HUSCAP：北海道大学学術成果コレクション

CURATOR
Chiba University’s Repository
&
HUSCAP
Hokkaido University’s Repository
Chiba Univ. Haruo ASOSHINA
Hokkaido Univ. Maiko KOSAKA
Hokkaido Univ. Masako SUZUKI
Chiba University
•
•
•
•
Faculty
Staff
Undergraduate Students
Graduate Students
•
Undergraduate Programs
– Letters, Education, Law & Economics,
Science, Engineering, Pharmaceutical
Science, Nursing Science, Horticulture,
Medicine
Graduate Programs(Master’s and Doctoral)
– Humanities, Education, Social Science,
Science and Technology, Medical and
Pharmaceutical Science
– Law School
1 University Hospital
12 Research Centers
•
•
•
1-2. DEC. 2005
1,200
1,300
12,000
3,500
http://www.chiba-u.ac.jp/e/
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
2
Chiba University Library
http://www.ll.chiba-u.ac.jp/
• Main Lib & 2 branchs
• Collection
1,500,000
• Circulation/year
148,000
• ILL /year
10,000
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
3
Our IR : CURATOR
• Name：
CURATOR
Chiba University's Repository for Access to Outcomes
from Research
• Contents： 800- records, so far
• System：
self-developed(Not using open source softwares)
OS:Linux DB:Oracle
• Registration：
OAI data provider, IAR(Institution Archives Registry)
• URL
http://mitizane.LL.chiba-u.jp/curator/
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
4
CURATOR: Status
Team
System
IR WG
’03 Prototype (‘-05)
young staff(6) & Div. Manager(1)
Mainly in charge of
System & serials section (2)
Committee of Info. dissemination
Faculty & lib. Managers (10)
PR on/off campus
Presentation for faculties
 each campus & unit
Web Site
Symposium (Sep. ’05)
What is IR, What is CURATOR.
1-2. DEC. 2005
Independent system
 1Ghz, 1GB, 80GB Dell
’06- Enforce for “actual release”
3GHz, 2GB,RAID5(1TB) Dell
Cooperation
Domestic
CSI (18 univ. consortia for developing IR)
Harvested Junii (National GW)
International
OAI , IAR
Scirus as well as T-Space
Google
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
5
CURATOR: Number of records
Now
(Dec.’05)
Departmental Bulletin
Papeｒ 564
Expected (Dec.’06)
Journal Article 64
Technical Report 44
Doctoral Thesis 24
Research Paper 19
Book Chapter 17
Preprint 12
Three quarters depending on
“digitized bulletins” (batch-loaded)
Teaching Material
Intend to advocate all faculties by
presentation and pamphlet, but very few
responsed.
Conference Paper
Book 1
Other 72
Very few (Green) journal articles
submitted.
total 827
Article over1000
Departmental Bulletin
Papeｒ 2000
Doctoral Thesis 2000
Digital collection500
Cooperation with “Faculty accomplishment
system” (semi-automatically catch articles)
Not believe and not rely on self-archiving.
 We(library)“find and gather anything”
Not intend to advocate all faculties OA.
 Negotiation with “targeted customers”.
Anyway, break and try new route as above.
Research Paper 500
Other 1000
TeachingMaterial
1-2. DEC. 2005
total over7,500
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
6
CURATOR:Faculties’ contribution
How many articles do our faculties submit to CURATOR?
Now
(Dec.’05)
More than 1
9%
Miserable…
Zero
91%
Expected
(Dec.’06)
I hope at least like this…
Zero
20%
More than 2
50%
One
30%
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
7
CURATOR:Future
Anyway, we need content, content, content.
For the moment, our basic interest is only “how do we
make our IR richer with contents, rather reasonably and
automatically? “
1. Finish the past (digitizable paper) ASAP. Like complete
jigsaw.
2. Break several routes to collect “present & future” (digital
version) rather than SA.
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
8
Location
Hokkaido Univ.
•
•
•
•
Researchers 2,123
Undergraduate students 11,299
Graduate students 6,250
Established in 1876 as Sapporo
Agricultural College (札幌農学校)
Chiba Univ.
HUSCAP
Hokkaido University collection of
scholarly and academic papers
• DSpace1.2.1
• 100 researchers
• 150 papers
- peer-reviewed: 100
- hit: 18,300 times
• Jul. 2005～
Feb. 2006 trial
HASKAP （berry）
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
10
HUSCAP
http://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
11
Before HUSCAP (1/2)
• WG (all librarians) started in June 2004
• Researcher’s survey on OA practice in Nov.
to inform researchers of OA, IR… , and
to understand researcher’s needs for IR
– Responded 466(22%) of 2142 faculty
• Agree with OA 421(91%) (51 already practiced)
• Agree with IR 328(70%)
• Agree to discuss with library about OA and IR 168
– No one knows about IR
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
12
Before HUSCAP (2/2)
“Hokkaido Univ. Academic Repository”
• March 2005 ～ May 2005
• Campus-use only
• Uploaded by researchers themselves
• Request to 168 researchers to upload their papers in the
list of green papers made by library from WoS
• 30 researchers, 50 papers
however 26 of them were pub. pdf
• Interview （→mostly, Author’s ver. files lost）
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
13
HUSCAP
• World wide access
• Uploaded by librarians
Researchers email papers by attached files
• Receive researcher’s submission at the same time
as the journal
rather than upload past papers retrospectively
• Change the way of approach to researchers
– Before： IR, OA, serial crisis, strictly
– Now： Digital Library Collection with a function of IR and
OA
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
14
Which to emphasize?
Library collection development
Accountability as a publicfunded research organization
Visibility, Research Impact
Chiba University
To researchers
To executives
Inside library
Hokkaido University
To researchers
To executives
Inside library
Keio University
To researchers
To executives
Inside library
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
15
Present policies
• Committee to discuss the IR matters
(established since Nov. 2005)
– Consists of 9 researchers, 1 official and 1 librarian
• Requesting cooperation from the
Departments
– Digital theses project
– Online Departmental Bulletin Project
• Effective public relations
– Presentation to researchers, posters, leaflets, etc.
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
16
For researcher’s understanding
• Explanatory meeting to researchers 28 times
– Librarians went to lab to explain
– Announcements by posters, leaflets, newsletters
– 110 researchers attended the meetings
• Researcher Interview 20 times
– Lunch meeting, seminar, individual appointment
– Librarians went to researcher’s workplaces to
explain
Good for understanding about HUSCAP.
But NOT a cost-effective method and too slow!
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
17
Problems for the future
• Obtaining more recognition by researchers
– What is the cost-effective method?
• Cooperating with “Research Achievements
Database Hokkaido Univ.”
– Is it possible to manage researchers information
using DSpace?
– Whether to include metadata without full text
1-2. DEC. 2005
meeting at Toronto univ. & Rochester univ.
18
Presentation finished

Download Report