E-3 INSPECTOR GENERAL Summary Mission

E-3 INSPECTOR GENERAL
Summary
Benchmarks
0
Commendables
0
Mission Rating
Discrepancies
0
AoCs
0
HHQ
0
Inspector General Complaint Resolutions Program
Inspector General Compliance Inspection Program
Staffing
Position - Inspector General (IG) held position:
Inspector General Specialty Track:
0 Year(s)
0 Month(s)
Mission and Staffing Notes
Y/N/NA Topic/ Detailed Question
01
Has the Wing IG completed
required training IAW CAP
regulations?
How to verify compliance
Discrepancy Write up
Notes
a) Provide copy of screen shot
of from eServices showing IG
College completion or a copy of
the waiver.
a) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 1) Wing IG has not
completed IG College IAW CAPR
123-1 para 10b.
b) Provide copy of screen shot
from eServices showing
completion of annual refresher
training.
b) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 1) Wing IG has not
completed annual refresher
training IAW CAPR 123-1 para 10e.
a) IG College
b) Annual Refresher Training
CI Checklists / Worksheet, Jan 2015
Previous Editions Will Not Be Used
OPR:IGI
02
Has/Have the Assistant Wing
IG(s) completed required training
IAW CAP regulations?
If wing has an Assistant Wing IG
then:
a) If not previously accomplished
was the IG Senior Course
completed within 13 months of
being appointed?
a) Provide copy of screen shot
from eServices showing IG
Senior Course completion.
b) Provide copy of screen shot
from eServices showing
completion of annual refresher
training.
b) Annual Refresher Training
03
Is the Wing IG billeted IAW CAP
regulations?
Is the Wing IG double billeted?
CI Checklists / Worksheet, Jan 2015
Review eServices.
a) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 2) Wing IG has not
completed IG Senior Course
before 13 months after being
assigned as an Assistant Wing IG
IAW CAPR 123-1 para 10c.
b) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 2) Wing Assistant IG(s)
have not completed annual
refresher training IAW CAPR 123-1
para 10e.
(A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3 Question
3) Wing IG is not billeted IAW
CAPR 123-1 para 6g(1).
Previous Editions Will Not Be Used
OPR:IGI
04
Are ECIM case files maintained
IAW CAP regulations?
A sample of ECIM cases will be
reviewed.
all) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 4) Wing ECIM case files
are not maintained IAW CAPR 1232 para 7 and 8.
Review uploaded SUIs to ensure
SUIs are accomplished
according to the wing's
scheduled inspection cycle.
(A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3 Question
5) Wing failed to ensure SUIs
were conducted IAW CAPR 123-3
para 12b. NOTE: list each unit
each subordinate unit affected.
ECIM CASE FILE: Sample
check (based on sampling) for the
following documents in ECIM
FILE SAMPLED, NOT
a check of document quality
NOTE: all sub steps required for
each file for overall YES
a) Does each case contain the
original complaint (i.e. CAPF 30
but not a requirement)? (Y/N)
b) Was the complaint
acknowledgement sent? (Y/N)
c) Does the file contain a written
complaint analysis? In case note
or as attachment? (Y/N)
d) If an investigation, was the IO
qualified? (Y/N)
e) If an investigation, was there a
proper Appointment Letter?(Y/N)
f) If an investigation, was there a
signed statement by the Legal
Officer?(Y/N)
g) Did the file contain a closure
letter? (Y/N)
h) If an investigation, was there a
report of investigation? (Y/N)
05
Are SUIs conducted in
accordance with the wing's
scheduled SUI cycle?
CI Checklists / Worksheet, Jan 2015
Previous Editions Will Not Be Used
OPR:IGI
06
If required, IAW CAP regulations,
did the Wing IG recommend
suspension of subordinate unit
activities for any subordinate unit
exceeding 27 months unless a
waiver had been obtained?
For any subordinate unit
exceeding 27 months, provide a
copy of waiver.
(A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3 Question
6) Subordinate unit exceeding 27
months did not obtain a waiver
IAW CAPR 123-3 para 12b.
07
Are SUIs completed IAW CAP
regulations?
a) Were SUI inspections
conducted with at least two
qualified inspectors?
a) Provide listing of qualified SUI
team inspectors from eServices
Member reports for IG Course
Completion.
a) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 7) SUI inspections were
not conducted with at least two
qualified inspectors IAW CAPR
123-3 para 12d(1).
b) Was any unit graded
Unsatisfactory which did not
receive a re-inspection?
b) Review SUIs and any reaccomplished SUIs.
c) Review eServices IG portal
SUIs for wing. Verify each unit
c) Are last two SUIs for each unit has two most recent SUIs
loaded in eServices?
loaded.
b) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 7) Subordinate unit
graded Unsatisfactory did not
receive a re-inspection IAW CAPR
123-3 para 12i.
c) (A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3
Question 7) All SUIs were not
loaded in eServices IAW CAPR
123-3 para 11.
08
Were all applicable SUI sections
inspected IAW CAP regulations?
CI Checklists / Worksheet, Jan 2015
Review sampling of SUIs taken
from eServices.
Review SUIs and commander's
dash board for IG information.
(A-Discrepancy): [xx] (E3 Question
8) All applicable TAB areas were
not inspected during SUI IAW
CAPR 123-3 para 12h(1).
Previous Editions Will Not Be Used
OPR:IGI
Instructions for writing Benchmarks, Commendables, closing a discrepancy on site, and writing an Area of Concern
1.
If there are “Identified Strengths or Weaknesses” list them then delete all of these instructions.
2.
When writing a Benchmark or Commendable you must include what is being or has been done that is a highly effective
concept, technique, or management practice that is above and beyond the requirements specified by the regulations AND
what its impact was on the wing/unit or its mission.
3.
Should a discrepancy be closed on-site prior to the inspectors leaving, the discrepancy should be written up followed by
this bullet point
a.
This discrepancy was verified corrected - discrepancy closed, no further action required.
4.
When writing an "Area of Concern" (AoC) keep in mind the definition of an AoC:
a.
An AOC indicates a minor weakness which does not violate a directive and is listed when mission
accomplishment, program purpose or membership satisfaction is impaired or threatened. Examples of AOCs include,
but are not limited to:
i.
A weakness or impairment that, if uncorrected, will lead to a violation of regulation or other standard.
ii.
A sample which may indicate an unsatisfactory trend or violation if found to be prevalent in the unit.
iii.
Non-mandatory processes or activities that are not accomplished, but would be beneficial or useful to
the program.