Name Case Number MASCHERONI Page LBI88203552 Locations of Personal Investigation OP1V1 Use lnvestigC~tion 76 Locations of Record Sources attempt to bring pressure on subject, subject would resist and report the attempt immediately. Source emphasized that the entire situation involving subject was a perfect example of an individual being mismanaged, and source now believes that subject should have had unlimited room to research the hydrogen fluoride laser. 2. New Mexico. , Part-Time Laboratory Employee, 1012 Alamo, Los Alamos, Issue Codes 5, 7, 11 and 12. first met Leo Mascheroni in October 1985, when began working at Group X-1, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, where Mascheroni was a full-time Staff Member. Source explained that she was a casual employee, as part of the secretarial pool, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and that source worked for only approximately three months, until January 1986, at which time source left Los Alamos National Laboratory to give birth to her first child. Source returned to Group X-1 in April 1986, and remained until approximately June 1987, when she left, again, to have a baby. Source recalls seeing subject approximately every other day, on a professional basis, and that the two have had no social contact. source knows subject is originally from Argentina, and source assumes that subject is a naturalized citizen, since subject had a security clearance. Source knows subject is married and has at least one child, although source does not know where subject resides and has never met subject's family. Contact with subject continued until approximately April 1987, when subject left Group X-1 for a new position at Group N-9, Source stated she had seen subject on one Los Alamos National Laboratory. occasion since that time in a Los Alamos restaurant, at which time she said hello to subject, but subject did not acknowledge her presence. recommended Mascheroni not be favorably considered for a position of trust and responsibility involving the national interest since does not consider Mascheroni to be trustworthy, for reasons to be described further. Source advised that when she first arrived at Group X-1, she was assigned to be the document control individual for Group X-1. Source elaborated that she was responsible for documents coming from outside Group X-1 which were classified, and was responsible for logging in those documents so as to have a complete chain of custody. If a document was created within Group x-1 and classified, that document was supposed to be taken to source, who would then assign it a working paper number. At that point, the paper would then be given to a derivative classifier within the group, then to OS-Division, possibly , an originating classifier. At that point, source would then get a receipt for the document, which would have a laboratory number assigned to it by OS-Division. Source stated she always had a strained relationship with subject, as subject was very obnoxious and demanding and was continually rushing the Group X-1 support REPORT OF INVESTIGATION Property of U.S. Office of Personnel Management P.O. Rnx RRil WMhinntnn n ('_ ?nn.l1.1 OPM Form 366 IRev. 10-81) 10 NNSA C000176 ! Case Number Name I MASCHERONI locations of Personal Investigation Page ~Investigation OPM Use ~BI88203552 77 Ilocations of Record Sources personnel which includes source, , the group secretary, and . Source stated subject always wanted things done as though subject was the only scientist within Group X-1 who needed assistance. On an unknown date, approximately fall 1986, source recalled subject handing her approximately 120 documents that had been made into vu-graphs. Source recalls the material was marked SECRET/RESTRICTED DATA. Subject wanted source to white out the only word on the documents that made the material classified. Subject was rude and insisted that he had cleared the procedure with the group leader, . Source recalls this occurred on several occasions, and source recalled complaining to about the rush jobs. Source did not know whether had actually approved for subject to have source mark out a word which was classified on the vu-graphs. On the other hand, source recalled subject presenting source a bottle of wine, presumably as a way of making up for his brusque manner. In December 1986, source recalled the subject bringing several vu-graphs to the office which looked graphically poor. Source recalls that the docwnents were marked SECRET and that they appeared to have been processed with a dot matrix printer, which source knew did not exist in the Group X-1 office. Subject took the documents to , who is a technician II for Group X-1, who was an expert in graphics. In January, 1987, source saw another document, authored by subject, again with printing done by a dot matrix printer. Source knew that subject had a laboratory personal computer, with a dot matrix printer, at subject's home in Los Alamos. Source, who stated she was extremely concerned that subject was processing classified material at home, was further disturbed when source was told by subject to distribute the document to various people within the Los Alamos National Labor-atory. Source stated the documents were marked SECRET/RESTRICTED DATA and source was shocked that subject did not ask source to bring the document under control. Source recalled she may have discussed this with subject, but that subject's attitude was that he did not have time and that the matter was trivial. Source recalls also bringing that document to attention. another occasion, came to and stated that she had found a package of SECRET/RESTRICTED DATA material in an envelope laying on her desk When she arrived at work on a Monday morning. was extremely upset that the documents were not marked and that they had been done on a dot matrix printer. This raised further alarm in source's mind, particularly in light of the fact that i f the documents had been found by a security guard sitting on desk, would have been issued the security infraction. Source felt this was unfair of subject to jeopardize in that manner. Source believes that, following source reporting the incident to , and , an associate group leader, and subject all had a meeting, and that subject had stormed out of office. later told source that subject had been told to return his PC to Group X-1. On REPORT OF INVESTIGATION Property of U.S. Office of Personnel Management P.O. Box 886, Washington, D.C. 20044 NNSA C000177 OPM Form 366 (Rev. 10-81) ~ Name Case Number MASCHERONI Page LBI88203552 Locations of Personal Investigation 78 .... · ~Investigation OPM Use I Locations of Record Sources Source knew, through overhearing conversations and/or typing memorandums, that and subject did not get along. Source knew subject only wanted to pursue work on subject's ideas and that the former group leader, , had maintained a more or less loose grip on subject, whereas maintained tighter control. Subject also would go over head to the Associate Director for Defense Research and Applications, and at one point, source was embarrassed because the subject revealed to source that was against everything that subject was doing. Subject also stated, in that same conversation, that supported subject and that was going to provide subject his very own secretary. Source believes subject has basic personality conflicts with and source. Source further believes subject is very insincere in his compliments and that subject wanted all support people to acquiesce to all of subject's demands. Source is aware that in approximately February 1987, subject was given official notification that he had been RIF'd from Group X-1. Following that RIF, source was going through subject's safe in order to perform an inventory and source was stunned to hear subject state that he was storing classified documents in his desk. Source asked subject for the documents, and subject stated he had no time. Approximately two days later, he provided those documents to source. It was source's suspicion at the time that subject may not have had the documents in his desk, but rather at his home, and had told source he had no time in order to delay handing the documents in, so that they could be retrieved from his home. Source recalled advising Wilson of that information . It is also source's recollection that then went to subject's desk and "jimmied" the drawer open. Source does not know if found anything in the desk or if he did anything at all. During two weeks in April 1987, the source was vacationing in Hawaii and when she returned, subject had already physically departed to a new position in Group N-9 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. When source returned, source was advised by , the group secretary, that subject had apparently been caught with documents in his desk, had written his combination to his safe on his bulletin board, and that, when subject had been forced to bring his PC back, the PC was found to have contained classified information . Source does not think was deliberately attempting to pin security infractions on subject, and source revealed that she did not believe reacted fast enough to the information was providing about subject's apparent lack of regard for security procedures. Source further revealed that, had Wilson not taken any action in regard to the security violations, would have gone over head and reported the incidents to Operational Safeguards Division herself. Source stated that she felt very strongly that the support and secretarial staff we very much aware of REPORT OF INVESTIGATION Property of U.S. Office of Personnel Management P.O. Box 886, Washington, D.C. 20044 NNSA C000178 OPM Form 366 (Rev. 10·81) Case Number Name MASCHERONI Locations of Personal Investigation LBI88203552 Page Investigation OPM Use 79 Locations of Record Sources security policies and procedures and she felt that the scientific staff should be no less aware and responsible in that regard. Source further revealed that of approximately two safe drawers full of classified documents that subject was in possession of, one-third were from the reports library, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the rest were generated by subject himself. Source recalls frequent discussions between herself and an unrecalled individual within Group N-9, because N-9 did not want subject's documents, and source knew that they could not remain in Group X-1. Source believes the problem was finally resolved by sending the documents to records storage, and source assumes they are there now. source stated she does not believe subject is an honest individual, and further stated that subject would "lie, cheat or steal" to achieve his ends. Source further questioned subject's honesty, stating that she believes subject was undermining Wilson's authority by attempting to influence the secretarial staff's thinking in regard to and by going over head. Additionally, source cited as an example of subject's dishonesty, the fact that he would not give her the documents that he claimed were in his desk, prompting subject to suspect that they were not in his desk at all, but were, in fact, at his home or other location. Source states subject had a poor reputation among the staff personnel because of his rude and demanding behavior, and the fact that she never saw subject arrive at his office before 11:00 A.M. Whenever source required subject's signature or needed information from subject, source could never find subject in his office, and source always had to hunt subject down. Although source does not believe subject is in need of any kind of mental or emotional counseling or therapy, source believes subject is extremely insecure, which he manifests by always reacting in a defensive manner when someone questions him. Insofar as source is concerned, subject is a very poor candidate for a security clearance. Source stated subject is untrustworthy and exercises poor judgement, but, more to the point, source believes subject, for egotistical purposes, chose to ignore the security rules. Source has no doubt that subject willingly processed classified information on his PC at home, and source states she believes the subject would knowingly divulge classified information if subject felt it would be useful in gaining support for his projects. Source is also aware that subject believes he was singled out to be made an example of in regard to security violations. Source stated categorically that, as the document control person within Group X-1, source never knew of any other security infraction of that magnitude, and is certain that she would have known REPORT OF INVESTIGATION Property of U.S. Office of Personnel Management P.O. Box 886, Washington, D.C. 20044 NNSA C000179 OPM Form 366 \Rev. 10·81) ~, ~' Name Case Number MASCHERONI Locations of Personal Investigation Page LBI88203552 Investigation OPM Use 80 Locations of Record Sources about them. Additionally, source does not know of any security violations which were "glossed over" by Wilson or anyone else within Group X-1. Source knows subject has traveled to Argentina on vacation on one occasion, date unknown. source does not know if subject still has family in Argentina, and source does not know the extent of any connections the subject may have with that country. Source does not believe that subject is loyal to the United States Government. Source believes subject is loyal only to subject. Source does not believe subject would actively hurt the United States Government or Los Alamos National Laboratory, but source believes subject is quite capable of hurting either of those two entities, inadvertently, while pursuing his own projects. Source would not rehire subject at the present time, because source doubts the subject could change his attitude toward people, temper his ego, or adjust his work style in a rapid manner. However, source stated she always believed in giving everyone a second chance, and stated that, sometime in the future, if source were in a position to hire subject, source would give subject a second chance. 2. , Data Analyst Technician II, University of California, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Group X-1, TA-35, Building 87, Los Alamos, New Mexico. Issue Codes 7 and 11. first met Leo Mascheroni in approximately October 1986, when became a data analyst technician at Group X-1, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, where Mascheroni was a full-time staff member. Source stated she provided graphics support for numerous scientists within Group X-1. Source stated contact with subject occurred approximately one time on the job. Source stated this infrequency of contact occurred because subject worked mostly at his home. Source stated this contact with subject continued until approximately early 1987, when subject fell victim to a reduction in force in Group X-1, but source has heard subject has found another position at Group N-9, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Source has had no contacts with subject since that time. Source knows nothing of subject's background, with the exception that he is from some foreign country, based on his heavy accent. Source knows nothing of subject's educational or employment background and has no stated she could knowledge as to subject's marital status or address. not recommend subject for a position of trust and responsibility involving the national interest because of subject's apparent disregard for security procedures, to be described further. REPORT OF INVESTIGATION Property of U.S. Office of Personnel Management P.O. Box 886, Washington, D.C. 20044 NNSA C000180 OPM Form 366 (Rev. 10-811
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc