Credit Research Asia-Pac HG Financial Institutions 10 September 2014 Asian banks Neutral – watch for supply We recommend a broadly neutral stance on Asian banks over the remainder of the year. We expect the pace of issuance to remain robust, especially in the bank capital space given the pending issuance of preference shares by the Chinese banks. We believe about USD23-30bn of further issuance across the capital structure is possible over the remainder of the year. Given the issuance pipeline, as well as tight valuations across most of the senior bond complex, we therefore think the scope for further compression is limited. With our economists expecting the growth recovery to continue in Asia, we expect banks’ fundamentals to remain broadly stable. However, across the region, we expect liquidity to remain tight, potentially driving funding costs higher. We expect headlines surrounding M&A to remain a theme in India, Indonesia and Malaysia. In Malaysia, if the proposed merger between CIMB and RHB is successful, we think this could change the domestic banking landscape, and raise questions about how Maybank would respond. In India and Indonesia, given the political sensitivities involved, we believe any progress on consolidation will take time and is unlikely to happen in the near term. Recommendations in major sectors: • Hong Kong (neutral): We think a neutral stance is appropriate over the next three to six months, as the higher-than-benchmark carry is balanced against risks related to potential implementation of resolution authority and likely moderation in fundamentals. That said, over the near term, we believe there will be potential for better entry points given supply pressures. In addition to expected preference share issuance by Chinese banks, we think some Hong Kong banks are also potential issuers. • India (overweight): We believe an overall overweight stance remains appropriate given India’s economic recovery and the structurally positive changes occurring in the country. In addition, we continue to think an eventual revision of S&P’s outlook on the India sovereign to Stable from Negative could be supportive for spreads. • Korea (underweight): We downgrade all of our ratings on the Korean banks under our coverage to Underweight as we think valuations are tight and any increase in concerns surrounding a rise in US Treasury yields could potentially weigh on performance of tight spread segments in Asia such as Korean banks. In addition, while US investors remain a significant source of demand for Korean bank bonds, we expect this buyer segment to, at best, provide an anchor for spreads in the face of potential supply, rather than help to drive spreads tighter. Trade ideas: • Sell CINDBK 7.25% perp (103.5/104.5) • Buy SBIIN 4.125% ‘17s (T+213/203bp) • Buy KTB 5.2% ‘24c19 (T+287/277bp) PLEASE SEE ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES STARTING AFTER PAGE 13 Lyris Koh, CFA +65 6308 3595 [email protected] www.barclays.com Barclays | Asian banks RECOMMENDATIONS Neutral stance on the Asian banks Asian bank bonds have underperformed the market year-to-date, generating an excess return of c.335bp versus c.385bp from the EM Asia High Grade Index. The underperformance has generally been driven by the low-beta, tight spread segments (ie Singapore and Korea seniors) as well as Chinese seniors given supply and concerns about China’s economy. The outperformers year-to-date have been the Indonesian and Indian seniors, driven by positive election outcomes. Over the remainder of the year, we recommend a broadly neutral stance on Asia banks. We expect the pace of issuance from Asian financials to remain robust and believe about USD23-30bn of further issuance across the capital structure is possible over the remainder of the year. Year-to-date issuance from Asian financials has been about USD38bn. Given the potential issuance pipeline, as well as generally tight valuations across most of the senior bond complex, we think the scope for further compression is limited. In addition, while we have a stable outlook for banks’ fundamentals, we think risks are biased to the downside given the fragile recovery in China. Liquidity is also tightening across several banking systems, placing pressure on funding costs and margins. We discuss our recommendations across the various banking systems in more detail below. FIGURE 1 Banks have underperformed year-to-date (excess return, bp) 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 ID senior IN senior EM Asia HG Index Basel II sub Sub banks TH senior All banks CH /HK sub MY senior Senior banks Basel III sub SG sub CH senior KR senior SG senior 0 Note: Data is as at 5 September 2014. Source: Barclays Live FIGURE 2 Most Asian bank seniors trade tight relative to the benchmark EM Asia USD HG Index 10 September 2014 End 2013 Current YTD change Difference to Index 188 148 -40 NA All banks 202 152 -50 4 Senior 191 138 -53 -10 Sub 259 217 -42 69 CH/HK senior 157 147 -10 -1 ID senior 313 173 -140 25 IN senior 288 186 -102 38 KR senior 116 85 -31 -63 2 Barclays | Asian banks End 2013 Current YTD change Difference to Index MY senior 179 100 -79 -48 SG senior 83 51 -32 -97 TH senior 186 139 -48 -9 CH/HK sub 253 238 -15 90 SG sub 186 166 -21 18 Note: Data is at 5 September 2014. Source: Barclays Live Trade ideas Sell CINDBK 7.25% perp (103.5/104.5) We recommend investors sell the CINDBK 7.25 perp ’19 as we believe likely T1 supply by the Chinese banks could weigh on performance of the former. Based on previous stock exchange announcements, we think about USD6-8bn of T1 bonds could be issued by Bank of China (BOC) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) in the USD bond space this year. Given the higher systemic importance of BOC and ICBC, as well as the arguably stronger fundamentals of the two banks relative to CINDBK, we think investors could look to switch out of CINDBK perp’ 19 into potential issuance of T1 bonds by Chinese banks. Buy SBIIN 4.125% ‘17s (T+213/203bp) The 3s5s curve of SBI is relatively flat compared to Export-Import Bank of India as well as other BBB-bucket issuers such as Siam Commercial Bank. For reference, the 3s5s curve of SBI is c.8bp on a Z spread basis versus the c.29bp of Export-Import Bank of India and c.33bp of Siam Commercial Bank. FIGURE 3 SBIIN 3s5s is relatively flat Z spread (bp) 160 SBIIN 19 150 EXIM 19 SBIIN 17 140 130 120 SCBTB 17 EXIM 17 110 100 SCBTB 17 90 80 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 Average life Source: Barclays Buy KTB 5.2% ‘24c19 (T+287/277bp) Notwithstanding the recent compression in the KTB’ 24c19s, we think there is still scope for further compression in the KTB ‘24c19s. As we discuss later in the note, Thai banks (including KTB) reported resilient 2Q14 results despite the challenging operating conditions during the quarter. We expect this trend to continue over the remainder of the year given the return of political stability as well as growth recovery. Notably, recent local media reports (Nation, Bangkok Post) have said that onshore retail investors will be allowed to buy Basel III T2 bonds, increasing the likelihood of T2 issuance onshore. Consequently, we expect technicals of the KTB ‘24c19s to remain well-supported. 10 September 2014 3 Barclays | Asian banks FIGURE 4 Summary of recommendations Previous rating New rating Bank of China HK Underweight Underweight Bank of East Asia Market Weight Market Weight CITIC Bank International Overweight Market Weight Axis Bank Overweight Overweight Bank of Baroda Overweight Overweight Bank of India Market Weight Market Weight Hong Kong India Canara Bank Market Weight Market Weight Export-Import Bank of India Overweight Overweight ICICI Bank Overweight Overweight IDBI Bank Market Weight Market Weight State Bank of India Overweight Overweight Indian Overseas Bank Market Weight Market Weight Export-Import Bank of Korea Market Weight Underweight Hana Bank Market Weight Underweight Industrial Bank of Korea Market Weight Underweight Kookmin Bank Market Weight Underweight Korea Development Bank Market Weight Underweight Shinhan Bank Market Weight Underweight Woori Bank Market Weight Underweight Market Weight Market Weight Development Bank of Singapore Market Weight Market Weight Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Market Weight Market Weight United Overseas Bank Market Weight Market Weight Underweight Underweight Korea Malaysia Malayan Banking Berhad Singapore Thailand Bangkok Bank Source: Barclays Live Hong Kong – Potential for better entry points Over the next three to six months, we believe a neutral stance on the Hong Kong subdebt space is appropriate. In our view, the higher-than-benchmark carry of the HK subdebt complex is balanced against risks related to the potential implementation of a resolution authority regime in Hong Kong as well as a moderation in fundamentals. Following a relatively strong 1H14, we think the Hong Kong banks’ fundamentals face several headwinds in 2H14. Firstly, we believe loan growth could slow as offshore lending opportunities to Chinese corporates decrease on the back of looser onshore liquidity. Secondly, we think NIMs could see some decline in 2H14 as banks are unlikely to reap the same benefit of high onshore interbank rates. In addition, deposit competition remains intense in Hong Kong, adding to funding cost pressures. Asset quality pressures are also unlikely to dissipate as the economic backdrop in China remains weak. Consequently, we think the bias is for credit costs to trend up from current low levels. 10 September 2014 4 Barclays | Asian banks In addition to the above, we think the likely issuance of preference shares by Chinese banks could loosen technicals at the margin, as some private bank clients could switch out of HK T2 bonds into higher-yielding preference shares. Indeed, we have already seen some widening in this segment in August. At the same time, we believe banks such as Bank of East Asia and Bank of China (Hong Kong) could be bank capital issuers. We also note that Bloomberg has reported that Bank of China is planning a USD1bn T2 bond issuance. Consequently, we think supply could provide better entry points into the Hong Kong subdebt segment, and recommend a tactically cautious stance over the near term. In particular, we downgrade our rating on China CITIC Bank International to Market Weight from Overweight. CINDBK’s bond complex has rallied strongly this year, in line with our expectations. However, as we highlighted above, we expect supply to put pressure on the Hong Kong subdebt segment. Across CINDBK’s bond complex, we believe the CINDBK 7.25 perps’ ‘19s are most vulnerable to spread widening on the back of potential T1 issuance by Chinese banks, as it is currently the only USD Basel III T1 bond outstanding in Asia. On the fundamentals front, similar to the trend seen across its peers, CINDBK reported strong 1H14 results. Its NIM improved c.6bp h/h supported by higher interbank loan yields, while loan growth was robust at 8% h/h (18% y/y). Its capital ratios were also healthy, with a CET1 CAR of c.10.2%. However, as we discussed above, we believe the operating environment for Hong Kong banks is more challenging in 2H14, and we expect CINDBK’s profit growth momentum to moderate. In addition, CINDBK’s asset quality is also showing an uptick in stress. Gross impaired loans increased c.13% h/h, driven by the bank’s Hong Kong and China loan portfolios. That said, its overall gross impaired loan ratio was still low at c.0.3%. India – Large banks still offer value Indian banks were the top performers in August among Asian banks, with an excess return of c.37bp. This outperformance follows the weak performance in July. The recent judicial actions on the coal sector and headlines on improper lending at some Indian state-owned banks could lead to an increase in NPLs. However, while these events are headline negative, we note that they stem from efforts to improve corporate governance in India – which we view as a medium-term positive for the banks. Consequently, while we suggest a more cautious stance in the near term given the potential for further negative headlines, we believe an overall overweight stance remains appropriate given India’s economic recovery and the structurally positive changes occurring in the country. In addition, we continue to think an eventual revision of S&P’s outlook on the India sovereign to Stable from Negative could be supportive for spreads. We would use any spread widening on the back of negative headlines related to the judicial actions on the coal sector to add exposure to our preferred banks - ICICI, State Bank of India and Axis Bank. Please see Indian banks: Value in larger banks; remain overweight, 13 August 2014 for our views of these banks’ fundamentals. Korea – Tight valuations On the fundamental front, Korean banks generally reported strong 2Q14 results. Preprovision profit was stronger q/q, supported by stable to improved NIMs and healthy loan growth. Asset quality trends were also benign, with gross NPLs declining across most banks. Over the remainder of the year, we expect credit metrics to remain resilient, although we think the August policy rate cut by the Bank of Korea could put some pressure on NIM over the near term. That said, we think net interest income should still hold up on the back of healthy loan growth. Indeed, we think the government’s loosened rules for property loans 10 September 2014 5 Barclays | Asian banks should provide a tailwind for loan growth – ceilings on loan-to-value ratio and debt-toincome ratio have been increased as part of a policy stimulus package announced by the government on 25 July. Notwithstanding the stable outlook for fundamentals, we expect tight valuations and concerns about treasury yields to be a bigger driver of performance for the Korean bank bonds over the next three to six months. In particular, we no longer think the Korean banks’ senior bonds offer value and see little catalysts for outperformance. For reference, the average spread of the Korean bank senior bond complex is currently about 85bp versus the 148bp of its benchmark. In our view, an increase in concerns surrounding a rise in Treasury yields could weigh on performance of tight spread segments in Asia such as Korean banks. In addition, while US investors remain a significant source of demand for Korean bank bonds, we expect this buyer segment to, at best, provide an anchor to spreads in the face of supply, rather than help to drive spreads tighter. Indeed, we note that recent secondary performance of new issues in the Korean bank space has been lacklustre – the KDB 2.5% ‘20s are currently indicated at T+81/78bp versus T+82.5bp at issuance. We also do not expect substantial divergence between the performance of individual Korean banks’ bonds. For example, Kookmin Bank has performed in line with its peers despite negative headlines related to internal management disputes as well as the recent resignation of Kookmin Bank’s CEO. YTD, Kookmin’s senior bonds have posted an excess return of c.184bp compared with c.177bp of all the Korean banks’ senior bonds (Figure 14). Given the above, we downgrade our ratings on Export-Import Bank of Korea, Hana Bank, Industrial Bank of Korea, Kookmin Bank, Korea Development Bank, Shinhan Bank and Woori Bank to Underweight from Market Weight. In our view, tighter-than-benchmark spreads and continued issuance mean that the bias is for these Korean banks to underperform over the next three to six months. Please refer to the appendix for peer comparison tables of the Korean banks and details regarding YTD performance. FIGURE 5 Summary of 2Q14 results Bank Commentary Hana Bank Pre-provision profit increased c.32% q/q and 70% y/y. The sharp improvement was driven by healthy net interest income growth as well as strong gains on disposition and valuation of securities. The growth in net interest income was largely due to the 3bp q/q increase in NIM to 1.5%, as loan growth was muted at c.0.6% q/q. Provisions declined during the quarter, supported by the improvement in asset quality. Gross NPLs declined c.6% q/q and Hana's gross NPL ratio consequently declined c.9bp q/q to 1.33%. Industrial Bank of Korea IBK's 2Q14 results beat market expectations. Core operating trends were generally healthy, with NIM increasing c.4bp q/q and loan growth of 1.5% q/q (c.3.3% year-to-date). Pre-provision profits were down c.9% q/q, but this was largely due to higher one-off items in 1Q14. NPLs picked up slightly q/q, but overall gross NPL ratio was still relatively low at 1.5%. IBK's capital ratios increased sequentially, but its CET1 CAR remained lower than peer at c.8.5%. Kookmin Bank Kookmin's pre-provision profit increased c.8% q/q. In line with its peers, its net interest income and NIM improved q/q (+4bp q/q). Loans grew modestly during the quarter, expanding 1.5% q/q. Gross NPLs declined c.3% q/q and Kookmin's gross NPL ratio consequently declined c.7bp q/q to c.1.75%. Its coverage ratio was broadly stable at c.111%. Its CET1 CAR improved c.29bp q/q to reach c.13.1% at end June 2014. Shinhan Bank Shinhan's pre-provision profit increased c.19% q/q, supported by one-off items related to disposal of securities during the quarter. Net interest income was stable, with reported NIM remaining steady at about 1.77%. Asset quality trends were also benign, with NPLs remaining stable. Shinhan's gross NPL ratio was c.1.1% and its coverage ratio was c.152% at end June 2014. Its capital position remains a strength, with CET1 CAR of c.12.9%. Woori Bank Woori's 2Q14 pre-provision profit expanded 33% q/q, supported by stronger revenues during the quarter. The trend in its NIM was slightly weaker than its peers, with NIM declining 2bp q/q to c.1.59%. Gross NPLs declined c.6% q/q and Woori's gross NPL ratio decreased c.19bp q/q to c.2.51%. Its coverage ratio improved sequentially but remained lower-than-peer at c.88%. Its capital position was healthy, with CET1 CAR at c.11.4%. Source: Barclays Research 10 September 2014 6 Barclays | Asian banks Malaysia – Supply expected to remain opportunistic Our Market Weight rating on Maybank is driven by our view that spreads will remain supported by the scarcity value of Malaysian bank paper. While we expect some pick up in supply from these banks, we believe supply will remain largely opportunistic in nature. Our view is supported by the banks continued access to the onshore market, a trend we expect to continue. We note that Maybank recently obtained approval from the Securities Commission Malaysia and Bank Negara Malaysia to set up its proposed MYR10bn Basel III T1 programme. In the USD bond space, CIMB Bank could be a potential issuer as Moody’s recently assigned ratings to the bank’s proposed USD5bn Euro MTN programme. Overall, Malaysian banks’ 2Q14 results were credit-neutral. Asset quality trends are still relatively benign while capital ratios remained healthy. That said, revenue growth is under pressure given the slowdown in domestic loan growth. We note that Maybank downgraded guidance for its 2014 domestic loan growth to 9-10% from 12% at its 2Q14 results briefing. NIMs are also under pressure, with competition for deposits remaining intense. With Malaysia’s loan-to-deposit ratio ticking up, we expect deposit competition will remain in place over the remainder of the year. In addition, we think the more geographically diversified financial groups, such as Maybank, will continue to see asset quality pressure in their Indonesian loan portfolios. Over the medium term, more consolidation in the banking system, assuming a successful CIMB-RHB merger, would be positive for the sector, although competition among the smaller players could intensify further. Singapore – Move down the capital structure Our Market Weight ratings on the Singapore banks reflect our view that their senior bonds are rich, given tight valuations and the potential for a pick-up in senior supply. In our view, senior/covered bond issuance by the Singaporean banks is possible given the rise in loanto-deposit ratios, particularly at UOB. In addition, while overall credit metrics at the three banks remain sound, we note that an eventual rise in interest rates as well as moderating domestic property prices could put some pressure on fundamentals in due course. At the same time, our Market Weight ratings are underpinned by our view that the Basel III T2 bonds of the banks are attractive, offering a decent pick-up over the senior bonds. While we think DBS could be a potential T2 bond issuer, we think any supply from the bank would be well-absorbed and is unlikely to drive spreads in the Singaporean Tier 2 bond complex materially wider. In addition, ratings pressure on OCBC has eased following its announcement of a SGD3.3bn equity raise as well as the potential sale of its stake in United Engineers Limited. Both Moody’s and Fitch have revised the outlook on OCBC back to Stable following the news of its equity raise. Please see Singaporean banks - Neutral 2Q14 results; buy Basel III callable bonds, 5 August 2014 and OCBC - Announces plan to raise SGD3.3bn in equity, 18 August 2014 for more details. Thailand – Valuations reflect improved fundamental outlook Our decision to maintain our Underweight rating on Bangkok Bank (BBL) was a close call. On a fundamental basis, the 2Q14 results of BBL and the other banks were resilient despite the challenging operating environment during the quarter. Indeed, BBL’s 2Q14 preprovision profit was stable, supported by healthy net interest income growth. BBL’s NIM increased c.14bp q/q to c.2.44%, driven by maturities of high cost fixed deposits during the quarter. Its gross NPLs were broadly stable during the quarter and its gross NPL ratio was relatively low at c.2.3%. 10 September 2014 7 Barclays | Asian banks With political stability resuming in Thailand and our economist expecting a modest growth recovery in 2H14 and into 2015, we think the outlook for banks’ fundamentals has improved. Indeed, the banks themselves appear more optimistic and expect a pick up in loan growth. Asset quality risks have also abated given the economic recovery, although a further uptick in NPLs cannot be ruled out in our view. However, we believe the improvement in the outlook for fundamentals is already largely reflected in current valuations. Since the military coup in late May, Thai senior bonds have rallied strongly and are currently trading about 10bp tighter than their benchmark. For reference, Thai seniors were trading 16bp wider than their benchmark at end May. Consequently, with bond issuance likely to pick up with the return of political stability, we think the bias is for Thai banks’ senior spreads to trend wider, or at best remain stable. Across the Thai bank complex, we see value in going down the capital structure to pick up spread. Recent local media reports (Nation, Bangkok Post) have said that onshore retail investors will be allowed to buy Basel III T2 bonds, which we think will increase the likelihood of T2 issuance onshore – and provide positive technical support for the KTB ‘24c19s. FIGURE 6 Thai banks are trading tighter than benchmark FIGURE 7 KTB 24c19s still offer decent pick-up to its senior bonds Thai banks EM Asia HG Index Differential (RHS) OAS (bp) 220 KTB 2.25 18 OAS (bp) 25 20 200 15 180 10 5 160 0 350 300 250 200 -5 Source: Barclays Live 10 September 2014 04-Sep-14 21-Aug-14 100 07-Aug-14 Sep-14 Aug-14 Jul-14 Jun-14 May-14 Apr-14 Mar-14 Feb-14 Jan-14 -20 24-Jul-14 -15 100 150 10-Jul-14 -10 120 26-Jun-14 140 KTB 5.2 24c19 Source: Barclays Live 8 Barclays | Asian banks FUNDAMENTAL THEMES Fundamentals still stable; but rising headwinds On the whole, the fundamentals of Asian banks (excluding India) have been fairly resilient this year. While loan growth rates have moderated, we think it remains at levels sufficient to support healthy revenue growth. Meanwhile, asset quality trends have been broadly benign, notwithstanding idiosyncratic spots of weaknesses. Consequently, credit costs have remained at multi-year lows across the region, supporting banks’ bottomline growth. Over the remainder of the year, with the economic recovery expected to continue in Asia, we expect banks’ fundamentals to remain broadly stable. However, across the region, we believe pressure on margins will remain a key theme. As we discuss below, we think tighter liquidity as well as impending Basel III liquidity rules will drive funding costs higher. Consequently, momentum in revenue growth could slow further, although we expect still low credit costs to support net profit growth. We expect capital ratios to remain broadly stable to slightly higher. As we had anticipated at the start of the year, capital management has been and will continue to be a major focus of the Asian banks. In addition to the expected issuance of preference shares by Chinese banks, we have seen greater focus on risk-weight management (eg Bank of China (Hong Kong)) and increased optimization of capital structures (eg OCBC, Bank of India). Notwithstanding our stable outlook for fundamentals, we think China’s fragile economic recovery poses downside risk for the region. A weaker-than-anticipated recovery could have negative knock-on impact on growth in Asia, and consequently banks’ revenue growth and asset quality. In such a scenario, away from the Chinese banks, we think the Hong Kong and Singaporean banks would clearly be the most affected given their growing China exposure. Indeed, Hong Kong banks have already seen their China-related impaired loans creeping up, although they remain at low levels relative to the size of their total loan portfolios. In addition to the risks from China’s recovery, we expect investors to increasingly focus on the impact of potentially higher rates on banks’ asset quality, especially given the build-up in household leverage in most banking systems over the past few years. FIGURE 8 Chinese banks’ NPLs are rising… FIGURE 9 …as are NPLs in Hong Kong banks’ China portfolios CNY mn HKD mn 120,000 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 BOC CCB Dec-13 Source: Banks 10 September 2014 AGRBK ICBC BOCHK BEA Jun-14 Dec-13 Jun-14 Source: Banks 9 Barclays | Asian banks Focus on liquidity to increase Liquidity across most banking systems in Asia has continued to tighten this year, as seen by the rise in loan-to-deposit ratios. The rise has been most stark in Singapore, where the system-wide LDR reached a high of c.111% at the end of June 2014. Even on a DBU-basis, Singapore’s loan-to-deposit ratio was c.112%. While we believe the tightness in liquidity is probably more acute at the foreign banks, we note that the local banks have also posted rising SGD loan-to-deposit ratios. Indeed, UOB’s SGD LDR was c.100% at end-June 2014. While LDRs in the rest of Asia have not reached the levels of that seen in Singapore, a rising trend has also been seen in Malaysia, Thailand, Hong Kong and Indonesia. Overall, we think liquidity will likely remain tight over the next six months, especially as we approach the end of QE by the US Federal Reserve. However, the recent easing by the European Central Bank should provide some counterbalance to moves by the Fed. Singapore and Hong Kong could also see some reprieve in liquidity pressure in the nearterm as we believe a looser monetary stance in China should reduce the offshore lending opportunities for banks, resulting in a slower pace of loan growth. Our China economist expects two interest rate cuts by the PBoC in 2H14 and believes that lowering medium-term interest rates/financing costs in the economy is a top priority for China’s central bank. As the deadline for implementation of Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio approaches, we expect banks’ focus on liquidity management to also increase. Consequently, we believe the competition for deposits will remain intense, particularly given the moderation in deposit growth across most systems. SG Source: Central banks, Barclays Research TH MY May-14 Jan-14 Mar-14 Sep-13 Nov-13 Jul-13 Mar-13 May-13 Jan-13 Nov-12 Sep-12 Jul-12 Jan-12 Mar-14 May-14 Jan-14 Sep-13 60% Nov-13 90% Jul-13 65% May-13 95% Mar-13 70% Jan-13 100% Nov-12 75% Jul-12 105% Sep-12 80% May-12 110% Jan-12 85% Mar-12 115% May-12 FIGURE 11 Loan to deposit ratios in Malaysia and Hong Kong Mar-12 FIGURE 10 Loan to deposit ratios in Singapore and Thailand HK Source: Central banks, Barclays Research Headlines surrounding M&A likely to continue Following OCBC’s successful acquisition of Wing Hang Bank, we think headlines surrounding consolidation in Hong Kong should ease for now. However, we expect consolidation to remain a major topic in Malaysia, Indonesia and India. In Malaysia, there have been little further details regarding the proposed merger between CIMB and RHB. However, a successful merger between the two could change the banking landscape in the country and raises questions about how Maybank would respond. In India and Indonesia, given the political sensitivities involved, we believe any progress on consolidation will take time and is unlikely to happen in the near-term. In India, we believe 10 September 2014 10 Barclays | Asian banks consolidation is more likely to begin with State Bank of India and its associate banks. While there have been media reports commenting on the possibility of mergers between the small banks (ie, IDBI and United Bank of India, Economic Times, 26 July 2014), we think such mergers would be challenging given the capital constraints faced by most of the smaller stateowned banks in India. Nonetheless, we think any progress on the consolidation front would be positive for India and Indonesia as fragmentation in these systems would be reduced. 10 September 2014 11 Barclays | Asian banks APPENDIX FIGURE 12 Peer comparison of Korean banks Kookmin KRW bn Shinhan Hana Woori IBK 1Q14 2Q14 1Q14 2Q14 1Q14 2Q14 1Q14 2Q14 1Q14 2Q14 Net interest income 1,209 1,242 1,083 1,090 614 644 1,066 1,082 1,081 1,114 Pre-provision profit 545 585 591 703 330 435 405 538 707 641 Provisions 222 242 57 194 108 89 30 225 263 262 Net profit 258 288 425 417 297 272 305 221 327 293 Profitability Provisions/pre-provision profit NIM 41% 41% 10% 28% 33% 21% 7% 42% 37% 41% 1.78% 1.82% 1.77% 1.77% 1.47% 1.50% 1.61% 1.59% 1.92% 1.96% 3,687 3,576 2,008 2,001 1,790 1,680 4,906 4,607 2,295 2,419 Asset quality NPLs NPL ratio 1.8% 1.7% 1.1% 1.1% 1.4% 1.3% 2.7% 2.5% 1.5% 1.5% Coverage ratio 111% 111% 147% 152% 119% 119% 84% 88% 161% 155% 12.8% 13.1% 12.8% 12.9% 10.6% 10.8% 11.3% 11.4% 8.2% 8.5% Capital CET1 CAR T1 CAR 12.8% 13.1% 14.1% 13.7% 10.6% 10.8% 12.8% 12.8% 9.0% 9.3% Total CAR 15.4% 15.6% 16.3% 15.9% 13.5% 13.7% 15.4% 16.2% 12.0% 12.2% 97.7% 98.5% 98.0% 98.2% 98.8% 98.7% 97.8% 97.9% NA NA Funding KRW LDR Source: Banks, Barclays Research FIGURE 13 OAS of Korean banks - senior Total Kookmin Kexim Hana IBK KDB Shinhan Woori Dec-13 116 132 104 132 102 108 118 125 Jan-14 108 119 103 111 93 101 112 109 Feb-14 91 97 84 105 82 78 107 104 Mar-14 79 89 73 88 71 69 99 97 Apr-14 86 76 79 93 78 78 104 105 May-14 82 76 75 88 75 74 89 97 Jun-14 83 76 77 87 76 77 91 98 Jul-14 80 71 77 85 75 73 89 99 Aug-14 84 80 81 89 75 78 89 100 Note: Data as at 5 Sept. Source: Barclays Live 10 September 2014 12 Barclays | Asian banks FIGURE 14 Year to date excess return by bank Excess Return (bp) Hana KEB Kexim Kookmin KDB Shinhan Woori IBK 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Note: Data as at 5 Sept. Source: Barclays Live 10 September 2014 13 Analyst Certification I, Lyris Koh, CFA, hereby certify (1) that the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect my personal views about any or all of the subject securities or issuers referred to in this research report and (2) no part of my compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this research report. Important Disclosures: Barclays Research is a part of the Corporate and Investment Banking division of Barclays Bank PLC and its affiliates (collectively and each individually, "Barclays"). For current important disclosures regarding companies that are the subject of this research report, please send a written request to: Barclays Research Compliance, 745 Seventh Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10019 or refer to http://publicresearch.barclays.com or call 212-526-1072. Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that Barclays may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Barclays Capital Inc. and/or one of its affiliates regularly trades, generally deals as principal and generally provides liquidity (as market maker or otherwise) in the debt securities that are the subject of this research report (and related derivatives thereof). Barclays trading desks may have either a long and/or short position in such securities, other financial instruments and/or derivatives, which may pose a conflict with the interests of investing customers. Where permitted and subject to appropriate information barrier restrictions, Barclays fixed income research analysts regularly interact with its trading desk personnel regarding current market conditions and prices. Barclays fixed income research analysts receive compensation based on various factors including, but not limited to, the quality of their work, the overall performance of the firm (including the profitability of the investment banking department), the profitability and revenues of the Fixed Income, Currencies and Commodities Division and the potential interest of the firm’s investing clients in research with respect to the asset class covered by the analyst. To the extent that any historical pricing information was obtained from Barclays trading desks, the firm makes no representation that it is accurate or complete. All levels, prices and spreads are historical and do not represent current market levels, prices or spreads, some or all of which may have changed since the publication of this document. Barclays produces various types of research including, but not limited to, fundamental analysis, equity-linked analysis, quantitative analysis, and trade ideas. Recommendations contained in one type of research may differ from recommendations contained in other types of research, whether as a result of differing time horizons, methodologies, or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, Barclays trade ideas are provided as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice due to changes in prices. In order to access Barclays Statement regarding Research Dissemination Policies and Procedures, please refer to https://live.barcap.com/publiccp/RSR/nyfipubs/disclaimer/disclaimer-research-dissemination.html. In order to access Barclays Research Conflict Management Policy Statement, please refer to: http://group.barclays.com/corporates-and-institutions/research/research-policy. Explanation of the Barclays Research High Grade Sector Weighting System Overweight: Expected six-month excess return of the sector exceeds the six-month expected excess return of the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, the PanEuropean Credit Index, or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index, as applicable. Market Weight: Expected six-month excess return of the sector is in line with the six-month expected excess return of the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, the Pan-European Credit Index, or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index, as applicable. Underweight: Expected six-month excess return of the sector is below the six-month expected excess return of the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, the PanEuropean Credit Index, or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index, as applicable. Explanation of the Barclays Research High Grade Credit Rating System The High Grade Credit rating system is based on the analyst's view of the expected excess returns over a six-month period of the issuer's index-eligible corporate debt securities relative to the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, the Pan-European Credit Index or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index, as applicable. Overweight: The analyst expects the issuer's index-eligible corporate bonds to provide positive excess returns relative to the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, the Pan-European Credit Index, or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index over the next six months. Market Weight: The analyst expects the issuer's index-eligible corporate bonds to provide excess returns in line with the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, the Pan-European Credit Index, or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index over the next six months. Underweight: The analyst expects the issuer's index-eligible corporate bonds to provide negative excess returns relative to the Barclays U.S. Credit Index, the Pan-European Credit Index, or the EM Asia USD High Grade Credit Index over the next six months. Rating Suspended (RS): The rating has been suspended temporarily due to market events that make coverage impracticable or to comply with applicable regulations and/or firm policies in certain circumstances including where the Corporate and Investment Banking division of Barclays is acting in an advisory capacity in a merger or strategic transaction involving the company. Coverage Suspended (CS): Coverage of this issuer has been temporarily suspended. Not Rated (NR): An issuer which has not been assigned a formal rating. For Australia issuers, the ratings are relative to the Barclays U.S. Credit Index or Pan-European Credit Index, as applicable. Disclaimer: This publication has been prepared by the Corporate and Investment Banking division of Barclays Bank PLC and/or one or more of its affiliates (collectively and each individually, "Barclays"). It has been issued by one or more Barclays legal entities within its Corporate and Investment Banking division as provided below. It is provided to our clients for information purposes only, and Barclays makes no express or implied warranties, and expressly disclaims all warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use with respect to any data included in this publication. Barclays will not treat unauthorized recipients of this report as its clients. Prices shown are indicative and Barclays is not offering to buy or sell or soliciting offers to buy or sell any financial instrument. Without limiting any of the foregoing and to the extent permitted by law, in no event shall Barclays, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees have any liability for (a) any special, punitive, indirect, or consequential damages; or (b) any lost profits, lost revenue, loss of anticipated savings or loss of opportunity or other financial loss, even if notified of the possibility of such damages, arising from any use of this publication or its contents. Other than disclosures relating to Barclays, the information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources that Barclays Research believes to be reliable, but Barclays does not represent or warrant that it is accurate or complete. Barclays is not responsible for, and makes no warranties whatsoever as to, the content of any third-party web site accessed via a hyperlink in this publication and such information is not incorporated by reference. The views in this publication are those of the author(s) and are subject to change, and Barclays has no obligation to update its opinions or the information in this publication. The analyst recommendations in this publication reflect solely and exclusively those of the author(s), and such opinions were prepared independently of any other interests, including those of Barclays and/or its affiliates. This publication does not constitute personal investment advice or take into account the individual financial circumstances or objectives of the clients who receive it. The securities discussed herein may not be suitable for all investors. Barclays recommends that investors independently evaluate each issuer, security or instrument discussed herein and consult any independent advisors they believe necessary. The value of and income from any investment may fluctuate from day to day as a result of changes in relevant economic markets (including changes in market liquidity). The information herein is not intended to predict actual results, which may differ substantially from those reflected. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. This material has been issued and approved for distribution in the UK and European Economic Area (“EEA”) by Barclays Bank PLC. It is being made available primarily to persons who are investment professionals as that term is defined in Article 19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005. It is directed at, and therefore should only be relied upon by, persons who have professional experience in matters relating to investments. The investments to which it relates are available only to such persons and will be entered into only with such persons. Barclays Bank PLC is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority and is a member of the London Stock Exchange. The Corporate and Investment Banking division of Barclays undertakes U.S. securities business in the name of its wholly owned subsidiary Barclays Capital Inc., a FINRA and SIPC member. Barclays Capital Inc., a U.S. registered broker/dealer, is distributing this material in the United States and, in connection therewith accepts responsibility for its contents. Any U.S. person wishing to effect a transaction in any security discussed herein should do so only by contacting a representative of Barclays Capital Inc. in the U.S. at 745 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10019. Non-U.S. persons should contact and execute transactions through a Barclays Bank PLC branch or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless local regulations permit otherwise. Barclays Bank PLC, Paris Branch (registered in France under Paris RCS number 381 066 281) is regulated by the Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel. Registered office 34/36 Avenue de Friedland 75008 Paris. This material is distributed in Canada by Barclays Capital Canada Inc., a registered investment dealer and member of IIROC (www.iiroc.ca). Subject to the conditions of this publication as set out above, the Corporate & Investment Banking Division of Absa Bank Limited, an authorised financial services provider (Registration No.: 1986/004794/06. Registered Credit Provider Reg No NCRCP7), is distributing this material in South Africa. Absa Bank Limited is regulated by the South African Reserve Bank. This publication is not, nor is it intended to be, advice as defined and/or contemplated in the (South African) Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 37 of 2002, or any other financial, investment, trading, tax, legal, accounting, retirement, actuarial or other professional advice or service whatsoever. Any South African person or entity wishing to effect a transaction in any security discussed herein should do so only by contacting a representative of the Corporate & Investment Banking Division of Absa Bank Limited in South Africa, 15 Alice Lane, Sandton, Johannesburg, Gauteng 2196. Absa Bank Limited is a member of the Barclays group. In Japan, foreign exchange research reports are prepared and distributed by Barclays Bank PLC Tokyo Branch. Other research reports are distributed to institutional investors in Japan by Barclays Securities Japan Limited. Barclays Securities Japan Limited is a joint-stock company incorporated in Japan with registered office of 6-10-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6131, Japan. It is a subsidiary of Barclays Bank PLC and a registered financial instruments firm regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan. Registered Number: Kanto Zaimukyokucho (kinsho) No. 143. Barclays Bank PLC, Hong Kong Branch is distributing this material in Hong Kong as an authorised institution regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. Registered Office: 41/F, Cheung Kong Center, 2 Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong. Information on securities/instruments that trade in Taiwan or written by a Taiwan-based research analyst is distributed by Barclays Capital Securities Taiwan Limited to its clients. The material on securities/instruments not traded in Taiwan is not to be construed as 'recommendation' in Taiwan. Barclays Capital Securities Taiwan Limited does not accept orders from clients to trade in such securities. This material may not be distributed to the public media or used by the public media without prior written consent of Barclays. This material is distributed in South Korea by Barclays Capital Securities Limited, Seoul Branch. All equity research material is distributed in India by Barclays Securities (India) Private Limited (SEBI Registration No: INB/INF 231292732 (NSE), INB/INF 011292738 (BSE) | Corporate Identification Number: U67120MH2006PTC161063 | Registered Office: 208 | Ceejay House | Dr. Annie Besant Road | Shivsagar Estate | Worli | Mumbai - 400 018 | India, Phone: + 91 22 67196363). Other research reports are distributed in India by Barclays Bank PLC, India Branch. Barclays Bank PLC Frankfurt Branch distributes this material in Germany under the supervision of Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin). This material is distributed in Malaysia by Barclays Capital Markets Malaysia Sdn Bhd. This material is distributed in Brazil by Banco Barclays S.A. This material is distributed in Mexico by Barclays Bank Mexico, S.A. Barclays Bank PLC in the Dubai International Financial Centre (Registered No. 0060) is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). Principal place of business in the Dubai International Financial Centre: The Gate Village, Building 4, Level 4, PO Box 506504, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Barclays Bank PLC-DIFC Branch, may only undertake the financial services activities that fall within the scope of its existing DFSA licence. Related financial products or services are only available to Professional Clients, as defined by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Barclays Bank PLC in the UAE is regulated by the Central Bank of the UAE and is licensed to conduct business activities as a branch of a commercial bank incorporated outside the UAE in Dubai (Licence No.: 13/1844/2008, Registered Office: Building No. 6, Burj Dubai Business Hub, Sheikh Zayed Road, Dubai City) and Abu Dhabi (Licence No.: 13/952/2008, Registered Office: Al Jazira Towers, Hamdan Street, PO Box 2734, Abu Dhabi). Barclays Bank PLC in the Qatar Financial Centre (Registered No. 00018) is authorised by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority (QFCRA). Barclays Bank PLC-QFC Branch may only undertake the regulated activities that fall within the scope of its existing QFCRA licence. Principal place of business in Qatar: Qatar Financial Centre, Office 1002, 10th Floor, QFC Tower, Diplomatic Area, West Bay, PO Box 15891, Doha, Qatar. Related financial products or services are only available to Business Customers as defined by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority. This material is distributed in the UAE (including the Dubai International Financial Centre) and Qatar by Barclays Bank PLC. This material is distributed in Saudi Arabia by Barclays Saudi Arabia ('BSA'). It is not the intention of the publication to be used or deemed as recommendation, option or advice for any action(s) that may take place in future. Barclays Saudi Arabia is a Closed Joint Stock Company, (CMA License No. 09141-37). Registered office Al Faisaliah Tower, Level 18, Riyadh 11311, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Authorised and regulated by the Capital Market Authority, Commercial Registration Number: 1010283024. This material is distributed in Russia by OOO Barclays Capital, affiliated company of Barclays Bank PLC, registered and regulated in Russia by the FSFM. Broker License #177-11850-100000; Dealer License #177-11855-010000. Registered address in Russia: 125047 Moscow, 1st Tverskaya-Yamskaya str. 21. This material is distributed in Singapore by the Singapore branch of Barclays Bank PLC, a bank licensed in Singapore by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. For matters in connection with this report, recipients in Singapore may contact the Singapore branch of Barclays Bank PLC, whose registered address is One Raffles Quay Level 28, South Tower, Singapore 048583. Barclays Bank PLC, Australia Branch (ARBN 062 449 585, AFSL 246617) is distributing this material in Australia. It is directed at 'wholesale clients' as defined by Australian Corporations Act 2001. IRS Circular 230 Prepared Materials Disclaimer: Barclays does not provide tax advice and nothing contained herein should be construed to be tax advice. Please be advised that any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained herein (including any attachments) (i) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax-related penalties; and (ii) was written to support the promotion or marketing of the transactions or other matters addressed herein. Accordingly, you should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. © Copyright Barclays Bank PLC (2014). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or redistributed in any manner without the prior written permission of Barclays. Barclays Bank PLC is registered in England No. 1026167. Registered office 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP. Additional information regarding this publication will be furnished upon request. AS7614
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc