ffi
SCDT{
GOVERNMENT oF rNDIA
sRBBp POSr
eftlq 6rqFq, ctrqq etr,
+II-{CT
ffi
r*rlcnrr,; G
t!-.tdq qqt
crmng qR*dq
rndq
rurNrsrRy oF ENvrRoNMENr, FoRESrs
.LIMATE .HANGE
nani^--r
-::':*:o":tn#1iffi*i*#'
AND'##HiPJtl,lfl?il?fxyf:;
p-5,1ffi0x
flnavi
snanr"uiN"ugur,
s \ _.rlcrd (rovo)/Bhopal-46}0l6tM]p.l
aAm-*r / Te ef ax-2 42 6
49 6,2 +'62
6
I
I5
2
465
I
0Z
er5sro /E-rnail : rowz.bpl_rn [email protected]
?rqr.D: 6-MPA-13/2014_BHO/
qfr,
Itr' oB notzou.
Z 6q
*
gqo cfto dtrfr,
Tr6f{6 qq qufuftero,
qqiq{"I, qq \'q q-dqE qRq-dq qTrdq,
GTFry. Tft-frq, g,a qdli, gfugr qqiqi'r.Tfi,
qtq qm Qc, oTtrq,
1S lqc'cll - 110003
-JAA
frEq: Proposal for diversion of 169.281 ha. for Rehabilitation
of Village Bhadbhurl from
the Bori sanctuary, under the Forest (conservation) Act, r9g0
in satpura Tiger
Reserve, District Hoshangabad of Madhya pradesh _ Reg.
qra
ri+f
rrTm"rt, cqfs-{q, q=T
a-za/zot+-qm
gq q-d4g
qffiq
$ k{m zz /oe/zoq.
..iTt-d.q,
q$ ffit
61 qa e-qio:
-rdrqq,
sq-i-fr frcrqril{fu riqD-d qMq-{r tg fu{rf, zz/os/zor+ o} rera ftffeTq gs
olqliilq em fu-qr rrir I Efir relcT ftfterq Rt'rC sil-€{r6 61rfqr6l tg 3i-}R-d qff qr
rS t
r
q-d.q-f,: sq-sffiEqrq
I
(
3TtR qerl=I
SI cover
ccf
5uq qq
Site Inspection Report by the Western Regional Office Bhopal Zone, Bhopal in
respect of Rehabilitation of Village Bhadbhud from Bori Sanctuary in Satpura
Tiger Reserve of district Hoshangabad of Madhya Pradesh
:
Introduction: To ensure proper development of the best habitat of the Indian Tiger i.e. the Bori
Sanctuary, relocation
of the existing BHADBHUD village from the core area is desirable. The
rehabilitated villagers
will
be provided
with the decessary financial and social benefits in addition
to infrastructural facilities. For evacuation of villages and resettlement of affected persons
169.281 ha of forest land will be diverted for the use at new site. This area includes the
agricultural land, @
2
ha.lfamily, construction
of
house, other community development
programme and nester facilities.
1.
Legal status offorest land proposed for diversion:
Protected Forest. Compartment No. P- 87 Range Kala akhar (Sukhtawa), Hoshangabad
(T) Forest Division. Located on west of NH 69 between Sukhtawa and Bhoura on NH 69.
2.
How the land proposed for diversion is to be utilized?
The Land is proposed for settlement of Village Bharbhoor, which is to be relocated from
the Critical Tiger Habitat/(CTH) core zone of Satpura Tiger Reserve.
3.
Whether the proposal involves any construction of buildings (including residential)
or not? If yes, details thereof:
No pre-existing buildings present at proposed site. Proposals involve construction of
residential quarters for villagers, Primary School, Community Hall, Temple and
development of agricultural fields, ponds, roads inside the village.
4.
Total cost of the project at present rates:
Rs. 13.30 Crore.
5.
Wildlife: Whether forest area proposed for diversion is important from wildlife
point
A-t3lt4
of view?
The
The space vacated from Bharbhoor forest village will be utilized as CTH of STR'
Reserve' It is
Bharbhoor village is located in critical Tiger Habitat (CTH) of Satpura Tiger
located deep inside the CTH. Relocation
of this village will restore the habitat
and
provide an inviolate space of around 250 ha' of land
6.
Aerial distance from the nearest bouo'hu.y of any Protected Area:
the distance the protected area is less than 10 kms, clearance from the
file
Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife is required before the
(In
case
can be processed for forest clearance)
than 10
The distance of the proposed area from nearest protected area boundary is more
km.
7.
Vegetation:
a.
Total number of trees to be felled
i.
691
Totat number of trees proposed to be felled
ll.
Number of trees to be felled of girth below 60 cm
:
I11.
Number of trees to be felled of girth above 60 cm
:
126
s65
b. Effect of removal of trees on the general ecosystem in the area
It is class V quality forest adjoining to National Highway NH-69'
Importantspecies: (10 to 15 tree species available in the site proposed for
diversion
will be given. In case there is any other plant species which is threatened or endangered
is
found in the area or any species is endemic to the area, should also be mentioned).
The tree species include chloxylon swietania, Terminalia tomentosa, Madhuca indica'
Acacia leucophlea, Anogeissus latifolia, Butea monospenna, Adina cordifolia, Terminalia
bellerica, Gardenia pinnnata, Diospyros melanoxylon, Buchanania lanzana, Soymida
febrifuga
No endangered species found in this area.
A-13114
Background note on the proposal:
As per NTCA guidelines and the wildlife protection act 1972,
it is mandatory for tiger
reserves to have a Critical Tiger Habitat (CTH)/or inviolate Core Zone free from all type
of biotic influence. CTH of STR has been notified on 24.12.2007. The proposed village
for relocation, Bhardbhoor is located inside CTH of STR. Hence voluntary relocation of
village Bhardbhoor is proposed. Relocation will benefit wildlife on one hand and lead to
better socio economic life
of the villagers. The villagers will
govemment development schemes and better facilities
have access to all
like school, health
center,
proximity to weekly markets, block and tehsil place.
Compensatory afforestation
a.
:
Whether land proposed / selected for compensatory afforestation is suitable from
plantation and management point of view?
Not required.
b.
Whether land for compensatory afforestation is free from encroachments and
other encumbrances?
Not applicable.
c.
Whether land for compensatory afforestation is important from religious or
archaeological point of view?
Not applicable.
d.
Land identified for raising compensatory afforestation is in how many patches?
Whether patches are compact or not?
Not applicable.
e.
Map with details.
Not applicable.
A-t3ll4
f.
Compensatory afforestation area should be clearly shown on the map, patch wise
and their contiguity to the forest area etc.
Not applicable.
g.
Total financial outlay of ten year GA programme.
Not applicable.
10.
Whether the proposal involves any violation of Forest (Conservation) Act 1980? If
yes, a detailed report on violation including action taken against the concerned
officials.
No
lt.
Whether the proposal involves rehabilitation of displaced persons.
If
yes, whether
rehabilitation plan has been approved by the state government?
The rehabilitation plan has been approved by the State Government and also by NTCA
Details to be furnished specifically
if the rehabilitation plan would affect any other
forest area by translocating oustees in and around the said forest.
Yes other village is relocated nearby
The rehabilitation plan has proposed that Relocation from CTH to peripheral degraded
forest on NH 69. With this settlement no more honey combing or fragmentation of forest
will
12.
be involved.
Reclamation plan: Details and financial allocation:
Not applicable.
13.
Details on catchment and command area under the project. Catchment area
treatment plan to prevent siltation of reservoir:
Not applicable.
14.
A-t3/14
Cost benefit ratio:
It is a rehabilitation project, hence not applicable.
Utility of the Project: Numbers of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes to be benefited
by the project.
Total relocation units are 133 all of them belong to Scheduled Tribes. Previously, since
the village was located deep inside the forest the villagers were cutoff from basic facilities
like school, health center, market place and had to face many hardship in case of
emergency like sickness
Relocation
will
etc.
!
result in creation of inviolate space in the critical Tiger habitat, free from
all types of biotic
disturbance and secondly
it will give
tribals better socio economic
conditions for future development.
16.
Whether land being diverted has any socio-cultural/ religious value? Whether any
sacred grove
or very old growth trees/forests exist in the areas proposed for
diversion?
No
17.
Recommendations of the Nodal OfficerlPCCF and the State Government:
The PCCF and the State Government have recommended the proposal for approval.
18.
Site inspection report
The site inspection was done by Shri S. K. Bhandari, Chief Conservator of Forests on
22.09.2014. The inspection report is enclosed containing comments on the alternatives
examined and recommendations of the inspecting officer.
19.
Any other information related to the project:
Pictures taken during site inspection of the atea are enclosed to have an idea
of
the
vegetation and other aspects ofthe forest area.
20.
a) Regional Addl. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests shall give detailed
comments on whether there are any alternative routes/ alignment for locating the
project:
A-t3/t4
PF-87 is proposed for resettlement. Density of forest is less then 0.1 (Degraded forest)
Further this area is located on NH 69 and hence is devoid of wildlife activity. Relocation
of village will protect the land from
encroachments. Other forest compartments were
shown to the villagers but they were not suitable for resettlement as they were far away
from main road, railway station
etc.
j
b) Recommendations of the Regional Addl. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
along with detailed reasons:
The present site is best altemative because
1. No honey combing
of forest is involved in future.
wildlife sighting is almost
2.
The NH 69 is passing on the western side, hence
-t.
No forest is involved in providing road to Relocation site.
4.
The site is close to kala-akhar railway station.
absent.
r l,t
bv'
Addl. Principal
A-13/14
,o*rr,
SITE INSPECTION REPORT OF PROPOSAL FOR DERESERVATION OF 169.281HA OF
Lo*o
FOR DISTRIBUTION FOR REHABILITATION OF VILLAGE BHADBHUD FROM BORI SANCTUARY IN
SATPURA TIGER RESERVE,DISTRICT HOSANGABAD OF MADHYA PRADESH.
lntroduction
:
The site was inspected by me on 22/09/2014 along with the officers and staff of State Forest
Department, territorial and wildlife who facilitated the inspection. The villagers residing inside the
Bori Wildlife Sanctuary are proposed to be given forest land for village settlement in the forestland
of Hosangabad Forest Disvision in Hosangabad district.
Description
:
The proposed area lies in Hosangabad Forest Divis.ions of Madhya pradesh. This location is in
Kala
ankhar beat in Sukhtawa range of Hosangabad Forest Division. The proposed area in in
Reserved Forest, compartment no.PF.87 ( area 169.281 ha). The proposed area is 169.2g1
ha, i.e.
the entire area. 1539 trees out of which L62
are below 60 cm girth, are required
to be felled.
Methedology:
The area was crisscrossed and visited at various locations.
lnspection:
The inspection was carried out on 22/09/2OL4 in presence of officers and staff of State Forest
Department,territorial and wildlife who facilitated the inspection.
OBSERVATIONS:
This is a plain area with degraded forest. Density is around 0.3 to 0.4. Trees are scattered.
The compartment area is 1'69.28L ha and the entire area is proposed for rehabilitation.
r
.
The main species
is
are Butea, Mahua and Tendu. Compartment history
is enclosed
for details. NHAI
within 1 km. from this site. Facility of electricity, school and Hospital are available in nearby
areas.
.Water will be the ground water through pumps. This block along with 86RF is isotateA patch
of
Hosangabad Division.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1' The topography is mostly plain there may be no objection in clearing this
site for rehabilitation.
2' Rehabilitation should be as per the approved rehabilitation policy of NTCA/state
Government.
t11
3. Since it is a RF block along with g6(RF) is isolated and surrounded all around by the revenue area ,
the
proposal is recommended for acceptance.
Enclo(l) 3 photos.
( 2) Compartment historY.
Dated
:
W
-:::l:'5
,:,ii-,1 ; .
l, i-r' :
,
':' cCF(c)r lr 4 t4
\
Bhopal
'.:
:;l
t.:i,
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
