Creating Storages in Deep Underground Aquifers, Beynes / France

Aquifer storages
The discovery process – Their specificities
01 Introduction to
STORENGY
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
2
GDF SUEZ
Key figures

GDF SUEZ is a global energy player and an expert operator in the three key sectors of
electricity, natural gas and energy services

€81.3 billion in 2013 revenues

€13.4 billion in 2013 EBITDA

1st company in the “utilities” sector worldwide (Forbes Global 2010)

Most valuable brand in the “utilities” sector worldwide (Brand Finance Global 500»)

€7.5 billion invested in 2013

147,400 employees throughout the world
•

Inc. 58,600 in power and natural gas
1,100 researchers and experts in 9 R&D centers
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
3
3
STORENGY within GDF SUEZ group
Environment
Energy
Europe
Energy
International
Global Gaz
& LNG
Infrastructures
TUGS Ankara
Energy
Services
October 31st 2014
4
4
Storengy: UGS leader in Europe
Ranking
Company
bcm
1
12.5
2
10
3
8.5
4
6.1
5
4.2
6
3.3
7
2.6
8
2.4
9
1.6
A 60-year experience
in developing and
operating all types of
underground gas
storages
Stublach
Lesum
Harsefeld
Reitbrook
Uelsen
Peckensen
Saint-Clair-sur-Epte
Saint-Illiers-la-Ville
Beynes
Solings-en-Sologne
Céré-la-Ronde
Gournaysur-Aronde
Trois-Fontaines
Cerville
Fronhofen
GermignysousCoulombs
Breitbrunn**
Pozagas
Schmidhausen
Chémery
Amgas
Depomures
Etrez
Tersanne
Hauterives
Bagnolo Mella
Manosque*
Albero
Acquifiers
* 50% participation and site exploration
** 19.7% participation
TUGS Ankara
Salt cavern
Projects in exploration
Pore storage
Under construction/planned
Participation in boards
October 31st 2014
5
A global ambition in UGS
3rd storage operator
in the world
St Flavien
Pointe du Lac
23 storage sites in Europe
Chicago
Beijing
New Delhi
Ranking
Company
1
2
bcm
12.5
(*)
10
3
8.5
4
6.1
~1,000
employees
5
4.2
6
3.3
7
2.6
Lost Time Injury
rate2014=0
8
2.4
9
1.6
~ 40 clients
(*) Excludes strategic reserve
Storengy offices
TUGS Ankara
12.5 Gm3
of total storage
capacity
Participations
October 31st 2014
6
Portfolio overview
 A diversified portfolio in five countries, mostly
operated by Storengy
 French Portfolio includes 1 depleted gas field,
9 aquifer and 3 salt caverns sites. The total
UGS working capacity amounts 10,5 Bcm. All
are operated by Storengy.
 In France, Chemery UGS is the second largest
in Europe (7 Bcm of gas inventory managed
through 67 injection/production wells).
 In Germany, STORENGY Deutschland operates
7 out of its 8 UGS portfolio (in depleted field
and salt) with 2 Bcm working gas capacity.
 In UK, STORENGY UK is currently operates the
Stublach Gas Storage (20 salt caverns are
planned for a total gas storage capacity of 400
MMm3).
Salt
Depleted
Aquifer
TUGS Ankara
Country
Development Commissioning
Status
Date
Site
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
Gournay-sur-Aronde
Saint Illiers-La-Ville
Saint-Clair-sur-Epte
Beynes
Chémery
Céré-la-Ronde
Soings-en-Sologne
Cerville
Germigny-sous-Coulombs
Etrez
Tersanne
Manosque
Hauterives
Trois-Fontaines
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Ongoing
Ongoing
1976
1965
1979
1956
1968
1993
1981
1970
1982
1980
1970
1993
n.r.
n.r.
Germany
Germany
Germany
Germany
Germany
Germany
Germany
Germany
Fronhofen
Reitbrook
Schmidhausen
Peckensen
Breitbrunn
Uelsen
Lesum
Harsefeld
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
Exploitation
1996
1973
1983
2002
1993
1997
2002
1993
UK
UK
Stublach
North Ireland
On going
Exploration
n.r.
n.r.
Spain
Andalusia
Exploration
n.r.
Canada
Canada
Saint Flavien
Pointe-du-Lac
Exploitation
Exploitation
1998
1990
October 31st 2014
7
02 Storengy’s skills
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
8
Subsurface Competences/Expertises
Geophysics, Geology, Reservoir, Job Data & Tools
+
Essentially
Collaborative
Jobs
R&D
Data
Management
GED/Archives
Mapping (SIG)
Geophysics
Geology
Petrophysics
Job Software,
Internal Tools,
Job Information
system
(geosciences
server calculation
power)
Core storage
facility
Supervision
Geological Drilling
Seismic campaigns
Reservoir
engineering, geomechanics,
leaching, hydrogeology
•Performance, availability, operational strategy
•Environmental impact
•Projects development
•Operational support (drilling, leaching, well test, productivity, water & sand production, …)
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
9
A UGS adapted and pragmatic approach of the
technical studies (subsurface)
Various cases of application
Aquifer, depleted gas and oil
