What Do We Find in Recent Studies of the Municipal and Post-Secondary Institution Relationship? Rob Shields, University of Alberta Canada. Prepared for the Conference Board of Canada Quality Network of Universities meeting Feb. 6-7 2014, Edmonton Canada. Summary In preparation for the workshop I have drafted a summary of academic articles in this area. These suggest a number of key points that might guide discussions. -Reviewing many presentations, a beneficial relationship flowing from post-secondary institutions (PSIs) to cities is often presumed but the relationships is neither addressed nor managed directly as a form of 'mutuality' between organizations. -In this research, there is little cause and effect but often correlations. -Evidence does not support claims for creative cities or creative classes nor for a guaranteed positive effect by PSIs – hence the need for attention to mutuality. Employment growth is the single reliable indicator of urban and regional economic health. -PSIs have local varying impacts through students and employees, but research institutions create an important local demand for highly skilled individuals, attracting human capital to a locality. -Cities in Europe and North American are increasingly creating metropolitan master plans around PSIs, not just 'university-cities'. Good planning may avoid 'studentification' of adjacent neighbourhoods. Introduction In library catalogues and journal databases, there is first a steady increase in relevant work on cities and post-secondary institutions (PSIs) and then exponential growth in the number of relevant publications in each of the last six years (2007-2013). We see a maturing of reflection on the relationship between cities and post-secondary institutions, from which policy insights can be drawn to respond to specific local issues (Goddard & Vallance, 2013). The focus of the literature moves from histories (Brockliss, 2000), to observing (Harloe & Perry, 2004; Kitagawa, 2004) and proposing general principles (2007-10) and observing that the relationship between cities and PSIs is under investigated (Russo, van den Berg, & Lavanga, 2007), to documenting opportunities amongst populations, neighbourhoods or technologies (2009-12), to specific cases of mutuality between cities and PSIs (2010-13) (recent books include Thorpe & Goldstein, 2010; Ingallina, 2012; Goddard & Vallance, 2013). Presentations by academics, however, tend to presume that benefits flow from university research to cities and partner institutions, rather than addressing the relationship between organizations. 1 Mutuality I use 'mutuality' to describe engagement that is participatory or partnership-based between PSIs, communities and non-educational organizations in the public and private sectors (see also Morris, et al., 2011 re inner cities). Mutuality is a feature of emerging urban regimes (Mitra & Frick, 2011 re Rust Belt cities). Critical approaches to PSIs contribution to local economies are important (Felsenstein, 1996 is one seminal study). Problems in studies include the ways counterfactual and null-hypotheses are specified, the definition of the local area, the identification of "new" expenditures, the tendency to double-count economic impacts, the role of local taxes, and the omission of local spillover benefits from enhanced human capital created by higher education (Siegfried, Sanderson, & McHenry, 2007). Anchor Institutions and Urban Strategies Anchor institutions are intended to be drivers of urban revitalization and a designer of urban landscape by attracting particular segments of the population and constituting a collective body of citizens. Over the long epoch of modernity, high quality post-secondary institutions can be correlated with successful local governance and urban development (Percoco, 2013 re Italy for the period 1300-1861). These institutions include post-secondary institutions (PSIs), hospitals, military bases and so on that will contribute to economic growth (often by receiving state subsidies, thereby scaling wealth from the national level to concentrate it at a local scale), a real estate developer and a service provider (Harkavy et al., 2009 cited in Tohvri & Udumae, 2013 re. Tartu). Research parks are another form of anchor institutions that has been favoured by planning and policy agendas based on 'knowledge society' and 'creative-city' theories (Siemiatycki, 2013 re Oshawa) but for which results are equivocal. High student populations can raise housing issues and conflicts over lifestyle, domesticity and culture in communities who compete for rental properties. The neighbourhoods in which students live can change suddenly and rapidly (Sage, Smith, & Hubbard, 2012 re. Brighton UK). 'Studentification' often precedes gentrification (Davison, 2009 re. Melbourne; Chatterton, 1999 re Bristol). Purpose built student accommodation may appear to be the solution to 'studentification' but risks of segregating students, promoting gentrification and having large or incongruously institutional buildings become a magnet for student-community conflicts and local feelings of dispossession and displacement (Sage, Smith, & Hubbard, 2013). Research indicates that it is space-time segregation that erodes communication between groups. Urban Nodes Within cities and regions, PSIs are amongst the anchoring institutions for the comprehensive planning initiatives for urban sub-centres or nodes which have specific services and transportation modes attached to them (Van der Heijde, 2012 re. The Netherlands). The comprehensive planning around PSIs done in Lyon, and the creation of new transit plans to link PSIs, is a Can$80M initiative to focus the city on its universities (see also Sanfeliu, 2011 for a historical case-study; Forsyth & Crewe, 2010 re. suburban technopoles and campuses). Collaborative opportunities to produce new urban spaces abound in the management of university properties (Benneworth, Charles, & Madanipour, 2010). 2 The significance of universities in urban planning and regional development is accompanied by changes in the institutional location of public debates out of government agencies into public fora, and are accompanied by new issues of legitimacy and coalition-building that must be undertaken by PSIs (Srinivas, et al., 2008 re. Finland). A political focus on collaboration is also found to be a way of legitimizing changes in national regional policy rather than delegation of authority in a comparative study of Swedish cities (Engstrand & Ahlander, 2008). Vibrant Cities: Production, Attraction and Demand for Human Capital PSIs derive advantages from being located in an economically active, high-amenity regions. Often these are major metropolises or capitals. These advantages are indirect and direct, as in partnerships with local information sources (archives, museums) and proximity to private sector users of research. However, only graduates in a limited number of fields derive a premium during their early wage earnings by being closest to the largest economic arenas or pools of employment. The microgeographies of human capital appear to be significant as in a 2006 study of smart cafes in Boston (Fu, 2006). Similarly, hiring from a diverse range of universities and geographic backgrounds rather than local graduates is positively correlated with corporate success (O'Hagan & Rice, 2013). There is only a small positive relationship between a metropolitan region's PSIs producing graduates and the local stock of human capital, suggesting that migration is important. Both metropolitan production and attraction of migrants are significant for Canadian cities (Brown, Newbold, & Beckstead, 2010). For the case of Poland, only major centres retain as well as attract graduates (Goddard & Vallance, 2013). By contrast, academic R&D significantly increases demand for skilled employees, raising local human capital levels (Abel & Deitz, 2012re USA). Employment opportunities are more important that quality of life but QoL can be a feature of particular cities such as Ottawa (Darchen & Tremblay, 2010 comparing Montreal) that are outliers to national patterns. Avoiding 'Creative Cities' Sterotypes As of 2012, there was little or no empirical evidence to support either industrial cluster or creative city theories (Dai, et al., 2012 re. China) despite the significance of these notions for academic debate (Ribera-Fumaz, 2009) and public controversy (Peck, 2009). For the case of Italy 2001-6, an increase in the number of firms active in the creative industries and net entry of legal immigrants are positively correlated to regional employment growth, shown to be the key determinant of value-added growth regionally (although others emphasize the importance of employed degree holders as determinant (Brown & Scott, 2012 re. Canada). Trademarks, patents, cultural amenities, and industrial districts such as science parks have no significant effect, while high numbers of university faculties are negatively correlated with regional employment growth (Piergiovanni, Carree, & Santarelli, 2012) but overall benefit youth employment rates (Frenette, 2009). Studies converge on employment growth as a reliable indicator of urband regional economic growth. Efforts have been made to refine the measurement of cultural indicators that have been conflated together such as ethnic diversity and sexual tolerance. These reveal that the focus should be placed on specific practices at the city and neighbourhood scale to address intangibles such as communication and trust between all communities and fractions (Qian, 2013). Cities and regions identified as 'creative cities' have not been more resilient to cyclic recessions which are economy-wide and at the scale of the capitalist system, globally. Such cities and regions tend to be more vulnerable because of their high immigrant populations ( a key measure of the creative economy) who are at higher risk of unemployment (Sands & Reese, 2013) during downturns. 3 The planning literature is generally characterized by a magical, seamless and painless vision of revitalization and progression between one urban economic engine and another or between modes of accumulation. This puts cities and citizens at risk of creating new problems of poverty, homelessness and inequality as a result of simplistic policies (Siemiatycki, 2013 re Oshawa). German research illustrates the importance of distinguishing between cities on the basis of urban regimes, sectoral industrial bases and types of innovation (Buerger & Cantner, 2011). Hypothetically it may be that accumulation and growth is local and regional, while negative is economy-wide. Path dependency is an important factor (Van Assche, et al., 2011; Benjamin, 2012 re. NYU)). Small, geographically distant and deindustrializing areas have successfully implemented the 'triple-helix' framework (Leydesdorff & Deakin, 2011) in the form of cross-institutional partnerships and companies that balanced cooperation and competitoin within the region, increased local leverage in bids for national resources and hybridized the existing industrial base with new knowledge (Svensson, Klofsten, & Etzkowitz, 2012 re. Norrkoping). Knowledge spillovers are an important contribution that academic R&D can make to city and region. This is positively correlated to private R&D and to service-sector employment growth and non-technical innovation (Raspe & van Oort, 2011 re. the Netherlands). The Common Wealth By commonwealth I mean the public good in the broadest sense of inclusiveness, vibrancy and equality. Critiques of university-city engagement include the argument that overly exploitive attitudes towards education characterize the neoliberal approaches to PSIs as key sites of the knowledge economy (Pierce, 2012). Historical studies suggest that the success of progressive initiatives in post-secondary education, such as the admission of women to liberal professions such as medicine, is dependent on both reforms of the educational system and community initiative and leadership, not just acceptance of progressive outcomes that result from initiatives within colleges and universities (Watts, 2013 re. Birmingham). It may be possible to apply contemporary studies of innovation to post-secondary institutions. Research hypotheses and efforts have moved toward bottom-up, popular, informal or open innovation with closed networks seen as having negative impacts on university startups and spinoffs ( van Geenhuizen & Soetanto, 2012). Research maps regional learning networks that cross firms, institutions and customers or users as an alternative to innovation within single organizations (Van Geenhuizen & Soetanto, 2013). Institutional Forms of Mutuality Communities benefit from many university's services, including recreational services, security (such as the effect of safe-walk programmes) and awareness and even shelter in the case of adverse events. Disasters can be an opportunity for student engagement with communities (Reardon, et al., 2009 re Cornell Univ. And New Orleans). Community Service Learning placements benefit local organizations (Brail, 2013; McIntyre, 2006). Some professional programs such as planning contribute to municipalities. The City of Vancouver recently reported to the University of Alberta City-Region Studies Centre over 50,000 hours of contact time with planning students on placements). Coordination takes engagement initiatives beyond single neighbourhoods and offers the advantages of support for the added challenge of working with marginalized groups and communities (Allahwala, et al., 2013). In the South African context, University of Cape Town African Centre for Cities set up a series of 'CityLabs' as partnerships with six specific neighbourhoods on particular problems to coproduce interdisciplinary knowledge and implement solutions (Anderson, et al., 2013; see also Tasci, et 4 al., 2011 re Turkey). The University of Washington has a program, that offers a selected municipality one year of access to expertise across the University (Lesage, 2010). After criticism (Zukin, 2012), the University of Pennsylvania created the Penn Institute for Urban Research to blend practice and theory (Rodin, 2005). Other forms including participatory fora such as design charettes (Shields & Patchett, 2012), walking tour exercises Trell & van Hoven, 2010) and online games can increase engagement by mobilizing the idea of play (Poplin, 2012). Thinking Bigger PSIs add to the international recognition and image of cities and regions (Martinez-Fernandez & Sharpe, 2008 re. Sydney Australia). However, grandiose claims are made about globalized universities and branch campuses (eg. NYU and many British universities) as a restructuring of space in ways that are indifferent to local identity or city character (Looser, 2012). Mutuality can thus be thought a different scales and as a continuum from deep engagement to indifference: engagement with local communities and with cities as wholes in ways that enhance and promote them globally. Regional innovation systems or 'Arenas' are observed extend across cities (Fogelberg & Thorpenberg, 2012 re. Sweden) to transnational scale clusters that are self-reinforcing concentrations of particular industries (Sum, 1999). Similarly, transnational 'Education Hubs' and partnerships can be found in research, training and liberal arts (eg. The faculty and student initiated 'NYLON' seminars (New York and London Universities); FU, TUBerlin and Humboldt's Transatlantic Collegium with Columbia and CUNY) that increasingly are part of the public diplomacy of cities (Knight, 2013). References Abel, J. R., & Deitz, R. (2012). Do colleges and universities increase their region's human capital? Journal of Economic Geography, 12(3), 667-691. Access May: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000303329900005 Allahwala, A., Bunce, S., Beagrie, L., Brail, S., Hawthorne, T., Levesque, S., et al. (2013). Building and Sustaining Community-University Partnerships in Marginalized Urban Areas. Journal of Geography, 112(2), 43-57. Access Mar: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000314346600001 Anderson, P. M. L., Brown-Luthango, M., Cartwright, A., Farouk, I., & Smit, W. (2013). Brokering communities of knowledge and practice: Reflections on the African Centre for Cities' CityLab programme. Cities, 32, 1-10. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000321420200002 Benjamin, R. (2012). The City University of New York (CUNY), 1980-1998: a case study in the tyranny of small decisions. Benneworth, P., Charles, D., & Madanipour, A. (2010). Building Localized Interactions Between Universities and Cities Through University Spatial Development. European Planning Studies, 18(10), 1611-1629. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000281893800004 Brail, S. (2013). Experiencing the city: Urban Studies students and service learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(2), 241-256. Access May: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000317901800009 Brockliss, L. (2000). Gown and town: The university and the city in Europe, 1200-2000. Minerva, 38(2), 147-170. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000165794000002 Brown, W. M., Newbold, K. B., & Beckstead, D. (2010). Growth and Change in Human Capital across the Canadian Urban Hierarchy, 1996-2001. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1571-1586. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000277877900010 Brown, W. M., & Scott, D. M. (2012). HUMAN CAPITAL LOCATION CHOICE: ACCOUNTING FOR 5 AMENITIES AND THICK LABOR MARKETS. Journal of Regional Science, 52(5), 787-808. Access Dec: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000311236100003 Buerger, M., & Cantner, U. (2011). The regional dimension of sectoral innovativeness: An empirical investigation of two specialized suppliers and two science-based industries. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 373-U378. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000291316400008 Chatterton, P. (1999). University students and city centres - the formation of exclusive geographies - The case of Bristol, UK. Geoforum, 30(2), 117. Access May: Dai, J. C., Zhou, S. Y., Keane, M., & Huang, Q. (2012). Mobility of the Creative Class and City Attractiveness: A Case Study of Chinese Animation Workers. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 53(5), 649-670. Access Sep-Oct: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000311807500006 Darchen, S., & Tremblay, D. G. (2010). What attracts and retains knowledge workers/students: The quality of place or career opportunities? The cases of Montreal and Ottawa. Cities, 27(4), 225-233. Access Aug: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000279218300004 Davison, G. (2009). Carlton and the Campus: The University and the Gentrification of Inner Melbourne 195875. Urban Policy and Research, 27(3), 253-264. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000282998200005 Engstrand, A. K., & Ahlander, A. M. S. (2008). Collaboration for local economic development: Business networks, politics and universities in two Swedish cities. European Planning Studies, 16(4), 487-505. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000254947100002 Felsenstein, D. (1996). The Unviersity int he MEtropolitan Area: Impaces and Public Policy Implications. Urban Studies, 33, 1565-1580. Fogelberg, H., & Thorpenberg, S. (2012). Regional innovation policy and public-private partnership: The case of Triple Helix Arenas in Western Sweden. Science and Public Policy, 39(3), 347-356. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000305491900005 Forsyth, A., & Crewe, K. (2010). Suburban technopoles as places: The international campus-garden-suburb style. Urban Design International, 15(3), 165-182. Access Fal: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000281968500003 Frenette, M. (2009). Do universities benefit local youth? Evidence from the creation of new universities. Economics of Education Review, 28(3), 318-328. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000266864900004 Fu, S. (2006). Smart Café Cities: Testing human capital externalities inthe Boston metropolitan area. Journal of Urban Economics(61), 86-111. Goddard, J., & Vallance, P. (Eds.). (2013). University and the City. New York: Routledge. Harloe, M., & Perry, B. (2004). Universities, localities and regional development: The emergence of the 'Mode 2' university? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 212-+. Access Mar: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000220063100013 Ingallina, P. (2012). Universités et enjeux territoriaux: Une comparaison internationale de l'économie de la connaissance. Villeneuve d;Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. Kitagawa, F. (2004). Universities and regional advantage: Higher education and innovation policies in English regions. European Planning Studies, 12(6), 835-852. <Go to ISI>://000224512900005 Knight, J. (2013). Education hubs: international, regional and local dimensions of scale and scope. Comparative Education, 49(3), 374-387. Access Aug: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000322946500008 6 Lesage, E. (2010). An American Idea for Canada, A Novel Approach to Partnership. Curb, 1(2), 23. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53-63. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000299210100004 Looser, T. (2012). THE GLOBAL UNIVERSITY, AREA STUDIES, AND THE WORLD CITIZEN: Neoliberal Geography's Redistribution of the "World". Cultural Anthropology, 27(1), 97-117. Access Feb: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000299735600006 Martinez-Fernandez, C., & Sharpe, S. (2008). Intellectual Assets and Knowledge Vitality in Urban Regions: The Role of Universities. McIntyre, A. (2006). Activist research and student agency in universities and urban communities. Urban Education, 41(6), 628-647. Access Nov: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000241237200005 Mitra, D. L., & Frick, W. C. (2011). Civic Capacity in Educational Reform Efforts: Emerging and Established Regimes in Rust Belt Cities. Educational Policy, 25(5), 810-843. Access Sep: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000300102800004 Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Edmonds, V., & Watters, C. (2011). Inner city engagement and the university: Mutuality, emergence and transformation. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(5-6), 287-315. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000292726000002 O'Hagan, S. B., & Rice, M. (2013). Exploring the Personal Histories of the Top Executives of US Firms Using a Quantitative Approach: Is There a Geographical Relationship with Corporate Headquarters, and Does It Influence Firm Performance? Geographical Research, 51(3), 279-291. Access Aug: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000322654200006 Peck, J. (2009). The Creativity Fix. Variant(34), 5ff. Access Spring: http://www.variant.org.uk/34texts/variant34.html Percoco, M. (2013). Geography, institutions and urban development: Italian cities, 1300-1861. Annals of Regional Science, 50(1), 135-152. Access Feb: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000314302600006 Pierce, C. (2012). The Promissory Future(s) of Education: Rethinking scientific literacy in the era of biocapitalism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(7), 721-745. Access Sep: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000307167500005 Piergiovanni, R., Carree, M. A., & Santarelli, E. (2012). Creative industries, new business formation, and regional economic growth. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 539-560. Access Oct: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000308348900002 Poplin, A. (2012). Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 195-206. Access May: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000303078500001 Qian, H. F. (2013). Diversity Versus Tolerance: The Social Drivers of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in US Cities. Urban Studies, 50(13), 2718-2735. Access Oct: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000323704700006 Raspe, O., & van Oort, F. (2011). Growth of new firms and spatially bounded knowledge externalities. Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 495-518. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000290690500002 Reardon, K. M., Green, R., Bates, L. K., & Kiely, R. C. (2009). Overcoming the Challenges of Post-disaster Planning in New Orleans Lessons from the ACORN Housing/University Collaborative. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 391-400. Access Mar: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000264706200010 Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2009). From urban political economy to cultural political economy: rethinking culture and economy in and beyond the urban. [Review]. Progress in Human Geography, 33(4), 447-465. Access Aug: 7 <Go to ISI>://000268679700002 Rodin, J. (2005). The 21st century urban university - New roles for practice and research. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(3), 237-249. Access Sum: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000230357600001 Russo, A. P., van den Berg, L., & Lavanga, M. (2007). Toward a sustainable relationship between city and university - A stakeholdership approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 199-216. Access Win: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000251318200007 Sage, J., Smith, D., & Hubbard, P. (2012). The Rapidity of Studentification and Population Change: There Goes the (Student)hood. Population Space and Place, 18(5), 597-613. Access Sep-Oct: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000306859200009 Sage, J., Smith, D., & Hubbard, P. (2013). New-build Studentification: A Panacea for Balanced Communities? Urban Studies, 50(13), 2623-2641. Access Oct: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000323704700001 Sands, G., & Reese, L. A. (2013). Fair weather friends? The impact of the creative class on the economic health of mid-sized US metropolitan areas, 1990-2009. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 6(1), 7191. Access Mar: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000315554200005 Sanfeliu, C. B. (2011). The university into the city, urban form and structure. The case of the University of Lleida. Scripta Nova-Revista Electronica De Geografia Y Ciencias Sociales, 15(381), 1-17. Access Nov: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000297186500001 Shields, R., & Patchett, M. (2012). Strip Appeal Edmonton: CRSC and Space and Culture Publications. Siegfried, J. J., Sanderson, A. R., & McHenry, P. (2007). The economic impact of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 26(5), 546-558. Access Oct: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000250189600003 Siemiatycki, E. (2013). A Smooth Ride? From Industrial to Creative Urbanism in Oshawa, Ontario. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1766-1784. Access Sep: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000323198200015 Srinivas, S., Kosonen, K. J., Viljamaa, K., & Nummi, J. (2008). Varieties of Innovation and Welfare Regimes: The Leap from RD Projects to the Development of City-regions. European Planning Studies, 16(9), 12671291. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000260834000006 Sum, N.-L. (1999). Rethinking Globalization: Re-articulating the spatial scale and temporal horizons of transborder spaces (London: Routledge. 129-146. Svensson, P., Klofsten, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). An Entrepreneurial University Strategy for Renewing a Declining Industrial City: The Norrkoping Way. European Planning Studies, 20(4), 505-525. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000303568800001 Tasci, D., Gokalp, E., Kumtepe, E. G., Kumtepe, A. T., & Toprak, E. (2011). City's Perception of University: The Case of Anadolu University and Eskisehir. Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 44(2), 131-146. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000293820000006 Thorpe, H., & Goldstein, B. (2010). Engines of Innovation: The Entrepreneurial University int he Twenty-First Century. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press. Tohvri, E., & Udumae, K. (2013). PLANNING IN A VACUUM: TARTU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF TARTU IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences(39E), 201-211. Access Jun: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000320833000012 8 Trell, E.-M., & van Hoven, B. (2010). Making Sense of Place: Exploring creative and (inter)active research methods with young people. Fennia: International Journal of Geography, 188(1). Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Jacobs, J., & Teampau, P. (2011). Crossing Trails in the Marshes: Rigidiy and flexibility in the Governance of the Danube Delta. journal of Environmentla Planning and Management, 54(8), 997-1018. Van der Heijde, P. (2012). NEW URBAN CENTRES IN THE NETHERLANDS. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 103(3), 362-373. Access Jul: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000305124000007 van Geenhuizen, M., & Soetanto, D. P. (2012). Open innovation among university spin-off firms: what is in it for them, and what can cities do? Innovation-the European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 191-207. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000303212100007 Van Geenhuizen, M., & Soetanto, D. P. (2013). Benefitting from Learning Networks in "Open Innovation": Spin-off Firms in Contrasting City Regions. European Planning Studies, 21(5), 666-682. Access May: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000320079700003 Watts, R. (2013). Universities, medical education and women: Birmingham in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. History of Education, 42(3), 306-319. Access May: <Go to ISI>://WOS:000320222100004 Zukin, S. (2012). De la tour d'ivoire à la plate-forme entrepreneuriale: une vision postfordiste des universités urbaines. In P. Ingallina (Ed.), Universités et enjeux territoriaux: Une comparaison internationale de l'économie de la connaissance (Villeneuve d;Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. 9
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc