Analysis of Relationships Between the Built Environment and Illegal

Analysis and Modelling of Truck
Parking in Downtown Toronto
Matthew Roorda, Adam Wenneman
May 13, 2014
[email protected]
P
1
Cost, Congestion, and Conflict
The “last mile” is the most expensive
portion of the supply chain.
Commercial vehicles (CVs) in Toronto incurred
over $27M in parking citations in 2012.
Commercial vehicle (CV) parking is a major
source of congestion in urban areas.
CV loading activities lead to over 476,000,000
vehicle-hours of delay every year in the US.
2
Cost, Congestion, and Conflict (cont.)
Illegally parked CVs can result in safety
issues for other road users.
In NYC, 14% of curbside deliveries result in a
conflict with a cyclist.
The problems intensify as cities grow.
3
Research Questions
Does the built environment have an impact on
illegal parking?
Are parking infractions occurring because of
inadequate parking supply?
Does increased supply reduce illegal parking?
Can we simulate the process of parking search
and evaluate parking policies?
7
Two Research Approaches
Phase I - Parking Ticket Analysis
Phase II - Integrated Traffic / Parking
Simulation Model
Phase I - Parking Ticket Analysis
Method
Collect information on parking supply,
parking demand, and parking citations
Aggregate to postal code
4:00 — 6:00 PM
Analyze spatial distribution of data to identify
patterns
Estimate regression models to quantify
relationships
9
Study Area for
Parking Ticket Analysis
10
Study Area for
Parking Ticket Analysis
11
Parking Supply
Complete parking inventory of
Toronto CBD
Multiple categories
On-street
Surface lot & parking garage
Loading bay & loading zone
Varies by time of day
Policy restrictions
Competition
12
Parking Demand
Freight trip generation (FTG) model
Employment-based
Segmented by industry classification
Parameters estimated for Greater Golden
Horseshoe Commercial Vehicle Model
Business establishment classification,
location, and employment from InfoCanada
13
Parking Tickets
Tickets for all vehicles available from City of
Toronto Open Data
FOI needed to identify commercial vehicles
630,280 CV tickets in Toronto
Over $27M in fines
14
Freight Trips Generated (FTG)
CV Accessible Parking Spaces
16
CV Parking Tickets
Regression Model for CV Tickets
Dependent variable: Parking ticket density
18
Regression Model for CV Tickets
Independent variables:
Freight Trips Generated (FTG)
FTG density (FTG/road meter)
Number of loading zone spaces
Number of loading bay doors
Number of on-street parking spaces
Density of on-street parking spaces
Number of on-street standing spaces
Density of on-street standing spaces
Number of surface lot spaces
19
Phase I - Conclusions
There is a link between Freight Trip
Generation and illegal commercial vehicle
parking
It is unclear whether parking infractions
occurring because of inadequate parking
supply.
It is unclear whether increased supply
reduce illegal parking
Aggregation of data may be masking effects
Missing the effect of car/truck competition
20
Phase II – Traffic/Parking Simulation
Looking at the process of ‘parking search’
30% of vehicles cruising
Parking choice model
Microsimulation
Compare alternative policies
Useful tool for policy makers
21
Additional Data Collection
Driver Interviews
• 200 drivers interviewed
• Short, multiple choice, and a few qualitative questions
• Information collected:
• Parking location, facility type, arrival time, etc.
• Delivery location, type of goods, total weight, etc.
• Driver’s difficulties and experiences
Parking Choice Model
•
•
Binary logit model
Select Spot
Truck arrives at
parking spot
Choice is a function of:
Wait for better
spot
•
Availability of a spot
•
Suitability for truck parking
•
Distance from parking spot to destination
•
Facility type (e.g. loading bay vs street parking)
Parking Choice Model
TABLE 1 Binary Choice Model for Freight Vehicle Parking Location
Log Likelihood
-84.35
Pseudo R-squared
0.3086
Variable
Coefficient
Distance to destination
-6.23E-03
On street parking facility
-1.61
Loading bay parking facility
2.21
Constant
2.12
t-stat
-3.87
-4.11
2.09
6.09
Traffic Simulation
• Software:
• Paramics
• car-by-car simulation
• Inputs:
• Detailed road network
• Parking facility type, location, and capacity
• Truck and passenger vehicle demand matrices
Choice-Simulation Model Integration
•
Vehicles are tracked when within 250 m of
destination
Choice-Simulation Model Integration
•
Tracked vehicles evaluate parking facilities using
the binary choice model
Choice-Simulation Model Integration
•
If no spot selected, vehicles cruise around the block
and try again
Choice-Simulation Model Integration
•
Once parked, vehicles dwell at the spot for a
modelled dwell time and then depart.
Simulated Scenarios
Scenario 1:
Scenario 2
Interior streets reserved for trucks
Interior streets reserved for trucks
All trucks park on interior streets
Trucks may also park on other roads
30
Simulation Results
31
Potential Solutions
Space management
Parking information
Dynamic pricing
Parking reservation
Off-peak deliveries
32
Thank you
Matthew Roorda, Adam Wenneman
May 13, 2014
[email protected]
P
33