11/4/2014 VIN: it’s not so SIMPLE November 7, 2014 Mary-Margaret B. Noland, M.D. Assistant Professor Dermatology University of Virginia Department of Dermatology PRW Laboratories Dermatopathologist Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia • First introduced as a terminology in 1980 by the International Society for the Study of Vulvar Disease (ISSVD) – Human Papilloma Virus induced dysplasia – Classified as VIN I,II, and III (I= mild dysplasia II=moderate dysplasia, and III= severe dysplasia or Carcinoma in situ) based on the degree of epidermal atypia and maturation 1 11/4/2014 Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia • Designation to replace prior terminology atypia, dysplasia, Bowen’s disease, bowenoid papulosis, erythroplasia of Queyrat, carcinoma in situ, and carcinoma in situ simplex type • Revised Classification of VIN in 2004 by the ISSVD – Suggests the modification/elimination of VIN 1 and reserves VIN for what was previously VIN2/3- high grade dysplasia (although most experts still feel that VIN 1 holds value as a diagnostic terminology) – Breaks VIN down into two subclassifications VIN classic/usual/basaloid/warty type and VIN differentiated type/simplex type – Addresses VIN in both an HPV and HPV negative form Why the elimination of VIN I? • Intraobserver variability in diagnosis • VIN 1 is HPV induced; however, is no longer considered precancerous. • Unlike VIN2 and VIN 3, VIN 1 is most often caused by low risk HPV subtypes 6 and 11 in contrast to high risk HPV strands, 16,18 (31,33) that are isolated from VIN 2/3 in over 90%. • VIN 2/3 show a more direct progression to squamous cell carcinoma. 2 11/4/2014 Clinical Presentation of classic/ usual/ warty/ or basaloid VIN • Multifocal vulvar lesions • Often associated with other areas of involvement of the female genitourinary tract • Hyperkeratotic papules and plaques, erythroplasia, leukoplasia, erosions, or hyperpigmented papules. VIN 1 3 11/4/2014 VIN 3 VIN 2/3 4 11/4/2014 VIN III- Bowenoid Papulosis variant Histopathology of Classic/Basaloid/ Warty VIN • Epidermal dysmaturation with 2/3 to full thickness atypia • High N:C ratio • Hyperchromatic, pleomorphic nuclei • Increased mitotic activity with atypical mitoses • P16INK4A positive, P53 negative 5 11/4/2014 VIN I VIN 2 6 11/4/2014 VIN 3 VIN 3 7 11/4/2014 VIN 3 What is VIN Simplex/Differentiated Type? 8 11/4/2014 Clinical Presentation VIN Differentiated/Simplex Type • • • • • • • Difficult to recognize and often missed both clinically and histologically Under biopsied due to clinical presentation mimicking benign dermatoses May mimic prurigo nodules, lichen simplex chronicus, or a hyperkeratotic area in lichen sclerosis Most often a solitary lesion within an area of dermatitis- ie not multifocal. Occurs in areas of chronic dermatitis, most often patients with lichen sclerosis, but also in lichen simplex chronicus and eczematous dermatitis. Occurs in an older patient population (Mean Age 66.8 years) Often flanks invasive keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma in vulvectomy specimens. 9 11/4/2014 10 11/4/2014 Histopathology of Simplex or Differentiated • Highly differentiated form of VIN 3 • Atypia is confined to the basal layer • Maturation of the superficial layers of the epidermis is preserved • Parakeratosis with acanthosis characterized by elongated and anastamosing rete ridges • Premature keratinization in the suprabasilar region of rete ridges with eosinophilic cytoplasm and squamous pearls • Prominent intracellular bridges • Often associated with an underlying chronic inflammatory infiltrate • Negative for P16INK4A and the majority show positive suprabasalar staining for P53 VIN 3 Differentiated/Simplex 11 11/4/2014 VIN 3 Simplex VIN 3 Simplex 12 11/4/2014 VIN 3 Simplex 13 11/4/2014 So Why does it Matter? Why does it matter? • 65% of squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva are classified as keratinizing type. • VIN differentiated/simplex type is felt to represent a direct precursor lesion to keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and is often found in vulvectomy specimens flanking invasive squamous cell carcinoma. 14 11/4/2014 Why does it matter? • Classic VIN 2/3 more commonly progresses to basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. • Abell believed that VIN Simplex has a shorter in situ phase with more rapid evolution to invasive squamous cell carcinoma than classic/warty/bowenoid VIN. • VIN Simplex continues to be under-diagnosed in its primary form, i.e. unassociated with invasive squamous cell carcinoma Speculation and Recommendations • Although VIN Simplex is not the most common form of VIN, it is aggressive and remains difficult to diagnose. • VIN Simplex may show a more rapid and direct progression to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. 15 11/4/2014 Speculation and Recommendations • Dermatologists should routinely be performing vulvar exams and can aid in the diagnosis of VIN Simplex. • • Dermatologists are more familiar with the inflammatory dermatoses of the vulva and may more easily recognize an anomaly in presentation. Speculation and Recommendations • Clinicians should have a high degree of suspicion in patients with background longstanding inflammation, older patients, or those unresponsive to conventional treatment. • Biopsy all vulvar dermatoses not responsive to conventional treatment in an appropriate time course. • Send vulvar biopsies to a dermatopathologist or GYN pathologist with a strong understanding of VIN and its variants. 16 11/4/2014 • Special thanks to Dr. Mark Stoler and Dr. Barbara Wilson Dr. James Lampros for their assistance with this presentation. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Reyes MC1, Cooper K. An update on vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: terminology and a practical approach to diagnosis. J Clin Pathol. 2014 Apr;67(4):290-4. Taube JM1, Badger J, Kong CS, Dadras SS. Differentiated (simplex) vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2011 May;33(3):e27-30. Mulvany NJ1, Allen DG. Differentiated intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008 Jan;27(1):125-35. Ordi J, Alejo M, Fusté V, Lloveras B, Del Pino M, Alonso I, Torné A. HPV-negative vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) with basaloid histologic pattern: an unrecognized variant of simplex (differentiated) VIN. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Nov;33(11):1659-6523. Hart WR. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: historical aspects and current status. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2001 Jan;20(1):16-30. Yang B, Hart WR. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia of the simplex (differentiated) type: a clinicopathologic study including analysis of HPV and p53 expression. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Mar;24(3):429-41 van de Nieuwenhof HP1, Bulten J, Hollema H, Dommerholt RG, Massuger LF, van der Zee AG, de Hullu JA, van Kempen LC. Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia is often found in lesions, previously diagnosed as lichen sclerosus, which have progressed to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2011 Feb;24(2):297-305. Mills, SE. Sternberg’s Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. 5th Edition. (51) pp2105-2110. Robboy S. Robboy’s Pathology of the Female Reporductive Tract 2nd Edition 2008 17
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc