E-Health in The Netherlands

Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
E-Health in The
Netherlands
Van Cauwenberge Joris
Verhoyen Gregory
Course: Medical Informatics
Prof. M. Nyssen and Prof. F. Questier
Academic year 2013-2014
1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Intro: The Netherlands compared to Belgium
Nation-wide EHR
E-prescription
E-consultation
Conclusions
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Contents
2
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
INTRO: THE NETHERLANDS
COMPARED TO BELGIUM
3
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
EU – study (2010)
4
• Already a few years
• Standards (IHTSDO)
• HL7, Snomed CT, ICD9,
ICD10, EN/ISO 13606
• Telemedicine
• Patient-to-doctor
• Doctor-to-doctor
• E-prescription
• Started 2014
• Standards (IHTSDO)
• KMEHR, SUMEHR, ATC,
ICPC2, ICD-10, ICD-9-CM
• Telemedicine
• Tele-monitoring
• Elderly
• Chronic diseases
• Mobile monitoring
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
• E-prescription
5
• Citizen service
number (CSN/BSN)
• DigID (not obligated)
• UZI-register for
healthcare
professionals
• Identification
• eID
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
• Identification
6
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
NATION-WIDE ELECTRONIC HEALTH
RECORDS
7
Development towards nation-wide
EHR
2005
first ideas for
nation-wide EHR
ministry of Health,
Welfare and Sports
(VWS) takes leading
role
2009
2012
Approval EHR-law Push-through nationby Dutch House of
wide EHR without
Representatives
governmental support.
Foundation VZVZ
...
2002
foundation of NICTIZ
 Start Aorta-project
2008
2011
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
1997
2013
Obligation Citizens EHR-law rejected National exchange
Service Number
unanimously by
EHR  Regional
(CSN/BSN) in healthSenate
exchange EHR
care
(except for hospitals)
8
For Who?
What can be exchanged?
GP’s, specialists and
Electronic Medication Record
pharmacists that have a
(EMR)
therapeutical relation with  Summary of GP’s records :
the patient
o allergies,
patients can request to
o health problems
look into their data and set
o ...
authorisation.
Juvinile health records
Future:
maternal facilities
physiotherapists
...
In development:
Lab results
prescriptions
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Nation-wide EHR
9
Aorta and the LSP
Responsability of:
• NICTIZ (standards)
• VZVZ (technical)
Goals:
1. Facilitating the exchange of medical data.
2. Make it possible for the patient to consult
his/her medical records.
Providers of care
?
Patient
Qualified Patient
Portals
Qualified
Client
offices
Qualified Healthcare
Information system
(QHIS)
National Switching Point (LSP)
UZI/BIG
registry
PKIO
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Aorta = The national, standardized infrastructure for
exchanging and consulting medical records.
Basic
services
DigID
10
National Healthcare information hub
SBV-Z
(CSN)
Architecture LSP
National Healthcare information hub
Metadata :
locations of
medical
records.
Registers all
consultations
and
adaptations.
Act Reference
Registry
(Verwijsindex)
Identification and
authentication
UZI/BIG
registry
PKIO
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
decentralized storage of
medical records (by law)
Basic
services
Audit Log
Access Contral
(Authorisation)
Many additional components ...
DigID
SBV-Z
(CSN)
11
Standards
Terminology
Snomed CT, ISO 9999,
LOINC, ATC, ...
Text
HL7 v3
Transport
SOAP and HTTP
Security
HTTPS
Qualified
patient portal
QHIS
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Exchange of messages
client office
Two parts that need to be qualified;
1. Software on its own (by private providers)
2. Data communication network (DCN) that
uses a private TCP/IP
12
UZI – card
= Smartcard for registered
physicians, assistants or
“businesses”
Public/private key
infrastructure (UZI-register) :
secure connection to LSP (TLS)
Sign documents
DigID
 DigID low
Login name and password.
 DigID middle
login name, password and
sms
Based on CSN, yet without
public/private key
infrastructure  insufficient
for access!
Future prospects : the eNIK.
(started 2004 ...)
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Identification & authentication
13
Therapeutic relation obligated,
yet technically not necessary!
Opting-out
Intelligent audit log
Opting-in (each time)
Authorisation-protocols : who
can see what
Uses BIG-registry
www.ikgeeftoestemming.nl
Possibility to exclude or
include medical personnel
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Authorisation
14
security andprivacy
Costs: € 30 million/ year (NICTIZ)
no governmental support
HL7 v3
well-standardized
technically OK
Current use of the LSP for exchange of information
(5th of may 2014)
Absolute number
% of population
GP – practices
3312
81%
GP – posts
1687
85%
Pharmacists
111
90%
Hospitals
28
31%
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Summary nation-wide EHR
15
Patient-data
3 614 090 unique
CSN’s
21,5 %
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
E-PRESCRIPTION
16
E-prescription
Year
Medication-related acute avoidable
hospitalization
2005
4.6%
20%
2008
3.9%
18%
 7000 to 8000 cases in the Netherlands
• Medication monitoring
• Responsible care
• Interactions medication
• Allergies
• Incorrect dosage
• Double medication
• Contra-indications and other patient characteristics
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
• Safety
17
• In 2008 already 62% electronic prescriptions
• The only way of prescribing from January 1, 2015
• Possible to use different software platforms
• Only qualified ICT-suppliers
• “EMD plus” program
• EHR and EVS software platforms have different
suppliers
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
E-prescription
• Extra work physician to include records in both the
systems
18
E-prescription
• Authenticity – integrity
Electronic
prescribing
Digital
signature
prescriber
Transmission
receiving
Service provider
• Exchange prescriptions
• With AORTA
• Without AORTA
Process
prescription
pharmacy
Store
prescription
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
• Digital signature with UZI-pas (obligated july 2007)
via LSP
directly to pharmacy
• HL7v3 standard
• Digital signature implemented
19
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
E-CONSULTATION
20
E-consultation
• Time
• Physician: 11 minutes
• Patient: half day
• Content poorly remembered
• E-consultation
•
•
•
•
•
More flexible
More efficient for both doctor and patient
Possible to reread content
Safe
New ICT-applications
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
• Normal consultation
21
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
E-consultation
22
• Results www.webspreekuur.nl
•
•
•
•
•
86% satisfied
Consultation time from 11 to 4 minutes
Safe
Almost no waiting time
Low cost
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
E-consultation
23
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
CONCLUSIONS
24
difficulties for standardisation.
decentralisation.
privacy and safety concerns.
fewer progression the last years compared to e.g.
Belgium.
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Technically, the dutch E-health is quite
advanced.
Yet legislation lags, and governmental issues
persist, causing:
25
• Ministry of Health, welfare and sports:
http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/ministeries/vws/organisatie
• Nictiz: https://www.nictiz.nl/
• Vzvz: https://www.vzvz.nl/
• EU-studies: http://www.ehealth-strategies.eu/ (2010)
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
References
• WHO: http://www.who.int/en/
26
Van Cauwenberge Joris - Verhoyen Gregory
Thank you for your attention!
27