Linguistics and the Structure of Language

Linguistics,
Language Structure,
Language Variation, and
Plain Language
John P. Broderick, Ph.D.
Old Dominion University
[email protected]
Linguistics is an empirical science: It bases its
claims on objective analysis of perceptible data
(what speakers of a language say and write) and
on what they know about what they say and
write.
Thus, linguists are interested in what you know
about English. What do you know about English?
First, you know what is not English . . .
Second, you know what is English, to various
degrees: For example, are the things that I am
about to say English, yes or no?
Phonology/Pronunciation/Sounds
•Formal Categories:
Sounds: about 3 dozen Consonants and
Vowels, but not, e.g., German ach or French
rue.
•Patterns of Arrangement ...
... into Syllables:
(C) + (C) + V + (C) + (C)
(smart, mart, art, mar, a, but not zbart,
ngar)
Flayber aybul shawd velery tay mordodon.
Morphology/Vocabulary/Words
•Formal Categories:
Morphemes: numerous Prefixes, Roots, and
Suffixes, e.g., holi, day, -s, crowd, -ed, train
and -s.
•Patterns of Arrangement ...
... into Words:
(P) + (R) + R + (S)
(crowded, unbreakable but not edcrowd,
ablebreakun)
holidays the during crowded most are trains the
Syntax/Grammar/Sentences
•Formal Categories:
Parts of Speech: numerous Articles (e.g., the)
Adjectives (e.g., fast), Nouns (e.g., trains), etc.
•Patterns of Arrangement ...
... into Phrases, etc.: (Art) + (Adj) + N
•(the fast trains but not trains fast the)
The trains are most crowded during the holidays.
{the train-es are most crowd-ed during the holy-day-es}
/      
    /
Speakers of English (you) know more than its
sounds, words, and sentences; you also know
that certain sub-sets of sounds, words, and
sentences are consistently associated with
certain groups of speakers (dialects) or with
certain communicative situations (styles).
For example . . .
British Regional Dialect:
“The committee are studying worker attitudes
concerning the cost of petrol for the plant’s
lorries. I jolly-well haven’t time to meet with
them directly, but if I must, I will do later.”
Standard Social Dialect:
“I’m not going to tolerate any more corruption.”
Versus . . .
Vernacular Social Dialect:
“I ain’t gonna put up wit no more ripoffs.”
Dialects, regional and social, are defined by the
groups of speakers who use them, and use them
all the time. The group can live in or come from
a specific geographic location (regional dialect) or
can be members of a particular social class
(social dialect).
Styles (versus dialects) are sub-sets of sounds,
words, and sentences that are consistently
associated with certain communicative situations.
Speakers don’t use them all the time but shift from
one style to another.
Casual Spoken Style:
“Ran into a guy at the Colonel’s yesterday. Walked
up to me and said, ‘How about givin’ me a buck.’ He
looked so down and out, I did.” . . . versus . . .
Careful Spoken Style:
“I met a man at a fast-food restaurant yesterday,
who approached me and requested a dollar; he
looked so destitute, I decided to give him one.”
Informal Written Style:
“The fact that a girl can earn her own living and may leave her
husband to do so, brings out respect. Half the working women
are married, which makes them an economic asset, something
they haven’t been since the days of the farm. Since they’re
out, the husband helps with the housework, which leads toward
equality. In a marriage, there’s either equality or the stronger
personality takes over”
. . . versus . . .
Formal Written Style:
“Today’s women are in a position unique in their history. For
the first time, they are not shackled by marriage: they can
go out and earn their own livelihood. This fact has enhanced
progress toward sexual equality. With wives spending more
time outside the home, husbands assume more of the household
responsibilities, and the two roles in a marriage tend to
equalize. Personality rather than sex, now determines who will
be the dominant partner in a marriage”
Formal written style is the subject matter of middleschool, secondary-school, and college courses in “English
Composition.” Such courses often instill more insecurity
than skill:
 Students learn that formal written style has a rather
long list of special features (of spelling, word choice,
grammar, paragraph structure, etc.).
 But students do not tend to learn just what those
special features of formal written style are or how to use
them effectively.
 As a result, much writing (especially in government)
tends to exaggerate (or even seems to parody) what formal
written style should be.
 The plain language movement arose both to tone down
those exaggerations and to help people learn the special
features of formal written style and use them effectively.
Some Plain-Language Resources
The Plain Language Action Network (part of the
National Partnership for Reinventing Government –
NPR): An enormous array of resources may be
found at this web site: http://plainlanguage.gov/
John P. Broderick’s home page at Old Dominion
University: His paper on “Reinventing Government:
The Role of Plain Language” and a number of
documents from the above web site that might not
be so obviously accessible upon first visiting that
site (which has many links):
http://web.odu.edu/al/jpbroder/plainlang.html/