
New
None specified
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Field
reporting/
N/A
N/A
38 months
April
2003
In
progress
this section.
4 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
TABLE I.3-2: RELIABILITY OF PROPOSED MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Vancouver; NTP 2006;
IGBT-based AC
Propulsion System;
Automated Rail Transit
(ART) System (Linear
Induction Motors)
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
Customer Concurrence
Letter
Data is collected from field site and car
builder reports.
Mike Belyea, Vehicle Project Administrator
MTBF: 2,000 hours
604-927-4452
Definition of failures: Not known
[email protected]
Warranty period: 24 months
5,041 hours ( as of
January 2012)
Not available (N/A)
Method of reliability calculation: MTBF =
Mean Time Between Failures components.
MIL-STD 217F Notice 2/ MIL-STD 785
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Sample of the raw defect history data: N/A
Kuala Lumpur ; NTP
2007; IGBT-based AC
Propulsion System;
Automated Rail Transit
(ART) System (Linear
Induction Motors)
Data is collected from field site and car
builder reports.
Khairani Mohamed, Chief Executive Officer
MTBF: 5,000 hours
+603 7625 6622
Definition of failures: Not known
[email protected]
Warranty period: 24 months
11,712 hours ( as of November
2013)
5,524 hours ( as of May
2013)
Method of reliability calculation: MTBF =
Mean Time Between Failures components.
MIL-STD 217F Notice 2/ MIL-STD 785
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Sample of the raw defect history data: N/A
Data is collected from field site and car
builder reports.
Bombardier
MDBF: 3,800,000 miles
(6,115,506 km)
Rocket; TTC; NTP
2007; IGBT-based AC
Propulsion System;
Heavy Rail Vehicles
(HRV)
Propulsion
Mr. Kam T. Kwok
416-393-3608
[email protected]
Definition of failures: Train delay
of more than 5 minutes.
Warranty period: 24 months
general equipment
2,094,819 km ( as of February
2014)
Method of reliability calculation: MDBF =
Mean Distance Between Train Delay ( 5
min delay in service)
Still in warranty
MIL-STD 217F Notice 2/ MIL-STD 785
Sample of the raw defect history data: Only
reliability failure at this point is a zero
velocity relay outside of the propulsion
system but supplied by BTPC. Each failure
requires waiting for a technician.
5 years for motors and gears.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Data is collected from field site.
Taipei; TRTC; NTP
2010; IGBT-based AC
Propulsion System;
Heavy Rail
(HRV)/Commuter Trains
MTBF: 30,600 hours
Method of reliability calculation:
886-2-2893-0105 Ext. 8660
Definition of failures:
Component failures
MTBF = Mean Time Between Failures components.
[email protected]
Warranty period: 24 months
Chui Y. C., Director – Rolling Stock
Division
34,850 hours
Still in warranty
MIL-STD 217F Notice 2/ MIL-STD 785
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Sample of the raw defect history data: N/A
LIRR/MNR
MNR M-7
Bombardier
Provided by carbuilder
MDBCF 200,000 miles
N/A
MDBCF 345,000 miles
Kevin Fitzpatrick, 450-441-3003
(carbuilder monitors failure during revenue
service)
Melco
MNR/CDOT
MNR M-8
Kawasaki
Dan Alcantara, 914-376-4700
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
MDBCF 200,000 miles
MDBSF 500,000 miles
5 of 18
MDBCF 358,410 miles
MDBSF 509,319 miles
Nov, 2013)
(as of
N/A (end of warranty
period is 2019)
Provided by carbuilder
(carbuilder monitors failure during revenue
service)
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
MDBF: 55,556 miles required
by contract
WMATA 5000
Ken Morford
[email protected]
Definition of failures: An event
resulting in the inability to
perform an intended function as
designed or specified
Contractual Warranty period:
2 years from car acceptance or
3 years from date equipment is
shipped from Knorr Brake
Company, whichever occurs first
MDBTD: 1,820,000 miles
Toronto Rocket
J. Skonieczny
Definition of failures: An event
resulting in the inability to
perform an intended function as
designed or specified
416-393-3163
Contractual Warranty period:
2 years from car acceptance or
3 years from date equipment is
shipped from Knorr Brake
Company, whichever occurs first
MDBF: 62,500 miles
Ken Morford
Definition of failures: An event
resulting in the inability to
perform an intended function as
designed or specified
[email protected]
Contractual Warranty period:
Knorr
Friction Brakes
and Pneumatic
System
WMATA 6000
2 years from car acceptance or
3 years from date equipment is
shipped from Knorr Brake
Company, whichever occurs first
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Achieved Reliability data is held
by CAF and the transit authority,
as part of the Failure Review
Board.
Knorr’s estimated MDBF, based
on the contractual requirements,
is:
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Achieved Reliability data
is held by CAF and the
transit authority, as part of
the Failure Review Board.
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
Data collected from Transit Authority
Method of reliability calculation: MIL-STD756
Customer Concurrence
Letter
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
46,724 miles
Average speed: 10.8 mph
Achieved Reliability data is held
by Bombardier and the transit
authority, as part of the Failure
Review Board.
Knorr’s estimated MDBTD, based
on the contractual requirements,
is:
Achieved Reliability data
is held by Bombardier and
the transit authority, as
part of the Failure Review
Board.
Data collect from Transit Authority
Method of reliability calculation: MIL-STD756
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
2,540,843 miles
Average speed: 10 mph
Achieved Reliability data is held
by Alstom and the transit
authority, as part of the Failure
Review Board.
Knorr’s estimated MDBF, based
on the contractual requirements,
is:
Achieved Reliability data
is held by Alstom and the
transit authority, as part of
the Failure Review Board.
Data collected from Transit Authority
This contract has not
completed the Warranty
phase.
Data collected from Transit Authority
Method of reliability calculation: MIL-STD756
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
113,288 miles
Average speed: 21.1 mph
MDBF:
Friction Brake System:
250,000 miles
Pneumatic System:
500,000 miles
WMATA 7000
Ken Morford
[email protected]
NYCT
Wabtec
NYCT R142
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
718-694-4460
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
Definition of failures: An event
resulting in the inability to
perform an intended function as
designed or specified
Achieved Reliability data will be
held by Kawasaki and the transit
authority, as part of the Failure
Review Board.
Knorr’s estimated MDBF, based
on the contractual requirements,
is:
Friction Brake System: 179,893
miles
Contractual Warranty period:
Pneumatic System:
2 years from car acceptance or
3 years from date equipment is
shipped from Knorr Brake
Company, whichever occurs first
397,663 miles
Average speed: 15 mph
MDBCF = 60,000
miles
MDBF = 1,260,000
miles
6 of 18
Method of reliability calculation: MIL-STD756
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Wabtec’s Estimate:
N/A
MDBCF = 113,160 miles
MDBF = 1,267,455 miles
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
MDBCF = 60,000
NYCT
NYCT R142A / R142S
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
718-694-4460
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
NYCT R160 actual reliability information
received directly from the carbuilder report.
The data was last received for July 2011.
Data may include NDFs within the systems,
and Wabtec was not involved in
determining responsibility of the reported
failures.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
61,194 miles
PATH PA5 actual reliability information
derived from Wabtec FAR reports. The data
was last calculated for July 2011.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
N/A
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
N/A
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
N/A
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
N/A
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
Wabtec’s Estimate:
miles
N/A
MDBF = 719,424
MDBCF = 94,740 miles
MDBF = 1,204,815 miles
miles
MDBSCF = 71,940
NYCT
NYCT R143
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
718-694-4460
NYCT
NYCT R160
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
718-694-4460
Wabtec’s Estimate:
miles
N/A
MDBF = 719,424
MDBSCF = 103,020 miles
MDBF = 1,197,767 miles
miles
MDBSCF = 60,000
miles
N/A
MDBSCF =
151,864 miles
MDBF = N/A
MBTA
MBTA #5 Blue Line
S. Adkins, Chief Mechanical Officer
[email protected], 617-293-4635
MDBF = 60,000 miles
N/A
PATH
PATH PA5
D. Dreisbach Program Manager
MDBF = 60,000 miles
N/A
Wabtec’s Estimate:
MDBF = 94,925 miles
MDBSCF =
973-350-2854
Fuji
Data to follow later in the
procurement process.
101kVA, Static Converter
MNR M-7
85kVA, Static Converter
MNR M-7
101kVA, Static Converter
Auxiliary Power
System (including
LVPS & Auxiliary
Power Inverter)
MNR M-7
SEPSA
85kVA, Static Converter
MNR M-7
Carbuilder Bombardier
End customer: Long Island Rail Road
(LIRR)
End customer: Long Island Rail Road
(LIRR)
(18h/day; 356 day/year; 35mph)
1 041 456 miles
180 000 miles
(18h/day; 356 day/year; 35mph)
Carbuilder Bombardier
End customer: Metro North. (MNR)
2 127 428 miles
180 000 miles
(18h/day; 356 day/year; 35mph)
Carbuilder Bombardier
End customer: Metro North. (MNR)
Overhaul
NYCT R68
End customer: NYCTA
6.5kWA
Overhaul
NYCT R62
End customer: NYCTA
PATH PA5
1 181 106 miles
180 000 miles
Carbuilder Bombardier
6.5kWA LVPS
54kVA
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
Customer Concurrence
Letter
3 204 221miles
180 000 miles
(18h/day; 356 day/year; 35mph)
120 000 miles
2 985 141miles
(20h/day/360day/year; 18mph)
N/A
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
120 000 miles
2,651,6330 miles
(20h/day/360day/year; 18mph)
N/A
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
75 000 miles
514 766.35 miles
(24h/day;360day/year/15 mph)
N/A
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
Carbuilder KRC
End customer: PATH - Port Authority of NY
& NJ.
7 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
WMATA 7000
Customer
Kawasaki
Carlo Danesi, 914-376-4700
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
Reliability Achieved (Current)
MDBF – 400,000 miles
MDBD- 4,000,000 miles
MTBF (in hours) 6.256269E+04
MDBF (MTBF x avg 15 mps) in
miles 9.384404E+05
MDBCF 350,000 miles
MDBTD 1,000,000 miles
MDBCF (MTBF x avg 25 mph in
miles) 2.161155E+06
MTBF (in hours) 8.644619E+04
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Not yet in Warranty
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
Prediction performed by Luminator
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Prediction performed by Luminator
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided.
Luminator
Houston LRV
CAF
Lisa Brady, 607-737-3011
Not yet in Warranty
Customer Concurrence
Letter
MDBCF ≥ 2,000,000 car miles
MTBF ≥ 58,824 hours (based on
Metrolinx / GO Transit
BiLevel, Bombardier
Transportation, 2014,
Supply of the Interior
Lighting System
GO Transit
Walter Speare
416-253-1303 ext 4893
(Bombardier Transportation)
TDG records data when a field failure is
reported to TDG.
average speed of 34 MPH)
Definition of failures: Single
component failure
Warranty period: Two years,
equipment replacement
No data – system not in service
yet.
Not yet in Warranty
Use failure data of product with similar
circuitry to determine MTBF. Apply MTBF
value to specific system with specific
instances of the core circuitry.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
No failures on similar circuitry to date.
Failure analysis within 30 days
Reliability demonstration
program
Lighting (not
including lamps)
MDBF ≥ 4,000,000 km (based
on average speed of 20 KPH)
TDG
King Abdullah Financial
District Monorail Project,
Bombardier
Transportation, 2012,
Supply of the Interior and
Exterior Lighting System
Bombardier Transportation
MTBF ≥ 200,000 car hours
613-384-3103
Definition of Failures: Failure
which reduces light intensity
below minimum.
[email protected]
Warranty period: Two years,
equipment replacement
Sol Donagi-Perez
TDG records data when a field failure is
reported to TDG.
No failures to date.
MTBF calculated at 7,884,000
hours to date.
No failures to date.
Use failure data of product with similar
circuitry to determine MTBF. Apply MTBF
value to specific system with specific
instances of the core circuitry.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
No failures on similar circuitry to date.
MTTR ≤ 0.5 hours
Failure analysis as required.
MDBF ≥ 8,000,000 km (based
on average speed of 40 KPH)
Bombardier Transportation
ART MK III Platform,
Bombardier
Transportation, 2011,
Supply of the Interior and
Exterior Lighting System
MTBF ≥ 200,000 car hours
613-384-3103
Definition of Failures: Failure
which reduces light intensity
below minimum.
[email protected]
Warranty period: Two years,
equipment replacement
Sol Donagi-Perez
MTTR ≤ 0.5 hours
TDG records data when a field failure is
reported to TDG.
No failures to date.
MTBF calculated at 3,431,000
hours to date.
No failures to date.
Use failure data of product with similar
circuitry to determine MTBF. Apply MTBF
value to specific system with specific
instances of the core circuitry.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
No failures on similar circuitry to date.
Failure analysis as required.
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
8 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
WMATA 5000
Customer
Ken Morford [email protected]
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
MDBF:
HVAC: 76,923 miles
HVAC Controls: 156,250
miles Definition of failures:
An event resulting in the
inability to
perform an intended function as
designed or specified
Contractual Warranty period:
2 years from car acceptance or
3 years from date equipment is
shipped from Knorr Brake
Company, whichever occurs first
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Current (post warranty)
achieved Reliability data is
held by Alstom and the transit
authority, as part of the Failure
Review Board.
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Achieved Reliability
data is held by CAF
and
the
transit
authority, as part of
the Failure Review
Board.
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
Customer Concurrence
Letter
Data collected from Transit Authority
Method of reliability calculation: MIL- STD756
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Data collected from Transit Authority
Method of reliability calculation: MIL- STD756
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Data collected from Transit Authority
Method of reliability calculation: MIL- STD756
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Merak’s
estimated
MDBF, based on the
contractual
requirements, is:
HVAC: 134,971 miles
HVAC Controls:
174,520 miles
Average speed: 10.8
mph
WMATA 6000
Ken Morford [email protected]
Merak NA
MDBF:
HVAC: 76,923 miles
HVAC Controls: 156,250
miles Definition of failures:
An event resulting in the
inability to
perform an intended function as
designed or specified
Current (post warranty)
achieved Reliability data is
held by Alstom and the transit
authority, as part of the Failure
Review Board.
Merak’s
estimated
MDBF, based on the
contractual
requirements, is:
Contractual Warranty period:
2 years from car acceptance or
3 years from date
equipment is shipped from
Knorr Brake
Company, whichever occurs
first
HVAC System
WMATA 7000
Ken Morford [email protected]
MDBF: 200,000
Definition of failures: An
event resulting in the inability
to
perform an intended function
as designed or specified
Contractual Warranty
period:
2 years from car acceptance or
3 years from date
equipment is shipped from
Knorr Brake
Company, whichever occurs
first
Achieved
Reliability
data is held by Alstom
and
the
transit
authority, as part of the
Failure Review Board.
HVAC: 211,345 miles
HVAC Controls:
322,449 miles
Average speed: 21.1
mph
These cars have not entered
revenue service, as they are
currently undergoing type testing
Not Applicable
Metro North Railroad
MNR M-8
Melco
Dan Alcantara
MDBCF 200,000 Miles
MDBCF 358,410 Miles
(as of November 2013)
N/A (Warranty has not
ended)
MDBF 415,901 Miles
MDBF 415,901 Miles
(as of August 2011)
(as of August 2011)
Official Information from Car-builder
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Official Information from Carbuilder
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
914-376-4700
NJT Multilevel
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
KRC
New Jersey Transit
Bombardier
MBDF 320,000 Miles
9 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
point of contact is
provided
Kari Rasco, (516) 566-5218
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Not at end of warranty
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Not at end of warranty
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
Agence Métropitaine de Transport
AMT Multilevel
Bombardier
MBDF 320,000 Miles
N/A
N/A (Warranty has not
ended)
N/A
N/A (Warranty has not
ended)
N/A
N/A (Warranty has not
ended)
N/A
N/A (Warranty has not
ended)
Jonathan Gobeil, (514) 402-8167
New York City Transit
NYCT R188
KRC
MDBCF 100,000 Miles
Yasutoshi Hinada, (914) 376-4700,
ext.4368
New Jersey Transit
NJT Multilevel 2
Bombardier
MBDF 320,000 Miles
Kari Rasco, (516) 566-5218
Maryland Transit Administration
Maryland Multilevel
Bombardier
MBDF 250,000 Miles
Kari Rasco, (516) 566-5218
Fuji
Data to follow later in the
procurement process.
NYCT R142
Doors and Door
Controls
Vapor
1030 Cars
Bruce Alexander, Director, Car Systems
Engineering
6 Doorways per Car
718 694-4485
NYCT R142A / R142S
600 Cars
Bruce Alexander, Director, Car Systems
Engineering
8 Doorways per Car
718 694-4485
NYCT R143
212 Cars
Bruce Alexander, Director, Car Systems
Engineering
8 Doorways per Car
718 694-4485
NYCT R160
1002 Cars
Bruce Alexander, Director, Car Systems
Engineering
8 Doorways per Car
718 694-4485
LIRR M-7
906 Cars
4 Doorways per Car
MDBSCF 60,000 miles
at end of warranty
MDBF 320,000 miles
MDBSCF 60,000 miles
MDBF 2,500,000 miles
at end of warranty
MDBF 320,000 miles
at end of warranty
718 558-4877
MDBSCF 45,000 miles
1-year: Feb 2011 - Jan 2012
MDBF 100,000 miles
MDBSCF 180,328 miles
MDBSF 2,000,000 miles
1-year: Nov 2004 - Oct
2005
MDBF 675,000 miles
MDBCF 140,000 miles
John Gariti, Sr. Manager, MoE PM
1-year: Nov 2004 - Oct
2005
MDBF 1,200,000 miles
MDBSCF 45,000 miles
MDBF 240,000 miles
1-year: Nov 2004 - Oct
2005
at end of warranty
Not at end of warranty
1-year: Aug 2007 - July
2008
MDBCF 180,400 miles
MDBF 4,000,000 miles
PATH
350 Cars
6 Doorways per Car
CTA 5000
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
Customer Concurrence
Letter
Mark Barberash, Project Manager
973 350-2854
Robert Kielba, Chief Rail Equipment
Engineer
MDBSCF 60,000 miles
none specified
1-year: Aug 2012 - July 2013
MDBSCF 131,163 miles
1-year: Feb 2013 - Jan 2014
10 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
706 Cars
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
847 982-5164
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
MMBCF 60,879 miles
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
6-month: June - Nov 2013
Refer to Appendix I.3-3.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
MDBCF of 2,671,886, as
of Jul 31, 2013
Field reporting
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
4 Doorways per Car
MNR M-8
405 Cars
4 Doorways per Car
Cab Equipment
and Controls
Kawasaki
PATH PA5
Amir Rahimi, Project Manager
212 499-4408
Mr. Thomas H. Rowbottom,
Superintendent
(973) 350-3913
Long Island Railroad / Metro-North
Railroad
0821 M-7
Axion
MDBCF 140,000 miles
MDBSF 2,000,000 miles
MDBF 4,000,000 miles
None
MDBSF 2,419,267 miles
Not at end of warranty
MDBF 9,677,067 miles
Communication
MDBCF: 500,000 miles
Communication
See attached:
(Bombardier)
MDBSF: 5,000,000 miles
MDBCF: 602,589 miles
P007606-02 RCR.pdf
Yatin Khurana
Signs
Signs
PL005942 RCR.pdf
[email protected]
m
MDBCF: 500,000 miles
MDBCF: 955,168 miles
PL005910 RCR.pdf
End of warranty
See attached:
November 2013
(Kawasaki)
MDBCF: 350,000 miles
Dan Alcantara
MDBSF: 3,000,000 miles
MDBCF: 967,707 miles
Still in warranty
MDBSF: 9,677,067 miles
PL004449 RCR.pdf
P005539 RCR.pdf
P005512 RCR.pdf
Kawasaki
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
PIS IZMIR
Metro Izmir - Turkey
4 680h
4 651.9h
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
CCTV IZMIR
Metro Izmir - Turkey
1 960h
3 411.09h
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
PIS RECIFE
Metro Recife - Brasil
4 100h
6 450h
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
CCTV RECIFE
Metro Recife - Brasil
16 500h
18 321h
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
PIS – CPTM32 0
CPTM
25000km/train
43 261km
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
CCTV – CPTM 320
CPTM
20 000h
32 256h
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
PIS – PPP5000
CPTM
72685km/train
85624km/train
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
CCTV – PPP5000
CPTM
2500h for overall cameras and
4000 for the rest of the CCTV
equipment
2564.10h for overall cameras and
9560.96 for the rest of the CCTV
equipment
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
CESIS- MDE
RENFE
17 950h
17 950.10h
Still in warranty
SAP tool and W- G00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
CESIS- 2008
RENFE
19 131.46h
19 131.46h
Still in warranty
SAP tool and WG00059 procedure
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
PATH PA5
Mr. Thomas H. Rowbottom,
Superintendent
(973) 350-3913
Field reporting
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
SEPSA
Trainlines and
Networks
(includes coupler
pins)
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
MDBSF: 5,000,000 miles
[email protected]
Communications
(including signs,
but not CCTV
cameras &
recorders)
MDBCF 158,640 miles
Not reported to Kawasaki
Metro-North Railroad
0045 M-8
Customer Concurrence
Letter
None
Not reported to Kawasaki
11 of 18
MDBCF of 6,679,715, as
of Jul 31, 2013
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
Customer Concurrence
Letter
DORTS
DORTS provided raw data
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
DORTS provided raw data
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
DORTS provided raw data
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
SEPTA provided assessment
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
WMATA provided assessment
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
WMATA provided assessment
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
WMATA provided assessment
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Zhong-Xien WU
Taipei
TuCheng
Signalling Site Manager 7F, No.08 Sec 1,
Chunghosiao E. Road Taipei, ROC
MTBF = 5,000 hrs
MTBF = 5,614 hrs
ATP MTBF = 10,877 hrs
ATP = 26,875 hrs
ATO MTBF = 9,254 hrs
ATO = 15,907 hrs
Reliability data only
available for Reliability
Test Period.
[email protected]
866-02-2358-2035
DORTS
Zhong-Xien WU
Taipei
OBLEX Phase 1
Signalling Site Manager 7F, No.08 Sec 1,
Chunghosiao E. Road Taipei, ROC
Reliability data only
available for Reliability
Test Period.
[email protected]
866-02-2358-2035
DORTS
Zhong-Xien WU
Taipei
OBLEX Phase 2
Signalling Site Manager 7F, No.08 Sec 1,
Chunghosiao E. Road Taipei, ROC
ATO = 5,000 hours
ATO = 8,487 hrs
Reliability data only
available for Reliability
Test Period.
MDBF = 117,870 miles
Reliability data only
available for Reliability
Test Period.
4.6 FPMM
Reliability data only
available for Reliability
Test Period.
4.1 FPMM
Reliability data only
available for Reliability
Test Period.
5.8 FPMM
Reliability data only
available for Reliability
Test Period.
[email protected]
866-02-2358-2035
Alstom
SEPTA
K.S.Lee
Silverliner V
ATP/ASR
Hyundai-Rotem USA Corporation 4500
Germantown Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19144
MDBF = 100,000 miles
[email protected]
267-315-3696
WMATA
WMATA 5K
Ken Mortford, WMATA Project Manager
[email protected]
8 Failures Per Million Miles
(FPMM)
202 962 1451
WMATA
WMATA 2K/3K
Ken Mortford, WMATA Project Manager
8 FPMM
[email protected]
202 962 1451
WMATA
WMATA 6K
Ken Mortford, WMATA Project Manager
6 FPMM
[email protected]
202 962 1451
Data Collection Process: FRCAP
Method of Reliability Calculation: MIL-217
Ansaldo
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
MPM-10 Vehicle Cab
Signaling
STM Montreal
MDBF: 4,570,360km/car
MTBF: 15,900/car
12 of 18
Not Yet in Service
N/A
FRCAP/FRACAS: Failure Reporting and
Corrective Action Plan/ Failure Reporting
Analysis and Corrective Action System are
Ansaldo’s processes/systems for
identifying, tracking trends, and correcting
causes of failures. When defective parts
are returned to Batesburg for analysis, they
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
Customer Concurrence
Letter
are entered into a database so the failures
can be tracked (FRCAP). If repeat failures
occur, the FRACAS takes place and trends
are analyzed so mitigations can be put in
place.
WMATA 7000 Series
Vehicle Cab Signal
System
WMATA
MR-73 Vehicle Cab
Signaling
STM Montreal
MDBF: 344,272 miles/car
MTBF: 22,952
MDBF: 3,586,550km/car
MTBF: 12,456
Not Yet in Service
N/A
N/A
N/A
Data Collection Process: FRCAP
Method of Reliability Calculation: MIL-217
Data Collection Process: FRCAP
Method of Reliability Calculation: MIL-217
MNR/CDOT
Melco
MNR M-8
Kawasaki
MDBCF 200,000 miles
Dan Alcantara
MDBSF 5,000,000 miles
MDBCF 1,209,633 miles
MDBSF 9,677,067 miles
Nov, 2013)
Provided by carbuilder
(as of
N/A (end of warranty
period is 2019)
(carbuilder monitors failure during revenue
service)
914-376-4700
New (1800 / 800 series)
Coach Cars
(75 Cars)
Monitoring and
Diagnostic System
53 Cars in revenue service. No warranty
repairs to date.
MBTA (Hyundai Rotem)
Stephen Hicks, Deputy Director of Heavy
Rail Maintenance and Engineering
(617) 222-3228
Existing revenue service proven
performance more than
4,000,000 miles operation (total
all systems delivered)
No warranty repairs to date
N/A- Still in warranty
period
Estimated hours of service:
53 cars average over 6 months, @
12hours/day = 116,070 hours
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3
4 warranty failures for 100 Cars entering
revenue service in one year (2013).
New Multilevel II Cars
(100 Cars)
Monitoring & Diagnostic
System
Vehicle Monitoring
System including
Vehicle Monitoring
Display
NJT (Bombardier)
Dak Murthy,Director, Quality Assurance
(201) 955-5783
168,000 miles MDBF
(Bombardier)
Estimated reliability:
545,000 miles MDBF
N/A- Still in warranty
period
Estimated hours of service:
50 cars average over 1 year @
12hours/day = 219,000 hours
Estimated fleet mileage @10mph =
2,190,000 miles
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3
Quester
Detroit People Mover HMU Replacement
(12 Cars)
Health Monitor Unit
No warranty failures for fleet of 12 Vehicles.
Hours of service not available from DPM.
Detroit People Mover
Barbara Huisman
General Manager
(313) 224-2190
No requirement
(DPM)
No warranty failures to date.
No warranty failures for
entire fleet of 12 vehicles.
Estimated hours @10 hrs/day @ 12
vehicles = 43,000hrs annual.
Refer to Appendix I.3-3
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
10 warranty claim failures from start of
warranty to last car entering revenue
service (3 years), avg. =3 per yr.
New Rapid Transit Cars
(120 Cars)
Central Diagnostic
System
SEPTA (Hyundai Rotem)
Charlie Tuzzo, Engineering Manager,
Operations Division, Vehicle Engineering
(215) 580-8624
No contractual requirement
(SEPTA)
Target: 400,000 Miles
(Hyundai Rotem)
Estimated:
788,000 miles MDBF
N/A- Still in warranty
period
Estimated hours of operation:
60 cars average over 3 years @ 12hrs/day
= 788,400hrs
Estimated fleet mileage @10mph =
7,884,000 miles
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3
New Multilevel Cars
(160 Cars)
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
AMT (Bombardier)
168,000 miles MDBF
13 of 18
Estimated:
Estimated:
15 warranty failures in last year of warranty
(2012)
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Monitoring & Diagnostic
System
Customer
Richard Williams, Head – Procurement
514 287-2464, ext 4246
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
(Bombardier)
Reliability Achieved (Current)
>1,100,000 miles MDBF
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
460,000 miles MDBF
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
6 warranty failures in current year (2013)
Estimated hours of service:
Customer Concurrence
Letter
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
160 cars @ 12hrs/day = 700,000hrs
Estimated fleet mileage @10mph =
7,000,000 miles
Refer to Appendix I.3-3
Client internal report (Bombardier) and QT
RMA data
New BiLevel Passenger
Cars
(329 Cars)
Monitoring & Diagnostic
System
NJT (Bombardier)
Dak Murthy, Director, Quality Assurance
(201) 955-5783
168,000 miles MDBF
(Bombardier)
(Note: Includes MDS + Trainline
Translator + Wireless Data Link)
Client data (2011)
Client data (2011-Q3):
>600,000 miles MDBF
>500,000 miles MDBF
10 failures for approximately 160 of 329
remaining in revenue service in one year
(to Sept 2011).
10 failures for 329 Vehicles (2013)
Quester data(2013):
>1,600,000
Quester data (2011):
>800,000 miles MDBF
*Estimated vehicle mileage =49,000 miles
(*NJT annual rail fleet mileage = 63MM for
1287 Vehicles from “NJT Facts at a Glance
Fiscal Year 2012”)
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Refer to Appendix I.3-3
Trucks
Kawasaki
Mr. Thomas H. Rowbottom,
Superintendent
(973) 350-3913
None
Bombardier
MDBF: N/A
Jean Beauchmin
MTBF: N/A
[email protected]
.com
86 cars in service.
CAF
MDBF: N/A
Scott Reichert
MTBF: N/A
[email protected]
110 Automatic Couplers
Desiro DMU
Siemens UK
MDBF: N/A
Desiro UK, Romania,
Austria, Bulgaria,
San Vong
MTBF: N/A
MTBF =72 993 hours Estimated
Operation with one coupler.
[email protected]
112 Automatic Couplers
Year 2006-2012
PATH PA5
Boston Red Line
Dellner
WMATA 5000
Coupler and Draft
Gear (mechanical
parts)
NYCT R142
Not reported to Kawasaki
MDBCF of 6,679,715, as
of Jul 31, 2013
Field reporting
Definition of failures: All coupler relevant
failures.
Not available
MDBF=122 800 km (car
km)
86 Automatic Couplers
Warranty period: Reliability demonstration
2 years.
Method of reliability calculation:
Point estimate according to CEI/IEC 606054.
MTBF =59 500 hours
Not available
Estimated Operation with
one coupler.
Cars are still in warranty
and no failure records.
Method of reliability calculation:
Point estimate according to CEI/IEC 606054.
Wabtec’s Estimate:
miles
718-694-4460
MDBF = 6,000,000
MDBCF = 3,048,780
miles
miles
MDBF = 38,461,545 miles
Method of reliability calculation:
NYCT R142A / R142S
MDBCF = N/A
718-694-4460
MDBF = N/A
N/A
MDBCF = 3,048,780
miles
MDBF = 38,461,545 miles
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
14 of 18
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
Wabtec’s Estimate:
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
All coupler relevant
Point estimate according to CEI/IEC 606054.
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
N/A
Definition of failures: All coupler relevant
failures.
Definition of failures:
failures
MDBCF = 3,000,000
Wabtec
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
System /
Subsystem
Proposed Major
Subcontractor
Project Name
Customer
Contractual Reliablity
Requirements
Reliability Achieved (Current)
Reliability Achieved
(end of Warranty
Period)
Data Collection Process / Raw Data*
Wabtec’s Estimate:
NYCT R143
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
MDBCF = N/A
718-694-4460
MDBF = N/A
N/A
MDBCF = 3,048,780
miles
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
NYCT R160 actual reliability information
received directly from the carbuilder report.
The data was last received for July 2011.
Data may include NDFs within the systems,
and Wabtec was not involved in
determining responsibility of the reported
failures.
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
N/A
Customer Concurrence
Letter not available, in
lieu of letters agency
point of contact is
provided
MDBF = 38,461,545 miles
NYCT R160
M. Wetherall, Chief Mechanical Officer
MDBSCF = N/A
718-694-4460
MDBF = N/A
N/A
MDBSCF = 1,877,587
miles
Wabtec’s Estimate:
PATH PA5
Mr. Thomas H. Rowbottom,
Superintendent
(973) 350-3913
Whole Car
MDBF = N/A
N/A
MDBF = 1,727,116 miles
(A-Car)
MDBF = 1,149,425 miles
(C-Car)
Customer Concurrence
Letter
Refer to Table I.3.1
*Samples of the raw defect history data are included in Appendix I.3-1 to this section.
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
15 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
TABLE I.3-3: KAWASAKI PROJECT INFORMATION FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION RAIL CAR CONTRACTS
Schedule
Contractual
Customer
Delays?
Pilot
Long Island Rail Road (LIRR)
1.
James W. Allen
M9 Project Manager
Tel: 718-725-2625
Actual
Vehicle Type
Prod
Manuals
Spare Parts
Special Tools
Pilot
M-9
Electric
Commuter Rail
Car
Mr. Debo Ogunrinde
Program Manager, 7000 Series
7000 Series
Subway Car
Manuals
Spare Parts
Special Tools
11/15/2017
6/1/2018
Not applicable
Not
applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not
applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
Not applicable
8/15/2014
2/15/201
4
Not applicable
8/15/2014
Not applicable
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not
applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
Not applicable
No pilot cars
required
To be
determin
ed
Not required
No date
specified
December,
2013
No pilot cars
required
Not
applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
(ongoing)
Not applicable
December, 2013
Due to Hurricane Sandy in October 2012,
the qualification testing on the base R188
cars and the remaining option cars has
been impacted and as a consequence, a
new testing schedule is under discussion.
None
7/29/2005
5/2010
Not applicable
Not
applicable
Not applicable
8/10/2005
5/2010
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
None
None
None
None
Washington Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority (WMATA)
2.
Prod
Liquidated
Damages?
Tel: 202-962-2347
New York City Transit (NYCT)
Mr. Kenneth Teu
3.
Director, Contract Administration,
Car Equipment Engineering &
Technical Support
R188
Subway Car
Tel: 718-694-4481
New York City Transit (NYCT)
Mr. Kenneth Teu
4.
Director, Contract Administration,
Car Equipment Engineering &
Technical Support
R160B
Subway Car
Tel: 718-694-4481
1/31/2010
6/30/201
3
Not applicable
Not
applicable
Not applicable
6/10/2011
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
Notwithstanding the issues currently being
mitigated by Kawasaki and the Railroad on
this project, in 2013 Kawasaki was
awarded the M-9 contract, the next
generation of this series of vehicles. Refer
to item1 above. This shows the continued
confidence of the Railroad in Kawasaki’s
ability to deliver innovative vehicles of the
highest quality. Commercial issues are
still under discussion at the time of this
proposal submisseion and the Contractural
Schedule still may be changed.
6/30/2009
7/31/201
2
Not applicable
Not
applicable
Not applicable
6/23/2009
7/16/2012
March, 2014
March, 2014
March, 2014
None
Metro-North Railroad (MNR)
Mr. Timothy McCarthy
5.
Senior Director, Capital
Engineering
M-8
Electric
Commuter Rail
Car
Tel: 212-499-4428
Port Authority Trans-Hudson
Corporation (PATH)
6.
Mr. Thomas H. Rowbottom
Superintendent
PA-5
Rapid Transit
Car
Tel: 973-350-3913
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
16 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
Schedule
Contractual
Customer
Delays?
Pilot
New York City Transit (NYCT)
Mr. Kenneth Teu
7.
Director, Contract Administration,
Car Equipment Engineering &
Technical Support
Actual
Vehicle Type
R142A &
R142S
Subway Car
R142A
12/31/99
Prod
R142A
8/30/02
Manuals
Spare Parts
Special Tools
Final Drafts
Delivery with 1st
unit 12/31/99
Approx. 1
year prior to
acceptance
of 1st unit
Approx. 1 year
prior to
acceptance of
1st unit
Approx. 1
year prior to
acceptance
of 1st unit
10/04
R142S
Not
applicable
R142S
3/4/05
2/21/01
6/13/02
Final Drafts
Delivery with
1str unit 5/10/01
10/05
Complete drafts
with delivery of
the advance
coaches and
prior to
maintenance
training
Pilot
Prod
R142A
12/31/99
R142A
9/30/02
R142S
Not applicable
R142S
3/14/05
Approx. 1 year
prior to
acceptance of
1st unit
5/10/01
2/6/03
Delivery of
special tools to
be made at
one or more
Boston area
sites to be
designated in
future
12/04
1/06
Manuals
Spare Parts
Special Tools
R142A
11/01
R142A
11/01
R142S
10/04
R142S
10/04
Final Drafts
Delivery
5/10/01
7/01
9/11/06
1/05
Final Drafts
Delivery
10/12/99
Liquidated
Damages?
Not applicable
Yes
7/01
Not applicable
Yes
1/05
Total days: 90
Yes
Tel: 718-694-4481
New York City Transit (NYCT)
Mr. Kenneth Teu
8.
Director, Contract Administration,
Car Equipment Engineering &
Technical Support
R143
Subway Car
Tel: 718-694-4481
Massachusetts Bay
Transportation Authority
(MBTA)
9.
Mr. Jeffery D. Gonneville
Chief Mechanical Officer
Tel: 617-222-4554
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
FC451, FC633
& FC641
Bi-Level
Commuter Rail
Coach
12/04
17 of 18
May 15, 2014
M assachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
New Orange and Red Line Vehicles
RFP No. CAP 27-10
APPENDIX I.3-1: RAW DEFECT HISTORY DATA SAMPLES
Refer to the attached samples provided by the following vendors:
•
Axion
•
Quester
•
SEPSA
•
Vapor
Part B – Technical Proposal
Tab I.3 Past Performance.doc
18 of 18
May 15, 2014
04/08/2014
Coût de réparation / Repair Cost
Nom client
Customer
name
Bomb MNR Croton
Contact
Bon original
Original PO
Numéro de série
Serial number
# RMA P005512
Numéro de pièce
Part number
Numéro de pièce client
Customer part number
Description
Bon réparation
PO for repair
9000585
N.SUAREZ
WO-20040
957
Quantité
Quantity
04584191431S
1
Responsabilité / Liability
Client / Customer
Axion Technologies
0045 COMMUNICATION CONT PANEL
WO-20040
RMNC client
Customer NCR
WO-20040
Description du problème / Problem description
IC/PA FUNCTION ON ENGINEERS SIDE NOT TRANSMITTING
Réparations / Repairs
None
Modification et révision / Modification and revision
None
Réparations sous garantie / Repairs under warranty
R/R DEFECTIVE MICROPHONE WITH NEW ONE, TESTED OK REV-F
# Pièce / Part #
Description
Quantité / Quantity Coûts / Cost ($)
Pièces / Parts
$0.00
Main d'oeuvre / Labor
$0.00
Transport / Shipping
$0.00
Ajustement / Adjustment
$0.00
Total
$0.00 USD
Commentaires
/ Comments
Main d'oeuvre / Labor (h)
Client / Customer
Accepté par /
Accepted by :
Bon commande /
Purchase order :
Date:
Transporteur /
Carrier :
Compléter et retourner par fax ou par courriel / Complete and return by fax or by e-mail.
Tax Id:
Numéro compte /
Account number :
Fax: 1 (418) 856-5978 Courriel / E-mail : [email protected]
04/08/2014
Coût de réparation / Repair Cost
Nom client
Customer
name
Bombardier Plattsburgh
Contact
Bon original
Original PO
Numéro de série
Serial number
# RMA P005539
Numéro de pièce
Part number
Numéro de pièce client
Customer part number
Description
Bon réparation
PO for repair
9000585
C.DUFRANE
0450401#0040
2213
Quantité
Quantity
04584191431S
1
Responsabilité / Liability
Client / Customer
Axion Technologies
0045 COMMUNICATION CONT PANEL
RMNC client
Customer NCR
0450401#0040
117088
Description du problème / Problem description
UNIT IS UNABLE TO ACCEPT INCOMING PEI CALL
Réparations / Repairs
None
Modification et révision / Modification and revision
None
Réparations sous garantie / Repairs under warranty
J-1 ON THE 8100951 BRD WAS NOT CRIMPED PROPERLY; REPLACED J-1; TESTED; WORK AS REQUIRED; CONFIG - OK; UNIT AT REV "F"
# Pièce / Part #
Description
Quantité / Quantity Coûts / Cost ($)
Pièces / Parts
$0.00
Main d'oeuvre / Labor
$0.00
Transport / Shipping
$0.00
Ajustement / Adjustment
$0.00
Total
$0.00 USD
Commentaires
/ Comments
Main d'oeuvre / Labor (h)
Client / Customer
Accepté par /
Accepted by :
Bon commande /
Purchase order :
Date:
Transporteur /
Carrier :
Compléter et retourner par fax ou par courriel / Complete and return by fax or by e-mail.
Tax Id:
Numéro compte /
Account number :
Fax: 1 (418) 856-5978 Courriel / E-mail : [email protected]
04/30/2008
Coût de réparation / Repair Cost
Nom client
Customer
name
Bomb MNR Croton
Contact
Bon original
Original PO
Numéro de série
Serial number
# RMA P007606-02
Numéro de pièce
Part number
Numéro de pièce client
Customer part number
Description
9000782
RMNC client
Customer NCR
84100153S
PEDRO MALDONADO
1
WO-78158
Responsabilité / Liability
Client / Customer
Axion Technologies
045M COMMUNICAT CONT UNIT (B)
Bon réparation
PO for repair
Description du problème / Problem description
PA/PEI SYSTEM ACTING ERACTICLY
Réparations / Repairs
None
Modification et révision / Modification and revision
None
Réparations sous garantie / Repairs under warranty
DONE DM-5525. TAKE CONFIG. TEST CCU AND FUNCTIONS ACCORDING TO TEST. REV = A
# Pièce / Part #
Description
Quantité / Quantity Coûts / Cost ($)
Pièces / Parts
$0.00
Main d'oeuvre / Labor
$0.00
Transport / Shipping
$0.00
Total
Main d'oeuvre / Labor (h)
$0.00 USD
Client / Customer
Accepté par /
Accepted by :
Bon commande /
Purchase order :
Date:
Transporteur /
Carrier :
Compléter et retourner par fax ou par courriel / Complete and return by fax or by e-mail.
Tax Id:
Numéro compte /
Account number :
Fax: 1 (418) 856-5978 Courriel / E-mail : [email protected]
12/23/2011
Coût de réparation / Repair Cost
Nom client
Customer
name
MTA Metro North Rail R.
Contact
Bon original
Original PO
Numéro de série
Serial number
# RMA PL004449
Numéro de pièce
Part number
Numéro de pièce client
Customer part number
Description
9000595
JAMES BUTLER
MNCRR-1000001164
1519
Quantité
Quantity
24699033N
1
Responsabilité / Liability
Client / Customer
Axion Technologies
0045 SIDE DESTINATION SIGN
Bon réparation
PO for repair
RMNC client
Customer NCR
PCT#32729
Description du problème / Problem description
LED BLOCKS STAY ON WITH SYSTEM OFF. SEND ON OCT. 2011 UNDER RMA PL004296- MRV-14543
Réparations / Repairs
THE RIBBON CONNECTORS HAVE BEEN REPLACED. LET THE UNIT RUN UNDER LOAD FOR 2 HOURS WITH NO FAILURES. TOOK
CONFIGURATION. THE SIGN TESTS GOOD AS PER ROUTINE TEST PROCEDURE.
Modification et révision / Modification and revision
None
Réparations sous garantie / Repairs under warranty
None
# Pièce / Part #
Description
Quantité / Quantity Coûts / Cost ($)
Pièces / Parts
$0.00
Main d'oeuvre / Labor
$0.00
Transport / Shipping
$0.00
Ajustement / Adjustment
$0.00
Total
Main d'oeuvre / Labor (h)
$0.00 USD
Client / Customer
Accepté par /
Accepted by :
Bon commande /
Purchase order :
Date:
Transporteur /
Carrier :
Compléter et retourner par fax ou par courriel / Complete and return by fax or by e-mail.
Tax Id:
Numéro compte /
Account number :
Fax: 1 (418) 856-5978 Courriel / E-mail : [email protected]
03/31/2014
Coût de réparation / Repair Cost
Nom client
Customer
name
KAWASAKI
Contact
Bon original
Original PO
Numéro de série
Serial number
# RMA PL005910
Numéro de pièce
Part number
Numéro de pièce client
Customer part number
Description
2101476
NA
Quantité
Quantity
24403-03577
CIRC 060 ANG P FC
Bon réparation
PO for repair
TEJAS RANA
1
Responsabilité / Liability
Client / Customer
Axion Technologies
PK
RMNC client
Customer NCR
M8-14-1801
Description du problème / Problem description
FAR REQUESTED: THIS PLUG KIT CAME IN WITH A BACKSHELL CLAMP BROKEN IN TWO.
Réparations / Repairs
None
Modification et révision / Modification and revision
None
Réparations sous garantie / Repairs under warranty
CLAMP HAS BEEN REPLACED
# Pièce / Part #
Description
Quantité / Quantity Coûts / Cost ($)
Pièces / Parts
$0.00
Main d'oeuvre / Labor
$0.00
Transport / Shipping
$0.00
Ajustement / Adjustment
$0.00
Total
$0.00 USD
Commentaires
/ Comments
Main d'oeuvre / Labor (h)
Client / Customer
Accepté par /
Accepted by :
Bon commande /
Purchase order :
Date:
Transporteur /
Carrier :
Compléter et retourner par fax ou par courriel / Complete and return by fax or by e-mail.
Tax Id:
Numéro compte /
Account number :
Fax: 1 (418) 856-5978 Courriel / E-mail : [email protected]
03/28/2014
Coût de réparation / Repair Cost
Nom client
Customer
name
KAWASAKI
Contact
# RMA PL005942
Numéro de pièce
Part number
Numéro de pièce client
Customer part number
Description
9001390
TEJAS RANA
Bon original
Original PO
Numéro de série
Serial number
1537
Quantité
Quantity
1
21304-03509
Responsabilité / Liability
Client / Customer
Axion Technologies
0821 SIDE DESTINATION SIGN
Bon réparation
PO for repair
RMNC client
Customer NCR
M8-14-1549A
Description du problème / Problem description
LOOSE HARDWARE THAT CANNOT BE TIGHTENED DOWN WITHOUT OPENING THE BACK OT THE UNIT.
Réparations / Repairs
None
Modification et révision / Modification and revision
None
Réparations sous garantie / Repairs under warranty
ADJUSTED LOWER CENTER 1/4 TURN BRACKET + UNIT TESTED AND FUNCTIONS AS PER ROUTINE TEST PROCEDURE + ALL 1/4 TURNS ARE
GOOD + LOADED V 2.01+ NO CONFIGURATION CHANGE
# Pièce / Part #
Description
Quantité / Quantity Coûts / Cost ($)
Pièces / Parts
$0.00
Main d'oeuvre / Labor
$0.00
Transport / Shipping
$0.00
Ajustement / Adjustment
$0.00
Total
$0.00 USD
Commentaires
/ Comments
Main d'oeuvre / Labor (h)
Client / Customer
Accepté par /
Accepted by :
Bon commande /
Purchase order :
Date:
Transporteur /
Carrier :
Compléter et retourner par fax ou par courriel / Complete and return by fax or by e-mail.
Tax Id:
Numéro compte /
Account number :
Fax: 1 (418) 856-5978 Courriel / E-mail : [email protected]
Feuille1
Basic Information
Month
Jun. 2007
Jul. 2007
Aug. 2007
Sep. 2007
Oct. 2007
Nov. 2007
Dec. 2007
Jan. 2008
Feb. 2008
Mar. 2008
Apr. 2008
May. 2008
Jun. 2008
Jul. 2008
Total
Bug related
Number of
days
30
31
31
30
31
30
31
31
29
31
30
31
30
31
Millage
6141974
6252188
6448543
5938790
6460391
6095657
6114935
6320547
5977645
6773021
6786731
6922230
6617844
6935326
89785822
LIRR Average speed :
Qty. per car
Cumulated Failures
as per BTNA :
Cumulated operating
hours
Failure rate
Qty x failure rate
Total failure rate
1 / failure rate
MDBCF achieved
MDBCF required
Communications System
Number of
Cars in
Service
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
1172
CCP
Relevant
CCP
Fleet
operating Relevant as per
time (hours) as per AX BTNA
175485
2
2
178634
2
3
184244
3
3
169680
3
2
184583
3
3
174162
0
0
174712
5
7
180587
3
4
170790
4
6
193515
2
6
193907
5
8
197778
2
3
189081
3
3
198152
3
7
2565309
40
57
-30
27
CCU
Relevant
CCU
Relevant as per
as per AX BTNA
1
3
2
3
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
7
4
4
4
5
0
1
4
11
2
5
1
7
3
7
2
3
32
63
-25
38
MFU
RU
RU
Relevant
MFU
Relevant relevant as Relevant as per
as per Ax per BTNA as per Ax BTNA
0
1
2
4
1
4
0
1
0
1
1
4
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
4
0
0
1
2
4
11
10
31
RCH
Relevant
RCH
Relevant as per
as per AX BTNA
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
14
ANS
ANS
Relevant
Relevant as per
as per Ax BTNA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
IMDSS
Relevant
IMDSS
Relevant as per
GPS
Antenna as per AX BTNA
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
2
7
0
2
6
0
4
6
1
10
29
35 mph
2
1
2.5
1
0.5
2
3
CCP
CCU
PEI
RU
MFU
RCH
27
38
9
11
31
14
5130618
5.26E-06
2565309
1.48E-05
6413273
1.40E-06
2565309
4.29E-06
1.4813E-05
3.508E-06
1.0525E-05
PEI
Relevant
PEI
Relevant as per
as per AX BTNA
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
1
0
1
1
9
2
4
1.5
3.5
4
ANS
0.5
GPS
Antenna
IMDSS
SDS
IMDDS
ISPK
ESPK
1
1
29
54
11
1
1
1282655 2565309 7695928 1282655 5130618 10261237 3847964 8978582 10261237
2.42E-05 5.46E-06 1.30E-07 7.80E-07 5.65E-06 5.26E-06 2.86E-06 1.11E-07 9.75E-08
4.288E-06 1.21E-05 1.09E-05
3.9E-07
3.9E-07 1.13E-05 2.11E-05
4.29E-06
3.9E-07
Signs
Communication
3.66E-005 5.80827E-05
27291
17217
955168
602589
500000
500000
Page 1
3.9E-07
1
RAD
Antenna
1
2565309
3.9E-07
3.9E-07
One failure for calculation but there was no failure for
these units.
Signs
SDS
Relevant
SDS
Relevant as per
as per AX BTNA
4
9
0
4
3
7
1
4
2
7
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
3
4
28
54
IMDDS
Relevant
IMDDS
Relevant as per
as per AX BTNA
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
4
11
Failure Analysis Report
Project
T111 AMT MNS
Client
Bombardier Mt.Saint Hilaire
Client FAR
Product
AMT Trailer MCU
Client NCR
Serial Number
QTC MS12F00 Q15441
FAR/RMA No
100512
17368
8015812
Client WO
Repair Type:
Client Description of Failure
Warranty Repair
MCU Doesn’t display odometer value on MDU
car 3041
Receiving Inspection Comments
Rec'd Date:
07-Jun-10
No Visible Damage
Initial Bench Test Results
Odometer offline in DDS
Fails odometer in BTE mode no RX
A. Clarke
Initial Bench Test By
Fault Code
3
11-Jun-2010
Initial Test Date
Repeatable
Fault Diagnosis and Repair
Fault Code Legend
1. No Fault Found
2. Client Damage
3. Component Failure
4. Design Issue
5. Manufacturing Defect
6. Other/Undefined
7. Upgrade
Found receiver to be attenuated
Replaced U46 serial receiver
Executed Routine test:Pass
Repaired By
A. Clarke
14-Jun-2010
Repair Date
Root Cause of Failure
U46 serial port receiver partially failed
Corrective Action
Isolated Instance: None Needed
A. Clarke
Root Cause/Corrective Action by
Authorized By
A. Clarke
Auth Date
14-Jun-2010
Date
15-Jun-2010
FAR Status
DQS-QSQF-1903-R03 QTFAR
Closed
2008-05-06
Failure Analysis Report
Project
T111 AMT MNS
Client
Bombardier Mont St. Hilaire
Client FAR
Product
AMT Maintenance Display
Client NCR
Serial Number
QTC DS08F01 Q14356
FAR/RMA No
100518
8011328
Client WO
Repair Type:
Client Description of Failure
Warranty Repair
Video has shaky output
Receiving Inspection Comments
Rec'd Date:
15-Jun-10
Scratches on the bezel
Paint peeled off the handles
Initial Bench Test Results
Powered up unit in BTE mode
Ran the DU routine performance test
A prominent blue tint is observed in the background during the lazy dog test window.
HB
Initial Bench Test By
Fault Code
3
27-Aug-2010
Initial Test Date
Repeatable
Fault Diagnosis and Repair
Checked diode D5: Reading has slight variation when compared to a known good unit
Replaced D5: No change. Blue tint still visible
Replaced Differential Equalizer U19: Blue tint not prominent anymore
Compared the original U19 with a known good: Slight variation in resistance at the output of Voltage control and
output gain pin
Executed DU routine performance test: Passes all test
Set up in train mode: Working as intended
Repaired By
HB
Fault Code Legend
1. No Fault Found
2. Client Damage
3. Component Failure
4. Design Issue
5. Manufacturing Defect
6. Other/Undefined
7. Upgrade
08-Sep-2010
Repair Date
Root Cause of Failure
Component failure of differential equalizer U19 increased the output impedance of the voltage control and output gain pin.
Corrective Action
Isolated instance
None needed
HB
Root Cause/Corrective Action by
Authorized By
A. Clarke
09-Sep-2010
Date
Auth Date
09-Sep-2010
FAR Status
DQS-QSQF-1903-R03 QTFAR
Closed
2008-05-06
Failure Analysis Report
Project
T111 AMT MNS
Client
Bombardier Lachine
Client FAR
Product
AMT Trailer MCU
Client NCR
Serial Number
QFG-MS12-0000 S/N Q15440
FAR/RMA No
101038
8035236
Client WO
Repair Type:
Client Description of Failure
Warranty Repair
Car 3084
Reason:
Odometer Offline on MCU
Swapped board AFM with other car. The issue follow the board. Need to change the MCU.
Receiving Inspection Comments
Rec'd Date:
04-Feb-13
No Visual Damage
Initial Bench Test Results
Set up unit on the BTE and powered ON;
Executed full performance routine test: Passes all test;
L.Blanco
Initial Bench Test By
Fault Code
0
14-Feb-2013
Initial Test Date
Repeatable
Fault Diagnosis and Repair
Fault Code Legend
1. No Fault Found
2. Client Damage
3. Component Failure
4. Design Issue
5. Manufacturing Defect
6. Other/Undefined
7. Upgrade
Performed visual inspection on the PCB: No manufacturing defect observed;
Executed AFM board level tests using the BTE: Passes all test;
Odometer interface test: Passes
Executed full performance routine test: Passes all test;
Repaired By
L.Blanco
18-Feb-2013
Repair Date
Root Cause of Failure
No Fault Found
Corrective Action
NA
L.Blanco
Root Cause/Corrective Action by
Authorized By
H.Bains
18-Feb-2013
Date
Auth Date
18-Feb-2013
FAR Status
DQS-QSQF-1903-R03 QTFAR
Closed
2008-05-06
Document
Edition
Date
Technical Report
Chart Reliability for Past Performance
of SEPSA Systems
for
MBTA Orange and Red Line Vehicles
I – G002179
01
2014 - 04 - 30
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
1 of 14
2014-04-30
CONTROL OF EDITION AND MODIFICATIONS
00
Base edition
01
Section 7.1 updated
01
2014/04/30
Elia Gonzalez
Snezana Rancic
Snezana Rancic
00
2014/03/24
Elia Gonzalez
Snezana Rancic
Snezana Rancic
This information is property of SEPSA-SCI. All rights reserved
T-Y00073, ed.00
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
2 of 14
2014-04-30
INDEX
1.- OBJECT ................................................................................................................................................ 3
2.- SCOPE 3
3.- DOCUMENT REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 3
4.- DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS........................................................................................................ 3
5.- RESPONSABILITIES .............................................................................................................................. 3
6.- SEPSA SCI SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................................ 3
6.1.- Chart Reliability .................................................................................................................... 4
6.2.- Data Collection Process .................................................................................................... 6
6.3.- Examples for Service Reports ............................................................................................ 9
7.- SEPSA EDP SYSTEMS......................................................................................................................... 11
7.1.- Chart Reliability .................................................................................................................. 12
7.2.- Data Collection process .................................................................................................. 13
7.3.- Examples for Service Reports .......................................................................................... 13
ANNEX A: Title of Annex A
T-Y00073, ed.00
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
3 of 14
2014-04-30
1.- OBJECT
The purpose of this document is to sum up the information about Past Performance of the
SEPSA Systems which are similar to the systems that are offered for MBTA Orange and Red line
vehicles.
2.- SCOPE
This document is part of SEPSA offer for MBTA Orange and Red Line Vehicles.
3.- DOCUMENT REFERENCES
[1]
“MBTA RO Technical Specification October 22 2013”
4.- DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS
CCTV
Closed Circuit TV
CESIS
SEPSA Event Recorder
CPTM
Companhia Paulista de Trens Metropolitanos de Sau Paulo
DNR
Defect Notification Report
MDE
Middle Distance Train for RENFE
PIS
Passenger Information System
RENFE
Spanish Railway Authority
TAS
Technical Assistance Service
5.- RESPONSABILITIES
Not apply.
6.- SEPSA SCI SYSTEMS
SEPSA SCI offered to MBTA for Orange and Red Line Vehicles, the following three systems:
CS – Communication System with Signs
CCTV – Video Surveillance System
EVR – Event Recorder
Communication System with Signs is similar to the SEPSA product Passenger Information
System that was developed and installed in different trains of:
•
•
•
Metro IZMIR
Metro Recife
CPTM
Also, SEPSA has developed a few Video Surveillance Systems for the following customers:
•
T-Y00073, ed.00
Metro IZMIR
Document
Edition
Date
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
I-G02179
Page
01
4 of 14
2014-04-30
Metro Recife
CPTM
•
•
SEPSA Event Recorder also named CESIS is installed in different trains of RENFE (Spanish
Railroad Authority) such as:
•
•
6.1.System /
Subsyste
m
PIS+CCTV
Middle Distance train Units, series 449 and 599
RENFE locomotives for passenger and merchandise transport.
Chart Reliability
Proposed
Major
Subcontracto
r
SEPSA
HOLDING
Project
Name
PIS
IZMIR
CCTV
IZMIR
PIS
RECIFE
CCTV
RECIFE
PIS –
CPTM32
0
CCTV –
CPTM
320
PIS –
PPP5000
Custome
r
Metro
Izmir Turkey
Metro
Izmir Turkey
Metro
Recife Brasil
Metro
Recife Brasil
Customer
Concurrenc
e Letter**
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
85624km/trai
n
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
2500h for
overall
cameras and
4000 for the
rest of the
CCTV
equipment
2564.10h for
overall
cameras and
9560.96 for
the rest of
the CCTV
equipment
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
17 950h
17 950.10h
Still in
warranty
4 680h
1 960h
4 100h
16 500h
Reliability
Achieved
(Current)
4 651.9h
3 411.09h
6 450h
18 321h
43 261km
CPTM
20 000h
32 256h
CPTM
72685km/train
CPTM
CPTM
T-Y00073, ed.00
Data
Collectio
n
Process /
Raw
Data*
25000km/train
CCTV –
PPP5000
CESISMDE
Reliabilit
y
Achieved
(end of
Warranty
Period)
Contractual
Reliablity
Requirement
s
RENFE
SAP tool
and WG00059
Not Apply
Not Apply
Document
Edition
Date
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
System /
Subsyste
m
Proposed
Major
Subcontracto
r
Project
Name
Custome
r
Contractual
Reliablity
Requirement
s
Reliability
Achieved
(Current)
Reliabilit
y
Achieved
(end of
Warranty
Period)
I-G02179
Page
01
5 of 14
2014-04-30
Data
Collectio
n
Process /
Raw
Data*
Customer
Concurrenc
e Letter**
procedure
CESIS2008
T-Y00073, ed.00
19 131.46h
RENFE
19 131.46h
Still in
warranty
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedure
Not Apply
Document
Edition
Date
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
6.2.-
I-G02179
Page
01
6 of 14
2014-04-30
Data Collection Process
Data Collection Process is common for all SEPSA projects. It is based on general
company procedures that regulate Technical Assistance Service and Non-Conformities
control procedure (W-G00059).
The General Procedure flow diagram is the following:
:
Technical
Asistance
Service (TAS)
Client
Material /
Equipment Failure
YES
¿Resolved by
TAS?
NO
Failed material
retrieved from train
R&D
Quality
Failure is repaired
Incident Report is
prepared
Work Sheet
Material is identified
with DNR/Board/ WS
NO
¿Spare part on
consignment?
INC/NCR is
prepared
Repair
Logistics
YES
Request for RMA to
SEPSA
Material is sent to
SEPSA
Material delivered
to the client
Material is sent to
SEPSA
Materila with
failure
Material entrance
is recorded
Delivery note
SAP
Warehous deliveries
Repair and Test
Repairing record
Sent to Client with
documentation
Reception of the
repairs material
Delivery note
Work Report
END
Set for shipping
Repetitive failure
cause analysis
ó
SAP
END
Quality warning
Repetitive failure
analysis
Communication to
R&D and
Qualitydad
Set corrective/preventive
actions
END
Figure 1. General procedure for Technical Assistance Service
When the failure, detected on the train, is been resolved by TAS personnel the Service
Report is prepared and recorded on SEPSA informatics system (SAP System). If the
problem solution includes material change then the failed material is identified by Defect
Note Report. If the failed material is retrieved from the train by the client, it will be
identified by RMA number and No Conformity Report and the Service Report will be
open on SEPSA SAP System.
T-Y00073, ed.00
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
7 of 14
2014-04-30
When the failed material is sent back to SEPSA facilities, with the delivery note, the
material entrance is recorded and linked to the corresponding Service Report.
Once the material is repaired and tested, the repairing record is updated and closed.
The following is a template that is used for Service Report notice:
T-Y00073, ed.00
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
T-Y00073, ed.00
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
8 of 14
2014-04-30
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
9 of 14
2014-04-30
Based on Service Report information and the failure classification the reliability reports are
prepared periodically.
System and components reliability is evaluated through MTBF and MKBF calculation having in
mind mean distance, mean speed and fleet service time defined by customer.
6.3.-
Examples for Service Reports
Service Report example for IZMIR project:
T-Y00073, ed.00
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
Service Report example for Event Recorder project (CESIS-MDE):
T-Y00073, ed.00
I-G02179
Page
01
10 of 14
2014-04-30
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
11 of 14
2014-04-30
Service Report Example for Event Recorder (CESIS -2008)
7.- SEPSA EDP SYSTEMS
SEPSA EDP (as a part of the SEPSA HOLDING) proposed for the MBTA:
API – Auxiliary Power Inverter
LVPS – Low Voltage Power Supply
SEPSA EDP has developed similar equipment for different customers such
are:
LIRR (Bombardier) – 101KVA Static Converter
LIRR (Bombardier) – 85KVA Static Converter
MNR (Bombardier) – 101KVA Static Converter
MNR (Bombardier) – 85KVA Static Converter
New York Metro (R62) – 6.5kW LVPS
New York Metro (R68) – 6.5kW LVPS
New York Metro (PATH) – 54kVA Static Converter
T-Y00073, ed.00
Document
Edition
Date
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
7.1.-
System /
Subsyste
m
Auxiliary
Power
System
(including
LVPS &
Auxiliary
Power
Inverter)
Chart Reliability
Proposed
Major
Subcontract
or
SEPSA
Contractual
Reliablity
Requiremen
ts
Data
Collecti
on
Process
/ Raw
Data*
Customer
Concurren
ce Letter**
Custome
r
101kVA
Static
Convert
er
Carbuilde
r
Bombardi
er
End
customer:
Long
Island
Rail Road
(LIRR)
180 000
miles
1 181 106 miles
(18h/day; 356
day/year; 35mph)
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedur
e
Not Apply
Carbuilde
r
Bombardi
er
End
customer:
Long
Island
Rail Road
(LIRR)
180 000
miles
1 041 456 miles
(18h/day; 356
day/year; 35mph)
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedur
e
Not Apply
Carbuilde
r
Bombardi
er
End
customer:
Metro
North.
(MNR)
180 000
miles
2 127 428 miles
(18h/day; 356
day/year; 35mph)
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedur
e
Not Apply
Carbuilde
r
Bombardi
er
End
customer:
Metro
North.
(MNR)
180 000
miles
3 204 221miles
(18h/day; 356
day/year; 35mph)
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedur
e
Not Apply
Overhaul
End
customer:
NYCTA
120 000
miles
2 985 141miles
(20h/day/360day/yea
r; 18mph)
Not Apply
Overhaul
End
customer:
120 000
miles
2,651,6330 miles
(20h/day/360day/yea
r; 18mph)
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedur
e
SAP tool
and WG00059
M/7
M/7
101kVA
Static
Convert
er
M/7
85kVA
Static
Convert
er
M/7
6.5kWA
LVPS
R68
6.5kWA
R62
Reliability Achieved
(Current)
Reliabili
ty
Achieve
d (end
of
Warrant
y
Period)
Project
Name
85kVA
Static
Convert
er
T-Y00073, ed.00
I-G02179
Page
01
12 of 14
2014-04-30
Not Apply
Document
Edition
Date
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
NYCTA
54kVA
PA5
7.2.-
Carbuilde
r KRC
End
customer:
PATH Port
Authority
of NY &
NJ.
I-G02179
Page
01
13 of 14
2014-04-30
procedur
e
75 000miles
514 766.35 miles
(24h/day;360day/yea
r/15 mph)
SAP tool
and WG00059
procedur
e
Not Apply
Data Collection process
Data Collection Process is common for all SEPSA projects. It is based on general
company procedures that regulate Technical Assistance Service and Non-Conformities
control procedure (W-G00059).
See chapter 6.2.
7.3.-
Examples for Service Reports
Service Report Example for 101kVA Static Converter for LIRR.
T-Y00073, ed.00
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
Document
Edition
Date
Service Report Example for 101kVA Static Converter for MNR.
T-Y00073, ed.00
I-G02179
Page
01
14 of 14
2014-04-30
Chart Reliability
SEPSA Systems
T-Y00073, ed.00
Document
Edition
Date
I-G02179
Page
01
15 of 14
2014-04-30
2. (Vapor) Description of the data collection process, and the method of reliability calculation
Attached is the VSRS general procedure 13-WI-03 which governs how Vapor gets raw failure data from the
failure field and how it communicates the Field Reliability review to internal departments and the customer.
It contains sample data sheets for Field Data repair sheets and post repair data sheets. Below is a brief
narrative which details how the raw failure data is put together and analyzed to determine corrective actions
needed to achieve the target reliability.
Definition
Typically the definition of annual failure rate for a LLRU is the ratio of chargeable relevant failures to the
product of average cars and LLRU per car.
Typically the MDBCF of the door system is the ratio of the total operating distance accumulated by the total
population of cars to the total number of chargeable relevant failures occurring for that population within
each specified system of the cars during a specified length of time, generally 6 or 12 months.
Data Gathering
Vapor receives failure information from the Vapor field service team, the Vapor material and return process,
and directly from the Carbuilder or Customer.
Vapor receives the car fleet information regarding the number of cars in service and the mileage run from the
Carbuilder.
Vapor receives the initial relevant failures assigned by the Carbuilder.
Relevant information is recorded into an electronic form which is compatible with the RAMS database.
Data Analysis
This information is reviewed and categorized by a reliability engineer. The reliability engineer will cross check
the in service failure information with the internal repair information.
The failures and repairs are categorized in the FRACAS RAMS database.
The Carbuilder relevant failures are reviewed and either accepted as part of the Vapor door scope or
assigned a categorization of Carbuilder responsibility or of passenger responsibility.
The failures are then reviewed with the Carbuilder’s reliability engineer for data consolidation and
confirmation.
A review of the data over time will typically yield a door system reliability performance curve and a Vapor
responsibility reliability performance curve.
These performance curves are compared to the Contractual reliability requirement.
If the reliability is below the Contractual reliability requirement, trends are analyzed and areas of
improvement are identified to the Vapor project team for improvement resolution and communication to
the customer.

Nueva - Yanbal

Easy Dimmer series Multi Zone RGB LED Dimmer Switch for Easy

CONTINUING AT

Section 8.3 - Problem Solving

MAY 16, 2015 SMILES FOR MILES 5K

WILLIAM TUCKER

Heating Cable Installation Instructions

Pure Water Technology Raises Over 60K_4 Miles 4 Water

download - Pictures n Ideas

RFQ QAS AND MAINT FOR JUNE 5 BIDDING.xlsx