Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 8, 2014, no. 173, 8647 - 8650 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.410818 Non-uniform Bound on the Point Metric of the Beta Binomial and Binomial Distributions K. Teerapabolarn Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand c 2014 K. Teerapabolarn. This is an open access article distributed under Copyright the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract This paper uses Stein’s method and the specific w-function to determine a non-uniform bound on the point metric of the beta binomial distribution with parameters n, α and β and a binomial distribution with α . Numerical examples are provided to illustrate parameters n and α+β the result obtained. Mathematics Subject Classification: 62E17, 60F05 Keywords: Beta binomial distribution, Binomial approximation, Stein’s method, w-function 1 Introduction The beta binomial random variable X with parameters n ∈ N, α > 0, and β > 0 has probabilities n B(x + α, n − x + β) , x = 0, 1, ..., n, (1.1) bb(x) = x B(α, β) nαβ(n+α+β) nα and variance σ 2 = (α+β) and has mean µ = α+β 2 (1+α+β) , where B is the complete beta function. Because the beta binomial distribution obtained from the binomial distribution with parameters n and p, where p is a random variable that has a beta distribution with shape parameters α and β, it is natural to 8648 K. Teerapabolarn speculate that the beta binomial distribution can be approximated by the binomial distribution. In this case, [2] gave a uniform bound on the total variation distance between two such distributions n(n − 1) (1.2) dT V (BB n,α,β , Bn,p ) ≤ 1 − pn+1 − q n+1 (n + 1)(1 + α + β) for A ⊆ {0, ..., n}, where dT V (BB n,α,β , Bn,p ) = sup |BB n,α,β {A} − Bn,p {A}|, A BB n,α,β is the beta binomial distribution and Bn,p is the binomial distribution α with parameters n and p = α+β . Correspondingly, when A = {x0 } for every x0 ∈ {0, ..., n}, (1.2) becomes the point metric of two such distributions and its uniform bound as follows: n(n − 1) , (1.3) |bb(x0 ) − b(x0 )| ≤ 1 − pn+1 − q n+1 (n + 1)(1 + α + β) where b(x0 ) is the binomial probability function at x0 . Note that the uniform bound in (1.3) does not depend on x0 , which may not be sufficiently good for measuring the accuracy of this approximation. In this paper, we are interested to determine a non-uniform bound on the point metric |bb(x0 ) − b(x0 )| at x0 ∈ {0, ..., n}. 2 Method The tools for determining the desired result are Stein’s method and the wfunction associated with the beta binomial random variable. The following lemma gives that w-function, which is directly obtained from [2]. Lemma 2.1. We have w(x) = (n − x)(α + x) , x = 0, 1, ..., n, (α + β)σ 2 (2.1) nαβ(n+α+β) where σ 2 = (α+β) 2 (1+α+β) . For Stein’s method in the binomial approximation, following [1], it can be applied for n ∈ N and 0 < p = 1 − q < 1, for every x0 ∈ {0, ..., n} and bounded real-valued function g = g{x0 } : N ∪ {0} → R, where g(0) = g(1) and g(x) = g(n) for x0 ≥ n, So, Stein’s equation for these conditions is as follows: bb(x0 ) − b(x0 ) = E[(n − X)pg(X + 1) − qXg(X)]. For x, x0 ∈ {0, ..., n}, let ∆g(x) = g(x + 1) − g(x), [3] showed that ( 1−qn if x0 = 0, np n o sup |∆g(x)| ≤ 1−pn 1−pn+1 q n+1 min x0 q , (n+1)pq if x0 > 0. x≥0 (2.2) (2.3) Non-uniform bound on the point metric 3 8649 Result The following theorem presents a non-uniform bound for the point metric of the the beta binomial and the binomial distributions. α , then we have the following: Theorem 3.1. For x0 ∈ {0, ..., n}, if p = α+β ( (1−qn )(n−1)q if x0 = 0, n(1+α+β) o n |bb(x0 ) − b(x0 )| ≤ (3.1) (n−1)n (1−pn )p 1−pn+1 −q n+1 , if x > 0. min 0 x0 n+1 1+α+β Proof. By (2.2) and using the proof in Theorem 3.1 of [3], we have |bb(x0 ) − b(x0 )| = |E[(n − X)pg(X + 1) − qXg(X)]| ≤ E{|(n − X)p − σ 2 w(X)||∆g(X)|} + |np − µ|E|g(X)| α(n − X) 2 =E − σ w(X) |∆g(X)| α+β α(n − X) (n − X)(α + X) − =E |∆g(X)| α+β α+β (n − X)X =E |∆g(X)| α+β nµ − σ 2 − µ2 ≤ sup |∆g(x)| α+β x≥0 (n − 1)nαβ ≤ sup |∆g(x)| . (α + β)2 (1 + α + β) x≥0 Hence, by (2.3), (4.2) is easily obtained. 4 Numerical example The following examples are given to illustrate how well an improved binomial distribution approximates a beta binomial distribution. 10 Example 4.1 Let n = 10, α = 10 and β = 90, then p = 100 and the numerical result is as follows: ( 0.00522347 o if x0 = 0, n |bb(x0 ) − b(x0 )| ≤ (4.1) 0.08910891 min , 0.05558690 if x > 0. 0 x0 30 Example 4.2 Let n = 30, α = 30 and β = 470, then p = 500 and the numerical result is as follows: ( 0.00153030 n o if x0 = 0, |bb(x0 ) − b(x0 )| ≤ (4.2) 0.10419162 min , 0.04778921 if x0 > 0. x0 8650 K. Teerapabolarn From the Examples 4.1 and 4.2, it is seen that the result in Theorem 3.1 gives a good binomial approximation when αβ or βn is small. 5 Conclusion A non-uniform bound for the point metric of the beta binomial distribution with parameters n, α and β and a binomial distribution with parameters n and α p = α+β was derived by using Stein’s method and the w-function associated with the beta binomial random variable. With this bound, it is pointed out that the result obtained in the present study gives a good binomial approximation when αβ or βn is small, that is, β α or β n. References [1] A.D. Barbour, L. Holst, S. Janson, Poisson approximation, Oxford Studies in Probability 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992. [2] K. Teerapabolarn, A bound on the binomial approximation to the beta binomial distribution, Int. Math. Forum, 3(2008), 1355–1358. [3] K. Teerapabolarn, P. Wongkasem, On pointwise binomial approximaion by w- functions, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 71(2011), 57–66. Received: October 15, 2014, Published: December 3, 2014
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc