Vol. 96, No. 4 JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLCGY, Oct. 1968, p. 1427-1428 Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology P'inted in U.S.A. Lysis of Desulfovibrio vulgaris by Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid and Lysozyme JOHN E. FINDLEY AND J. M. AKAGI Departmentt of Microbiology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kanisas 66044 Received for publication 31 May 1968 The lysis of certain gram-negative bacteria by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and lysozyme was first reported by Repaske (7, 8). Lysis by EDTA alone was reported for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3, 8), Vibrio succinogenes (9), and Alkaligenes faecalis (3). The mechanism for lysis by EDTA (2) in conjunction with lysozyme has been attributed to the interruption of the integrity of the cell surface resulting from interference with divalent cation bonding (4, 8). Hypotonicity of the surrounding medium and alkaline conditions were shown to be requirements for the lysis of V. succinogenes by EDTA or lysozyme (9). Ochynski and Postgate (5) demonstrated that Desulfovibrio vulgaris (6) cells were lysed by EDTA and lysozyme. Under isotonic conditions, these cells formed osmotically fragile vibrios which rapidly lysed when transferred to an hypotonic environment. As part of our program for determining the various enzymatic activities associated with the membrane fragments from D. vulgaris, the conditions for lysing these cells with EDTA and lysozyme were investigated. D. vulgaris strain 8303 grown at 37 C for 24 hr, as previously described (1), in 300-ml Florence flasks containing 200 ml of medium. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7,000 X g for 10 min. They were suspended in 5 ml of a solution of 0.1 M EDTA in 0.05 M tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer, pH 9.0, and allowed to remain at 0 C for 10 min. The suspension was centrifuged at 7,000 x g for 10 min and the EDTA-treated cells were washed twice with 40 ml of 0.05 M Tris buffer, pH 7.0. The cells were suspended in 2 ml of the same buffer and a sample was removed such that, when it was added to 2.8 ml of 0.05 M Tris buffer, pH 9.0, the absorbancy was approximately 0.8. After the initial absorbancy was recorded, 0.1 ml of a lysozyme solution containing 150 ,ug was added to the cuvette, the solution was mixed rapidly, and the change in absorbancy was recorded. Absorbancy measurements were conducted at a wavelength of 620 nm was in 1-cm light path cuvettes with a Zeiss PMQ II spectrophotometer connected to a Honeywell Electronic 15 recorder. Under the conditions of our assay, the maximal rate of lysis occurred when lysozyme was added to EDTA-pretreated cells. When EDTA-pretreated cells were exposed to lysozyme, a rapid drop in absorbancy resulted, indicating lysis (Fig. 1). Under identical conditions, untreated cells plus lysozyme, EDTA-pretreated cells alone, untreated cells plus EDTA, or untreated cells incubated in the presence of both EDTA and lysozyme did not show any significant drop in absorbancy. In addition, when EDTA-pretreated cells were incubated at pH 9.0 in the presence of 0.1 M EDTA, no lysis occurred. Phosphatc buffer was capable of substituting for Tris buffer, thus indicating that the latter buffer was not participating in the lysing phenomenon. When the effect of EDTA concentration for pretreating cells was investigated, the maximal rate for lysis was observed with a concentration of approximately 0.05 M. Pretreating cells with a concentration of 0.01 M showed a decrease in absorbancy corresponding to 60% of the 0.05 M concentration within a 3-min interval. No lysis was observed with 10-3 M EDTA during the same time interval. Several divalent cations and organic diamino and polyamino compounds were tested for their ability to inhibit the lysis of D. vulgaris by lysozyme. These compounds were added to EDTA-pretreated cells just prior to the addition of lysozyme (Table 1). Cadmium was the most effective inhibitor and ferric or ferrous ions, in the concentrations used, had no effect; higher concentrations of the iron compounds caused clumping of the cells and the degree of lysis could not be measured. Sucrose in concentrations up to 0.04 M did not stabilize the cells from lysing when tested by the standard assay. The pH for obtaining rapid lysis of these cells was found to be on the alkaline side; lysis was considerably more rapid at pH 9.0 than under neutral conditions. Phase-contrast microscopy of cells lysing under neutral condi- 1427 1 42'..8 NOTES J. BACTERIOL. rod-shaped forms which had lost their internal contents as indicated by their optically clear appearance. Under both conditions, the medium in which the cells were suspended became viscous, and this viscosity was reduced by the addition of small amounts of ribonuclease and deoxyribonuclease. The data presented show that EDTA and lysozyme are required for lysing D. vulgaris cells. The relatively high concentration of EDTA required for this phenomenon may possibly be attributed to the large amount of ferrous sulfide precipitate surrounding their outer layers. Because EDTA TIME, MINUTES can partially inhibit lysozyme activity (9), it was FIG. 1. Requirement for ED TA anid lysozyme. Cells necessary to remove excess EDTA before lysotreated with EDTA were washed (as described) and zyme treatment. The inhibition of lysis of D. incubated at pH 9.0 with and without lysozyme. Cells vulgaris by cadmium was surprising since it does not treated with EDTA, but subjected to the same wash- not seem reasonable to assume that this metal is ing procedure, were incubated with EDTA alone (0.1 normally present in the outer layers of this orM), lysozyme alone, or with EDTA (0.1 M) plus lysozyme. Curves A and B (identical plots) represent un- ganism. Because both Cd++ and Zn++ inhibited treated cells, incubated in the presence of EDTA, and lysis by lysozyme, the possibility exists that some EDTA-pretreated cells respectively; curve C, untreated thiol complex, present on the cell surface, may be cells plus lysozyme; curve D, untreated cells pluis EDTA involved during lysis by lysozyme. When the and lysozyme; curve E, EDTA-pretreated cells plus sulfhydryl groups are bound by Cd++ or Zn++, lysozyme. Wavelength, 620 nm. perhaps this complex renders the cell resistant to lysozyme action. TABLE 1. Effect of divalenzt cations and diamines on lysis of ED TA-treated Desulfovibrio vulga-is This study was supported by Public Health Service by lysozymea Additions Concn (M) None CdCI2 ............ CaCl2 ............ MgCI ............ MnC12 ........... CoCl2 ............ ZnCI 2 ............ Spermidine . Spermine ........ Putrescine ....... Cadaverine . .... FeCI3 ............ FeCl2 ............ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 X 10-4 X 10-5 X 10-3 X 10-4 X 10-3 X 10-4 X 10-4 X 10-3 X 10-4 X 10-3 X 10-4 X 10-3 X 10-3 X 10-3 3 X 10-3 3 X 10-5 3 X 10-5 (3Am2i Relative 0.47 0.0 0.38 0.20 0.33 0.25 0.39 0.24 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.35 0.31 100 0.0 82 42 70 54 84 52 14 16 1.9 74 66 56 79 68 100 97 0.26 0.35 0.32 0.51 0.45 lys1s a Cells were pretreated with 0.1 M EDTA at pH 9.0, and the respective compounds were added just prior to the addition of 150 pg of lysozyme. tions showed a predominance of spherical forms which were optically dense. These cells slowly disintegrated into cell fragments which, presumably, corresponded to a decrease in absorbancy. Cells lysing at pH 9.0 appeared to be swollen, research grant Al 04672 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and by Public Health Service training grant GM-703. J. M. Akagi was the recipient of Public Health Service Research Career Development Award I-K3-GM30, 262. LITERATURE CITED 1. Akagi, J. M., and L. L. Campbell. 1962. Studies on thermophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. III. Adenosine triphosphate-sulfurylase of Clostridium migrificans and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. J. Bacteriol. 84:1194-1201. 2. Carson, K. J., and R. G. Eagon. 1966. Am. J. Microbiol. 12:105-108. 3. Gray, G. W., and S. D. Wilkinson. 1965. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 28:153-164. 4. Leive, L. 1965. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. 53: 745-750. 5. Ochynski, F. W., and J. R. Postgate. 1963. p. 426441. In C. H. Oppenheimer (ed.), Symposium on marine microbiology. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, Ill. 6. Postgate, J. R., and L. L. Campbell. 1966. Classification of Desulfovibrio species, the nonsporulating sulfate-reducing bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 30:732-738. 7. Repaske, R. 1956. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 22:189191. 8. Repaske, R. 1958. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 30:225232. 9. Wolin, M. J. 1966. Lysis of Vibrio suiccinogenies by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid or lysozyme. J. Bacteriol. 91:1781-1786.
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc