Evaluation of Integrated Soil Fertility and Water Management on Cereals, Legumes and Promotion of Agroforestry in Tharaka, Machakos & Makueni Counties of eastern Kenya (J. N. Gitari, E. Gichangi, A. Njaimwe, L. Kimotho, R. Wangari and B. Pelletier) KARI-McGill Food Security Research Project Innovating for resilient farming systems Research to Feed Africa CIFSRF Symposium Naivasha, Kenya 23-27 June 2014 Photos: IDRC/PANOS, Sven Torfinn Introduction Low soil fertility and poor or lack of water conservation are considered the as the main biophysical root cause of low crop and livestock production in semi-arid eastern Kenya Inadequate soil moisture together with low and declining soil fertility is a limiting constraints to land productivity in the semi-arid lands (ASAL) of Kenya Apart from conservation of soil and water in ASALs, soil fertility depletion has been described as the major biophysical root cause of the declining per-capita food availability Objectives To Assess the farmers’ perceptions and prevalence of these NRM and Agroforestry practices To catalyze the adoption and assess the social, economic and environmental impacts of soil and water as well as Agroforestry management practices Materials & Methods………cont’d Experimental design 54 sub locations found in the 3 Counties of Tharaka, Machakos and Makueni in eastern Kenya Each location was designated as Focal Research Development Area (FRDA) Every FRDA had 3 sub sites called Primary Participatory Agricultural Technology Evaluation (PPATE) adapted from Snapp (1999) Materials & Methods………cont’d Experimental design Each of 54 PPATEs = Replicate in RCBD of one of the 18 FRDAs NRM had 3 main components: 1. Agroforestry 2. Water conservation 3. ISFM 3 crops presented in the NRM are: 1. Sorghum 2. Cowpeas 3. Green grams Materials & Methods………cont’d Sorghum Materials & Methods………cont’d Cowpeas Materials & Methods………cont’d Green grams Agroforestry Experimental design Agroforestry: Mainly nurseries in all the 12 PPATES of Thraka Main TREES were: 1. Medicinal trees: Neem (Azadirachta indica), Moringa Oleifara (Drum stick), Prunus Africana, Warburgia ugandensis e.t.c 2. Fruit trees and nuts: Grafted mangoes, Pawpaw, Grapes and Tamarindus indica e.t.c 3. Fodder trees: Leucaena trichandra, Calliandra calothyrsus and Mullberry (Morus alba) e.t.c 4. Ornamentals: Various indigenous trees, various flowers and Keiapple e.t.c 5. Timber/firewood trees: Cassia siamea, Vitex keniensis and Grevillea robusta e.t.c Agroforestry in Tharaka County Materials & Methods in NRM Experimental design: Water Harvesting methods tested and demonstrated in PPATES Plate 1: Water harvesting treatments a) Open ridges and b) Tied ridges Results 1800 1600 Grain Yield (kg/ha) 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Tied Ridges Open Ridge Control Fertilizer Manure Control Fertilizer Manure Control Fertilizer Manure 0 Flat Ground Moisture Conservation Structures Fig.: Sorghum grain yield under different water conservation and soil fertility treatments in Tharaka sub County Results 2000 1800 1600 Grain Yield (kg/ha) 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Manure Fertilizer Control Tied Ridges Manure Fertilizer Control Open Ridge Moisture Conservation Structures Manure Fertilizer Control Flat Ground Fig.: Cowpea grain yield under different water conservation and soil fertility trts Green grams in Kathonzweni sub county Grain yield in Kathonzweni Subcounty o Combined FYM & Inorganic fertilizer increased grain yield of green gram relative to fertilizer alone irrespective of water harvesting technique 1000 900 800 Green gram yield (Kg/ha) o Across water harvesting and soil fertility management practices, green gram yield ranged from 360 to 1540 kg ha-1. 700 600 500 Open ridge 400 Tied ridge 300 200 100 0 Manure alone Manure + Fertilizer Fertilizer alone Green grams in Yatta sub county o In WM trt - Tied Ridges had higher grain yields but not significant (P≥0.05) EFFECT OF SOIL TREATMENT AND WATER HARVESTING 1600 1400 o In ISFM trts - Fertilizer + FYM gave significantly higher (P≥0.05) grain yields GREEN GRAM YIELD (KG/HA) 1200 1000 5t FYM/ha 800 20 kg P2O5 ha-1 + 10 Kg N 600 5t FYM/ha + 20 Kg P2O5 + 10Kg N 400 200 0 Tied ridges Open ridges Green grams in Kabefa PPATE of Makindu sub County o In WM trts - Tied Ridges had slightly more grain yields than open ridges but not significant (P≥0.05) o In ISFM trts Fertilizer + FYM gave more grain yields Farmer Assessments: They ranked combined organic & inorganic ISFM as the best treatments They had reservations on the labour requirements for applying manure in the furrows Similarly they were impressed with TIED ridges Farmer Perceptions & Future Implications Fertilizer trts are good but EXPENSIVE & RISKY investment FYM is a good source of nutrient but have INSUFFICIENT quantities plus is cumbersome to handle myth that inorganic fertilizers “SPOIL” the soil is fast fading and more farmers are now willing to apply fertilizers on their fields. For example, farmers in Katangi PPATE and associated SPATEs collectively raised Ksh 76,500 for purchase of inorganic fertilizers for their short rains 2012/2013 season crops Acknowledgements The two project-PI-Dr. Gordon M. Hickey & Dr. Lutta Muhammad Canadian International Food Security Research Fund (#106510) Canadian International Food Security Research Fund (CIFSRF) IDRC who supported the work through the financial support of the Government of Canada provided through Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD) Director KARI for authorizing this publication and for creating an enabling environment under which the work is being done Collaborating farmers & Ministry of Agriculture staff of Tharaka, Machakos & Makueni Counties Centre Director and staff of KARI - Embu & Katumani YOU ALL for listening Photos: IDRC/PANOS, Sven Torfinn Photos: IDRC/PANOS, Sven Torfinn
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc