North Central LRT Route Planning Study Update SPC on Transportation & Transit 2014 March 12 Previous Council Direction • 2012: North Central Light Rail Transit Planning (TT2012-06) – Identified transit network and operational issues with Nose Creek Valley alignment – Public support for investigating LRT alignment within North Central communities – Conduct a route planning study for the North Central LRT – Report back no later than the end of 2014 Project Background • 1967: Early documents showing a North LRT line connecting downtown and communities north • 1980s: Nose Creek Valley alignment identified • 2009: Calgary Transportation Plan and Municipal Development Plan updated • 2011: Community support Project Background • Urban low-floor LRT vehicles • Integrate with communities • Lighter infrastructure • Connect with SE LRT Project Background • Consultant team: Stantec, Steer Davies Gleave, Context • Phase one of the study, currently underway, will identify: – A route for North Central LRT; – Station locations and amenities (e.g. opportunities for transit oriented development, bus terminals, park and ride lots); – Bus, bus rapid transit and LRT network connections, including a possible connection to the future Southeast LRT Project Background – LRT vehicle technology and right of way concepts (elevated, instreet, segregated right of way); – Ridership and traffic projections; and – Projected high level costs and land implications. Project Background • Phase two of the study, to be completed in 2015-2016: – more detailed planning of the required infrastructure – land requirements – project costs • Extensive public engagement will also be undertaken as part of phase two. Project Governance • Calgary Transit with stakeholders from a wide variety of business units form the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) • North Central LRT Community Advisory Group (CAG) • Variety of community members and stakeholder groups Public Engagement and Input • Interactive open houses held in 2013 June – 675 participants at three events along the North Central corridor – Activities built on the public input from 2011 – Input from participants helped the project team to identify important characteristics of the communities, develop the evaluation criteria – 4 Street NW included in evaluation as a result of participant input Public Engagement and Input • One interactive workshop held in late 2013 July – Groups identified locations in their community that are important to them and destinations where they travel – Exercise to try and fit various elements in a constrained right-of-way – Provided input to the draft vision and evaluation criteria Public Engagement and Input • In the Fall of 2013 and during election period the team focused on technical analysis • Continued to hold events with City staff, including a workshop to determine the principles for rapid transit in the Centre City Public Engagement and Input • Utilizing an online engagement tool called PlaceSpeak Sustainability Approach • First large transit infrastructure project to adopt The City’s sustainability approach to decision making • Based on The City’s 2020 Sustainability Direction • Public and stakeholder input informs the process 2020 Sustainability Direction Economy Sustainable Corporation Sustainable Environment Sustainability Direction Financial Capacity Community Well-being Smart Growth & Mobility Project Vision A transit service that improves mobility in existing communities in North Central Calgary, connecting people and places, and enhancing the quality of life in the city Community Principles • Enhance connectivity between people and places, connecting to all modes of transportation in the community; • Contribute positively to community development and revitalization; • Be the affordable transportation mode; Community Principles • Be accessible for people to get to, board and use; • Contribute to the character and cohesion of the community through integrated design with no barriers to accessibility; • Contribute to an efficient traffic management system that promotes the optimal transportation choice, and reduces congestion and travel times; • Contribute to the vitality of businesses in the community by promoting business development and access; Community Principles • Enhance the environment by reducing greenhouse gases (GHG), protecting natural areas and urban beautification; • Create a positive transportation experience - safe, accessible, efficient; and • Contribute to complete streets including landscaping, urban form, pedestrian and cycling systems. Evaluation Criteria • Capital Financial Capacity/Sustainable Corporation • Community Well-being • Prosperous Economy • Transportation Evaluation Criteria • Urban Development/Urban Realm • Sustainable Environment • Deliverability Alignment Options •Nose Creek Valley •Edmonton Trail NE •Centre Street North •4 Street NW Alignment Options • North of Beddington Trail right-of-way is determined and available • Between 96 Avenue North and 16 Avenue North alignment analyzed • South of 16 Avenue North, into downtown Alignment Options – Central Section (Beddington Trail to 16 Avenue North) • Public engagement, evaluation criteria, technical analysis • Performed ‘high-level’ multiple account evaluation (MAE) on the four alignment options • Study area bounded by Deerfoot Trail, Nose Hill Park, 16 Avenue North, up to Stoney Trail Alignment Options – Central Section (96 Avenue North to 16 Avenue North) • Underground, elevated and at-grade (ground level) – 10 possible alignments in total • Evaluation criteria based on public input, 2020 Sustainability Direction, project vision and project objectives • Evaluation criteria informed and endorsed by various stakeholders Alignment Options – Central Section (96 Avenue North to 16 Avenue North) • Centre Street North at-grade and Edmonton Trail NE at-grade alignments performed better than other alignments based on the evaluation • Nose Creek Valley and 4 Street NW alignments eliminated from further analysis • Does not preclude tunneled and elevated sections Alignment Options – Central Section (96 Avenue North to 16 Avenue North) • Next steps – Currently undertaking detailed evaluation of the two remaining alignments • Refined capital costs • Transit-oriented development opportunities • Right-of-way constraints • Land requirements • Traffic and transit operations Alignment Options – South Section (16 Avenue North to Centre City) • Previous studies indicated North Central LRT would utilize 7 Avenue S transitway • SE LRT approved alignment • River crossing • Light rail and heavy rail crossings • Constrained right-of-way Alignment Options – South Section (16 Avenue North to Centre City) • 18 possible alignments developed for Centre City – needed to focus the analysis • Engaged the NC LRT Technical Advisory Committee in a workshop to develop goals for rapid transit in the Centre City Alignment Options – South Section (16 Avenue North to Centre City) • Round 1 – 18 possible alignments analyzed using multiple account evaluation (MAE) • Round 2 – Seven possible alignments analyzed using MAE – Two preferred alignments presented today – Further analysis required Two Preferred Alignments Draft concept for discussion Next Steps • Central section (96 Avenue N to 16 Avenue N) – Centre Street N and Edmonton Trail NE at-grade alignments • South section (16 Avenue N to Centre City) – Two alignments presented today are at the top of the technical analysis, but other alignments are still being considered – Public engagement events in Centre City to inform further analysis Next Steps • Nose Creek Valley and 4 Street NW alignments are eliminated from further analysis • Public engagement – Centre City event in March – Open houses and interactive workshops in April/May – Open houses and stakeholder events in September to present recommendations Next Steps • Continue to engage with Calgarians and Council • Return with recommendation for North Central LRT alignment in 2014 December
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc