WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES Kavya et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Volume 3, Issue 5, 759-764. Research Article ISSN 2278 – 4357 EVALUATION OF PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND PYTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF POLYHERBAL FORMULATION *Surabhi Kavya 1, Dr. H. Padmalatha2 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, JJT University, Jhunjhunu, Chudela 333001 Rajasthan, India. 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gyana Jyothi College of Pharmacy, Gyana Jyothi Nagar, Uppal bus depot, Hyderabad, India. Article Received on 26 February 2014, Revised on 27 March 2014, Accepted on 23 April 2014 ABSTRACT The main objective of the present study was to formulate and evaluate the polyherbal formulation by following the standardization parameters like organoleptic characters, physico-chemical parameters and phytochemical screening and the formulation consist of following *Correspondence for Author herbs zingiber officinael, Ocimum sanctum, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Surabhi Kavya murraya koenigii and emblica officinalis .The phytochemical screening Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, JJT University, has been done for different extracts of the formulation and it revealed Jhunjhunu, Chudela the presence of flavanoids, tannins, carbohydrates, volatile oil, Rajasthan, India. alkaloids and proteins. The study was done for the purpose of highlighting the potentiality and quality of the formulation in order to carry out further pharmacological screening on various activities like analgesic, inflammatory, diabetics and ulcer etc. Key words: standardization, polyherbal formulation, Pytochemical screening, physicchemical parameters. INTRODUCTION The subject of herbal drug standardization is massively wide and deep. For the purpose of research work on standardization of herbal formulations and neutraceuticals, a profound knowledge of the important herbs found in India and widely used in Ayurvedic formulation is of utmost importance. India can emerge as the major country and play the lead role in production of standardized, therapeutically effective ayurvedic formulations. India needs to www.wjpps.com Vol 3, Issue 5, 2014. 759 Kavya et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences explore the medicinally important plants. This can be achieved only if the herbal products are evaluated and analyzed using sophisticated modern techniques of standardization 1.Churna is a fine powder of a drug or drugs which is prepared by mixing clean, finely powdered, and sieved drugs 2. In recent years, plant derived products are increasingly being sought out as medicinal products, nutraceuticals and cosmetics and are available in health food shops and pharmacies over the counter as self medication or also as drugs prescribed in the nonallopathic systems3,4. Herbal medicines widely used in health-care in both developed and developing countries are complex Chemical mixtures prepared from plants and are limited in their effectiveness because they are poorly absorbed when taken orally5.WHO has listed about 20,000 plant species in the world which are used in manufacturing different medicines. In India over 2,500 species are credited with medicinal value. About 1100 plant species are used in Indian systems of medicines, out of these plants 500 medicinal plant species are frequently used in the preparation of Ayurvedic and Homeopathic medicines6.Herbal formulations have reached widespread acceptability as therapeutic agents for diabetics, arthritics, liver diseases, cough remedies, memory enhancers and adoptogens7. As per WHO definition, there are three kinds of herbal medicines: raw plant material, processed plant material and medicinal herbal products. Herbal drugs are finished labeled products that contain active ingredients such as aerial or underground parts of plant or other plant material or combination thereof, whether in the crude state or as plant preparations. The use of herbal medicines has increased remarkably in line with the global trend of people returning to natural therapies8. Herbals are traditionally considered harmless and increasingly being consumed by people without prescription. However, some can cause health problems, some are not effective and some may interact with other drugs. Standardization of herbal formulations is essential in order to assess the quality of drugs, based on the concentration of their active principles9. Quality evaluation of herbal preparation is a fundamental requirement of industry and other organization dealing with ayurvedic and herbal products. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant material: Polyherbal formulation consists of 5 ingredients, viz., Ocimum sanctum, Glycyrrhiza glabra, murraya koenigii, Emblica officinalis, and Zingiber officinale. All these plant parts were procured from the local market of Hyderabad, India, and were authentified from National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources Regional Station Hyderabad. www.wjpps.com Vol 3, Issue 5, 2014. 760 Kavya et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Preparation of polyherbal formulation: All plant parts were then dried in shade, powdered and passed through sieve no.100 and then mixed together in specified proportions in a geometrical manner to get uniform mixture and lastly packed in a well closed container to protect them from moisture. Composition of polyherbal formulation was given in (Table 1). Standardization parameters : The various standardization parameters studied were Organoleptic properties, Physico‐chemical parameters , determination of pH, Preliminary Phytochemical analysis, determination of moisture content, microbial analysis and determination of physical characteristics of powder formulation. Organoleptic evaluation: The Organoleptic evaluation refers to evaluation of the formulation by color, odor, taste, appearance, particle size and Texture (Table 2). Physicochemical investigations: Physico‐chemical investigations of formulations were carried out for the determination of total ash, water soluble ash, acid insoluble ash and Moisture content was determined by loss on drying (LOD) method10 (Table 3). Physico‐chemical investigations was performed using standard procedures a) Moisture Content An accurately weighed 3g of polyherbal formulation powder was taken in a tarred glass bottle. The crude drug was heated at 1050C in an oven till a constant weight. Percentage moisture content of the sample was calculated with reference to the shade dried material. b) Ash Values (i) Determination of total ash Weighed accurately 2g of polyherbal formulation powder was added in crucible at a temperature 500-6000C in a muffle furnace till carbon free ash was obtained. It was calculated with reference to the air dried drug. (ii) Determination of acid insoluble ash Ash above obtained, was boiled for 5min with 25ml of 1M Hydrochloric acid and filtered using an ash less filter paper. Insoluble matter retained on filter paper was washed with hot water and filter paper was burnt to a constant weight in a muffler furnace. The percentage of acid insoluble as was calculated with reference to the air dried powdered drug. www.wjpps.com Vol 3, Issue 5, 2014. 761 Kavya et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (iii)Determination of water soluble ash Total ash 1g was boiled for 5min with 25ml water and insoluble matter collected on an ash less filter paper was washed with hot water and ignited for 15min at a temperature not exceeding 4500C in a muffle furnace. Difference in weight of ash and weight of water Determination of pH: 1% solution of Polyherbal formulation was prepared in distilled water and pH was determined using DIGITAL pH METER, (Table 3). Preliminary Phytochemical analysis: Preliminary qualitative phytochemical analysis of all the extracts was carried out by employing standard conventional protocols 11, 12 (Table 4). RESULTS Table 1: Composition of polyherbal formulation S. no. 1 2 3 4 5 Sanskrit Name Plant Name Family Part used Shunthi Amalaki Tulsi Yashti-madhu Girinimba Zingiber officinale Emblica officinalis Ocimum sanctum, Glycyrrhiza glabra, murraya koenigii Zingiberaceae Euphorbiaceae Lamiaceae Leguminosae Rutaceae Rhizomes Fruits Leaves Rhizomes Leaves Table 2; Organoleptic properties of polyherbal formulation Appearance Color Odor Taste Powder Greenish brown Characteristic Bitter Texture Fine Particle size 100# Table 3: Physicochemical characteristics of polyherbal formulation S. no. 1. 2. a b c 3. Parameters Moisture content Ash content Total ash Acid insoluble ash (w/w %) Water Soluble ash (w/w %) pH (1%) www.wjpps.com Vol 3, Issue 5, 2014. Percentage mean (n=3) ± SD 6.03±0.03 8.306±0.029 1.60±0.04 6.55±0.01 3.20 762 Kavya et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Table 4 : Preliminary Phytochemical analysis TESTS CHLOROFORM Alkaloids Coumarines Carbohydrate Flavanoids Glycosides Steroids and pytosteroids Tannins Terpinoids Proteins Volatile oil PET ETHER -ve +ve +ve +ve +ve +ve +ve +ve ETHYL ACETATE -ve +ve +ve +ve ETHANOL -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve +ve +ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve +ve +ve +ve -ve +ve +ve -ve +ve +ve +ve AQUEOUS EXTRACT +ve +ve +ve +ve (+)=Present, (-) =Absent DISCUSSION The formulation was tested for various standardized parameters like organoleptic, physicochemical parameters, and also pytochemical screening. organoleptic parameters revealed that Churna was Greenish brown , fine powder, odor- Characteristic, taste- Bitter is shown in (Table 2) and results of physicochemical properties for Loss on drying at 105º C, pH, Total ash, Acid insoluble ash, Water soluble ash, and pH were calculated and results were shown in (Table 3). Ash value is useful in determining purity of drug and mainly important for quantitative standards. Percent weight loss on drying or moisture content was found to be 6.03% w/w. The less value of moisture content could prevent bacterial, fungal or yeast growth. The Pytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloids, flavanoids, Coumarines, carbohydrates, tannins, proteins, volatile oil and absence of Terpinoids, steroid and glycosides id shown in (Table 4). CONCLUSION Standardization is an important measure for knowing the quality, purity and for sample identification. It is one of the simplest and cheapest methods for the correct identity of the materials. Physicochemical analysis of the formulation confirms the quality and purity of plant .The present study was useful for further pharmacological and therapeutic screening of various activities along with the standardization of plant material. www.wjpps.com Vol 3, Issue 5, 2014. 763 Kavya et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author is thankful to Principal, Dr. H. Padmalatha, Gyan Jyothi college of Pharmacy, Uppal Chauraha, Hyderabad, for providing laboratory facilities with encouragement. REFERENCES 1. Sriwastava NK, et al. Standardization of Ajmodadi churna, a polyherbal formulation. Phcog Res. 2010; 2(2): 98-101. 2. Meena AK, et al. Standardization of ayurvedic polyherbal formulation, Pancasama churna. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research. 2010; 2(1): 11-14.) 3. Gautam V, Raman RMV, Ashish K. Exporting Indian healthcare (Export potential of Ayurveda and Siddha products and services) Road beyond boundaries (The case of selected Indian healthcare systems).Gautam V, Raman RMV, Ashish K. (eds.) ExportImport Bank of India; Mumbai: 2003; p 4–54. 4. Sagar Bhanu PS, Zafar R, Panwar R. Herbal drug standardization. The Indian Pharmacist 2005; 4(35):19-22. 5. Amit J, Sunil C, Vimal K, Anupam P. Phytosomes: A revolution in herbal drugs. The Pharma Review 2007; 11 13. 6. Chauhan NS. Medicinal and aromatic plants of Himachal Pradesh. Indus publishing company New Delhi.1995, 5. 7. Patel PM, Patel NM, Goyal RK. Quality control of herbal products. The Indian Pharmacist 2006; 5(45):26-30. 8. Vaidya ADB, Devasagayam TPA. Current status of herbal drugs in India: An overview. J Clin Biochem 2007; 41(1):1– 11. 9. Yadav NP, Dixit VK. Recent approaches in herbal drug standardization. Int J Integr Biol 2008; 2:195-203. 10. Chetankumar N, Physicochemical and phytochemical evaluation of Dendrobium Macraei Roots. 11. Kokate C.K., Purohit A.P. and Gokhale S.B 2006. Pharmacognosy. 34th Edn. Nirali Prakashan, Pune, India. 12. Trease E.G., Evans W.C 1978. Pharmacognosy. 11th Edition, Balliere Tindall, London. 115‐222. www.wjpps.com Vol 3, Issue 5, 2014. 764
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc