Flemish level - Bestuurszaken

Measuring public sector
performance &
innovation
Brussels, February, 13
2014
Towards a(n)
(even) more
decisive
government of
Flanders
Josée Lemaître & Dries Verlet
Research Centre of the Government of Flanders
Overview
1. Institutional context
2. Efficiency and effectiveness: the magical twin?
3. Measuring performance in the public sector
4. The way towards a more decisive government…
Conclusion
2
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
1
1. Institutional context
• A major administrative reform: ‘Better
Administrative Policy (2000-2006)
Based on the NPM principles
Focus on autonomy, transparency, managerial
responsibility
New structures and processes
• 2007: OECD-recommendations on personnel policy,
human resources, cooperation between different
political levels in the Flemish region
• 2007: Executive Board defining basic principles for good
governance
3
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
Institutional context
• 2007: a new launching of the Flemish region on social,
economic level: ‘Flanders-in-Action’ and ‘Pact 2020’
• 2008: Commission for Efficient and Effective
Government
• 2009: General political agreement and program at
the administrational level: the multi-annual program
4
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
2
Overview
Recommendations
OECD
Board of Senior
Officials
CEEG
Committee of
wise persons
Basic principles on
Good governance
Final report on
Decisive
Governance
Flemish Political
Agreement (FPA)
2009-2014
Flemish
Government
Flemish
administration
Flanders in Action
(FiA) / Pact 2020 ->
Chpt ‘decisive
governance’
Program on monitoring
FPA and FiA - Goal n°7:
decisive governance
Multiannual
program on ‘decisive
governance':
Ministerial multiannual policy
document
2009-2014
Ministerial annual
policy document
Project
'Internal
constitutional
reform’
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
Implementing good governance in the
Flemish administration
• The Flemish government political agreement (2009)
A beacon for a more efficient and effective working
government (including administration), based on
the commission’s final report, stakeholders at
different level
Reaching the top: economical, social and ecological
Supported by an efficient, goal focused and good
functioning administration
To become one of the leading regions in Europe, in
2020
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
3
Multi-annual program on decisive governance
• Based on 4 strategic goals:
Internal constitutional reform and partnership
‘Doing more with less’
More quality in output by means of innovation of
processes and instruments
More client trust by means of increased output,
solutions and responsiveness
• Elaboration into 13 crucial organization wide key
projects (including organization specific subprojects)
towards a more decisive government
• Monitoring results by key indicators: combination of
administrative data and data based on the perception of
target groups
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
2. Efficiency and effectiveness: the magical twin?
• Difficult to define “good governance”, reason: a social
construction
• Focus on efficiency and effectiveness?
Tendency of increased responsibility
Financial and economic crisis: value for money
• Good governance: more than just efficiency and
effectiveness alone
Rising attention for government governance
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
4
The measurement of efficiency: a try-out
• As an initiative of the Board of Senior Officials: a
voluntarily pilot study in all policy fields
• Our approach:
Measurability of the proposed indicators
Policy relevance of the topics
Comparability of the data
Diversity of policy areas
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
9
The measurement of efficiency: a try-out
• Experience with the first results :
Too strong emphasis on the tools to realize
efficiency gains
Difficult to measure input and output of specific
units
Fear of losing budget
Ad hoc selection of indicators: availability versus
relevance
Difficulties to define meaningful targets
10
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
5
The measurement of efficiency: a try-out
• Some critical success factors for the further
measurement:
Ownership of the measurement at the level of
the policy domains
More systematic approach is absolutely needed
Fine-tuning/consensus needed about definitions
and methods of measurement
Clear communication on the gains and
measurement of efficiency
• To be continued: per entity (business plan and
annual report)
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
11
The measurement of effectiveness
• Survey:
citizens,
local
organisations/companies
governments
&
• Because of the special attention for the
perception of the services provided by the
Flemish administration
• Focus on the perceived quality and added value
of the service of the Flemish administration in
respect of the target groups (effectiveness)
Not an evaluation of the political policy as
such
Not an evaluation of the service of specific
organizations within the Flemish government
Global appreciation at the strategic level
12
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
6
3. Measuring performance in the public sector
• Measuring performance in order to guarantee efficiency
and effectiveness
Performance as a multifaceted concept
Persistent problems:
› On which level do we measure performances?
› Do we measure perception or reality?
› Which value indicators can be used for the
measurement of public service?
The need for quality guidelines
Availability of necessary data
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
Added value of “Government at a Glance”
• Apples versus oranges: comparing the
regional level with the state level
Shared competence across several policy levels
Difficult to find comparable actors
• Nevertheless, a valuable reference, source of
inspiration for the development of regional
indicators
• Some reflections on the available indicators
of the data:
The use of perceptual data, taking into account the
vision of several stakeholders
Open data
More and more focus on the meso level, cf. policy
fields
Stronger focus on the quality dimension
14
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
7
Added value of “Government at a Glance”
• A fruitful benchmark for indicators on the
performance of the Flemish government, e.g.
Public sector employment
The use of internet to interact with public
authorities
Trust of government (Eurostat, not
Gallup)
Structure of general government
expenditures by COFOG-function
Performance budgeting
15
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
4. The way towards a more decisive
government…
• Based on the recommendations of several societal
actors: Flanders Social and Economic Council, the
Commission on efficient and effective government,
Policy Research Centre - Governmental
organization - Decisive Governance, Flemish
Advisory Council for Administrative Affairs,
Administration of Flanders, …
• A broad diversity of recommendations, however
with a lot of common ideas
16
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
8
Main challenges towards an even more
decisive government
• Focus on effectiveness towards the main target
groups
• From processes towards performance
• Further rationalisation of the inputs (efficiency)
• Strategic planning and integration of policy,
governance and financial cycle
• A more integrated approach
• Stimulation of innovation
• Openness and transparency, taking into account
the meaning of developments in the external
environment and the expectations of the main
stakeholders
17
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
To what extent do we meet these challenges?
• General satisfaction surveys for the main target
groups: local governments, citizens and
organizations/companies
• Integrated approach : new program on decisive
government
• Measurement of efficiency: integrated in the
governance and management agreements
• Further implementation of the performance budgeting
• Stimulation of innovation: cf. ambitions in the
Programs of Flanders in Action and Pact 2020
• Transparency: open data, cf. the website of the
department of public governance Flanders,
http://governance-flanders.be/
18
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
9
Conclusion
• A clear option about the kind of government that
we want is needed, before discussion about the
selections of indicators
• Need of political and administrative top level
support for a genuine measurement of our
performance
• What about the measurement of impact and
outcome?
More meso level studies are needed
Not easy, although important for the legitimacy
of government
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
19
• Contact information:
Dries Verlet
Research Centre of the Flemish Government
Boudewijnlaan 30 bus 23
B1000 BRUSSELS
[email protected]
20
Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering
10