Dr. Lawrence Cunningham Fall 2014 Commencement Speech University of Guam Thank you Dr. Underwood, for that very kind and generous introduction. Lady’s and gentlemen, honored guests, distinguished faculty, staff, and especially the graduates and your parents, I’m honored by this opportunity. Forty-six years ago, my wife and I were smitten with wanderlust. Our goal was to work our way around the world in five years. Longfellow, perhaps, captures our sentiments best, “I plowed the land with horses, but my heart was ill at ease, for the old seafaring men, came to me now and then, with their sagas of the seas.” We bid farewell to our old Kentucky homes and drove across the United States and Canada, to Alaska and south to San Francisco. And then, embarked for what became an auspicious landfall, Guam. I will never forget our first fiesta. I read the food table as a history of Guam. It looked like a potluck at the United Nations. Our wanderlust transmogrified into what Eduardo Galliano calls wanderlust’s shadow word, wonderment. We had found a multi-cultural microcosm of the world in Guam, and I had found my life’s work, Exploring Guam. As you graduate and commence your career, I believe a couple of lessons I have learned will help you in your pursuit of happiness. First, we deserve a better political status, and second, team work trumps individualism. The Supreme Court, in the 1901 Insular Cases, defined Guam as an unincorporated and unorganized US territory. This racist decision states that the people of Guam, the Philippines and Puerto Rico will never be able to master Anglo-Saxon democratic values and will never be able to become a fully incorporated part of the US. Other races Supreme Court decisions, such as Dred Scott, and Plessy vs. Ferguson have been overturned. But the Insular Cases still stand. Next February, American Samoans will be represented in the US, District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals. Neil Weare will deliver oral arguments that challenge the Insular Cases. Neil, a graduate of Southern High School, Guam, and Yale Law School, began his political status research, right here, at the Richard Flores Taitano Micronesian Area Research Center. Of course, Guam has improved its political status since 1901. The 1950 Organic Act made the people of Guam US citizens, and organized the government, but Guam remains an unincorporated territory. The journey is not complete. The Organic Act is an apocryphal Constitution and serves to vale Guam’s colonial status. Army Reserve Sgt. Tricia Santos, who graduated from Southern High School was a friend and classmate of Neil Weare. She was a University of Guam student who finished her undergraduate degree at Fordham University. Sgt. Santos served in Afghanistan in 2011 and 2012. Her commanding officer was adamant that all of his soldiers be good citizens. He expedited the soldiers obtaining absentee ballots so that they could vote for the President of the US. When Sgt. Tricia Santos told him that she could not vote for President because she was a resident of Guam, he did not believe her. He replied, “Residents of Guam are US citizens. Of course they can vote for President.” She responded, “Yes, I’m a US citizen, but I do not have the privilege of voting for the President of the US.” Simultaneously, Sgt. Santos and her commanding office realized the irony and injustice in this fact. One of the avowed reasons the US sent troops to Iraq and Afghanistan was to build democratic nations in the Middle East. We were fighting so that Iraqis and Afghans could vote for their leaders and commander in chief. Our troops were separated from their families, risking their lives and even dying so that Iraqis and Afghans can vote and yet we have American citizens that cannot vote for their President. This injustice cannot stand. Surely, if we can spend billions of American dollars and American lives for a democratic Middle East then we can find a way so US citizens in Guam can vote for their President. Our country was founded upon de-colonization. In the case of George Washington, decolonization was as American as cherry pie. Right now, Guam’s political status is on the back burner, but it will never be off the stove until justice is done. An improvement in political status that establishes a free market economy will remove the Jones Act and cabotage and spark Guam’s economy in a way that we have not seen since 1962 when the Naval Security Clearance was lifted. Within five years of that political change, Guam established a tourism industry. When we make demands to improve Guam’s political status, it’s not a demand for some precious gift or favor. In the paraphrased words of Frederick Douglass, it’s just a simple question. Will our country live up to it’s own principles? That is, the belief that legitimate governments must have the consent of the governed, that citizens are equal and the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people. Based on my experience, the most important factors in my successes, and I must confess, also in my failures, has been how well I mastered the concepts of inafa’maolek and todu manatungo’. Teamwork trumps individualism. Inafa’maolek is defined as interdependence, getting along and literally, making it good for each other. Todu manatungo’ is defined as consensus decision-making. These concepts are not unique to Chamorro culture. All social cultural characteristics, good and bad, can be found in every culture on earth. Nevertheless, we know that cultures differ in the emphasis they place on these cultural characteristics. For example, hospitality is known in every culture, but we all know that there is a greater degree of hospitality in Guam than in New York City. Through my study of Marianas history and living in Guam I have learned that I am most successful when I suppress my selfish individualism and lean towards interdependence and working well with others. The extreme emphasis that Chamorro culture places on inafa’maolek is revealed in a creation myth. Myths can be a window into the heart and soul of a culture. In the beginning, according to Chamorro mythology, there was nothingness, and out of this void were born a brother and sister, Puntan and Fuuana. We can learn a valuable lesson from this myth. In ancient Chamorro culture it was not god the father, nor was it god the mother, but rather gods the brother and sister. And here is the important part. It was only through their cooperation and working with one another that they created the universe. There is a lesson in emphasis here, if the gods need to cooperate then surely your success in a career will depend upon your ability to work with others. The practice of inafa’maolek is not a panacea. It will not remove all conflict, but it is an attitude and a goal to work towards. One might think that writing a book is a matter of individual effort, but I could not have written Ancient Chamorro Society or any other book without the unselfish help of many others. When the American Library Association named Ancient Chamorro Society as one of their choice books for 1992, I could not take credit without acknowledging the 80 people that selflessly helped me write the book. One of my most recent failures began when an organization I belonged to abandoned a ten-year practice of consensus decision-making. TASI (Traditions About Seafaring Islands), fractured into four separate organizations all dedicated to the restoration of the building and sailing of traditional outrigger sailing canoes and to traditional noninstrument navigation. The most prominent of those four groups are TASI with its canoe house at the Paseo de Susana and TASA with a canoe house at Ypao Beach. Let me give you an example of how infa’maolek and todu manatungo’ operate in an island setting. In 1969 my wife and I visited Yap proper. We had permission to camp in the coastal village of Wanead in Maap. At that time, in Maap, there were no roads only stone and grass paths. Our stay in Wanead was idyllic. Even though we had brought our own food to cook, children came at every mealtime with breadfruit leaf platters of cooked fish, taro and sweet potatoes. One day our host, Garongsi, invited me to a house warming party about 1½ miles south of our encampment. We were very excited. The next day we awoke in an insouciant mood, “We’re going to a party!” We could hardly wait for noon when we started our walk along the east coast of Maap to the new house. Most of the walk was beautiful Japanese grass. The path looked like a linear golf green. On our left were lines of stately coconut palms, stands of nipa, the wide reef at low tide and the beautiful ocean beyond. On our right was dense jungle interspersed with flowering hibiscus bushes and fertile taro patches. When we approached the new house, its nipa roof glowed in the sunlight. In front of the house there were several dozen men. They were shirtless and the younger men wore a cloth loin-cloth and older men wore a hibiscus fiber loin-cloth. There were NO women present. Garongsi greeted me with a big smile that soon changed to a look of concern when he saw my wife. He quickly escorted us about 50 yards away from the house warming party. He excused himself and said that he would return for us as soon as possible. Later, I learned that the men debated whether they should allow my wife to attend the party. The debate went something like this: “We can all agree we want this man and woman to enjoy this day.” Some thought that my wife should be able to attend the party because she was not Yapese. Others said “No. She may not be Yapese, but still, she is a woman and this is a men’s party.” This discussion went on for an hour with the winning argument being, we want this man to enjoy himself, if his wife comes to the party he may misinterpret the attention we give his wife and be jealous. That could cause conflict. We all know that he will enjoy himself more if his wife does not attend the party and furthermore, without his wife here we know that he will be able to drink as much as he wants to. In western culture this decision could have been made in a few minutes with a vote, but the islanders took the time to reach a consensus decision. When the vote is taken there are winners and losers and often acrimony. When a consensus is reached, there are no losers. Everyone wins. But, what was to become of my wife? This is where the infa’maolek comes in. As soon as the consensus decision had been reached, runners were dispatched to find out if the women would like to have a party and host my wife. When they agreed, beautiful baskets were woven out of young yellow coconut leaves and filled with food and bundles of green drinking coconuts were gathered. The beautiful freshly woven yellowish green baskets were decorated with red hibiscus flowers. Garongsi and his caravan of food-laden baskets, escorted my wife to a women’s party. I joined the men’s party and we both had a memorable day. The literal definition of infa’maolek, was truly met. It was a good day for everyone. The process wasn’t easy. It forced the group to take some time and make some sacrifices. The quest for harmony made it all worthwhile. In conclusion, my bride of 50 years would never let me live it down if I didn’t get to the wonderment part: take time to smell the plumeria, open yourself to Guam and Guam’s people’s unspeakable beauty. Perhaps a slightly modified Robert Louis Stevenson couplet, that our precocious granddaughter, Alana, likes, best express my wife’s feelings: Guam “is so full of a number of things, I’m sure we should all be as happy as kings.” Take time to nap, cha-cha-cha, listen to the music, the sound of rain on a tin roof, the ubiquitous cock’s crow, the heart healing chant of the techa and always be ready to heed the following noble words: “Shoot, let’s barbeque!” Guam is good and the University of Guam’s Tritons Fall Class of 2014 shall make Guam even better. In this holy season, God bless us each and everyone. Thank you.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc