25-6-2014 - Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission

No. 38 / 2014 dated: 3-6-2014
TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
CAUSE LIST
Cases posted for 25-6-2014
Venue: Court Hall of the Commission
Time : 2.30 pm
Sl.
No.
1
Case No.
Name of the Parties
Counsel or parties
Remarks
S.M.P.No. 4 of
2013
Electro Automotive Madras
Pvt. Ltd.,
Versus
1) Thiru. N. Azhagarsami
AE, Enforcement CEDC
South.
2) Thiru. N. Ravichandran,
AEE, Construction, Adyar
3) EE, Adyar
4) SE, CEDC/South
Thiru.
R.Venkatraman
Summon
person.
to
appear
in
2
S.M.P.No. 2
of 2014
Thiru. M. Kubendran
Summon
person.
to
appear
in
3
D.R.P.No.17
of 2012
M.Kubendran
Versus
1) AE, Sindupatti
2) AEE, Sindupatti
3) EE, Usilampatti
4) SE, MEDC, Madurai
PTC India Ltd.,
Versus
1) SV Sugar Mills Ltd.,
2) TNEB
3) TANGEDCO
4) SLDC
PTC India Ltd.,
Versus
1)
Auromira
Energy
Co.P.Ltd.,
2) TANGEDCO
M/s.RnR Associates
Praying to direct the SV
Sugar to pay Rs.8,53,70,112/crore along with interest at
18% p.a. till the date of filing
this petition. For arguments.
M/s.RnR Associates
Praying to direct the 1st
respondent
to
make
a
payment of Rs.1,19,31,776/along
with
interest
of
Rs.26,76,248/for
not
complying
with
its
contractual obligations. For
arguments.
Karmic
Business
Specialities Pvt., Ltd.,
Versus
1) TANGEDCO
2) CFC, TNEB
3) SE, Tirunelveli EDC
1. Terra Energy Ltd.,
2. Shree Ambika Sug. Ltd.
Versus
1. TNEB
2. TANGEDCO
3. CE, Operation, SLDC
4. PTC India Ltd.,
Adv. P. Subba Reddy
“ K. Aparna Devi
Praying to direct the
respondents to release
outstanding dues as per
PPA. For arguments.
Adv. Rahul Balaji
Praying to declare the
action of TNEB and PTC in
treating
the
nonacceptance of generation
and supply of power for
the month of September
and October 2009 as
arbitrary and illegal. For
arguments.
4
D.R.P.No.25
of 2012
5
D.R.P.No.
of 2012
6
D.R.P.No.15
of 2011
6
Adv.Rahul Balaji
M/s.RnR Associates
1
7
D.R.P.No.16 of
2011
8
M.P.No.4
2012
of
9
M.P.No.34 of
2012
1. Shree Ambika Sug.Ltd.,
2. Terra Energy Ltd.,
Versus
1. TNEB
2. TANGEDCO
3. CE, Operation, SLDC
4. PTC India Ltd.,
Adv. Rahul Balaji
Indian
Wind
Association
Versus
Nil
Adv. Rahul Balaji
Power
Brakes India Ltd.,
M/s.RnR Associates
Thiru. N.L. Rajah
Versus
TANGEDCO
10
P.P.A.P.No.5
of 2012
SPEC Power (P) Ltd.,
Versus
TANGEDCO
Adv. Rahul Balaji
11
D.R.P.No.26
of 2012
Madurai Power Corp. Pvt.,
Ltd.,
Adv. Rahul Balaji
Versus
1) TANGEDCO
2)TANTRANSCO
3) SLDC
12
D.R.P.No.27
of 2012
Samalpatti Power Co. Pvt.
Ltd.,
Adv. Rahul Balaji
Versus
1) TANGEDCO
2) TANTRANSCO
3) SLDC
Praying to direct PTC to
make
payment
of
Rs.4,97,14,775/- being the
amount illegally deducted
st
from the bills of 1 petitioner.
For arguments.
Praying to extend the time
for implementation of RPO
to next year March 2013
instead of March 2012.
For arguments.
Praying to clarify that the
demand available to the
petitioner
should
be
calculated only on the
basis of the energy
injected into the grid and
non on the basis of the
energy consumed by the
petitioner.
For
arguments.
Praying to approve the
addendum 2 to the power
purchase agreement. For
arguments.
Praying to declare that the
respondents are bound to
issue dispatch instructions
under the PPA strictly in
terms of Article 6.3 thereby
disentitling
them
from
issuing part / zero power
dispatch instructions under
the terms of the PPA between
the parties except in the
event of an emergency
affecting the grid system.
For arguments.
Praying to declare that the
respondents are bound to
issue dispatch instructions
under the PPA strictly in
terms of Article 6.3 thereby
disentitling
them
from
issuing part / zero power
dispatch instructions under
the terms of the PPA between
the parties except in the
event of an emergency
affecting the grid system.
For arguments.
(By Order of the Commission)
S. Gunasekaran
Secretary
2

Download Report