Always Good for a New Paradox

DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
The Complex Association Between Alcohol Consumption and Myocardial
Infarction: Always Good for a New Paradox
Running title: Kiechl et al.; Alcohol consumption and myocardial infarction
Stefan Kiechl, MD; Johann Willeit, MD
ustria
Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, A
Austria
Address
Add
dr forr Correspondence:
Corr
Co
rresspo
rr
pond
nden
nd
ence
ncee:
Address
S effan
St
a Kiechl
Kiech
hl MD
MD
Stefan
Depa
De
part
pa
rtme
rt
ment
me
nt ooff Neur
N
eur
urol
olog
ol
ogyy
og
Department
Neurology
nnsbbruckk Medical
Medi
Me
dica
call University
Univ
Un
iversi
sity
ty
y
Innsbruck
A i h
35
Anichstrasse
A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Tel: 0043-512-504-24244
Fax: 0043-512-504-23987
E-mail: [email protected].
Journal Subject Code: Etiology:[4] Acute myocardial infarction
Key words: Editorial, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular disease, alcohol, epidemiology
1
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
First mention of alcohol as a component of diet and communal events dates back to the 7th
millennium B.C. Famous ancient savants like Hippocrates used alcohol as a solvent for herb
extracts, an antiseptic, and to counteract lethargy and diarrhoea, while in medieval times alcohol
was well within the armamentarium of anaesthetics, sedatives, disinfectants, and diuretics.
Nowadays, alcohol is no longer administered for medicinal purposes, but is a frequent
constituent of regular diet favoured for its broad availability and lack of effective sale
restrictions. In 2010, the worldwide average amount of pure alcohol consumed per person aged
15 or over was 6.2 litres per year or 13.5 grams per day. 1 There is now solid evidence that
alcohol, when consumed on a regular basis and at low volumes (up to one drink for women and
wo drinks for men daily), confers protection against cardiovascular disease, wh
her
ereaas re
regu
gula
gu
larr
la
two
whereas
regular
amounts of more than four to five drinks daily and heavy episodic drinking have opposite effects
effects.
2,3
,3
The
The J-shaped
J-ssha
happedd as
asso
association
sociation applies to low- and hhigh-risk
ighh-risk individ
ig
individuals,
dua
u ls,, th
thee primary prevention
ettting,
in and too survivors
suurv
viv
vorss of myocardial
myoca
yocaardia
dial iinfarction.
nfarrcttion.. S
ex ddifferences
iffe
if
feereenc
ncees are
re aattributed
tttri
ribu
bu
ute
tedd to distinct
dis
isti
t ncct gastric
ti
gasstric
setting,
Sex
allco
coho
holl dehydrogenase
ho
dehy
de
hyddrog
hy
drog
ogeenas
asee (ADH)
(ADH
(A
DH
H) activity
acti
ac
tivvit
ti
ityy an
andd bo
body
d ddistribution
dy
istrrib
i ut
utio
ionn vo
io
vvolumes.
l me
lu
mes.
s.. 4 C
Consumption
on
nsuump
mpti
tionn off al
ti
alc
alcohol
cohhol
ho
alcohol
during mealss on
on a daily
dail
da
illy basis
basi
ba
siss is deemed
si
dee
e me
m d an ideal
idea
eall drinking
drin
dr
in
nki
k ng pattern,
pat
atte
teern
rn, characterized
char
ch
arac
ar
acte
ac
teri
te
r zeed by prolonged
ri
pro
r longed
absorption and persistency, because its most favourable effects are transient and it blunts
postprandial glucose spikes. Strictly speaking, however, the bulk of studies supporting this
knowledge operate in high-income countries with little evidence available from South America,
Africa or Asia, except China and Japan. 2 In this regard, the study by Leong et al. in the current
issue of Circulation delivers unique and, to some extent, surprising results. 5 Alcohol consumers
living in South Asia and the Middle East, in contrast to the rest of the world, do not enjoy
protection against myocardial infarction. Inhabitants of the South Asian countries Sri Lanka,
Pakistan, India and Bangladesh (1.644 Mio, 23.04% of the world population as of 2013) even
2
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
faced a significantly elevated risk after adjusting for body composition, physical activity,
smoking, quality of diet, classic vascular risk factors, as well as socioeconomic and sociocultural
factors. 5 INTERHEART is among the pioneer initiatives aimed at scrutinizing effects of lifestyle on human diseases on a large scale and around the globe. 6 It involves more than 27.000
individuals from 52 countries and employs rigorous methodological standards. Early releases
from this database already point to differential effects of alcohol in South Asia 6,7, but full data
have not been made available until now. 5
INTERHEART’s findings are relevant and timely given that alcohol consumption is on
the rise in South Asia, especially India, according to the most recent WHO report released in
ongoing
ing ddiscussion
isscu
cuss
ssio
ss
ionn on
io
2014 (Figure 1A). 1 The elegant study by Leong et al. inevitably fuels the ongoi
he mechanisms linking alcohol intake and cardiovascular disease. Beyond doubt, alcohol exerts
the
mu
mult
ltip
lt
iple
ip
le effects
eff
ffec
eccts all
all aalong
long the atherosclerosis process
pro
oce
c ss from early lesion
leesi
s on
n formation
formation
or
to plaque
multiple
fi
isssur
u ing and thrombus
th
hromb
mbuus formation
forrma
m ti
tion
on and
and
n directly
directtlyy affects
aff
ffec
fects he
hear
artt rh
hyt
ythm
hm aand
nd myoc
m
yoc
ocar
ardi
diial
a ccontractile
onntrracti
acti
tilee
fissuring
heart
rhythm
myocardial
3,8,9
9
pe
perf
rfor
rf
orrma
m ncce.
e 3,8
Most
M
osst pro
pproperties
ropeerti
ertiies pproposed
rop
ro
pose
pose
sedd ar
are
re do
dose-dependent
ose-d
dep
pen
ende
deent
n aand
nd m
mediated
edia
ed
iate
teed by eethanol
than
th
noll pe
perr se,
se ,
performance.
with moderate
moderat
atee amounts
amou
am
ount
ou
ntts offering
offe
of
feri
fe
ring
ri
ng
g protection
pro
ote
t ct
ctio
io
on and
and larger
laarg
rger
e qquantities
er
uant
ua
ntit
nt
i ie
it
iess ma
aki
king
ng tthe
he ppoison.
oiso
oi
son.
so
n
n.
making
Alcohol and vascular disease – the bright side
Figure 2 illustrates current knowledge on potential athero- and cardio-protective consequences
of alcohol consumption. In brief, alcohol in moderation favourably affects reverse cholesterol
transport, insulin sensitivity, abdominal obesity, systemic inflammation and oxidative stress,
endothelial function, endogenous fibrinolysis, postprandial hypercoagulability, and platelet
aggregation. 3,8-13 These effects are in part of reasonable size and may well contribute to the
health benefits of habitual moderate alcohol consumption regarding coronary heart disease
(decrease of 29%), 2 diabetes (decrease of 30%-40%), 3 and life span (decrease of 17%-18% in
3
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
total mortality). 3
The “South Asian paradox”
The beneficial effects of alcohol, however, are difficult to reconcile with INTERHEART’s
observation of an elevated vascular risk among mainly moderate drinkers in South Asia. As
discussed by Leong et al., genetic differences in alcohol metabolism, reflected by functional
polymorphisms in the genes encoding alcohol degradation enzymes like ADH and aldehyde
dehydrogenase (ALDH)-2, are unlikely to explain the paradox, because health hazards diminish
in emigrants leaving South Asia. 5 Other potential explanations for the paradox are chance,
unmeasured confounding, disease-modifying life-style and dietary peculiarities, unique drinking
patterns and the quality of alcoholic beverages consumed. Chance is abrogated byy cconsistent
onsi
on
sist
si
sten
st
entt
en
evidence from another large-scale study from India. 14 Importantly, this study demonstrates that
de
eleete
teri
riou
ri
ou
us effects
effect
ef
ctts of
o alcohol are not confined too frequent
freequent binge dr
rinki
king
ng in India, but extend to
deleterious
drinking
m
odderate
de
drink
nker
errs consuming
co
onsum
umin
um
ingg minor
in
minnor
mi
nor amounts
amounnts of aalcohol.
lccoho
ho
ol.
l. C
on
nfo
fouundi
unding
ng
gm
ay
y aarise
rise ffrom
rise
ro
om th
he use
use of
moderate
drinkers
Confounding
may
the
elf
lf-r
-rep
-r
epor
ep
ortt in
inst
stru
ru
ument
mentss on
on a fundamentally
fun
unda
dame
da
m nttallly different
me
diff
ffer
ff
e ent
er
ent sociocultural
soociioc
ocul
ultu
tura
tu
raal background,
back
ba
ck
kgrrou
ound
nd,, bu
nd
ut it
it iss not
n ot
self-report
instruments
but
mmediately
y ap
appa
pare
pa
rent
re
n w
nt
hy
y tthis
his sh
hi
shou
ou
uld
l ppretend
reete
tend
nd hharm
arm
m iin
n So
Sout
uthh As
ut
Asia
i bbut
ut nnot
ot iin
n ot
oother
herr co
he
comp
m arable
immediately
apparent
why
should
South
comparable
Asian regions or countries tabooing alcohol. Nutritional modifiers of alcohol effects remain to be
unravelled and hold some promise to resolve the paradox. Unique characteristics of alcohol
consumption in South Asia are the globally highest proportion of unrecorded (homemade)
alcohol (one-half in India) 1 and the almost exclusive consumption of spirits (93.1% spirits, 6.8%
beer, and 0.1% wine in India). 1,14 In small intervention trials and based on pathophysiological
considerations, wine surpassed other types of alcoholic beverages in terms of favourable shortterm metabolic changes. 3,9,11,12 To date, epidemiological research has not confirmed the
superiority of wine over spirits. 2 However, it must be remembered that in epidemiological work
4
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
it is challenging, if possible at all, to disentangle effects of different types of beverages in
“mixed” drinkers, and drinking behaviours allocated to one type of beverage only are usually
driven by cultural and regional peculiarities. The stimulating INTERHEART publication should
motivate further scientific elaboration of alcohol’s preferential harm in South Asia and revive
research targeting alcohol quality. Promising research foci may address unexplored areas like
alcohol’s influence on the gut microbiota and metabolome, and the effects of distinct alcoholic
beverages on lipid composition 15 and de novo lipogenesis.
Alcohol and health – the dark side
Harmful use of alcohol is a component cause of more than 200 disease and injury conditions 1,3
ncluding myocardial infarction, stroke, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, non-ischemic
ic
including
cardiomyopathy, sleep apnea, cancer (most notably of the breast and gastrointestinal tract), foeta
foetal
allco
oho
holl syndrome,
syynd
ndrrome
me,, and
me
and liver cirrhosis. It is the th
hird
ird-leading causee of premature
pre
rem
mature death in the US,
alcohol
third-leading
urp
pas
a sed onlyy by
by smoking
sm
mok
okin
ingg and
in
and overweight,
ov
ver
erw
weight,, and
and eve
eeven
ven cconstitutes
onsttittut
onst
utees tthe
he nnumber
umbe
um
beer on
onee ki
kill
ller
ll
err aamong
mong
mo
ng
surpassed
killer
meen aged
aged 15
15 to 50
50 ye
yyears.
arss.
s. 3 O
On
n a po
pop
population
pulaatiion llevel,
pula
ev
vel
e , hhazardous
azaard
dou
ouss ef
eff
effects
fects
ts ooff al
alcohol
lco
cohhol
hol in aaggregate
ggreegaate m
ggre
may
ay
ay
men
18
nef
efic
i ia
ic
iall on
nes
e , 1,8
aand
ndd cardiovascular
car
ardi
d ov
ovas
ascu
as
cula
cu
larr disease
la
dise
di
seas
se
a e is a key
key contributor
co
ont
n ri
ribu
buto
bu
torr too alcohol-related
to
alc
lcoh
ohol
oh
o -related
offset the ben
beneficial
ones,
mortality (33.4% globally). 1 Despite the intriguing novel findings for South Asia, it must be
emphasized that the dimension of the problem is still greatest in the Western world and in
emerging economies with rates of alcohol-related deaths peaking in the Russian Federation and
successor states of the former USSR (2014 WHO Report, Figure 1B). 1 Figure 2 summarizes
mechanistic pathways linking heavy drinking and vascular disease (3, 8). The second main
finding of INTERHEART, namely that more than four alcoholic drinks in men and three in
women (or •6 drinks unisex in an alternative analysis), consumed on a single occasion, translates
into short-term harm 5, fits very well with these pathophysiological considerations. Alcohol in
5
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
excess produces an immediate rise in blood pressure, a short-lived oxidative and proinflammatory burst, impaired fibrinolysis, and temporary heart rhythm changes with enhanced
oxygen demands. 3,8-13 Briefly delayed, the platelet-rebound phenomenon creates a reversible
pro-coagulant state and vulnerable period. Moreover, heavy drinking interferes with the
absorption, metabolism, and action of several drugs used in cardiovascular prevention and may
prompt irregular or delayed pill intake, which further amplifies risk. The enhanced burden of
atherosclerosis and more common alcohol-drug interferences provide a plausible explanation
why individuals older than 65 years are more susceptible to injurious effects of heavy episodic
drinking in INTERHEART. 5
Some notes on limitations
Limitations of the INTERHEART Study are the case-control design with control recruitment
from
fr
rom
m hospitals,
hospi
ospi
pita
talls, the
ta
th
he general
general community, and visitors
visit
ittor
o s or relatives off thee iindex
ndex patient. Subsidiary
nd
analyses,
an
nallys
y es, however,
howe
wevver, argue
arg
guee against
aga
gain
in
nst a meaningful
meaninggfuul influence
infflu
uen
ncee of
of this
th
his heterogeneous
heter
ete ogeneo
ous
us enrolment
enr
nrol
olme
ol
ment
nt
procedure
obtained.
pr
proc
oced
oc
edur
ed
uree on tthe
hee kkey
ey ffindings
in
ndi
ding
nggs ob
obta
tain
ta
ined
in
ed
d. 5 A
Analyses
naly
na
lyse
ly
sees off sho
short-term
hort
ho
rt-tter
rt
erm
m ef
effe
effects
ffe
f cts of aalcohol
lccoh
o ol
ol iingestion
ng
gessti
tion
onn
entail the problem
pro
obl
b em that
tha
h t alcohol
a co
al
oho
hol consumption
cons
co
nsum
ns
umpt
um
p io
pt
ionn inn the
the 24
24 hours
hoour
urss prior
prio
pr
iorr too myocardial
io
myo
yoca
card
ca
r ia
rd
iall infarction
infa
in
farc
fa
r tion is
rc
compared with alcohol consumption in the 24-to-48-hour period prior to infarction as a picture of
customary drinking pattern. Acute effects of alcohol do not strictly follow a 24-hour cut-off.
Still, this comparison is more robust than the approach commonly used in case-crossover studies,
namely using self-reported long-term consumption as a reference. Finally, INTERHEART did
not record alcohol quantities, types of alcoholic beverages, or previous drinking behaviours, and
thus missed the opportunity to further deepen its findings in these respects. 5 Finally, problems
inherently linked to epidemiological alcohol research also apply to INTERHEART, such as
recall bias and deliberate denial of alcohol intake. Realistically speaking, however, all these
6
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
limitations are unlikely to invalidate the key findings of INTERHEART.
Some thoughts about thresholds and moderation
The dispute surrounding the optimal quantity of alcohol that should be consumed has a history
almost as long as the history of alcohol itself. The Greek poet Eubulus (375 B.C.) voted for three
“Kylix” cups (à 250 mL) and in one of his plays had Dionysos, the god of wine, say: “Three
bowls do I mix for the temperate: one to health, which they empty first, the second to love and
pleasure, the third to sleep. When this bowl is drunk up, wise guests go home.” Since it was
customary at that time to dilute wine in a ratio of 1:2 or 1:3, Eubulus’s view comes close to
current guidelines. However, all recommendations suffer from the fact that the thresholds of
individual
healthy moderation are population averages and do not necessarily reflect correct
correcct in
ndi
divi
vidu
vi
dual
du
al
thresholds.
hresholds. 8 Actually, intestinal degradation, absorption, metabolism, and blood clearance of
etthaano
noll ar
re al
all su
ubj
bjec
e t to high interindividual va
ari
riab
ab
bility. Accordin
in
ngly,
y, oone
ne is well advised to
ethanol
are
subject
variability.
Accordingly,
co
onsider
ns
thressho
hold
lds ann uppermost
upp
pper
ermo
er
m st limit.
mo
lim
imiit. On
On the
the other
ottheer hand,
hand,
han
nd, alcohol
allco
cohhol
hol consumption
connsuump
co
umpti
ption
ion is
i underreported
und
nderrre
repporrted
consider
thresholds
sel
elff es
festi
tiima
m te
te,, ass evident
eviddent
den from
fro
r m comparisons
comp
co
mp
parris
isoons
ons of
o prospective
prosp
rosppeccti
tivve
ve diet
dieet records
rec
ecor
orrdss and
and
nd tax
tax iincomes
ncom
om
mes
es
by self-estimate,
alcohol sales),
sales
es),
), and
and the
the non-differential
non
n-d
dif
iffe
fere
fe
r nt
re
ntiaal response
reespo
pons
nsee error
ns
erro
er
rorr is 330%-65%,
ro
0%-6
0%
-6
65%
5%,, or eeven
venn hi
ve
igh
gher
er.. 16 This bias
er
(alcohol
higher.
is not relevant in terms of clinical recommendations, because it strikes epidemiological studies
and the routine setting equally.
Summary and implications
Overall, men and women consuming alcohol in moderation face a lower risk of myocardial
infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and death in many high-income, emerging,
and developing communities. The current publication from the INTERHEART Study, however,
casts doubts on whether this is a universal finding that is valid around the globe. Most guidelines
explicitly do not advise starting alcohol consumption for the purpose of cardiovascular
7
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
prevention, but instead recommend limiting alcohol intake to quantities below or equal to the
thresholds of one or two drinks in women and men daily, respectively. They advise abstention in
heavy drinkers only, but the current INTERHEART findings suggest extending this
recommendation to South Asians en bloc. Heavy habitual or episodic drinking, on top of its
long-term hazards, may be a short-term trigger of myocardial infarction already at amounts well
below the conception of binge drinking.
“In vino veritas” said the Greek lyric poet Alkaios of Mytilene (630 B.C.). The full truth
regarding the complex interplay between alcohol consumption and vascular disease, however,
remains a well-guarded secret. The INTERHEART Study in this issue of Circulation is another
tep in deciphering the truth and the “South Asian
a paradox” is a valuable startingg point
pooin
nt for
for new
n w
ne
step
esearch.
research.
Ack
Ac
kn
knowledg
dggme
m nt
nts:
s: We
We thank
than
th
ankk P.
P. Werner
Wer
erne
nerr MD for
forr assistance
assisstaance with
witth the
the preparation
prep
pr
e arrat
ep
atio
ionn of Figure
io
Fig
igur
u e 2.
ur
2
Acknowledgments:
Co
onf
nfli
lict
li
ct of
of Interest
Inte
In
tere
rest
re
st Disclosures:
Disscl
clos
osur
u es
ur
es:: N
onne.
Conflict
None.
References
s:
References:
1. Global status report on alcohol and health 2014. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2014
(http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112736/1/9789240692763_eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 22
May 2014).
2. Ronksley PE, Brien SE, Turner BJ, Mukamal KJ, Ghali WA. Association of alcohol
consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d671.
3. O'Keefe JH, Bhatti SK, Bajwa A, DiNicolantonio JJ, Lavie CJ. Alcohol and cardiovascular
health: the dose makes the poison…or the remedy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:382-393.
4. Baraona E, Abittan CS, Dohmen K, Moretti M, Pozzato G, Chayes ZW, Schaefer C, Lieber
CS. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics of alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25:502-507.
5. Leong DP, Smyth A, Teo KK, McKee M, Rangarajan S, Pais P, Liu L, Anand SS, Yusuf S;
INTERHEART Study investigators. Patterns of alcohol consumption and myocardial infarction
8
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
risk: observations from 52 countries in the INTERHEART case-control study. Circulation.
2014;120:XX-XXX.
6. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P,
Varigos J, Lisheng L; INTERHEART Study Investigators. Effect of potentially modifiable risk
factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): casecontrol study. Lancet. 2004;364:937-952.
7. Joshi P, Islam S, Pais P, Reddy S, Dorairaj P, Kazmi K, Pandey MR, Haque S, Mendis S,
Rangarajan S, Yusuf S. Risk factors for early myocardial infarction in South Asians compared
with individuals in other countries. JAMA. 2007;297:286-294.
8. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Rungger G, Egger G, Oberhollenzer F, Bonora E. Alcohol consumption
and atherosclerosis: what is the relation? Prospective results from the Bruneck Study. Stroke.
1998;29:900-907.
9. O'Keefe JH, Bybee KA, Lavie CJ. Alcohol and cardiovascular health: the razor-sharp doubleedged sword. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1009-1014.
10. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Poewe W, Egger G, Oberhollenzer F, Muggeo M, Bonora
Bonorra E.
E. Insulin
Ins
nsul
ulin
lin
sensitivity
ensitivity and regular alcohol consumption: large, prospective, cross sectional population study
(Bruneck
Bruneck study
study).
d ). BMJ.
J 1996;313:1040-1044.
11.
11
1. Krenz
Kr
M, Korthuis
Korrth
t ui
uiss RJ.
RJ. Moderate
Mode
Mo
dera
de
rate
ra
te ethanol
eth
than
anol
ol ingestion
ing
ngeesttion and
and cardiovascular
cardi
diov
ovas
vascu
cu
ula
l r protection:
prot
pr
ottec
ecti
t on
ti
on:: from
from
epidemiologic
ep
pid
dem
e iologicc associations
asssoociiat
atio
ons tto
o ce
cell
cellular
lllul
ular
ar m
mechanisms.
echhanism
ms.. J Mol
Mol Ce
Cell
ll Cardiol.
Cardi
diol
o . 20
ol
2012
2012;52:93-104.
12;5
12
;52:
2:93
93-1
93
-104
-1
0 .
04
12
12.
2. Br
Brie
Brien
i n SE
ie
SE,, Ro
Ronksley
onk
ksl
sleey P
PE,
E T
E,
Turner
urrne
nerr BJ
BJ,, Mu
Muk
Mukamal
kamal
kam
mal KJ,
KJ, Gh
Ghali
hal
alii WA
WA.. Ef
Effe
Effect
f ct ooff alco
fe
aalcohol
lco
oho
ol cconsumption
onnsuump
umptio
pt on
on biological
bio
iolo
l gi
gica
cal markers
mark
ma
ker
erss associated
asso
sociat
ated
ed with
with risk
riisk of
of coronary
co
oro
r nary
ry heart
hea
eart
rt ddisease:
i eaase
is
se:: sy
system
systematic
emat
atic
ic revie
review
iew
w an
andd
meta-analysis
meta-analysi
is of interventional
int
nter
e ve
er
vent
n io
iona
nal st
na
sstudies.
udie
ud
i s.. BMJ.
ie
BMJJ. 20
BM
2011
2011;342:d636.
11;3
11
;342
;3
42:d
:d63
:d
636.
63
6
13. Lucas DL, Brown RA, Wassef M, Giles TD. Alcohol and the cardiovascular system: research
challenges and opportunities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1916-1924.
14. Roy A, Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Thankappan KR, Mohan V, Ramakrishnan L, Joshi P,
Ahmed F, Mohan BV, Saran RK, Sinha N, Reddy KS; Sentinel Surveillance in Industrial
Populations Study Group. Impact of alcohol on coronary heart disease in Indian men.
Atherosclerosis. 2010;210:531-535.
15. di Giuseppe R, de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Laporte F, Di Castelnuovo A, Krogh V, Siani A,
Arnout J, Cappuccio FP, van Dongen M, Donati MB, de Gaetano G, Iacoviello L; European
Collaborative Group of the IMMIDIET Project. Alcohol consumption and n-3 polyunsaturated
fatty acids in healthy men and women from 3 European populations. Am J Clin Nutr.
2009;89:354-362.
16. Nelson DE, Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Roeber J. US state alcohol sales compared to survey data,
1993-2006. Addiction. 2010;105:1589-1596.
9
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011036
Figure Legends:
Figure 1. A) Five-year changes in recorded per capita alcohol (15+ years) consumption, 20062010. B) Alcohol-attributable fractions for all-cause deaths, 2012 (in percent). Reproduced, with
the permission of the publisher, from the Global status report on alcohol and health 2014.
Geneva, WHO 2014.
Figure 2. Proposed mechanistic insights into athero- and cardio-protective (in green) as well as
injurious (in red) effects of alcohol consumption regarding inflammation (CRP, C-reactive
protein; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; TNFĮ, tumor necrosis factor alpha;
alph
al
phha;; IICAM-1,
CAMCA
M-1,,
ntra-cellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM, vascular adhesion molecule), oxidation (LDL, lowintra-cellular
deens
nsit
ityy lipoprotein;
it
lipo
li
popr
po
prrotei
einn;
ei
n; ROS, reactive oxygen species),
speciies
e ), endothelial function
fun
u ctio
io
on (NO,
( O, nitric oxide:
(N
density
eN
NOS, endothelial
endoth
hellia
i l NO synthase;
syn
ynth
nth
thas
asse; ET-1,
ET-1
T-1, endothelin-1),
endoothhelinn-1
n-1), co
oag
gullat
atio
io
on, lliver
iveer ffunction
iv
unncttio
ionn an
andd in
iinsulin
suli
su
linn
eNOS,
coagulation,
ens
nsit
itiv
it
ivit
iv
ityy (H
(HDL
DL
L, high
hhigh-density
igh
h-d
den
ensiity llipoprotein;
ipop
ip
opro
op
ro
ote
tein
in;; ap
in
apoo A
-I,
I,, aapolipoprotein
poli
po
lipo
li
popr
po
prot
pr
o ei
ot
e n AA-I
I),, th
thee he
hear
arrt (PK
((PKC-İ,
PKCKC-İ,
sensitivity
(HDL,
A-I,
A-I),
heart
see C-epsilon;
C-eeps
psil
ilon
on;; HSP-70,
on
HSPHS
P 70
P70,, heat-shock
h att-s
he
- ho
hock
ck
k protein
pro
ote
tein
in 70;
70;
0 HO-1,
HOO 1, heme
hem
emee oxygenase-1;
oxyg
ox
ygen
yg
en
nas
asee 1; MnSOD,
eMnSOD,
protein kinase
manganese superoxide dismutase), and fat tissue. Most effects refer to ethanol. Effects
demonstrated for non-alcohol components of red wine (polyphenols) only are labeled with the
following symbol “
”.
10
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
A
B
Figure 1
Copyright by American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
InsulinsensitivityĹ
HDLĹ
Apo AͲIĹ
LiverToxicity
eNOS
eN
eNOS,NOĹ
O , NO
OS
N Ĺ
ETͲ1Ļ
ETͲ1
1Ļ
BloodPressureĻ
Blood Pr
Pressure
eĻ
FlowͲmediateddilationĹ
FlowͲmediat
ated
at
e dila
lati
at on
nĹ
BloodpressureĹ
Blood pressure
ur Ĺ
InsulinsensitivityĹ
AbdominalobesityĻ
TriglyceridesĹ
AbdominalobesityĹ
Diabetes
Preconditioning,PKCͲİ Ĺ
HeartHSPͲ70,HOͲ1,MnSODĹ
CoronaryflowĹ
ProtectionagainstI/R
Myocyte aldehyde toxicity
PKCͲİ Ļ
ArrhythmiaĹ
Arrhythmia Ĺ
Platelet
reactivity Ļ
PlateletreactivityĻ
CoagulationĻĻ
Coagulation
Fibrinolysis Ĺ
Plateletrebound
Platelet
rebound
d
Fibrinolysis
FFi
ibr
b inol
in
nolys
y is Ļ
ys
Fibr
FibrinogenĻ
b in
nogen
e Ļ
CRP,ILͲ6Ļ
CR
RP,, ILͲ6
6Ļ
TNFĮ
TN
NFĮ Ļ IL
IILͲ10Ĺ
Ͳ10
10 Ĺ
ICAMͲ1,VCAMĹ
ICAM
MͲ1,
1 VC
CAM Ĺ
xida
Ļ
LDLoxidationĻ
ROSĻĻ
OxidativestressĹ
LDLoxidationĹ
Figure 2