Evolution of plant life on ultramafic edaphic islands at Mt Kinabalu A. van der Ent Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract The Malaysia state of Sabah in the biogeographical province of Borneo is one of the world’s five plant diversity hotspots with in excess of 5,000 species per 10,000 km2 (Kier et al., 2005, Barthlott et al., 2007). The epicentre of local plant diversity is Mt Kinabalu, which is the world’s premier hotspot with over 5,000 species in an area of just 1,200 km2. Three unusual characteristics are the primary precursors for the exceptional diversity in plant species on Mt Kinabalu: 1) its isolation and recent mountain formation; 2) the occurrence of ultramafic soils; and 3) the very high altitude and precipitous morphology. Keywords: edaphic islands, Malaysia, Mount Kinabalu, plant evolution, ultramafics. Introduction Mount Kinabalu in Sabah, Malaysia, is the most biodiverse place on earth in terms of the number of species density with >5,000 species in 200 families and 1,000 genera (Beaman et al., 2003) in an area of 1,200 km2 (Beaman, 2005). Over 900 plant species occur on the 142 km2 of ultramafics that surround Mount Kinabalu. Soils derived from ultramafic rocks are unusual because of high magnesium and nickel concentrations and low levels of major nutrients (McCoy et al., 1999). Whittaker (1954) presented three characteristics common among ultramafic ecosystems: (a) low in stature and biomass production; (b) high levels of endemism; and (c) vegetation distinct from surrounding areas. Ultramafic edaphic islands Ultramafics are extremely restricting habitats posing a strong Darwinian challenge for plants to adapt and survive (Baker et al., 2010). The insularity of such soils can be considered mainland islands as opposed to offshore islands. The ‘physical barrier’, however, is not water, but instead adverse soil properties making it an edaphic island. Because ultramafic outcrops at Mt Kinabalu form ‘edaphic islands’ in a ‘sea’ of other ‘normal’ soils, they can be conceptualised in terms of the ‘Theory of Island Biogeography’ (MacArthur and Wilson, 1967). Such islands, when becoming available for plant colonization, are subjected to two modes of immigration; on the population level (i.e. those of dispersion, immigration and extinction), and the evolutionary level (i.e. those of adaptation and speciation). Immigration into the habitat is affected by the ‘distance’, which might be interpreted as geographical distance, but also as ‘geochemical distance’ (the difference in the geochemistry) between the islands (i.e. the ultramafic outcrop), the ‘sea’ (i.e. other ‘normal’ soils surrounding the island) and the differences between islands (ultramafic soils differ greatly in geochemistry). Each of these may be cumulative or antagonistic in their effect, and the greater these distances/differences, the less likely a particular island is to receive colonisers. The number of species present on an island is primarily determined by the size of the island (lower numbers on smaller ultramafic islands) and distance between islands (species number decreases with distance between ultramafics islands). Larger islands are also more diverse because they offer greater opportunity for speciation (Harrison et al., 2006). However, ultramafic islands are not truly insular, but recruit species from the surrounding matrix over ecological and evolutionary time when such other species adapt to the prevailing edaphic conditions (Harrison and Inouye, 2002). There is no ‘sea’ as such to be crossed; rather, ultramafic islands are directly surrounded by a rich reservoir of species and preadapted genotypes can make the cross relatively easily. Therefore, as opposed to true islands, immigration constantly takes place due to the close proximity of potential immigrants and, among other entry mechanisms, often follows (local) extinctions. Types of immigrants (colonizers to the ultramafic island) include: (a) indifferent species from the surrounding sea that occur on both substrates, but with some showing a higher abundance on ultramafics; (b) species that reach the islands as an extension of their normal range (‘outliners’); and (c) endemics to the substrate (either as taxa or as infraspecific types) (Kruckeberg, 1986, Kruckeberg and Rabinowitz, 1985). All three types are found on Mt Kinabalu. Examples of (a) are species that have a wide ecological amplitude, of (b) are species normally found on high altitude granites, but have their lowest altitudinal occurrence on ultramafics, and (c) encompass a range of species that have high taxonomic affinity with precursor taxa on ‘normal’ soils (neo-endemics) and paleo-endemics. The evolution of ultramafic endemics Darwin’s ‘survival of the fittest’ is a metaphor for the ‘better adapted for immediate, local environment’ and phenotypic plasticity allows individual plants to adapt to the limiting geochemical conditions to which they are confronted (Lasat, 2002). Ultimately, such adaptation leads to the evolution of new species. Insular soils (ultramafics) provide (genetic) isolation which, coupled with strong edaphic and climatic stresses, promotes evolutionary divergence and speciation, and thus the genesis of endemism (Kruckeberg, 1985). Some species are paleoendemics, resulting from widespread populations that have become confined to ultramafics due to competition elsewhere (Baker and Whiting, 2002), although most are neo-endemics that have evolved from closely related species that acted as precursors (Rajakaruna and Boyd, 2008). The stages that may lead to the evolution of edaphic endemics begins with a low incidence of individuals with tolerance to the prevailing geochemistry in the surrounding populations (Kruckeberg, 1991), followed by adaptive radiation due to strong edaphic filtering (i.e. ultramafics), catastrophic selection due to frequent El Niño droughts (in line of Lewis, 1962, Raven, 1964) and genetic drift leading to rapid speciation (Beaman & Beaman, 1990). The species pool then becomes more divergent (Kruckeberg, 1986), eventually leading to reproductive isolation (Rajakaruna, 2004). Interesting examples include species in Elaeocarpus, Diospyros, Hopea, Cyrtandra and Diplycosia with a high number of ultramafic endemics, and many species on sedimentary and intrusive rock that probably acted as precursors. The rapid up-rise of Mt Kinabalu took place in a time span of less than 800,000 years between 7.85-7.22 million years ago (Cottam et al., 2010) and up to 9,200 years ago large glaciers up to 5.5 km2 with moraines as low as 3,000m (Koopmans and Stauffer, 1967) made many of the current habitats unavailable for plant colonisation. This means that speciation of species restricted to those habitats must have been rather rapid. Strong changes in the local climate created extreme climatic fluctuations that enabled catastrophic selection. Furthermore, the precipitous morphology created a whole range of sharply distinct edaphic habitats for plants and geographical isolation. Threats and conservation Mount Kinabalu and ultramafic sites within national park boundaries are safeguarded, but land clearing has approached all park boundaries. Scientific research and preservation of ultramafics in Sabah needs to be given utmost priority, particularly in those areas without legal protection, before further destruction results in extinction of local endemic plant species. Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank Prof. David Mulligan and Dr. Peter Erskine from the Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation (CMLR) at the University of Queensland for providing continuous support. Antony van der Ent is a recipient of an IPRS scholarship from The University of Queensland. References BAKER, A. J. M., ERNST, W. H. O., VAN DER ENT, A., MALAISSE, F. & GINOCCHIO, R. 2010. Metallophytes: the unique biological resource, its ecology and conservational status in Europe, central Africa and Latin America. In: BATTY, L. & HALLBERG, K. (eds.) The ecology of industrial pollution. Cambridge University Press. BAKER, A. J. M. & WHITING, S. N. 2002. In Search of the Holy Grail: A Further Step in Understanding Metal Hyperaccumulation? New Phytologist, 155, 1-4. BARTHLOTT, W., HOSTERT, A., KIER, G., KÜPER, W., KREFT, H., MUTKE, J., RAFIQPOOR, M. D. & SOMMER, J. H. 2007. Geographic patterns of vascular plant diversity at continental to global scales. Erdkunde, 61, 305-315. BEAMAN, J., ANDERSON, C. & BEAMAN, R. 2003. Biodiversity of Mount Kinabalu. CBD Technical Series No. 8, 58. BEAMAN, J. H. 2005. Mount Kinabalu: Hotspot of plant diversity in Borneo. Biol. Skr., 55, 103-127. COTTAM, M., HALL, R., SPERBER, C. & ARMSTRONG, R. 2010. Pulsed emplacement of the Mount Kinabalu granite, northern Borneo. Journal of Geological Society, 167, 49. HARRISON, S. & INOUYE, B. 2002. High β diversity in the flora of Californian serpentine'islands'. Biodivers Conserv, 11, 1869-1876. HARRISON, S., SAFFORD, H. D., GRACE, J. B., VIERS, J. H. & DAVIES, K. F. 2006. Regional and local species richness in an insular environment: serpentine plants in California. Ecological Monographs, 76, 41-56. KIER, G., MUTKE, J., DINERSTEIN, E., RICKETTS, T. H., KÜPER, W., KREFT, H. & BARTHLOTT, W. 2005. Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1107-1116. KOOPMANS, B. N. & STAUFFER, P. H. 1967. Glacial phenomena on Mount Kinabalu, Sabah. Borneo Region Malaysia Geological Survey Bulletin, 8, 25-35. KRUCKEBERG, A. R. 1986. An essay: the stimulus of unusual geologies for plant speciation. Systematic Botany, 11, 455463. KRUCKEBERG, A. R. & RABINOWITZ, D. 1985. Biological aspects of endemism in higher plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 447-479. LASAT, M. M. 2002. Phytoextraction of toxic metals: A review of biological mechanisms. J Environ Qual, 31, 109120. MACARTHUR, R. H. & WILSON, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, Princeton University Press. MCCOY, S., JAFFRÉ, T., RIGAULT, F. & ASH, J. E. 1999. Fire and succession in the ultramafic maquis of New Caledonia. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 579-594. RAJAKARUNA, N. 2004. The edaphic factor in the origin of plant species. International Geology Review, 46, 471-478. RAJAKARUNA, N. & BOYD, R. 2008. Edaphic factor. 1-8. WHITTAKER, R. 1954. The ecology of serpentine soils. Ecology, 35, 258-288.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc