Electro‐Biochemical Reactor (EBR) Technology for Treatment of Leach Pad Waters at the Landusky Mine A. Ola Opara, Michael J. Peoples, D. Jack Adams*, & William C. Maehl Mine Design, Operations & Closure Conference 2014 Landusky Mine ‐ Background • The Landusky Mine is a closed gold mine located in the Little Rocky Mountains in north‐central Montana. • Cyanide leaching was used to extract the precious metals. • The mine operated until 1998, when its owner, Pegasus Gold Corporation, declared bankruptcy. Landusky Mine ‐ Background • Spectrum Engineering of Billing, MT, performed the reclamation and is currently managing the site and its water treatment plants, including the Landusky Biotreatment System (LBS). • The LBS system was comissioned in 2002; based on a patented advanced biological wastewater treatment process to treat contaminants not readily treatable by chemical precipitation. – nitrate‐N at 100‐350 mg/L – selenium at 0.8‐1.5 mg/L Landusky Conventional Biotreatment Treatment Conditions • Water temp. <2 ‐ 12° C • pH~4.0 adjusted to ~6.5 • NO3‐N ‐ 100 to 340 mg/L • Hardness >2,100 mg/L • Broad spectrum of metals (Se, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Zn) EBR – ORP Fundamental Concepts (Electron Availability) Wastewater + Substrate +800 E N E R G Y ORP (mV) -250 Y I E L D O 2 H 2O Aerobic Respiration NO3 N2 Denitrification SeO4 Se0 Selenium Reduction SeO42‐ + 3H+ + 2e‐ <‐> HSeO3‐ + H2O HSeO3‐ + 5H+ + 4e‐ <‐> Se(s) + 3H2O SO4-- HS- Sulfate Reduction CCl4 Cl- Reductive Dechlorination CO2 CH4 Methanogenesis EBR Technology • EBR technology utilizes nutrients to provide required component for cell growth • Low voltage (1-3 Volts potential) provides: 1. Electrons and electron acceptor environments for controlled contaminant removal environment 2. Compensation for inefficient and fluctuating electron availability through nutrient metabolism • • 1 mA provides ~6.24 x 1015 electrons/second to the EBR system. – Replaces excess nutrients – Better contaminant removal – Produces less TSS (bio-solids) The Electro‐Biochemical Reactor Electromicrobiology High-performing EBR technologies have been demonstrated within the precious metals, base metals, and coal mining sectors to remove target and co-contaminants to low ppb levels. ADAPTED FROM MAY 2013 Electro‐Biochemical Reactor Technology ORP [mV] Providing electrons directly has numerous benefits including better ORP control and stability. 200 150 100 50 0 ‐50 ‐100 ‐150 ‐200 ‐250 ‐300 1 22 43 64 Data Points 85 106 127 148 1 STAGE EBR 169 190 211 2 STAGE CBR Landusky Conventional Biotreatment System (3) – 250,000 gallon (946 m3) Bioreactors in series BR1 14‐hr BR2 14‐hr BR3 14‐hr Landusky EBR Pilot System EBR1 8‐hrs EBR2 8‐hrs Nitrate/Nitrite ‐ LBS NO3‐N + NO2‐N [mg/L] 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Aug‐10 Dec‐10 May‐11 Sep‐11 Date Feb‐12 Jul‐12 Influent Influent Influent BR1 BR1 BR1 BR2 BR2 Limit BR3 LimitLimit Nov‐12 Results: Nitrate/Nitrite ‐ EBR NO3‐N + NO2‐N [mg/L] Inoculation 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 11 100 50 0 7/17 Validation Temp. Stress (1.2 oC) Nutrient Stress 44 33 22 7/29 8/10 8/22 9/3 Date 9/15 Influent Influent EBR1EBR1 EBR2Limit Limit 9/27 Selenium ‐ LBS Total Selenium [mg/L] 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Aug‐10 Feb‐11 Influent Jul‐11 BR1 Dec‐11 Date BR2 May‐12 BR3 Nov‐12 Limit Results: Selenium ‐ EBR Inoculation Total Selenium [mg/L] 1.2 Validation Temp. Stress (1.2 oC) Nutrient Stress 1.0 0.8 0.6 4 1 3 2 0.4 0.2 0.0 7/17 7/29 8/10 Influent 8/22 Date EBR1 9/3 EBR2 9/15 Limit 9/27 Results: Other Contaminants (Average) Influent LBS Effluent EBR Effluent Discharge Limit CN1 (TOTAL) 0.084 NA <0.005 0.005 CN1 (WAD) 0.012 0.072 <0.005 NA Al [mg/L] 0.34 1.99 0.04 NA Cd [mg/L] 0.135 0.125 <0.001 0.005 Cu [mg/L] 0.061 0.122 0.014 0.031 Mn [mg/L] 57 55 29 NA Ni [mg/L] 0.832 0.893 0.007 NA Se [mg/L] 0.858 0.417 0.039 0.050 Zn [mg/L] 2.26 2.94 0.04 0.388 TSS [mg/L] <18 NA <16 NA 1After EBR system aerobic step. EBR Water Sampling EBR Water Sampling Microbial Metal Precipitates Biofilm Metal precipitate formation and growth on bacteria Biofilm with Se precipitate Al Mattes 2007 Refurbishment & Conversion of the Landusky Biotreatment System to an EBR EBR Pilot System 1 Combined EBR/In Situ Biotreatment Irrigation Groundwater Injection Reaction Zone: •Denitrification •Se+6 reduction •Adsorption, precipitation (Se0, Se2-) SEMI PASSIVE TREATMENTS SEMI PASSIVE TREATMENTS • Reconfigure water collection system for (additional amendments) and partial redistribution from the EBR active treatment system to in situ heap treatment • Approaches have been proven in full‐scale applications at several US hard rock mines at elevations >3,200 meters EBR – Yukon Mine • The EBR system consistently removed selenium from an average of 2.73 mg/L to an average of 0.002 mg/L ‐ well below the discharge requirement of 0.020 mg/L. • An ~8 hour EBR HRT will be required to achieve the lowest levels of selenium removal at full‐scale with temperatures down to <5° C at this site. www.inotec.us Thank You Jack Adams Cell: 801‐712‐2760 Office: 801‐966‐9694 [email protected]
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc