• • • • 11. • • • • [email protected] http://www2.toyo.ac.jp/~osera/ 1 2 1. • • – Famer,andStannard 1990 – CM – Stewart, 2011 – – • – 2011 Allan2008 3 4 CM CM 80 67.0 70 CM CM CM CM 65.0 15% 60 18% 50 40 29.0 30 27.0 85% 20 82% 6.0 10 0 CM 2010 2010 5 sound 6 • – – • music soundeffect SE – • • • • – 7 8 • • – 2 2006 • • imagesong – instrumental – musiceffect ME 9 • • • 10 • – a. – – – 2011 11 12 b. • c. • – – – • • – – – – 13 d. • 14 • – – – – – 15 16 e. – • • • * • – – – – • • Oakes(2007) 17 f. – 18 BGM • • mood – • * • tonality – – • 19 20 Guidoetal.(forthcoming) 21 Allan,D.(2008)“AContentAnalysisofMusicPlacementinPrime-TimeTelevision Advertising,”JournalofAdvertisingResearch,48(3),404-417. Guido,G.,Peluso,A.M.,Mileti,A.,Capestro,M.,Cambò,L.andPisanello,P.(2016) “EffectsofBackgroundMusicEndingsonConsumerMemoryinAdvertising,” InternationalJournalofAdvertising:TheReviewofMarketingCommunications, 35(3),504-518. Oakes,S.(2007)“EvaluatingEmpiricalResearchintoMusicinAdvertising:A CongruityPerspective,”JournalofAdvertisingResearch,47(1),38-50. Stewart,D.W.,K.M.FarmerandC.I.Stannard (1990)“MusicasaRecognitionCue inAdvertisingTrackingStudies,”JournalofAdvertisingResearch,30(4),39-48. 2006 48 139151. 2011 TVCM BGM CM 32 155-167. 2006 4 1 1-13. 2014 CM http://www.videor.co.jp/synapse/special/001/ 2010 CM http://prtimes.jp/main/html/rd/p/000000007.000001642.html 23 Guidoetal.(forthcoming) 22
© Copyright 2024 ExpyDoc