Comparison of a New Lunar Radiometric Model Based on SELENE

COMPARISON OF A NEW LUNAR RADIOMETRIC MODEL BASED ON SELENE/SP
WITH SATELLITE OBSERVING LUNAR IMAGES
Y.
2
Ishihara ,
R.
1
Nakamura ,
S.
1
Tsuchida ,
T.
3
Matsunaga ,
Sensor-sensitivity degradation in Space
Sensitivity degradation (ASTER)
The long-term radiometric calibration is indispensable
for quality assurance and control of data products.
Sensitivity
1.0
Sever conditions of space:
Outgassing, High energy particles, UV light…
-> sensitivity degradation of sensors are unavoidable.
2.
3.
4.
AIST, JAXA, NIES, JSS
0.8
Band 1
Band 2
0
Days since launch
・Band 3 (530 - 590 nm)
・Band 4 (640 - 670 nm)
・Band 5 (850 - 880 nm)
・Band 9 (1360- 1380 nm)
Date: 2013-06-24
Phase angle: 12°
Date: 2003-04-14
Phase angle: 27°
[Arai et al., 2011, IJAS]
3000
1 % brightness variation
 More than 1 Myr [Kieffer, 1997]
Earth
No atmosphere
SELnological and ENgineering Explorer (SELENE) launched in 2007 &
observed Moon until June 2009, operated by JAXA.
Spectral Profiler (SP): a spectrometer obtaining whole Moon
surface
reflectance
with
good
spectral
resolution
Reflectance map (752.8 nm)
SELENE/SP reflectance model
Radiance comparison
ASTER
Band 1
Correlation
0.992
coefficient
Ratio
(Observation / 1.05± 0.05
Model)
OLI
Correlation
coefficient
Ratio
(Observation /
Model)
©NASA
©NASA/USGS
Band 2
Band 3
0.993
0.993
1σ
1.01± 0.04
0.95± 0.03
Band 3
Band 4
Band 5
Band 9
0.992
0.993
0.993
0.992
1.08±
0.04
1.05±
0.03
0.98±
0.03
Results of pixel by pixel radiance comparison
0.95±
0.03
Band 5/OLI
Band 2/ASTER
Observed vs Simulated images:
- Good correlation: more than 0.99
- Small uncertainty of ratio: 1σ < 4 %
→ Standard errors should be much smaller (< 1 %).
- Quality remains in different phase angles
Simulated radiance (W/m2/μm/str]
SP model has good ability to be used for evaluating relative degradation of sensors
- High Spectral (VNIR: 6 nm, NIR: 8 nm)
This is enough for Moon 4. Summary and future works
- Well grid interval (0.5 ˚ x 0.5 ˚)
observation
from
Earth
- Spectral range: 510 – 1600 nm
Summary
- Photometrical dependencies on incident, emission and
From
the
comparison
between
observed
and
modeled
images,
phase angles are included
we
have
confirmed
the
good
quality
of
SELENE/SP
Lunar
reflectance
model.
This model enables us to simulate any Moon observations.
Reflectance
Application to future hyper spectral satellite missions, such as HISUI.
Wavelength [nm]
Simulated Moon images on various days
Purpose of this study
Evaluating usefulness of a new Lunar reflectance model to utilize Moon as much as possible
for radiometric calibration of satellite onboarding sensors.
Specifications
Spectral Range
Spectral Bands
Spectral Resolution
Spatial Resolution
Swath Width
Hyperspctral Imager
VNIR
SWIR
400 – 970 nm
900 – 2500 nm
57
128
10 nm
12.5 nm
30 m
30 km
Multispectral
Imager
450 – 900 nm
4
60 – 110 nm
5m
90 km
N. Ohgi et al., Japanese hyper-multi spectral mission, Proc. IEEE IGARSS, 3756-3759 (2010).
1σ
Band 2/ASTER
Band 5/OLI
θphase~27°
θphase~12°
Brightness Ratio
Future works
Studying distribution of obs./model brightness ratio
- Latitude dependency exists or not ?
- Different distribution in different phase angle condition ?
Normalized Frequency
2. New Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP
June 24, 2013
Landsat 8/OLI (9 bands)
・Band 1 (520 - 600 nm)
・Band 2 (630 - 690 nm)
・Band 3 (760 - 860 nm)
Band 3
Extremely Photometrical stable
[Yokota et al., 2011, Icarus]
and S.
3
1.
Yamamoto
Simulating Satellite observations
Terra/ASTER(14 bands)
0.9
0.7
No atmospheric absorption ->
Ideal observation condition
for radiometric calibration
Y.
3
Yokota
3. Radiance comparison: Observation vs Model
1. Radiometric calibration using Moon
Moon as a ideal calibration target
F.
4
Sakuma ,
Observed radiance
(W/m2/μm/str)
T.
1
Kouyama ,
-1σ
Acknowledgment: Authors greatly appreciate Dr. Jerad, USGS and Landsat8/OLI team members to
provide OLI Moon observation data.
References:
Arai et al., Trend Analysis of Onboard Calibration Data of Terra/ASTER/VNIR and One of the
Suspected Causes of Sensitivity Degradation, IJAS, 2, 2011
Kieffer, Photometric Stability of the Lunar Surface, Icarus, 130, 323-327, 1997.
Yokota et al., Lunar photometric properties at wavelengths 0.5–1.6 lm acquired by SELENE Spectral
Profiler and their dependency on local albedo and latitudinal zones , Icarus, 215, 639-660, 2011.