The Lattice Boltzmann Method for Complex Flows on the Microscale

Knut Küllmer
Andreas Krämer
Supervisors
Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, Sankt Augustin
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Joppich
In cooperation with the University of Siegen
[email protected]
Prof. Dr. Dirk Reith
[email protected]
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Holger Foysi
The Lattice Boltzmann Method
for Complex Flows on the Microscale
Introduction
The Lattice Boltzmann Method
Liquid-vapor equilibrium
‡ A method for simulating the motions of gases and liquids
(Computational Fluid Dynamics)
(Static droplet)
‡ Fundamentally different from classical fluid simulations: particle-based
description (BGK equation, particle distribution functions ݂௜ )
BGK
݂݀௜
ͳ
ୣ୯
࢞ǡ ‫ ݐ‬൅ ࢋ௜ ή ߘ݂௜ ‫ܠ‬ǡ – ൌ െ ݂௜ ࢞ǡ ‫ ݐ‬െ ݂௜ ሺ࢞ǡ ‫ݐ‬ሻ
݀‫ݐ‬
߬
Vapor phase:
Liquid phase:
Distinct strengths
‡ Efficient for parallel computing
‡ Easily solvable on regular lattice
‡ Particularly suited for complex flows (e.g. multiphase/multicomponent
flow, complex shaped boundaries)
Project 1: Droplet dynamics in microfluidic devices
Motivation
‡ Droplet-based microfluidics as a vastly expanding industry with
numerous biological, chemical, medical and technical applications
‡ Various assets make the Lattice Boltzmann Method a suitable tool for
flows on the microscale
‡ Multiphase models are limited due to numerical deficiencies
Goals
Optimization of discretization schemes in a class of Lattice Boltzmann
multiphase models to ensure a correct physical representation of a single
component.
The new discretizations reduce spurious velocities (undesired numerical
artefact) and force the simulated liquid and vapor densities to match the
values predicted by thermodynamic theory.
An accurate representation of a single component is substantial for the
simulation of multicomponent systems.
Taylor-Green decaying vortex : Comparing simulation and reality
Software Development
Couette Flow: Error between simulation and reality
‡ Simulation of droplet dynamics in microfluidic devices (coalescence,
deformation, interfacial tension, active manipulation)
‡ Optimization of the underlying algorithms (reduce numerical artefacts,
increase robustness, increase accuracy)
Project 2: Lubricant flow between rough surfaces
Validation: Model problems
Application: Real geometries
Motivation
‡ Different finishing techniques (grinding, polishing, sandblastingflead
to different surface shapes. Study their role in lubrication ՜ Simulation
‡ Classical simulation techniques do not behave well for complex-shaped
(= realistic) surfaces
՜ Lattice Boltzmann: a promising alternative
Goals
‡ To study how the shape of the surfaces affects the efficiency of
lubrication in realistic geometries
‡ Development of a modular software package for the Lattice Boltzmann
simulation on unstructured grids
0.1 mm
‡ Reducing friction is a pivotal part of energy-efficient engineering
One principal goal of the PhD is to simulate lubricant flow over
highly resolved geometries. But before a simulation tool can be
applied to real-world problems, it has to proof that it calculates the
right physics. Standard benchmarks are the Taylor-Green decaying
vortex or the Couette flow between two moving walls.
‡ Coupled simulation of fluid and surface movements (Multiphysics)
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rainer Herpers
[email protected]
www.gi.h-brs.de
Institute for Technology,
Renewables and Energy-efficient
Engineering (TREE)