An Analysis of Corrosion Performance for a variety of

An Analysis of Corrosion
Performance for a variety of
Substrates and Coatings
David A. Smith, Marty Higgins,
Gary Barone
Restek Corporation
Dr. Bruce Kendall
Elvac Laboratories
Base Material Cost Comparison
3000
250
2500
200
2000
1500
$USD
$USD
150
1/4" Tee
100' 1/4" Tubing
100
1000
50
500
0
0
316 SS
HP Alloy
1
Outline
ƒ Cost vs. effective solution (coatings)
ƒ Coating process
ƒ Coating data
ƒ Corrosion resistance data
ƒ Water/drydown performance
ƒ Other Applications
Chemical Vapor Deposition Process
ƒ Thermal decomposition of silanes
ƒ Amorphous silicon deposition
ƒ Functionalization of surface if desired
ƒ Process
ƒSurface preparation (caustic, aqueous)
ƒ Vacuum
ƒ 400º
400ºC
ƒ Applied in vessel or oven chamber
ƒ Total 3D coverage, not line-of-sight
ƒ Tubing, fittings, frits, fine structure
2
Coating Cross Section
Silcosteel GD-OES Depth Profile
3
Secondary Enhancements
ƒ Amorphous silicon deposition
ƒ Up to 20um in depth
ƒ Multiple layers to eliminate pinpin-holes
ƒ Enhances corrosion resistance
ƒ Additional organic functionalization
possible
ƒ Decrease of pinpin-holes
ƒ Improving surface inertness
Patented Functionalization
amorphous silicon
(a-Si)
FS Capillary
FS Capillary
4
Coating
Appearances
Coating Appearances (cont.)
5
Corrosion Resistance
ƒ Stainless steel surfaces susceptible to
attack from hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid
and nitric acid
ƒ Is it possible to Enhance Corrosion
resistance by deposition of an amorphous
silicon layer?
ƒ Silicon is insoluble in hydrochloric acid,
sulfuric acid and nitric acid
6M HCl Data
Tubing Type
Average
Weight loss (g)
Mpy corrosion /
Standard dev.
316 welded
0.3085
29.94 / 0.98
CR 316 welded
0.0492
4.76 / 4.45
1.9
EP 316 seamless
0.1669
15.57 / 1.09
1.0
CR EP 316
0.0019
0.17 / 0.06
97.2
CR/Func
CR/Func.. EP 316
0.0031
0.29 / 0.03
54.6
HP Alloy
0.0075
0.67 / 0.05
23.2
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Enhancement
72 hr exposure, agitation every 8hrs
22º
22ºC
n=3 for each
6
Corrosion Resistant Data (cont.)
ƒ External Evaluation
ƒ Certified corrosion
engineers
ƒ Spectroscopic
analysis
ƒ Pitting corrosion
ƒ Electrochemical
Cyclic Polarization in neutral, acidic, alkaline
ƒ Atmospheric corrosion
ƒ ASTM moisture condensation
ƒ Salt spray ASTM B117
ƒ Stress corrosion cracking (MgCl2; ASTM G36)
Corrosion Data
ASTM G45 Method B
ƒ ASTM G45 method B; Pitting and Crevice
Corrosion
ƒ 6% Ferric Chloride solution
ƒ 72hrs, 20º
20ºC
ƒ Gasket wrap
Sample
Initial
Weight (g)
Final
Weight (g)
Weight
Loss (g)
Weight Loss
(g/m2)
aSi Coated Sample 17
10.4105
10.3710
0.0395
19
aSi Coated Sample 28
10.1256
10.0743
0.0513
25
aSi Coated Sample 47
10.1263
10.0742
0.0521
25
Bare Sample 27
10.0444
9.5655
0.4789
231
Bare Sample 34
10.1265
9.6923
0.4342
209
Bare Sample 37
10.1007
9.6276
0.4731
228
7
ASTM G45 B (cont.)
ƒ Bare 316L Stainless Steel coupon
showing severe crevice corrosion
ASTM G45 B (cont.)
ƒ Corrosion resistant treated sample
showing no crevice corrosion only slight
pitting corrosion
8
Corrosion Data
ASTM G61
ƒ ASTM GG-61; Cyclic Polarization Electrochemical
Corrosion Testing
ƒ Acid, neutral, basic aqueous solutions with varying Cl- ion
concentrations (100, 3000, 5000ppm)
ƒ EG&G VersaStat System, 23º
23ºC
ƒ 316L vs. Silcosteel®-CR on 316L, 304L
Neutral solution;
3000ppm Cl-
-CR vs 316L Raw:
50x improvement
Sample
Ec, mV
Ic, uA/cm^2
Eb, mV
CR, mpy
316 L
-418
0.096
370
0.04
aSi Coated 316 L
-533
0.002
1460
0.0009
304 L
-435
0.145
361
0.06
Ec = corrosion potential
Ic = current density at Ec
Eb = pitting potential
CR = corrosion rate
ASTM G61 (cont.)
Acidic Solution; 1N H2SO4;
3000ppm Cl-
-CR vs 316L Raw:
10x improvement
Sample
Ec, mV
Ic, uA/cm^2
Eb, mV
CR, mpy
316 L
-662
1.920
370
0.83
aSi Coated 316 L
-843
0.123
927
0.05
304 L
-639
2.650
587
1.14
9
Corrosion Data
ASTM B117
ƒ ASTM B 117 – “Practice for Operating Salt
Spray (Fog) Apparatus.”
ƒ 1000 hour exposure
ƒ 100 degree Fahrenheit
ƒ 3.5% by weight sodium chloride
ƒ Reproduces exposure to marine
environments.
ASTM B117 (cont.)
ƒ Amorphous silicon treated samples
showed no signs of bleeding, rusting, or
pitting corrosion
10
ASTM B117 (cont.)
ƒ The nonnon-treated samples showed some light
surface rusting, but no signs of pitting
corrosion.
Corrosion Data
ASTM D4585
ƒ ASTM D 4585, “Practice for Testing the
Water Resistance of Coatings Using
Controlled Condensation.”
ƒ 1000 hour study
ƒ 100 degrees Fahrenheit
ƒ Distilled water
ƒ Reproduces exposure to atmospheric
conditions
11
ASTM D4585 (cont.)
ƒ Amorphous silicon treated samples
showed no signs of bleeding, rusting, or
pitting corrosion
ASTM D4585 (cont.)
ƒ A light surface oxide film was seen on the
bare samples.
12
Benefits
ƒ To extend lifetimes of equipment exposed
to corrosive environments and/or process
streams
ƒ Longer PM cycles minimal cost increase
ƒ Protection of high value equipment in
corrosive environments
Known Applications
ƒ Enhancing corrosion resistance in Marine
environments
ƒ Process streams containing HCl
ƒ Protection of Continuous Emissions
Monitoring Equipment (Nitric and Sulfuric
acid)
ƒ Use in Automotive Exhaust test
equipment (Nitric and Sulfuric acid)
13
Effect of moisture
ƒ Coatings decrease adsorption of water,
hydrophobic
ƒ Leads to quicker removal of moisture through
sampling lines
ƒ Components less susceptible to corrosion
ƒ Faster cycle times and increased accuracy
with less moisture hold-up in tubing
ƒ Several coatings and surfaces available
Moisture Data
ƒ Amount of time to equilibrate a 1ppm
moisture sample through 100 feet of dry
tubing:
ƒ Commercial Seamless 316L tubing:
ƒ 180 minutes (96% equilibrated)
ƒ Electropolished Seamless 316L tubing:
ƒ 60 minutes (98% equilibrated)
ƒ a-silicon coated ee-polished seamless 316L
tubing
ƒ 30 minutes (98% equilibrated)
14
Moisture Data (cont)
ƒ Time to dry 100’ tubing wetted with 1ppm
of moisture when connected to a dry purge
ƒ Commercial Seamless 316L tubing:
ƒ 175 minutes
ƒ Electropolished Seamless 316L tubing:
ƒ 65 minutes
ƒ a-silicon coated ee-polished seamless 316L
tubing
ƒ 35 minutes
Additional Benefits of a-silicon layer
ƒ Inertness: Coating is non-reactive to
organic compounds
ƒ Transfer lines
ƒ Instrumentation parts
ƒ GC consumables
ƒ Anti-Coking. Coating barrier eliminates
catalytic effect of substrate.
ƒ Ultra-High-Vacuum (UHV). Reduces
outgassing of vacuum components.
15
Cost Comparison
250
3000
2500
200
2000
1500
$USD
$USD
150
1/4" Tee
100' 1/4" Tubing
100
1000
50
500
0
0
316 SS
CR 316 SS
HP Alloy
16
Conclusions/Future
ƒ Develop Corrosion data comparing coating on
different substrates
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Enhancement of Carbon Steel
Protection of high nickel alloys
Value of coating in marine environments
Application of coating to valves & fasteners
ƒ Continual process improvement and new
product development
ƒ Hardness
ƒ Improved corrosion resistance
ƒ Customized surfaces
Acknowledgements
ƒ Swagelok Company
ƒ O’Brien Corporation
ƒ Haritec Scientific & Engineering Support
ƒ Matco Associates
®
17