Evaluation of Clinical Faculty by Patients Using Computerized

Evaluation of Clinical Faculty by
Patients Using Computerized
Handheld / Computer Devices
From patient satisfaction to faculty development
Amy W Fox, MD & Luis Diaz, MD
UNC Department of Dermatology
September 13th, 2014
Objectives
• Patient satisfaction in our current health care
system
• Mandated levels of patient satisfaction and
the impacts to reimbursement
• Clinic level patient satisfaction platform
• Utilization for faculty growth and development
______________________________________
We have no relevant financial disclosures
9/23/2014
2
The big picture
Acountable Care
Physican Compare
• Value based
payment modifier
• Effects all
providers by
2017
• Patient
satisfaction
metrics will play
a role
•“ratings” of clinics
and providers
searchable by
consumers
•Data displayed will
come from patient
satisfaction metrics
9/23/2014
3
Patient Centered Care
• Growing importance of the patient
experience.
• HCAHPS as a model for outpatient
9/23/2014
4
9/23/2014
5
UNC Dermatology Clinics
9/23/2014
6
CMS mandated
UNC HC mandated
UNC Dermatology
Bivarus
CGCAHPS;
Press
Ganey
CGCAHPS
UNC Dermatology
visit specific data
24-48 hrs after visit
UNC Dermatology
visit specific data
Within a week
UNC HealthCare
data
Months after visit
•
•
•
•
•
•
PQRS and VBPM
Clinical operations
CQI
Faculty/resident
development
•9/23/2014
Service Recovery
Clinical operations
CQI
Benchmarking
within our
institution
7
CAHPS Family
CG (clinician and group) CAHPS
H (Hospital) CAHPS
ACO CAHPS
Home Health CAHPS
______________________________________
• 34 question core survey, retrospective over 6
months
• Looks at access to specialist, timeliness of
care, provider specific data
• Measure of patient experience
9/23/2014
8
CG-CAHPS
•
In the last 6 months, when you phoned this provider’s
office after regular office hours, how often did you get
an answer to your medical question as soon as you
needed?
[never, sometimes, usually, always]
•
Wait time includes time spent in the waiting room and
exam room. In the last 6 months, how often did you see
this provider within 15 minutes of your appointment
time?
[never, sometimes, usually, always]
•
In the last 6 months, how often did this provider listen
carefully to you?
[never, sometimes, usually, always]
9/23/2014
9
Bivarus
Electronic survey with 10 questions – deployed
either to smartphone or email at 24-48 hr. post
visit
10 categories with 10 questions within each
area with priority set by the survey manager
Deployed over a 3 month cycle
40% + response rate with email
4900 surveys returned July 2013-2014
9/23/2014
10
Bivarus
9/23/2014
11
9/23/2014
12
9/23/2014
14
9/23/2014
15
Clinical improvements
9/23/2014
16
Free Text Comments
9/23/2014
17
9/23/2014
18
9/23/2014
19
9/23/2014
20
9/23/2014
21
Transforming Service Operations
Issue Identified: Patients
dissatisfied with lack of
parking availability at clinic
(doctors/staff parking in
spots near clinic).
Intervention
Developed/Implemented:
1) Share patient feedback
directly with faculty and
staff
2) Regular reminders with
update
Reminders
Intervention
Dec 2012-Feb 2013
Improvements in clinical
operations/patient experience
4.7
4.6
4.5
I would recommend this Dermatology
clinic to friends/family.
4.4
I was made aware of any delays.
4.3
The waiting room was comfortable.
The clinic was easy to find.
4.2
The overall appearance of the
Dermatology clinic was pleasant.
4.1
4
3.9
Q4 2012
Q1 2013
Q2 2013
Q3 2013
Q4 2013
Provider Level Questions
Communication
Patient Centered Care
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
My doctor explained my diagnosis.
My doctor explained my test
results.
My doctor explained things in a
way I could understand.
My doctor explained what
procedures were being performed.
My doctor explained what tests
he/she was ordering.
My doctor informed me of my
•
•
•
•
My doctor did not seem rushed
while with me.
My doctor included me in
decisions about my care.
My doctor listened to me.
My doctor made me feel
comfortable about asking
questions.
While in my room, my doctor was
focused on me/my issues.
treatment options.
24
Patient Safety
Provider Expertise
• My doctor alerted me to things
I should have checked
immediately should they occur
after surgery.
• My doctor reviewed possible
side effects of any procedure
before starting.
• Prior to starting, my doctor
made it clear I was having a
procedure.
• I would trust this doctor to care
for my friends/family.
• My doctor had a pleasant
bedside manner.
• My doctor had good medical
knowledge.
• My doctor was kind and caring.
• My doctor's overall
appearance was professional.
9/23/2014
25
Provider specific data
9/23/2014
26
Responses per Attending
Provider, 2012-2013, UNC
Dermatology
2000
1800
Patient responses
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Provider number
11
12
13
14
15
16
Score
Attending Provider Scores by
Category, UNC Dermatology
5
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.1
4
Overall Score
Communication
Patient
centered care
Patient safety
Provider
Expertise
0
1
2
3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Provider number
9/23/2014
29
Patient Safety
4.55
4.5
Likert Scale (out of 5)
4.45
4.4
Your Average
Score
4.35
Average Peer
Score
4.3
4.25
4.2
4.15
4.1
1
9/23/2014
2
Category Question
3
30
Provider A
9/23/2014
31
Provider B
9/23/2014
32
Fellow/Resident
9/23/2014
33
CMS mandated
UNC HC mandated
UNC Dermatology
Bivarus
CGCAHPS;
Press
Ganey
CGCAHPS
UNC Dermatology
visit specific data
24-48 hrs after visit
UNC Dermatology
visit specific data
Within a week
UNC HealthCare
data
Months after visit
•
•
•
•
•
•
PQRS and VBPM
•
Clinical operations
CQI
Faculty/resident
development
Service Recovery
9/23/2014
Clinical operations
CQI
Benchmarking
within our
institution
34
How we are able to use this
Daily monitoring for service recovery and
clinical operations
MOC requirements
Joint Commission
Departmental evaluation of faculty, residents,
staff
ACGME requirement for residents
Personal improvement
9/23/2014
35
Thank you
How to contact us:
[email protected]