2015-01-29 Ponencia Biogas (Cetaqua) VF

Nuevos procesos de
depuración con menores
costes y aprovechamiento
energético del biogás
JORNADA BIOGAS GALICIA
29/01/2015
Alberto Sánchez
Biogas general background
WHY RECOVER ENERGY FROM BIOGAS?
Sewage treatment is a high-energy consuming process (pumping & aeration):
0,4 – 0,6 kWh/m3
Electricity costs are rising
Climate change awareness: reduction of the carbon footprint
Use of renewable energies: target of 20% of the total in the UE by 2020
HOW IS IT DONE TODAY?
Energy Conversion Systems
(ECS): flare, boilers and some ICE
Biogas treatment: very light (FeCl3
dosing, moisture condensation…)
SE water branch (2011)
Energy balance in a WWTP
28% (CO2)
1 kg COD
3,5 kWh
30%
30% BIOGAS
35%
aireation & pumping
Boosting biogas
production
Energy from byproducts
7%
Effluent
Energy consumption
35% Final sludge
High efficient energy recovery
Energy production
ENERGY SELFSUFFICIENCY ?
Biogas: Value chain
• Include
external
sources
• Reduce
operation risk
• Quantify
correctly
• Select correctly
•Reduce cost
•Reduce
operation risk
Energy
production
INCREASE
• Enhance
productivity
Biogas
cleaning
REDUCE
INCREASE
Biogas
production
• Increase
electricity
production
• Increase heat
use
Biogas: Value chain
ADVANCED DIGESTION
• Anaerobic digestion at low temperatures
sludge
• Anaerobic digestion at ambient temperatures
sewage
• Anaerobic digestion control
Advanced digestion rationale
• Sewage sludge anaerobic digestion has limited
performance (VSR at around 40%) and is far from the
stoichometric ratio of 0.35 Nm3CH4/kg COD
boosting production through add-on
processes/different operating conditions
• Some digesters are not operated at full load
boosting production through co-digestion
Sludge AD at Low Temperature
Typical anaerobic digesters operate in:
30% Biogas produced : Maintain digester
temperature around 37ºC
Mesophilic conditions (30 – 40 ºC)
Thermophilic conditions (50 – 70 ºC)
Underloaded digesters need the same energy
PRESENT STATUS
FUTURE STATUS
Electric
energy
Electric
energy
Biogas
30%
Sludge
35ºC
Biogas
Grid
injection
Boiler
Grid
injection
7%
Others
Sludge
20 ºC
Boiler
Anaerobic digestion at psychrophilic temperatures
Reduction of the energy input required for heating the bioreactor
Lower temperatures lead to more stable conditions of operation
Improvement of the operational performance by reducing costs
Others
Sewage AD at ambient temperature
«Integrated System of Anaerobic Methanogenic reactor and Membrane bioreactor»
ES 2 401 445 B2
- 0.25 kw/m3
600 mgCOD/L
SIAM
•
50% lower sludge production
•
70 % NT removal
•
90 % dissolved methane removal (GHG)
•
High quality effluent (Reuse)
SIAM
50-75% CH4
(biogas)
CH4 (GHG)
N2
NO3-
25-50% CH4
(dissolved)
Anaerobic
CH4 + NO3
Anoxic
Aerobic
NH4+
Aerobic
NH4+
permeate
wastewater
O2
AD control
Oversized
Unstable
«Control System for Anaerobic Codigestors»
ES 2 516 615 A1
Biogas: Value chain
BIOGAS CLEANING
• Desulphurisation by micro-aeration
• Biogas deep polishing
Biogas cleaning rationale
• Gas treatment line should be designed according to CHP technologies
• Combination of treatment technologies is necessary
• The entire line should be considered altogether
H2S
CO2
CH4
Internal
Combustion
Engine
NA
> 45%
µ-turbine
NA
> 30%
Stirling
NA
> 30%
Fuel cells
NA
> 50%
Biomethane
Si
96 – 99%
Desulphurisation by Microaeration
H2S removal
Polishing
Inside
digester
Microaeration
FeCl3
dosing
NaOH Scrubbers
Main removal
Bio-scrubber
Outside
digester Iron based
sorbents
Bio-trickling filter
Activated
carbon
Desulphurisation by Microaeration
Injection in the
sludge loop
Injection in the
biogas loop
Injection in the
headspace
Patented (FR13.55.538)
Key issues
H2S removal efficiency (i.e.: residual content of H2S in the treated gas)
CH4 and CO2 content in the treated gas
Residual content of O2 in the treated gas (problems injection + S formation on piping)
Elemental sulphur accumulation (digester; aeration chamber; other locations)
Biogas deep
polishing
• Pilot plant in real WWTP for biogas polishing
• Characterization of adsorbent materials for H2S and
Siloxanes removal (virgin activated carbon, impregnated
activatd carbon, iron-based adsorbent, silica gel, etc.)
• Study the reaction mechanisms
Activated carbon
adsorbent (top: virgin;
bottom: saturated)
Iron-based adsorbent
(bottom: virgin; top &
middle: saturated)
Biogas: Value chain
BIOGAS END-USE
• Cogeneration with fuel cells
• Fuel: Biomethane
Biogas end-use rationale
Raw
biogas
Cleaning
(removal of
water,H2S,
siloxanes, …)
Cogeneration (ICE, µ-cogen, ICE+ORC)
Combined
Heat &
Power
(CHP)
High temperature fuel cells
Reforming + Low temperature fuel cells
Clean
Biogas
CO2 removal
FUEL
biogas upgrading
Waste heat
Jan-15
Cogeneration
with fuel cells
• Chemical combustion
External
combustion
Internal
combustion
• Electrochemical combustion
Cogeneration
with fuel cells
Key issues
• High temperature fuel cells are more efficient for biogas applications
• Net electrical efficiencies of 40 – 50% can be obtained
• Heat integrated systems; with thermal efficiencies of 30 – 35%
• Stack durability is an issue but guarantees are given
• CAPEX around 3 – 4 times compared to ICE/micro-turbines
Cogeneration
with fuel cells
78 biogas-powered fuel cell references accounting for 53.5 MW
Fuel: Biomethane
Car
fuel
Natural
gas grid
Fuel: Biomethane
Quality
monitoring
Definition of sampling points
and frequency of monitoring
Parameters
Temperature
Pressure
Dew point
CH4 - CO2
N2 - O2
H2S
Linear hydrocarbons
BTEX
Siloxanes
Sulphur compounds
Ammonia
Halogenated compounds
CO
HCN
Mercury
Density
Water
Low/high heating value
Wobbe Index
Different on-line analysers assessed
Conclusiones
Biogas
production
Biogas
cleaning
Energy
production
• Utillization of existing installations
• New operational strategies/processes
• Integration of biogas treatment
• Solutions for specific requirements
• High development potential
THANKS
QUESTIONS?