Sandstones, carbonates, fractured, ..
Studies based on experienced and successfully
implemented projects:
 Modern approaches (seismic, geostatistics for
G&G, automatic matching,…)
 Modeling of carbonate & sandstone, fractured
reservoirs including compositional simulation
 Utilization of commercial tools (Petrel, Eclipse,…)
but also specific in-house tools
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
10
Storengy: Worldwide Experience
 Storengy has been involved in many development and operational projects and studies for
all types of UGS, all over the world
 Storengy geoscientists have worked several years in E&P companies and have acquired a
strong level of knowledge in hydrocarbon field exploitation
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
11
02 Aquifers’
specificities
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
12
Aquifer storages – which specificities?
 Aquifers storages have been developped in regions where no
depleted fileds were available.
 Aquifer structures are geological traps initially filled with water
only.
 No hydrocarbons present because these structures may be
located in areas where no source rock is present.
 Comprehensive investigations are necessary in order to assess
the quality of the trap.
 The following of the presentation will focus on the process of
finding suitable structures and assessing the feasibility, which is
an actual exploration process.
 At the end, an aquifer storage is a kind of « synthetic gas
field »: the specificities are attached to this fact.
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
13
Aquifers storages
steps for the development
In order to develop aquifer storages, the following steps
are necessary:
 Collecting existing information,
 Completing the information through a comprehensive
exploration process,
 Qualifying structures,
 Building a geological model,
 Assessing the dynamic behavior.
As for exploration processes in E&P, a large enough
portfolio of prospects is essential in order to provide a
reasonable probability of success.
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
14
03 Information
collection
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
15
Information collection
 Obtained from all public institutions (in
France BRGM, l’IFP, …) and from O&G
operators
 Exemple of useful documents: stratigraphic
columns, seismic profiles, …)
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
16
Recherche
documentaire
Information
collection
 Studies done by universities, and/or for other O&G companies.
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
17
04
TUGS Ankara
Improving the information
through exploration
October 31st 2014
18
Mains steps of exploration
Steps
Detecting
Selection
of potential
sites
Purpose
• checking the presence of the
• documents analysis
structure suggested by previous •Seismic retreatment
research works
and interpretation
• precising the shape and the
localisation
Positive results
First
assessment
Derisking
• retaining the prospect for
further exploration
• first draft of mapping
Abandoning
• confirmation of level
curves
• characterisation of rocks
(core samples)
Abandoning
Negative results
• assessing the ability of the
• drillings
structure for natural gas storage. • seismic (3D)
• hydraulic testings
TUGS Ankara
Results
Negative results
• assessing depths, thicknesses • first drillings (core dril)
And the nature of the layers.
(2 to 3)
• 2D seismic
(2 crossed lines)
Positive results
Qualification
Structure ok
for storage
Nature of works
October 31st 2014
• cores
• hydraulic characteristics
19
Exploration for storages in France
Gas fields
PAVILLY
PAYS DE BRAY
GOURNAY-SUR-ARONDE
VREGNY
Aquifers
LE MAZELIN
ROYAUMEIX
VACHERAUVILLE
LA SEILLE
SAINT-CLAIR-SUR-EPTE
LA LOUETTE
VARENNES
MORHANGE
VERNON
IPPECOURT
CERVILLE-VELAINE
GERMIGNY-SOUS-COULOMBS
HOEVILLE
SAINT-ILLIERS-LA-VILLE
LE PETIT MORIN
BENNEY
JUMEAUVILLE
BEYNES
TOURNAN
LA ROSIERE
RAMBOUILLET
TROIS-FONTAINES
PLAISIR-GRIGNON
SOURDUN
ATTIGNEVILLE
BEAUCE NORD
LES ANDELYS
MARCHENOIR
ST-CYR-DU-GAULT
LE MEANT
ALSACE SUD
SENNELY
SOINGS-EN-SOLOGNE
CHEMERY
CHEMERY OUEST
Salt caverns
Exploration not completed
Abandonned prospects
BERRY-NORD
JURA
VILLEFRANCHE
CERE-LA-RONDE
CIRAN
CHATEAU-CHALONS
MONTREVEL
ETREZ
BRESSE
LE VILLIERS
SAINT-NIZIER
AUZANCE
TERSANNE
Presence of deep salt layers
LA TOUR BLANCHE
CRAMPSOULIE
SAINT-VALLIER
HAUTERIVES
MONTMIRAIL
MANOSQUE
Sedimentary basins
Granitic areas
LANDES DE SIOUGOS
IZAUTE
LUSSAGNET
TUGS Ankara
GARON
CASTRIES
VISTRE
ST GILLES
LA THONGUE
October 31st 2014
20
04 Qualifying the
structure
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
21
Qualification criterions
 1- Presence of a sufficient structure
Looking for the trap
• Closure
• Closed area size
• Volume associated
 2- Tightness of the cap rock
Assessing the maximum allowable pressure.
 3- Reservoir quality
Porosity
Permeability
 4- Site surface environment
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
22
Seismic profiles
Evolution of seismic accuracy between 1967 and 1988
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
23
Iso-depth mapping
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
24
Assessing the critical leak path - closure
Closure depth
-875 m SL
C
Top = -839 m SL
B
C
Leak
Leak
Top = -839 m SL
B
FAULT
FAULT
OK
Closure on fault
A
A
Hypothesis 1 : closure not on the fault
A
B
Top = -839 m NM
FAULT
C
Hypothesis 2 : closure on the fault
A
B
leak
-875 m NM
Top = -839 m NM
leak
-875 m NM
FAULT
Closure << 36 m
Closure: 36 m
Critical area
Gas area
TUGS Ankara
October
Water 31st 2014
25
C
Possible leak occurrence: failing tightness
Discontinuous cap rock
TUGS Ankara
Untight fault
October 31st 2014
26
Maximal allowable pressure
 Defined by using a safety « gradient » coefficient G
Pmax [barabs] = 1 + 0,0981.G.Depth
Reservoir ceiling
[m]
 G varies between 1,2 et 1,49 for sites in France
Hydrostatic
gradient
TUGS Ankara
<
Safety gradient
October 31st 2014
<
27
Lithostatic
gradient
Study of the reservoir
 Qualités recherchées
fortes porosité et perméabilité
continuité/homogénéité latérale des horizons réservoirs
connaissance des caractéristiques de l’aquifère
 Méthodes d’investigations
mesures pétrophysiques sur carottes en laboratoire
nombreuses mesures par diagraphies
large gamme d’essais hydrauliques (Drill Stem Test, essai de
production de longue durée, test d’interférence)
modélisation géologique du réservoir
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
28
Logging
Tool
Physical Parameter
Rock parameter
Polarisation
Potential
Clay content
Laterolog
Microlaterolog
Microlog
Dipmeter
Résistivity in different
directions and distances
to the well
(Water salt content)
(Porosity)
Gas saturation
Stratification and dip
Gamma Ray
Radioactivity
Clay content
Neutron
H2 atome
Porosity
Gas saturation
Density
Gamma ray absorption
Density
Sonic
Speed of sonic waves
Porosity
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
29
Hydraulic testings
Wells’ behavior
Water
production
Q
Pressure
variation
P
t
Measured
flow rate
TUGS Ankara
t
Unknown
permeability
October 31st 2014
Measured
pressure
30
05 Building a
geological model
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
31
Looking for analogies (sedimentology)
Fuvial deposits
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
32
Looking for analogies
Marine and coastal deposits
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
33
Preparing dynamic simulations
Geophysics
Static model
Production data
Dynamic model
Geology
Flows simulation
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
34
06 Assessing the
dynamic operation
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
35
Technical aspect for UGS characterization :
some gas inventory build up
 Quick build-up could
lead to :
- spill over
- heterogeneous gas
fill-up
- high pressure (trap
integrity & well
damage)
 Phased development
recommended for:
- large Gas Working
Volume
- flat structure
- heterogeneous
reservoir
Specific cases:
- pressure
interference with
others producing
fields or UGS
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
36
Technical aspect for UGS characterization :
cushion gas
 CGV/WGV Ratio is
basically related to the
maximum to minimum
pressure ratio and the
portion of rock volume
swept by aquifer
 CGV depends on reservoir
properties and geometry,
aquifer activity &
minimum UGS pressure &
well locations
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
37
06 Conclusion
Secificity of aquifers
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
38
Specificities of aquifers
 Need existing geological information to be realistically
considered.
 Significant explorations costs, what means a prospects
portfolio with a good global probability of success.
 Long lead development times: 10 to 15 years for
exploration, permitting, construction, ramp-up.
 Differences to former gas fields:
An injection pressure above the original pressure.
No production data available for the dynamic study.
TUGS Ankara
October 31st 2014
39