NWL wide contingency plan to maintain services levels during and post A&E closure Karl MunslowOng Paper x.x SaHF Implementation Programme Board 3 July 2014 To support the safe transition of A&E services from HH and CMH a regional contingency plan is being developed Joint closure of Hammersmith Hospital (HH) Emergency Unit and Central Middlesex Hospital (CMH) Accident & Emergency (A&E) is planned for 10 September, subject to satisfying assurance requirements from NHS England /TDA and the Hammersmith & Fulham and Brent Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG). A key component of the assurance process will be assurances the system has adequate measures to ensure safety is maintained during and after transition. The Programme‟s Clinical Board has considered mechanisms to support safety during transition and concluded that a NW London wide contingency plan be developed to manage A&E and associated „downstream‟ capacity during transition. The requirement for the contingency plan was driven by: • The wide catchment areas of both Central Middlesex Hospital and Hammersmith Hospital A&E activity • The spikes in activity that were seen at Barnet and Chase Farm post A&E closure • The need to ensure there is system wide support for Northwick Park Hospital and St Mary‟s Hospital given most of the A&E activity will move to these sites post closure of HH and CMH The Clinical Board also recommended that the contingency plan look at: • How emergency GP referrals could be managed post closure • How GP elective referrals could be managed post closure The contingency plan that is being developed is aligned with local plans and is being overseen by the NW London System Operational Group consisting of CCGs, Providers, London Ambulance Service (LAS) and Shaping a healthier future (SaHF) programme. This paper provides an update on the process to develop a system wide contingency plan and the NWL System Operational Group. 2 We have a clear plan for the development of the NW London system wide contingency plan The NWL System Operational Group consisting of CCGs, Providers, LAS and SaHF Programme will provide oversight and coordination of the NWL response to the closures. In particular review performance across NWL and make decisions about further short terms solutions. The plan is being progressed in alignment with local plans, at a sector level the strands of the plan that are being progressed are: June Mobilise project, team and governance Undertake capacity and activity modelling July August September October Winter 2014 Develop model to test resilience of emergency care departments Review of LAS Intelligent Conveyancing including how we improve use of UCCs Review of system capacity variables - workforce and beds (both acute and intermediate care) Confirming which winter schemes could be started early (or continued) Enact early or continue winter schemes Divert GP referral patterns through working with GPs to manage referrals for Urgent/Emergency Service transition 3 Activity modelling to support contingency planning LSOA level analysis showed that the current activity at CMH and HH has a wide footprint across NW London Note: This is based on where a patient lives NOT where the patient journey started. It is therefore imperative to view which sites can expect to receive activity from closures at CMH and HH Activity density maps were built from CSU data breaking down UCC attendances, A&E attendances and NEL admissions , at CMH and HH, by LSOA from 12/13. 5 We analysed LSOA level activity data set to determine the impact closures might have on other sites 1• By reviewing HSTAT Travel time data, we identified the LSOAs which were closest by journey time to the remaining 7 A & Es in NW London 2• We compared this against the actual activity from 12/13, reallocating activity from each LSOA to the nearest of the remaining 7 A & Es in NW London 3• Finally we have reduced these totals to take account of the activity that will be retained at both Central Middlesex and Hammersmith Hospital ADDITIONAL A&E Attendances / day Retained at CMH 0 0 0 0 Retained at HH 0 0 9 9 Northwick Park From HH From CMH 30 From HH 19 18 16 6 24 From CMH 5 From HH 8 Ealing 8 2 2 10 From CMH Charing Cross 2 7 36 St Mary’s By reviewing the closest hospital by journey times – we have effectively established a catchment area ADDITIONAL NEL Admissions / day From HH 11 11 From CMH 3 1 2 3 0 0 From HH 3 1 From CMH 0 From HH 1 WMUH 3 Hillingdon 1 0 0 1 From CMH 0 From HH 1 C&W 0 0 0 1 From CMH 0 3 0 0 6 We also undertook a travel survey of patients attending both CMH and HH • Patient travel survey data was collected to support the Travel Advisory Group. This work surveyed a number of patients attending both Central Middlesex and Hammersmith sites. • For any respondents using the A&E or UCC department the question was asked “What would be the next alternative location for care after the hospital they are currently attending” • The tables below presents how people responded: Central Middlesex Hospital Hammersmith Hospital Alternative Locations Respondents % Alternative Locations Respondents % Notes: Walk in centre or GP 89 42 Walk in centre or GP 94 57 Northwick Park 41 20 Charing Cross 24 15 St Mary‟s 29 14 St Mary‟s 9 5 Other 18 9 C&W 8 5 • Questions did not consider hospital sites outside of NW London (e.g. The Royal Free this could account for the 9% other at CMH) Hammersmith 13 6 Central Middlesex 7 4 Ealing 7 3 Ealing 6 4 Charing Cross 3 1 Other 5 3 C&W 1 0 Northwick Park 4 2 Hillingdon 1 0 Hillingdon 2 1 WMUH 1 0 WMUH 2 1 • Questions did not consider that both CMH and HH would be closed • This was a small sample size for both sites 7 We would ask the Programme Board to note progress made to date • This paper provides an update of the work done to date on the contingency planning and the process to implement the plan • The Implementation Programme Board is asked to note progress and provide comments on: • The role of the NWL System Operational Group • The strands of the plan that are being progressed at sector level 8
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc