September 12, 2014
Mr. Mark Dimondstein
President
American Postal Workers
Union, AFL-CIO
1300 L Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005-4128
Certified Mail Tracking Number:
7013 3020 0002 3616 8497
Dear Mark:
As information, enclosed is a copy of the second and final Post Implementation Review (PIR)
for the Jackson, Michigan Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) Area Mail
Processing (AMP).
In accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated February 11, 2013, the Postal
Service is providing both redacted and un-redacted copies of the PIR.
If there are any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7412.
Enclosures
(CA2014-708)
of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating
Name & Type: Jackson CSMPC
Street Address: 1500 North Elm Avenue
City: Jackson
5D
State: Ml
ZIP Code: 49202
District: Detroit
Area: Great Lakes
Finance Number:
Current 3D ZIP Code(s):
Miles to Gaining Facility:
EXFC office:
Postmaster:
Senior Plant Manager:
District Manager:
Facility Name &
Street Address:
City:
State:
5D Facility ZIP Code:
254800
492
72 Miles
Yes
Cheryl D. Bell
Brian K. Fisher
Lee Thompson
Detroit P&DC
1401 W Fort Street
Detroit
Ml
48233
District: Detroit
Area: Great Lakes
Finance Number:
Current 3D ZIP Code(s):
EXFC office:
Plant Manager:
Senior Plant Manager:
District Manager:
252492
481, 482
Yes
Patricia Dawson
Brian K. Fisher
Lee Thompson
PIR Type: Final PIR
Date
of Data:
Processing Days per Year: 310
Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,745
EAS Hours per Year: 1,822
Jul-01-2013: Jun-30-2014
Date of DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/
New Facility Start-up Costs Update
June 16, 2011
Date & Time this workbook was last saved:
Vice
Area Vice President:
Network
Area AMP Coordinator:
NAI Contact:
Jacqueline Krage Straka
David E. Williams
Nancy Schoenbeck I Stefanie Cherry
Jug S. Bedi I Barbara Brewington
PIR Data Entry
2
2
Final PIR
PIR
of Dai:a
Jul-01-2013
Jun-30-2014
Losing Facility Name and Type:
Street Address:
City:
State:
Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Gaining Facility Name and Type:
Street Address:
City:
Detroit P&DC
1401 W Fort Street
Detroit
Final PIR vs Pre AMP
Final PIR vs Approved
Function 1 Workhour Savings
from Workf)our Costs - Corr,bi'led
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings
(less Maint'Trans)
from Other Curr vs Prop
PCESiEAS Workhour Savings
from Otner Curr vs Prop
from Transpot1ation HCR
Transportation Savings
ancl Transportatton PVS
Maintenance Savings
Space Savings
from Space Evatuat10n and Other Costs
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
from Space Evatuatton and Ot1'ler Costs
Total First Year Savings
Craft Position Loss
from s,affrng-Crafl
PCESiEAS Position Loss
fro:,i
Losing Current Qtr
Staffing-PCESIEAS
Gaining Current Qtr
FCM Service Performance (EXFC OIN)
from Se1v1ce Performance & CSM
FCM Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)
95 05%
97.51%
from Service Performance & CSM
FCM Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)
from Service Performance & CSM
Customer Experience Measurement
Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level
Customer Experience Measurement
Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level
90.34%
from
from
Service Peliormance & CSM
Performar;ce &
PIR Executive Summary
3
Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data«
Pre AMP
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs
Ma1 rter,ar1ce
1
PCES/EAS Workhour Costs
Transportation Costs
Maintenance Costs
Proposed
Final PIR
$58,034.872
i=unct1on 1 Workhour Costs
$12,11
$8,842.082
$51,655,240
$23,789,213
$51,356.827
$22,893,444
$1
$7,687,497
$42,567,589
$22,261
$0
85.361
Space Savings
Total Annual Cost
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Costs
Craft Position Total On-Rolls
PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls
Function 1 Workhour Savings
Wvrkhvur Savings
(less tvla1nt/Trans)
PCESIEAS Workhour Savings
Transportation Savings
Maintenance Savings
Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
Staffing
Craft Positicn Loss
PCES/EAS Position Loss
PIR Executive Summary
4
Last Saved:
August 26 2014
Jackson CSMPC
Current SCF ZIP
492
of Distribution Consolidated:
Detroit P&DC
Current SCF ZIP
481,482
Background:
The Detroit District, with assistance from the Great Lakes Area, has completed the final (one year) Post
Implementation Review (PIR) of the SCF 492 Jackson, Ml Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC) Area Mail
Processing (AMP) project. The final PIR shows a full year savings and determines whether the Postal Service increased
efficiency by consolidating destinating mail processing operations from the SCF 492 Jackson, Ml CSMPC to the Detroit
P&DC. The data for the final PIR period is July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014.
Prior to this AMP, SCF 492 Jackson, Ml mail volume was processed at multiple facilities and subsequently involved in
multiple AMPs and operational moves. See below summary:
SCF 492 Jackson,
SCF 492 Jackson,
SCF 492 Jackson,
SCF 492 Jackson,
2013
•
•
•
•
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
originating parcels to Detroit P&DC, October 2012
originating letters /flats to Michigan Metroplex P&DC via Lansing AMP, February 2013
destinating letters from Lansing P&DC to Detroit P&DC via operational move, February 2013
destinating standard flats from Lansing P&DC to Detroit P&DC via operational move, April
This Jackson, Ml CSMPC AMP to the Detroit P&DC transferred First-Class and periodical destinating flats and parcel
volume to the Detroit P&DC (Detroit), which is approximately 76 miles away, in March of 2013. The Jackson, Ml
CSMPC (Jackson) is a postal owned facility that currently houses a carrier operation, a box section and a Business Mail
Entry Unit (BMEU) in addition to being used as a transfer and distribution hub.
Financial savings for the consolidation of destinating operations from Jackson, Ml CSMPC to Detroit P&DC are:
Financial Summary:
Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data:
Function ·1 Workhour Costs
PCES/EAS WorKhour Costs
Transportation Costs
r\>-1aintenance Costs
Pre AMP
Final PIR
$59,584
$58 ,034 ,872
$12,114,337
$8,842,082
$51,655,240
$23,789,213
$12,013,839
$8,842,082
$51,356,827
$22,893,444
$13,333,742
$7,687,497
$42,567,589
$22,261.674
$155,985,626
$153,141,064
$144,409,388
Space Savings
Total Annual Cost
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Costs
Total Annual Savings:
Total One-Time Costs:
Total First Year Savings:
Final PIR vs. Pre-AMP
$11,576,238
($185,361)
$11,390,877
$185,361
$153,141,064
$144,594,749
Final PIR vs. Approved
$8,731,677
($185,361)
$8,546,315
The total first year savings of $11,390,877 is greater than the expected savings of $2,844,562 for the AMP. There were
additional impacts as stated bellow:
-
A $7,131,252 non-AMP related HCR transportation savings
A $1,677,884 delivery service operations cost increase in Jackson which is not related to the AMP
Adjusting for the various impacts, which total $5,453,368, the adjusted first year savings is $5,937,509.
5
Customer Service Considerations:
Jackson service performance initially fell due to a zero bundle the first week after implementation of the AMP. In an
effort to improve pe1iormance, the district teamed with delivery operations to advance the collection profile to the
plant by revisiting the collection mail process and by adding Jackson to the "All Clear" collection runs from
transportation hubs. Since then, service scores have returned to pre-AMP levels.
The Detroit P&DC showed an initial drop in overnight and three-day service performance. To address this, the district
has adjusted transportation by adding a direct trip to Jackson, Ml from the Ml Metroplex for all volume not captured
on the dispatch of value (DOV) to the Detroit P&DC. As a result, the scores have been steadily rebounding to pre-AMP
levels.
Transportation Considerations:
The Jackson to Detroit package projected a transportation savings of $298,413. The final PIR shows
$9,087,651 compared to pre-AMP levels.
a savings of
Jackson, Ml CSMPC eliminated two HCRs due to the AMP: 481L2 and 48811. These changes resulted in a savings of
$889,053. Remaining HCR mileage fluctuations resulted in a net Jackson HCR savings of $1,104,417.
The Detroit P&DC showed a $7,309,656 decrease in costs due to elimination of multiple HCRs and mileage fluctuations
in remaining HCRs. Twelve non-AMP related HCRs had a significant impact on the Detroit HCR financials. Five of these
non-AMP related HCRs - 150YO, 207FE, 381ZO, 680PO and 751AE - added $710, 720 in non-AMP related HCR costs.
Conversely, the other seven non-AMP related HCRs OlOKE, 15112, 171LO, 303YE, 541EQ, 607NO and 640M1 saved
$7,841,972. Adjusting for the $7,131,252 net non-AMP related HCR savings, the actual Detroit P&DC HCR savings for
this package should be $178,404.
Total PVS and HCR transportation savings for the Jackson to Detroit consolidation should be $1,956,399.
Staffing Impacts:
The approved AMP package identified a net craft decrease of 14 employees and a net increase of five EAS positions
with the destinating consolidation of the Jackson, Ml CSMPC flat and parcel volume into the Detroit P&DC.
Complement data for the final PIR shows a 1·eduction of 116 craft employees and 23 EAS employees.
Other local initiatives and concurrent AMPs had a significant impact on the complement numbers at both the Jackson
and Detroit facilities.
The staffing impacts and management-to-c1·aft ratios for the Jackson, Ml CSMPC to Detroit P&DC consolidation are
summarized below:
L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " " " ! " " " I R Summary Narrativ
6
Maintenance Impacts:
The AMP projected a net annual savings of $895,769 in maintenance costs. The final PIR shows a savings of
$1,527,539,
The largest contributor to the savings beyond that projected in the AMP was the Sl,154,776 reduction in Maintenance
Parts, Supplies and Facility Utilities at the Detroit P&DC
Space Impacts and One-Time Fac:ility Costs:
The AMP projected no one-time costs for this package, A deviation was approved on 4/5/13 for· $155,000. The final
PIR shows a one-time cost of $185,361.
A total of $165,005 was utilized for machine relocations and installations at the Detroit P&DC. When the AMP was
written, the Detroit P&DC had five AFSM machines in its fleet. After the AMP was approved, but before it was
implemented, Detroit P&DC relocated one of its AFSMs to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC due to the needs to the
service. During implementation of the Jackson to Detroit AMP, Detroit received and installed a replacement AFSM
returning the facility machine total to 5. The cost for this was $99,180. In addition, the Detroit P&DC acquired two
additional DBCS machines, as the result of a concurrent initiative, to process the SCF Jackson, Ml destinating letter
volume. Relocating and installing these two machines cost another $65,825.
An additional $20,356 was used by the Facilities Service Office (FSO) for a study in support of the Jackson, Ml volume
consolidation into the Detroit P&DC
Other Concurrent Initiatives:
Prior to and during the twelve months of the Jackson, Ml CSMPC final PIR, the losing and gaining sites engaged in
other concurrent initiatives including:
•
•
•
•
SCF 492 Jackson,
SCF 492 Jackson,
SCF 492 Jackson,
SCF 492 Jackson,
2013
Ml
Ml
Ml
Ml
originating parcels to Detroit P&DC, October 2012
originating letters /flats to Michigan Metroplex P&DC via Lansing AMP, February 2013
destinating letters from Lansing P&DC to Detroit P&DC via operational move, February 2013
desti11ati11g standard flats from Lansing P&DC to Detroit P&DC via operational move, April
PIR Summary Narrative
7
Last Saved: August 26. 2014
PIR Type:
Date:
Final PIR
07/01/13
Jackson CSMPC
District:
Fiscal Quarter
Q4 2012
Overnight
Percentage
2 Day
Percentage
3
Percentage
95.02%
86.58%
96.77%
79.49%
91.98%
92.80%
86.03%
88.87%
Q4 2013
94.87%
86.88%
Q1 2014
93.13%
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
93.23%
86.83%
78.55%
Q1 2013
Q2 2013
Q3 2013
98.72°/o
98.65%
8511%
94.66%
Gaining Facility: _D_e_tr_o_it_P_&_D_C_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
District: Detroit
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
overnight
Percentage
96.18%
After AMP
94.56%
96.67%
93.20%
96.41%
96.96%
%
92.79%
97.44%
92.99%
92.73%
93.50%
96.30%
95.80%
96.29%
97.51%
90.84%
93.36%
02 20i4
Q3 2014
97.29%
84.08%
Customer Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Custon1er Experience Measuren1ent
·2010. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM
Sm/Med Bus
Top Two Box
Q1
Q4a
90.34%
93.13%
92.79%
85.89%
89.43%
88.41 %
Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience)
Satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving)
Satisfaction with Sending (Experience with sending)
Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently v1s1ted PO)
Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact wit
---~~~"--~~-_;;c~~-~--=~;;;_~ Likely to recommend the USPS
8
PIR Service Petiormance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
Workhour Costs - Combined Facmties
Combined Facilities
Augllst :ZS. 2014
PIR Type•:
Type of Distribution Consolidated:_
---~Q~.~1)_1'}£3~
Date R;mge ot Data:
Jul-Q!-2013
to
.Juin-.W~f.Q.t~ -·--
P!H VVorf.J1our Costs - Combmed
Workhour Costs losing Facility
Las1
Losing facility: :L<:!~:'91:i_Q§_~~-·- ~·---~------~----" ~--~
Type of DistriblLlftion Consolidated:
__ _9-~_~Ji~~~-
~,aved
PIR Typo':
Date Range of Oat.a:
J111:'JJ_.:_2Q_1_~_
-.J-~~~9-?0.!.1
(1)
13
PIR
- losing
14
Workt1rn1r
Facility
Gaining Facility: Del~o}~.-~Q_c;:·-·----
PIR Type•:
I llSl J!JR
Type of Distribution Consolidated:_
Date H.ange of Data:
Jul~1-:'.?':IJ3
_J1.m73Q~_2Q.!~-
(1)
P!H Workhour Costs
C&1r11ng
16
PIR Workhow·
- G21ninq
m
0
()
Losing Fac1lrty Jackson CSMPC
Gau1w1~1
Fac11ity:
Detro11 P&DC
Date Ranqe of Data
07/01/13
06i30114
$8,222,176
$2,239,902
$0
$6157
$3,734.549
$2,323,734
$208,985
$278,008
$15 774
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$26,359
$'14,784
$6,157
$3,'134,549
$2,323,734
$208.985
$278,008
$15,774
$0
$0
$0
$0
$159
02
31
39
39
63
83
08
31
65
582
615
616
624
653
666
668
£379
691
$79,097
$174,202
$169,267
$86
$7Y,097
19
P!f~
0Jhei Vv'orkhour
511,017,504
Totals
$9,934,882
$12.326.865
Totals
$27,137,155
20
PIP
VVorkhour
21
PIR Other VVrnkhour
N
N
$4,054
$1.423
$317.677
Totals
$89,677
$83 300
$138,416
Totals
$439,801
$447,072
$0
$6,376
'987,720
$0
16,847,467
23
PIR Other \Norkhour
30
0
0
0
0
$0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Adi
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Adi
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
so
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
so
24
I'll'(
Last Saved: August 26, 2014
Data Extraction Date:
PIR Type: Final PIR
07/12/14
Finance #: 254800
Losing Facility: Jackson CSMPC
(8)
(9)
Craft Positions
Function 1 -
Function 38 - Maintenance
Functions 67-69 - Lmtd/Rehab/WC
Other Functions
Total
Variances Total On-Rolls
(10)
Change
Analysis
1st PIR VS
Pre AMP
(11)
1st PIR
VS
Positions
Percent
Craft Positions
Function 1 - Clerk
Function 1 - Mail Handler
110
195
23
unctions
7
1, 133
Variances Total On-Rolls
,---'-(23) __ , __,----~24)----1
j
I
I
Final PIR vs Pre AMP
16
j Final PIR vs Proposed j
I
I
'1
I
f
(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)
'------------"------------~
25
Change
Analysis
(21)
(22)
Final PIR vs Final PIR vs
Pre AMP
Proposed
Positions
Percent
PIR Staffing - Craft
Last Saved August 26, 2014
PIR Type: Final PIR
Losing Facility: Jackson CSMPC
Finance#
PCES/EAS Positions
Line
254800
711212014
Data Extraction Date:
Authorized
On-Rolls
(1>
(7)
Position Title
Fmal PIR
POSTMASTER (F)
MGR MAIL PROCESSING OPERATIONS
0
0
0
N OPERATIONS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
0
0
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
58
59
60
Totals
26
(15)
(16)
Change
Analysis
Final P!R vs
Pre AMP
Final PIR vs
Proposed
Positions
(5)
Percent
ES/EAS
252492
Finance#
Authorized
Staffing
PCES/EAS Positions
Line
On-Rolls
(19;
120)
(25)
Position Title
Levei
fmal P1R
SR PLANT MANAGER (1)
MGR !~<-PLANT SUPPORT
MGR MAINTENANCE (LEAD)
4 SR MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
MGR MMHENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT
OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST
MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
MGR FIELD MAINT OPRNS (LEAD)
MGR PVS OPERATIONS
.NETWORKS SPECIALIST
OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST
1
0
'.>
3
6
0
0
0
0
3
30
9
0
5
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
NETWORKS SPECIALIST
SECRETARY (FLO)
PLANT MANAGER (3)
MGR MAINTENANCE
MGR IN-PL.A.NT SUPPORT
MGR TRANSPORTATION/NETWORKS
MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS
NETWORK SPECIALIST
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLO)
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
0
0
0
0
56
57
Totals
(33)
(34)
Final PIR vs
Pre AMP
Final P!R VS
Proposed
Positions
(18)
Percent
-22.5%
(24)
-27.9%
Change
Analysis
~#_#_#
27
!
!
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,,,,,, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
Total PCES/EAS!
Position Loss!
_ _ _,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I_~
137
381
i
23
,
(
,
!
28
!
L--·---·-·-----·---'-·---·---·-----~---·-·-------J
(Above numbers are ;:;amed forward to the E:<.ecwt,ve Summ;;>1y)
""""~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...o..~~"'1Sl'~'f"1'!~~ES/EAS
Transportation - PVS
last Saved: August
2014
Final PIR
PIR Type:
--------~
Date
of Data:
Jul-01-2013
Jun-30-2014
to --
~---------
Gaining Facility: Detroit P&DC
Finance N u m b e r : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Losing Facility: Jackson CSMPC
Finance Number: 254800
I
(2)
I
(4)
(5)
Variance
Variance
Final PIR I Final PIR vs Final PIR vs
Proposed
Pre AMP
(3)
Total Mileage Costs
0
0
0
$0
$0
PVS Leases
Total Vehicles Leased
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
26
0
0
2
0
0
$157,921
6
Total Lease Costs
$0
$64,500
PVS Workhour Costs
PVS Workhour Costs
LDC 34 (765, 766)
$0
$0
Total Workho
$0
(11) Total Final PIR vs Pre AMP
14
22
0
Total Lease Costs
LDC 31 (
(9)
Variance
Variance
Final PIR vs Final PIR vs
Pre AMP
Pro osed
PIR
PVS Owned Equipment
Seven Ton Trucl~s
Eleven Ton Trucks
Single Axle Tractors
Tandem Axle Tractors
Sootters
PVS Owned
Seven Ton Trucks
Eleven Ton Trucks
Single Axle Tractors
Tandem Axle Tractors
Spotters
S Transportation
Number of Schedules
Total Annual Mileage
(8)
mmnrtatinn-PVS
LDC 31 (617, 679, 764)
LDC 34 (765, 766)
Total Workhour Costs
Savings:
;$f;?' , ,
nn
(This number added to the Executive Summa1y
(12) Total Final PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS
(This number added
the Executive Summary)
Notes:
28
PIR
-PVS
LastSaved:August26,2014
PIR
of Distribution Consolidated:
Data of HCR Data File:
Route#
434MO
481L2
48811
490AS
49231
49237
49238
49267
49292
492AO
492A1
492A4
492BG
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
CT for Outbound Dock:
Final PIR
Annual
Cost/Mile
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Variances Total Annual Costs
(11)
Change Analysis
Final PIR vs Pre AMP
I
(12)
Final PIR vs
Dollars
Percent
30
PIR
HCR-
2014
Last Saved:
PIR
of Distribution Consolidated:
_
Date of HCR Data File:
(1)
(4)
CET for Inbound Dock:
CETfor OGP:
CET for Cancellations:
CT for Outbound Dock:
Final PIR
Route#
Annual Cost
(10)
(7)
(6)
I
Final PIR Annual
Final PIR Annual
Annual
Cost
Cost/Mile
Cost/Mile
010KE
150YO
15112
171LO
207FE
303YE
381ZO
46028
480'10
48012
48018
48030
48035
48039
48065
48066
48067
48090
480A6
480BK
-480L 1
480L6
480L7
480L9
--
480MO
480M1
31
PIR
·nf"lrl<:>t1nn
HCR _
~-:>inonn
480M3
480M4
480M5
480MR
48119
48130
48162
481L4
48431
48438
484L4
541EQ
607NO
640M1
680PO
751AE
196,525
1
$29,942,658
15,385,747
Variances Total Annual Costs
Change Analysis
(11)
Final PIR vs Pre
(12)
Final P!R vs
(13)
Final PIR vs Pre
AMP
AMP
Dollars
Losing
Percent
Gaining
(from
and
Total Final PIR vs Proposed
HCR
32
PIR
HCR
(14)
Final PIR vs
Total Final PIR vs Pre AMP
(PVS &
number carried forward to the Executive
Total Final PIR vs Proposed
(This number carried forward to the Executive
33
PIR
nrw+..,+•r.n
HCR _
Inventory
2014
Last Saved: August
PIR Type:
01/10/14
Data Extraction Date:
Final PIR
I
I
Jul-01-2013
-- to
Jun-30-2014
Gaining Facility: Detroit P&DC
CSMPC
Losing Facility:
Date Range of Data:
(2)
I
I
(3)
Final PIR
I
--
.
·-
l>'.PRAMfa.;j Proposed I Final PIR l;i Relocation
I
Costs
AFCS
0
r;<;:tl.•.· .·;•·.··''
.;<I}
I
0
0
AFCS200
AFSM-ALL
0
AFSM-ALL
APPS
0
APPS
CIOSS
0
CIOSS
CSBCS
0
CSBCS
DBCS
0
DBCS-OSS
0
DBCS-OSS
DIOSS
0
DIOSS
FSS
0
FSS
SPBSIAPBS
0
SPBS/APBS
···: •o.
>· 2.
UFSM
• (•'· ·;·tJ.'.
0
i;~•t5
;.
5
•.()'> ('
0
·'·~;
4
\;\: .;u .. :\
0
;
. :•:· 4
DBCS
0
rzi1<1:>··~"
32
Cl .,;,{
0
;,
3
.,,
·~~y~;i~:·.;
'
'
,
··.,
':.,,.·..
~
;
5
4
$0
$0
$99.180
·,·
$0
$0
;
$0
$0
't
$0
$0
$0
$65,825
$0
$0
$0
$0
'
I'
47
3
,;
0
2
$0
2
;
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
il ..; ·.·
0
$0
$0
PIV
!):
0
$0
$0
LC REM
f
$0
$0
UFSM
0
FC I MICRO MARK
0
FC I MICRO MARK
ROBOT GANTRY
0
ROBOT GANTRY
}oc;/•:.•··
\~Tra</ •
HSTS I HSUS
0
HSTS I HSUS
.......... ·p'•''•}>;
LCTS I LCUS
0
LIPS
0
LIPS
MPBCS-OSS
0
MPBCS-OSS
TABBER
0
TABBER
PIV
0
LC REM
0
0
0
Final PIR
Relocation
Costs
'.;<'.
;
LCTS I LCUS
.
c''·~·
; \(j .,·. f•·
.·.;
{;}
·.·
...
3
3
1
"
..
0
1
.
.
IVa~an~e
m
s
0
There were additional cost for
c:Mviation
DBCS:
for labor cost and $22,473 for material cost
work.
PIR MPE
OS
PIR Type*: Final PIR
Jul-01-2013
Date Range of Data:
Losing Facility:
Jackson CSMPC
Gaining Facility:
-----~----------~~~~---------
~r; )
p1
(10)
(8)
*"
Final
, wWe11tlt1!1Qlil1:! ~lll!Vii\I
;i'
t::UIUliJilO<!H<
------------------------··--·-··-------~-------~---
(7)
•'''llfoi:K:IQ1itt;J~btl1it~ ,
'
Jun-30-2014
Detroit P&.DC
i
$
0 $
$
$
$
0
$
$
$
0 $
$
5.391,321 $
$
0 $
$
0
--$
$
127 ,842 $
---0
s
16,950,f'67
~a• :anti Sui;ig(ii~·-,
EillD :anil!J llllp~lil!!tl
177,638 $
5,765,138
4 ,610,362
() $
0
iGMUI li~tal
'177,838
llM•I mmtal
22,715,805
21,457
(11) Final PIR vs Pre AMP - Maintenance Savings:
(l hese numbers carried forwa1 d to lhe
(12) Final PIR vs Proposed - Maintenance Savings:
(These numbers carried forward to the
$
Surnmary)
(13)Notes: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~--------~-------------------------------~----
1n
f-'!f~
<:olumn;, 1'.'
tm f-11,,1
35
PIR Mamtenance
Las! Saved August 26. 2014
: Jackson CSMPC
Losing
PIR
Final PIR
Date Range of Data: _ _Jul-01-2013
_ _ __ -- to -- Jun-30-2014
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
~~~~~~~~
Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s)
the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.
(1)
x
x
(4)
DMM L001
DMM L011
DMM L002
DMM L201
DMM L003
DMM L601
DMM L004
DMM L602
DMM L005
DMM L603
DMM L006
DMM L604
DMM L007
DMM L605
DMM L008
DMM L606
DMM L009
DMM L607
DMM L010
DMM L801
Drop Shipments for Destination
(2 )
PB 22359 Mar 21-2013
Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?
(3 )
Yes
Discounts
FAST Appointment Summary Report
(5)
No-Show
Count
%
Late Arrival
Count
%
Month
Losing I Gaining Facility
NASS
Code
Facility Name
Total
Schd
May '14
Losing Facility
492
Jackson CSMPC
0
0
0
0
0
0
June'14
Losing Facility
492
Jackson CSMPC
0
0
0
0
0
May '14
Gaining Facility
481
Detroit, Ml P&DC
888
339
38.18%
265
June'14
Gaining - --~ ....,
481
Detroit, Ml P&DC
896
357
39.84%
247
Notes:
~16
Jackson
Open
Count
%
Closed
Count
%
Unschd
Count
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29.84%
0
0.00'%
547
61.60%
10
27.57%
0
0.00%
539
60.16%
6
at Detroit
PIR Distribution Changes
Customer Service Issues
Saved Auousl 2A, 2014
Losing Facility:
____
CSMPC ___
"
5-Digit ZIP Code: 4_9_20_2_ _ _ __
Data Extraction Date: 07112114
PIR
1. Collection Points
PIR
PIR
Mon. -Fri.
Number picked up before 1 p.m
Sat.
Sat.
Sat.
31
Number picked up between 1-5 p.m.
182
Number picked up after S p.m.
Total Number ot Collect1on Pomts
...
_,,
....
~~~
...............
~--
()
.......~--
~~~~-'-~~~~--'"""'~~--
2. How rnany collection boxes are currentfy designated for "local delivery"?
3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP?
4. Delivery Performance Report
Final PIR
OuarterfFY
% earners returning
1700
04 2013
Q1 2014
02 20"14
03 2014
5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times}
Proposed
6. Business (Bulk} Mail Acceptance Hours
11
Final PIR
Proposed
Start
End
Start
I
End
Start
End
NiA
NIA
NIA
I
NIA
10:00
$·45
Final PIR
Start
I
End
10 00
I
6 45
f---
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
10:00
6:45
10 00
NI.A
NIA
NIA
NIA
10:00
6:45
10 00
NIA
NIA
NIA
I
MA
10:00
6"45
10 00
I
6 45
NI.A
NIA
NIA
I
NIA
woo
645
10 00
I
6 4S
NIA
NIA
NIA
I
NIA
10:00
6:45
10 00
I
6 45
1. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance-with applicable policies in the- Postal Operations Manual?
8. Notes:
Yes
There are no retail services at this facility. Retail is located at the Jackson Main Post Office. Retail and BMAU hours were 110! changed due to AMP.
Gaining Facility: _D_e_tr_o_it_P_&_D_C_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
9.
What postmark is printed on collection mail?
~~J
j,
:!'''')
Jackson and Detroit mail worked al Michigan Metroplex.
37
PIR
0
Space Evaluation and Other Costs
Last Saved August 26 2014
Date:
07/28/14
1 Affected Facility
Facility Name
Street t>.ddress·-7:~"":'~""='".'-"'---------------------------Ciry. State ZIP
==='-----..:.:.C.'---:.==-------------"""=
2 One-Time Costs
Enter any one-tlme costs.
SO
Costs
3 Savings Information
Space Savings($):
SO
Executive Sur:unary)
4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.
Yes. Jackson remains as a Post Office and hub operation
5. Notes:
The $20.356 one-time cost was for facilities study for investigation into .Jackson. Ml volume into the Detroit P&DC.
Deviation approved 4115/13 for $155K for equipment and facility work
Employee Relocation Costs
$165.005
Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs
(from MPE lnvento1yj
Facility Costs
(from above\
Total One-Time Costs
$0
Losing Facility: -=-:cc:::..:.::=.:_::_-=-:.:.:.:..__:___ _ _ _ _ _ __
Pre-AMP
Range of Report
161
(10)
Product
Final PIR Cost
pet 1.000
38
PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc
